Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-25T20:05:26.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization of Liquid Scintillation Counting Conditions With Two Kinds of Vials and Detector Shields for Low-Activity Radiocarbon Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Gemma Rauret
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Department of Analytical Chemistry University of Barcelona – Institute of Catalan Studies, Barcelona, Spain
J S Mestres
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Department of Analytical Chemistry University of Barcelona – Institute of Catalan Studies, Barcelona, Spain
J F Garcia
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Department of Analytical Chemistry University of Barcelona – Institute of Catalan Studies, Barcelona, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Low-level radiocarbon measurements were made using two liquid scintillation (LS) counters, both with passive lead shields of approximately the same dimensions. The first one had a conventional background reduction with low-activity lead and “high-low” coincidence bias selection, and the second one had a spectrum analysis background reduction based on the different three-dimensional pulse-height signal of background and beta pulses.

The performance of commercial teflon-copper and glass vials were compared with both LS counters. Optimum counting conditions for the two detectors studied were also established. From results obtained, quality parameters and characteristics of quench curves were studied. Performances of each counter in the working conditions established were also compared.

Type
I. Sample Preparation and Measurement Techniques
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Calf, G E and Polach, H, 1974, Teflon vials for liquid scintillation counting of carbon-14, in Liquid scintillation counting: Recent developments: New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kuc, T and Rozanski, K, 1978, A small volume teflon-copper vial for 14C low level liquid scintillation counting: Internatl Jour Applied Radiation Isotopes, v 30, p 452.Google Scholar
Operation manual TriCarb 2000 CA/LL: United Technologies, Packard Instruments, Zurich.Google Scholar
Polach, H, Gower, J, Kojola, H and Heinonen, A, 1983a, An ideal vial and cocktail for low level scintillation counting, in Advances in liquid scintillation counting: Alberta, Univ Alberta Press, p 508526.Google Scholar
Polach, H, Nurmi, J, Kojola, H and Soini, E, 1983b, Electronic optimization of scintillator counter for detection of low-level H-3 and C-14, in Advances in liquid scintillation counting: Alberta, Univ Alberta Press, p 420442.Google Scholar
Rauret, G, Mestres, J S and Garcia, J F, 1988, Effect of counting vials and scintillators on the detection of low-level 14C by liquid scintillation spectrometry: Nuclear Instruments & Methods, v B34, p 373376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M and Polach, H A, 1977, Discussion: Reporting of 14C data: Radiocarbon, v 19, no. 3, p 355363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar