Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T05:34:58.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Analysis of the International Intercomparison Study (ICS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

E. M. Scott ,
G. T. Cook ,
D. D. Harkness ,
B. F. Miller  and
M. S. Baxter
E. M. Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW Scotland
G. T. Cook
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, SURRC, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 OQU Scotland
D. D. Harkness
Affiliation:
NERC 14C Laboratory, SURRC, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 OQU Scotland
B. F. Miller
Affiliation:
NERC 14C Laboratory, SURRC, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 OQU Scotland
M. S. Baxter
Affiliation:
IAEA International Marine Laboratory, MC 98000 Monaco
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The major findings of the Intercomparison Study (ICS) have already been published (Scott, Long & Kra 1990), but a number of questions remain unresolved. We address here some issues of user and technical relevance, which include: 1) further investigation of the quoted errors and their relation to the perceived precision and accuracy, which is of interest to users of 14C dates; 2) the analysis of the known-age wood samples provided in Stages 2 and 3 of the ICS; 3) an investigation of the corresponding δ13C data base, of more technical relevance to laboratories.

Type
I. Sample Preparation and Measurement Techniques
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 34 , Issue 3: Proceedings of the 14th International Radiocarbon Conference , 1992 , pp. 520 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Cook, G. T., Harkness, D. D., Miller, B. F., Scott, E. M., Baxter, M. S. and Aitchison, T. C. 1990 International Collaborative Study: Structuring and sample preparation. In Scott, E. M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercomparison of Radiocarbon Laboratories. Radiocarbon 32(3): 267–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. and Kalin, R. M. 1990 A suggested quality assurance protocol for radiocarbon dating laboratories. In Scott, E. M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercomparison of Radiocarbon Laboratories. Radiocarbon 32(3): 329–335.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. W. and Stuiver, M. 1986 High precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale 500–2500 bc. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 839–862.Google Scholar
Rozanski, K., Stichler, W., Gonfiantini, R., Scott, E. M., Beukens, R. P., Kromer, B. and van der Plicht, J. 1992 The IAEA 14C Intercomparison Exercise 1990. Radiocarbon, this issue.Google Scholar
Scott, E. M., Aitchison, T. C., Harkness, D. D., Cook, G. T. and Baxter, M. S. 1990 An overview of all three stages of the International Radiocarbon Intercomparison. In Scott, E. M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercomparison of Radiocarbon Laboratories. Radiocarbon 32(3): 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, E. M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., 1990 Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercomparison of Radiocarbon Laboratories. Radiocarbon 32(3): 253–397.Google Scholar
van der Plicht, J. and Mook, W. G. 1989 Calibration of radiocarbon ages by computer. In Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 13th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 31(3): 805–816.Google Scholar
Ward, G. K. and Wilson, S. R. 1978 Procedures for comparing and combining radiocarbon age determinations: A critique. Archaeometry 20(1): 19–31.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. R. and Ward, G. K. 1981 Evaluation and clustering of radiocarbon age determinations: Procedures and paradigms. Archaeometry 23(1): 19–39.Google Scholar