Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:09:13.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relative bias in diet history measurements: a quality control technique for dietary intervention trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Gina S Martin ,
Linda C Tapsell ,
Marijka J Batterham  and
Kenneth G Russell
Gina S Martin*
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Linda C Tapsell
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Marijka J Batterham
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Kenneth G Russell
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Email gmartin@uow.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Investigation of relative bias in diet history measurement during dietary intervention trials.

Design:

Retrospective analysis of human dietary data from two randomised controlled trials examining modified fat diets in the prevention and treatment of type II diabetes mellitus.

Setting:

Wollongong, Australia.

Subjects:

Thirty-five overweight, otherwise healthy subjects in trial 1 and 56 subjects with diabetes in trial 2.

Interventions:

Diet history interviews and three-day weighed food records administered at one-month intervals in trial 1 and three-month intervals in trial 2.

Results:

In a cross-sectional bias analysis, graphs of the association between bias and mean dietary intake showed that bias decreased in higher carbohydrate consumers in trial 1 ( r = −0.344, P<0.05 ). No other significant associations were found. In a longitudinal analysis, bias did not change over time in either trial. There were no significant differences in bias magnitudes between the trials, with the exception of monounsaturated fat measurement where bias was significantly greater and more positive in trial 2, indicating overestimation of monounsaturated fat intake with the diet history. Subjects in control and intervention groups underestimated energy, fat, saturated fat and alcohol intakes with the diet history in both trials. Overweight and obese individuals appeared to make the greatest contribution to the overall underestimation of saturated fat intake by the diet history regardless of whether they were in the control or intervention group and whether they were healthy or had diabetes.

Conclusion:

Bias in diet history measurement appears to be macronutrient-specific, with energy, fat and saturated fat consistently underreported in the interview by subjects with and without diabetes and in both intervention and control groups in a dietary intervention trial. Relative bias analysis appears to be an informative tool in quality control for dietary intervention trials when biochemical markers are unavailable.

Keywords

BiasStatistical data interpretationDiet recordsNutrition assessmentRandomised controlled trialsLongitudinal studies
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , August 2002 , pp. 537 - 545
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2002

References

1Nikkari, T, Luukkainen, P, Pietinen, P, Puska, P. Fatty acid composition of serum lipid fractions in relation to gender and quality of dietary fat. Ann. Med. 1995; 27: 491–8.Google Scholar
2Bland, JM, Altman, DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–10.Google Scholar
3Bingham, SA. Limitations of the various methods for collecting dietary intake data. Ann. Nutr. Met. 1991; 35: 117–27.Google Scholar
4Hebert, JR, Clemow, L, Pbert, L, Ockene, IS, Ockene, JK. Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1995; 24: 389–98.Google Scholar
5Rothenberg, E, Bosaeus, I, Lernfelt, B, Landahl, S, Steen, B. Energy intake and expenditure: validation of a diet history by heart rate monitoring, activity diary and doubly labeled water. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998; 52: 832–8.Google Scholar
6Heitmann, BL, Lissner, L, Osler, M. Do we eat less fat, or just report so? Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2000; 24: 435–42.Google Scholar
7Heitmann, BL, Lissner, L. Dietary underreporting by obese individuals – is it specific or non-specific? Br. Med. J. 1995; 311: 986–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Tapsell, LC, Pettengell, K, Denmeade, SL. Assessment of a narrative approach to the diet history. Public Health Nutr. 1999; 2: 61–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Tapsell, LC, Brenninger, V, Barnard, J. Applying conversation analysis to foster accurate reporting in a diet history interview. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2000; 100: 818–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Vessby, B, Uusitupa, M, Hermansen, K, Riccardi, G, Rivellese, AA, Tapsell, LC, Nalsen, C, Berglund, L, Louheranta, A, Rasmussen, BM, Calvert, GD, Maffetone, A, Pedersen, E, Gustafsson, IB, Storlien, LH, Study, K. Substituting dietary saturated for monounsaturated fat impairs insulin sensitivity in healthy men and women: The KANWU Study. Diabetologia 2001; 44: 312–9.Google Scholar
11Grootenhuis, PA, Westenbrink, S, Sie, CM, de Neeling, JN, Kok, FJ, Bouter, LM. A semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire for use in epidemiologic research among the elderly: validation by comparison with dietary history. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1995; 48: 859–68.Google Scholar
12Rothenberg, E, Bosaeus, I, Steen, B. Evaluation of energy intake estimated by a diet history in three free-living 70 year old populations in Gothenburg, Sweden. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: 60–6.Google Scholar
13Kortzinger, I, Bierwag, A, Mast, M, Muller, MJ. Dietary underreporting: validity of dietary measurements of energy intake using a 7-day dietary record and a diet history in non-obese subjects. Ann. Nutr. Met. 1997; 41: 37–44.Google Scholar
14Delcourt, C, Cubeau, J, Balkau, B, Papoz, L. Limitations of the correlation coefficient in the validation of diet assessment methods. CODIAB–INSERM–ZENECA Pharma Study Group. Epidemiology 1994; 5: 518–24.Google Scholar
15De Vries, JHM, Lemmens, PHHM, Pietinen, P, Kok, FJ. Assessment of alcohol intake [abstract]. XIII International Congress of Dietetics, Edinburgh, 2000.Google Scholar
16Jarvinen, R, Seppanen, R, Knekt, P. Short-term and long-term reproducibility of dietary history interview data. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1993; 22: 520–7.Google Scholar
17Goris, AH, Westerterp-Plantenga, MS, Westerterp, KR. Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obese men: selective underreporting of fat intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000; 71: 130–4.Google Scholar
18Marlowe, D, Crowne, DP. Social desirability and perceived situational demands. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1961; 25: 109–15.Google Scholar
19Worsley, A, Baghurst, KI, Leitch, DR. Social desirability response bias and dietary inventory responses. Hum. Nutr. Appl. Nutr. 1984; 38: 29–35.Google Scholar
20Kristal, AR, Andrilla, CH, Koepsell, TD, Diehr, PH, Cheadle, A. Dietary assessment instruments are susceptible to intervention-associated response set bias. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1998; 98: 40–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Heitmann, BL. Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Implications for diet disease relationships. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1996; 25: 222–5.Google Scholar
22Hebert, JR, Ma, Y, Clemow, L, Ockene, IS, Saperia, G, Stanek, EJ III, Merriam, PA, Ockene, JK. Gender differences in social desirability and social approval bias in dietary self-report. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 146: 1046–155.Google Scholar
23Steen, B, Isaksson, B, Svanborg, A. Intake of energy and nutrients and meal habits in 70-year old males and females in Gothenburg, Sweden: a population study. Acta Med. Scand. 1977; 611: 39–86.Google Scholar
24Arnold, MS, Funnell, MM, Herman, WH, Brown, MB, Merritt, JH, Fogler, JM, Halter, JB. Discrepancies between perceived dietary changes and 4-day food records in older adults with diabetes. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1996; 7: 705–7.Google Scholar
25Macdiarmid, JI, Blundell, JE. Dietary under-reporting: what people say about recording their food intake. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: 199–200.Google Scholar