Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:57:51.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current Pretreatment Methods for AMS Radiocarbon Dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (Orau)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Fiona Brock ,
Thomas Higham ,
Peter Ditchfield  and
Christopher Bronk Ramsey
Fiona Brock*
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology, University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, United Kingdom
Thomas Higham
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology, University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, United Kingdom
Peter Ditchfield
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology, University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, United Kingdom
Christopher Bronk Ramsey
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology, University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, United Kingdom
*
Corresponding author. Email: fiona.brock@rlaha.ox.ac.uk.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper, we summarize the main chemical pretreatment protocols currently used for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, updating the protocols last described by Hedges et al. (1989).

Type
Methods, Applications, and Developments
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , 2010 , pp. 103 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Alloway, BV, Pribadi, A, Westgate, JA, Bird, M, Fifield, LK, Hogg, A, Smith, I. 2004. Correspondence between glass-FT and AMS 14C ages of silicic pyroclastic density current (PDC) deposits sourced from Maninjau caldera, west-central Sumatra. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 227(1–2):121–33.Google Scholar
Ashmore, PJ. 1999. Radiocarbon dating: avoiding errors by avoiding mixed samples. Antiquity 73(279):124–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batten, RJ, Bronk, CR, Gillespie, R, Gowlett, JAJ, Hedges, REM, Perry, C. 1986a. A review of the operation of the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit. Radiocarbon 28(2A):177–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batten, RJ, Gillespie, R, Gowlett, JAJ, Hedges, REM. 1986b. The AMS dating of separate fractions in archaeology. Radiocarbon 28(2A):698–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berstan, R, Stott, AW, Minnitt, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Hedges, REM, Evershed, RP. 2008. Direct dating of pottery from its organic residues: new precision using compound-specific carbon isotopes. Antiquity 82(317):702–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, MI, Ayliffe, LK, Fifield, LK, Turney, CSM, Cresswell, RG, Barrows, TT, David, B. 1999. Radiocarbon dating of “old” charcoal using a wet-oxidation, stepped-combustion procedure. Radiocarbon 41(2):127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, MI, Fifield, LK, Santos, GM, Beaumont, PB, Zhou, Y, di Tada, ML, Hausladen, PA. 2003. Radiocarbon dating from 40 to 60 ka BP at Border Cave, South Africa. Quaternary Science Reviews 22(8–9):943–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, F, Higham, TFG. 2009. AMS radiocarbon dating of Paleolithic-aged charcoal from Europe and the Mediterranean Rim using ABOx-SC. Radiocarbon 51(2):839–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, F, Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, TFG. 2007. Quality assurance of ultrafiltered bone dating. Radiocarbon 49(2):187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, F, Higham, TFG, Bronk Ramsey, C. Forthcoming. Pre-screening techniques for identification of samples suitable for radiocarbon dating of poorly preserved bones. Journal of Archaeological Science. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.11.015.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Hedges, REM. 1997. Hybrid ion sources: radiocarbon measurements from microgram to milligram. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 123(1–4):539–45.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, T, Bowles, A, Hedges, REM. 2004a. Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon 46(1):155–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, T, Leach, P. 2004b. Towards high-precision AMS: progress and limitations. Radiocarbon 46(1):17–24.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, TFG, Brock, F, Baker, D, Ditchfield, P. 2009. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 33. Archaeometry 51(2)323–49.Google Scholar
Brown, TA, Nelson, DE, Vogel, JS, Southon, JR. 1988. Improved collagen extraction by modified Longin method. Radiocarbon 30(2):171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, F, Duhr, A, Grootes, PN, Mintrop, A, Nadeau, M-J. 2001. Chemical removal of conservation of substances by ‘Soxhlet’-type extraction. Radiocarbon 43(2A):229–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, J, Polach, HA. 1972. Some effects of partial re-crystallisation on 14C dating of Late Pleistocene corals and molluscs. Quaternary Research 2(2):244–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coplen, TB. 1994. Reporting of stable hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen isotopic abundances. Pure and Applied Chemistry 66(2):273–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, NE. 1988. Geochemistry and archaeological geology of the Carrara marble, Carrara, Italy. In: Herz, N, Waelkens, M, editors. Classical Marble: Geochemistry, Technology, Trade. NATO ASI Series, Series E: Applied Sciences. Volume 153. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 315–23.Google Scholar
Dee, M, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2000. Refinement of graphite target production at ORAU. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):449–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douka, K, Hedges, REM, Higham, TFG. Forthcoming. Improved AMS 14C dating of shell carbonates using high-precision X-ray diffraction (XRD) and a novel density separation protocol (CarDS). Radiocarbon. Google Scholar
Fowler, AJ, Gillespie, R, Hedges, REM. 1986. Radiocarbon dating of sediments. Radiocarbon 28(2A):441–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, GM. 1959. Identification of carbonate minerals by staining methods. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 29(1):87–97.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R, Hedges, REM. 1983. Sample chemistry for the Oxford high energy mass spectrometer. Radiocarbon 25(2):771–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, R, Hedges, REM. 1984. Laboratory contamination in radiocarbon AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):294–6.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R, Hedges, REM, Wand, JO. 1984. Radiocarbon dating of bone by accelerator mass spectrometry. Journal of Archaeological Science 11:165–70.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R, Hedges, REM, Humm, M. 1986. Routine AMS dating of bone and shell proteins. Radiocarbon 28(2A):451–6.Google Scholar
Goh, KM, Molloy, BPJ. 1972. Reliability of radiocarbon dates from buried charcoals. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Radiocarbon Dating, Volume 2. Wellington: The Royal Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Head, MJ. 1987. Categorisation of organic sediments from archaeological sites. In: Ambrose, WR, Mummery, JMJ, editors. Archaeometry: Further Australian Studies. Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, ANU, Canberra. p 143–59.Google Scholar
Hedges, REM, van Klinken, GJ. 1992. A review of current approaches in the pretreatment of bone for radiocarbon dating by AMS. Radiocarbon 34(3):279–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, REM, Law, IA, Bronk, CR, Housley, RA. 1989. The Oxford Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Facility: technical developments in routine dating. Archaeometry 31(2):99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, TFG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Brock, F, Baker, D, Ditchfield, P. 2007. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry Datelist 32 Archaeometry 49(1):S1–S60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, TFG, Barton, H, Turney, CSM, Barker, G, Bronk Ramsey, C, Brock, F. 2009a. Radiocarbon dating of charcoal from tropical sequences: results from the Niah Great Cave, Sarawak and their broader implication. Journal of Quaternary Science 24(2):189–97.Google Scholar
Higham, TFG, Brock, F, Peresani, M, Broglio, A, Wood, R, Douka, K. 2009b. Problems with radiocarbon dating the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition in Italy. Quaternary Science Reviews 28(13–14):1257–67.Google Scholar
House, MR. 1993. Geology of the Dorset Coast. London: The Geologists' Association. 164 p.Google Scholar
Lanting, JN, Brindley, AL. 1998. Dating cremated bone: the dawn of a new era. The Journal of Irish Archaeology 9:1–7.Google Scholar
Lanting, JN, Aerts-Bijma, A, van der Plicht, H. 2001. Dating of cremated bones. Radiocarbon 43(2A):249–54.Google Scholar
Law, IA, Hedges, REM. 1989. A semi-automated bone pretreatment system and the pretreatment of older and contaminated samples. Radiocarbon 31(3):247–53.Google Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230(5291):241–2.Google Scholar
McFadgen, BG. 1982. Dating New Zealand archaeology by radiocarbon. New Zealand Journal of Science 25:379–92.Google Scholar
Morse, JW, Mackenzie, FT. 1990. Geochemistry of Sedimentary Carbonates. Developments in Sedimentology Series 48. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Santos, GM, Bird, MI, Fifield, LK, Parenti, F, Guidon, N, Hausladen, PA. 2003. The controversial antiquity of the peopling of the Americas: a review of the chronology of the lowest occupation layer in the Pedra Furada Rock Shelter, Piauí, Brazil. Quaternary Science Reviews 22(21–22):2303–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simms, MJ, Chidlaw, N, Morton, N, Page, KN. 2004. British Lower Jurassic Stratigraphy. Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 30. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.Google Scholar
Turney, CSM, Bird, MI, Fifield, LK, Roberts, RG, Smith, M, Dortch, CE, Grün, R, Lawson, E, Ayliffe, LK, Miller, GH, Dortch, J, Cresswell, RG. 2001. Early human occupation at Devil's Lair, Southwestern Australia 50,000 years ago. Quaternary Research 55(1):3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Klinken, GJ. 1999. Bone collagen quality indicators for paleodietary and radiocarbon measurements. Journal of Archaeological Sciences 26(6):687–95.Google Scholar
van Klinken, GJ, Hedges, REM. 1992. Experiments on 14C dating of contaminated bone using peptides resulting from enzymatic cleavage of collagen. Radiocarbon 34(3):292–5.Google Scholar
van Klinken, GJ, Hedges, REM. 1995. Experiments on collagen-humic interactions: speed of humic uptake, and effects of diverse chemical treatments. Journal of Archaeological Science 22(2):263–70.Google Scholar
van Klinken, GJ, Hedges, REM. 1998. Chemistry strategies for organic 14C samples. Radiocarbon 40(1):51–6.Google Scholar
van Klinken, GJ, Mook, WG. 1990. Preparative high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of individual amino acids derived from fossil bone collagen. Radiocarbon 32(2):155–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Klinken, GJ, Bowles, AD, Hedges, REM. 1994. Radiocarbon dating of peptides isolated from contaminated fossil bone-collagen by collagenase digestion and re-versed-phase chromatography. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 58(11):2543–51.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, HT. 1971. Working with radiocarbon dates. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 37:15–33.Google Scholar
Westgate, JA, Preece, SJ, Froese, DG, Pearce, NJG, Roberts, RG, DeMuro, M, Hart, WK, Perkins, W. 2008. Changing ideas on the identity and stratigraphic significance of the Sheep Creek tephra beds in Alaska and the Yukon Territory, northwestern North America. Quaternary International 178:183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, RE, Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, TFG. Forthcoming. Refining the background correction for radiocarbon dating of bone collagen with the ultrafiltration protocol at ORAU. Radiocarbon. Google Scholar