Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T16:02:56.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paleogroundwater in the Moutere Gravel Aquifers Near Nelson, New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Michael K Stewart ,
Joseph T Thomas ,
Margaret Norris  and
Vanessa Trompetter
Michael K Stewart*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Private Bag 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Joseph T Thomas
Affiliation:
Tasman District Council, Private Bag 4, Richmond, New Zealand
Margaret Norris
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Private Bag 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Vanessa Trompetter
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Private Bag 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
*
Corresponding author. Email: m.stewart@gns.cri.nz.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radiocarbon, 18O, and chemical concentrations have been used to identify groundwater recharged during the last ice age near Nelson, New Zealand. Moutere Gravel underlies most of the Moutere Depression, a 30-km-wide system of valleys filled with Plio-Pleistocene gravel. The depression extends northwards into Tasman Bay, which was above sea level when the North and South Islands of New Zealand were connected during the last glaciation. The aquifers are tapped by bores up to 500 m deep. Shallow bores (50–100 m) tap “pre-industrial” Holocene water (termed the “modern” component) with 14C concentrations of 90 ± 10 percent modern carbon (pMC) and δ18O values of −6.8 ± 0.4, as expected for present-day precipitation. Deeper bores discharge water with lower 14C concentrations and more negative 18O values resulting from input of much older water from depth. The deep end-member of the mixing trend is identified as paleowater (termed the “glacial” component) with 14C concentration close to 0 pMC and more negative 18O values (-7.6). Mixing of the modern and glacial components gives rise to the variations observed in the 14C, 18O, and chemical concentrations of the waters. Identification of the deep groundwater as glacial water suggests that there may be a large body of such water onshore and offshore at deep levels. More generally, the influence of changing sea levels in the recent past (geologically speaking) on the disposition of groundwaters in coastal areas of New Zealand may have been far greater than we have previously realized.

Type
Part II
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 46 , Issue 2: Proceedings of the 18th International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 2 of 2), Conference Editors: Nancy Beavan Athfield, Rodger J Sparks , 2004 , pp. 517 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Clark, ID, Fritz, P. 1997. Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology. New York: Lewis Publishers. 328 p.Google Scholar
Edmunds, WM. 2001. Palaeowaters in European coastal aquifers—the goals and main conclusions of the PALEAUX project. In: Edmunds, WM, Milne, CJ, editors. Palaeowaters in Coastal Europe: Evolution of Groundwater Since the Late Pleistocene. London: Geological Society, Special Publications 189:1–16.Google Scholar
Edmunds, WM, Buckley, DK, Darling, WG, Milne, CJ, Smedley, PL, Williams, AT. 2001. Palaeowaters in the coastal regions of southern and eastern England. In: Edmunds, WM, Milne, CJ, editors. Palaeowaters in Coastal Europe: Evolution of Groundwater Since the Late Pleistocene. London: Geological Society, Special Publications 189:71–92.Google Scholar
Hendy, CH, Wilson, AT. 1968. Palaeoclimatic data from speleothems. Nature 216:48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulston, JR, Taylor, CB, Lyon, GL, Stewart, MK, Cox, MA. 1981. Environmental isotopes in New Zealand hydrology. Part 2. Standards, measurement techniques and reporting of measurements for oxygen-18, deuterium and tritium in water. New Zealand Journal of Science 24:313–22.Google Scholar
Lihou Joanne, C. 1992. Reinterpretation of seismic reflection data from the Moutere Depression, Nelson region, South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 35:477–90.Google Scholar
Loosli, HH, Aeschbach-Hertig, W, Barbecot, F, Blaser, P, Darling, WG, Dever, L, Edmunds, WM, Kipfer, R, Purtschert, R, Walraevens, K. 2001. Isotopic methods and hydrogeological context in the investigation of palaeowaters. In: Edmunds, WM, Milne, CJ, editors. Palaeowaters in Coastal Europe: Evolution of Groundwater Since the Late Pleistocene. London: Geological Society, Special Publications 189:193–212.Google Scholar
Rattenbury, MS, Cooper, RA, Johnston, MR, compilers. 1998. Geology of the Nelson Area. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences 1:250,000 geological map 9. (1 sheet + 67 p) Lower Hutt, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Rosen, MR. 2001. Hydrochemistry of New Zealand's aquifers. In: Rosen, MR, White, PA, editors. Groundwaters of New Zealand. Wellington: New Zealand Hydrological Society Inc. p 77–110.Google Scholar
Shackleton, NJ. 1987. Oxygen isotopes, ice volume and sea level. Quaternary Science Reviews 6:183–90.Google Scholar
Stevens, GR. 1990. Rugged landscape: the geology of central New Zealand, including Wellington, Wairarapa, Manawatu and the Marlborough Sounds. Wellington: DSIR Publishing. 286 p. (DSIR information series, ISSN 0077–9636:169).Google Scholar
Stewart, MK, Dicker, MJI, Johnston, MR. 1981. Environmental isotopes in New Zealand hydrology. Part 4. Oxygen isotope variations in subsurface waters of the Waimea Plains, Nelson. New Zealand Journal of Science 24:339–48.Google Scholar
Stewart, MK, Morgenstern, U. 2001. Age and source of groundwater from isotope tracers. In: Rosen, MR, White, PA, editors. Groundwaters of New Zealand. Wellington: New Zealand Hydrological Society, Inc. p 161–83.Google Scholar
Stewart, MK, Thomas, JT. 2002. Moutere Valley groundwater: nature and recharge from isotopes and chemistry. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Science Report 2002/22. 28 p.Google Scholar
Taylor, CB. 1994. The relationship between electrolytic deuterium and tritium separation factors, and attainment of improved accuracy in radiometric low-level tritium measurement. Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 45(6):683–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, CB, Evans, CM. 2000. Isotopic indicators for groundwater hydrology in Taranaki, New Zealand. Journal of Hydrology (NZ) 38(2):237–70.Google Scholar
Taylor, CB, Trompetter, VJ, Brown, LJ, Bekesi, G. 2001. The Manawatu aquifers, North Island, New Zealand: clarification of hydrogeology using a multidisciplinary environmental tracer approach. Hydrological Processes 15:3269–86.Google Scholar
Thomas, JT. 1989. Hydrogeology of the Moutere Valley, Nelson, New Zealand [Unpublished MSc Eng. Geol. Thesis]. Department of Geology, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Thomas, JT. 1991. Moutere Valley groundwater investigations 1989/1990. Unpublished Nelson Marlborough Regional report. 81 p.Google Scholar
Thomas, JT. 1992. Hydrogeology of the Moutere Valley with emphasis on groundwater recharge. Unpublished Tasman District Council report. 8 p.Google Scholar
Thomas, JT. 2001. Groundwater resources of the Tasman Region. In: Rosen, MR, White, PA, editors. Groundwaters of New Zealand. Wellington: New Zealand Hydrological Society, Inc. p 411–25.Google Scholar