Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T11:26:52.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Soil Tongues in Northeastern Indiana Periglacial Relics or Active Fingering Zones?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kenneth M. Hinkel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soil tongues, or soil fingers, have been identified along the walls of an active gravel pit in northeastern Indiana. Locally enhanced pedogenesis, primarily carbonate leaching and clay illuviation, has resulted in wedge- and cone-shaped extensions of the B horizon into the underlying calcareous glaciofluvial sediments. Although previously described in the literature, the features at this site are considered unusual both for the numerous well-defined tongues and for the regularity of tongue spacing, which gives the illuviation front the appearance of a high-amplitude sinusoidal wave train. Depth to the illuviation front was measured at 0.25-m intervals along a 40-m exposure. Statistical tests indicate that the spatial pattern is nonrandom. The data were transformed using Fourier methods, and the resulting variance spectrum show a peak intensity at wavelengths bracketing 1.5 m. The results of these analyses suggest a surficial or near-surface topographic control. Climatic conditions following local glacier recession favored periglacial activity, and there is some evidence to suggest development of thermal contraction cracks and nonsorted or poorly sorted polygons 1.5 m in diameter. As an alternative hypothesis, laboratory experiments suggest that regularly spaced fingers can develop in homogeneous materials when instability occurs at the wetting front. In this case, soil tongues cannot be used as relict indicators of periglacial activity.

Type
Articles
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 75 - 83
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ballantyne, C. K., and Matthews, J. A. (1982). The development of sorted circles on recently deglaciated terrain, Jotunheimen, Norway. Arctic and Alpine Research 14, 341–354.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, C. K., and Matthews, J. A. (1983). Desiccation cracking and sorted polygon development, Jotunheimen, Norway. Arctic and Alpine Research 15, 339–349.Google Scholar
Bartelli, L. J., and Odell, R. T. (1960). Field studies of a clay-enriched horizon in the lowest part of the solum of some Brunizem and Gray-Brown Podzolic soils in Illinois. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 24, 388–390.Google Scholar
Birkeland, P. W. (1984). “Soils and Geomorphology.” Oxford Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
Black, R. F. (1976). Periglacial features indicative of permafrost: Ice and soil wedges. Quaternary Research 6, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, R. F. (1983). Pseudo-ice-wedge casts of Connecticut, northeastern United States. Quaternary Research 20, 74–89.Google Scholar
Blatt, H. Middleton, G., and Murray, R. (1980). “Origin of Sedimentary Rocks.” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Bleuer, N, K., and Moore, M. C. (1978). “Environmental Geology of Allen County, Indiana.” Indiana Geological Survey Special Report 13.Google Scholar
Brown, I. C, and Thorpe, J. (1942). “Morphology and Composition of Some Soils of the Miami Family and the Miami Catena.” U.S. De-partment of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 834.Google Scholar
Buol, S. W. Hole, F. D., and McCracken, R. J. (1980). “Soil Genesis and Classification.” Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Chapman, L. J., and Putnam, D. F. (1973). “The Physiography of Southern Ontario.” Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Davis, J. C. (1973). “Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology.” Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Denny, C. S. Lyford, W. H., and Goodlet, J. C. (1963). “Surficial Geology and Soils of the Elmira-Williamsport Region, New York and Pennsylvania. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper.Google Scholar
Gmbb, A. M., and Bunting, B. T. (1980). Micromorphological studies of soil tonguing phenomena in the Burford Loam, southern Ontario, Canada. Biuletyn Peryglacjalny 26, 237–252.Google Scholar
Hill, D. E., and Parlange, J.-Y. (1972). Wetting front instability in layered soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 36, 697–702.Google Scholar
Hillel, D., and Baker, R. S. (1988). A descriptive theory of fingering during infiltration into layered soils. Soil Science 146, 51–56.Google Scholar
Johnsson, G. (1959). True and false ice-wedges in southern Sweden. Geografiska Annaler 41, 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, D. R. (1975). Water escape structures in coarse-grained sediments. Sedimentology 22, 157–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, R. S. Butter, B. S. Anlauf, R., and Richter, J. (1987). Water penetration into soils with different textures and initial moisture con-tents. Soil Science 144, 389–393.Google Scholar
Mears, B. Jr. (1981). Periglacial wedges and the late Pleistocene environment of Wyoming’s intermontane basins. Quaternary Research 15, 171–198.Google Scholar
Parlange, J.-Y, and Hill, E. D. (1976). Theoretical analysis of wetting front instability in soils. Soil Scinece 122, 236–239.Google Scholar
Péwé”, T. L. (1973). Ice wedge casts and past permafrost distribution in North America. Geoforum 15, 15–26.Google Scholar
Philip, J. R. (1975). The growth of disturbances in unstable infiltration flows. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 39, 1049–1053.Google Scholar
Presant, E. W., and Protz, R. (1967). The origin of soil tongues in some Ontario soils. Canadian Mineralogist 9, 2.Google Scholar
Press, W. H. Flannery, B. P. Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T. (1989). “Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing,” Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
Raats, P. A. C. (1973). Unstable wetting fronts in uniform and nonuniform soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 37, 681–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, L. C. K. (1987). Late-glacial vegetational and climatic history of the Allegheny Plateau and the Till Plains of Ohio and Indiana, U.S.A. Boreas 16, 1–20.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (1960). “Soil Classification, a Comprehensive System (7th Approximation).” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (1969). “Soil Survey of Allen County, Indiana,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Svensson, H. (1976). Relict ice-wedge polygons revealed in aerial photographs from Kaltendirchen, northern Germany. Geografisk Tidsskrift 75, 8–12.Google Scholar
Tamai, N. Asaeda, T., and Jeevaraj, C. G. (1987). Fingering in two-dimensional, homogeneous, unsaturated porous media. Soil Science 144, 107–112.Google Scholar
Totten, S. M. (1973). “Glacial Geology of Richland County, Ohio.” Ohio Division of Geological Survey Report of Investigations 88.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, J. (1988). Cryoturbalions. In “Advances in Periglacial Geomorphology” (Clark, M. J., Ed.), pp. 179–298. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Veneman, P. L. M. Jacke, P. V., and Bodine, S. M. (1984). Soil formation as affected by pit and mound microrelief in Massachusetts, U.S.A. Geoderma 33, 89–99.Google Scholar
Washburn, A. L. (1980). “Geocryology—A Survey of Periglacial Processes and Environments.” Halstead Press, New York.Google Scholar
Washburn, A. L. Smith, D. D., and Goddard, R. H. (1963). Frost cracking in a middle-latitude climate. Biuletyn Peryglacjalny 12, 175–189.Google Scholar
White, I. Colombera, P. M., and Philip, J. R. (1977). Experimental studies of wetting front instability induced by gradual change and by heterogeneous porous media. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41, 483–489.Google Scholar
Yehle, L. A. (1954). Soil tongues and their confusion with certain indicators of periglacial climate. American Journal of Science 252, 532–546.Google Scholar