Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T20:12:19.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Upper Limits to the Prompt X-ray Flux from Supernova 1987a

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

P. J. Edwards
P. J. Edwards*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering and Applied Physics Canberra College of Advanced Education
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The literature contains numerous predictions of an X-ray pulse associated with the emergence of the shock-wave at the surface of a star undergoing a supernova explosion. Applied to supernova 1987a, these suggest a small, solar-flare like event lasting about a minute with a terrestrial flux of order 1 μWm-2 and a black-body temperature between 106K and 107K occurring between 0900 and 1000 UT on February 23, 1987. Unfortunately, no direct X-ray observations appear to have been made. However, such an event would be expected to give rise to an observable enhancement of ionization in the upper D-region of the ionosphere. The absence of a detectable perturbation in VLF radio signals propagating in the earth-ionosphere waveguide sets upper limits to the X-ray flux and temperature below those predicted.

Type
Spectroscopy
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , 1987 , pp. 205 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnett, W. D., 1987(a), preprint.Google Scholar
Arnett, W. D., 1987(b), preprint.Google Scholar
Colgate, S. A. and White, R. H., 1966, Astrophys. J., 143, 626.Google Scholar
Colgate, S. A., 1967, Can. J. Phys., 46, S476.Google Scholar
Dopita, M. A., Achilleos, N., Dawe, J. A., Flynn, C., Meatheringham, S. J., and McNaught, R. D., 1987, Proc. Astron. Soc. Aust. 7, 141.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. J., Burtt, G. J. and Knox, F., 1969, Nature, 111, 105.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. J., 1969, Proc. Astron. Soc. Aust., 1, 290.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. I., 1980, Astrophys. J., 244, L89.Google Scholar
Falk, S. W., 1978, Astrophys. J., 226, L133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A., 1987, IAUC, 4340.Google Scholar
Klein, R. I. and Chevalier, R. A., 1978, Astrophys. J., 223, L109.Google Scholar
Nicolet, M. and Aikin, A.C., 1960, J. Ceophys. Res., 65, 1469.Google Scholar
Lasher, G. J. and Chan, K. L., 1978, Astrophys. J., 230, 742.Google Scholar
Sedov, L. D., 1959, Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
Shigeyama, T., Nomoto, K., Hashimoto, M. and Sugimoto, D., 1987, (preprint).,Google Scholar
Svennesson, J., Reder, F. and Crouchley, J., 1972, J. Atmos. & Terres. Phys., 34, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. L. and Malin, D. F., 1987(a), 1AUC, 4330.Google Scholar
White, G. L. and Malin, D. F., 1987(b), Nature, 327, 36.Google Scholar
Wood, P., 1987, (private communication).Google Scholar
Woosley, S. E., Pinto, P. A., Martin, P. G. and Weaver, T. A., 1987, Astrophys. J., (in press).Google Scholar