Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:47:36.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary Results from the Edinburgh-Cape Bright QSO Survey (ECBQS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

A. Savage
Affiliation:
Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296 Epping, NSW 2121
R.D. Cannon
Affiliation:
Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296 Epping, NSW 2121
R.S. Stobie
Affiliation:
south African Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 9, Observatory 7935, Cape, South Africa
D. Kilkenny
Affiliation:
south African Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 9, Observatory 7935, Cape, South Africa
D. O'Donoghue
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, Cape, South Africa
An-Le Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, Cape, South Africa

Abstract

The Edinburgh-Cape Bright QSO Survey is a very small sub-set of the Edinburgh Cape Blue Object Survey, which is a major survey to discover blue stellar objects brighter than B~18 in the southern sky. It will cover an area of sky of 10,000 square degrees with |b|>30 and dec <0. The blue stellar objects are selected by automatic techniques from U and B pairs of UK Schmidt Telescope plates scanned with the COSMOS measuring machine. Follow-up photometry and spectroscopy is being obtained with the SAAO telescopes to classify the types of objects brighter than B=16.5, with some of the more stubborn objects being subjected to AAO service spectroscopy. Some preliminary results for the 6% QSO minority are presented in this paper and comparison is made with the Palomar-Green QSO Survey in the north, which we find to be at least a factor of two incomplete.

Type
Extragalactic
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beichman, C.A., Neugebauer, G., Habing, H.J., Clegg, P.E. and Chester, T.J. (eds) 1985, Explanatory Supplement to the IRAS Catalogs and Atlases, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Bolton, J.G., Wright, A.E. and Savage, A., 1979, Aust J. Phys. Astrophys. Suppl., 46, 1.Google Scholar
Clowes, R.G., Leggett, S.K., and Savage, A., 1991, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 250, 597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, P., Miller, L., La Franca, F. and Cristiani, S,. 1992, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 256, 65p.Google Scholar
Green, R.F., Schmidt, M. and Liebert, J. 1986, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 61, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, A. and Burbidge, G., 1987, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 63, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellermann, K.I., Sramek, R., Schmidt, M., Shaffer, D.B. and Green, R., 1989, Astrophys. J., 98, 1195.Google Scholar
Large, M.I., Mills, B.Y., Little, A.G., Crawford, D.F. and Sutton, J.M., 1981, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 194, 693.Google Scholar
Lauberts, A., 1982, The ESO/Uppsala Survey of the ESO(B) Atlas.Google Scholar
Maccacaro, T., Gioia, I.M., Morris, S.L., Schild, R., Stocke., J.T., and Wolter, A., 1988, Proc. workshop on optical surveys for quasars, PASP Conf. Ser. 2, 300.Google Scholar
MacGillivray, H.T. and Stobie, R.S., 1984, Vistas in Astronomy, 27, 433.Google Scholar
Miller, L., Peacock, J.A. and Mead, A.R.G., 1990, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 244, 207.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. and Green, R.F., 1983, Astrophys. J., 269, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaver, P.A., 1987, Nature, 326, 773.Google Scholar
Stobie, R.S., Morgan, D.H., Bhatia, R.K., Kilkenny, D. and O’Donoghue, D., 1987, IAU Colloq. 95, 149.Google Scholar
Stobie, R.S., Chen, A., O’Donoghue, D. and Kilkenny, K. 1992. to appear in Variable Stars and Galaxies: symposium in honour ofM.W. Feast, ASP Conf. Series.Google Scholar
Wampler, E.J. and Ponz, D., 1985, Astrophs. J., 298, 448.Google Scholar