Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-g8tfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T01:18:51.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pretoria Calibration Curve for Short-Lived Samples, 1930–3350 BC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

J. C. Vogel ,
AnneMarie Fuls ,
Ebbie Visser  and
Bernd Becker
J. C. Vogel
Affiliation:
Quaternary Dating Research Unit, CSIR, P.O. Box 395, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
AnneMarie Fuls
Affiliation:
Quaternary Dating Research Unit, CSIR, P.O. Box 395, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
Ebbie Visser
Affiliation:
Quaternary Dating Research Unit, CSIR, P.O. Box 395, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
Bernd Becker
Affiliation:
Institut für Botanik, Universität Hohenheim, D-7000 Stuttgart 70 Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The high-precision radiocarbon calibration curve for short-lived samples (1–4 yr) of the early historical period (3rd millennium BC) presented previously (Vogel et al. 1986) has been further substantiated and extended to link with a similar curve produced by de Jong for part of the 4th millennium BC (de Jong & Mook 1980). The precise dendrochronological age of the sample set measured by de Jong has finally been fixed (de Jong, Mook & Becker 1989), so that the two sets now cover the period 1930–3900 BC, i.e., the Early Bronze Age and Late Chalcolithic periods of the Middle East. The standard calibration curve for the two sets is presented by Vogel and van der Plicht (1993).

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , 1993 , pp. 73 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Becker, B. 1979 Holocene tree-ring series from southern central Europe for archaeology dating, radiocarbon calibration, and stable isotope analysis. in Berger, R. and Suess, H. E., eds., Radiocarbon Dating, Proceedings of the 9th International 14C Conference. Berkeley/Los Angeles, University of California Press: 554–565.Google Scholar
de Jong, A. F. M. and Mook, W. G. 1980 Medium-term atmospheric 14C variations. in Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 10th International 14C conference. Radiocarbon 22(2): 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, A. F. M., Mook, W. G. and Becker, B. 1989 Corrected calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, 3904-3203 cal BC. Radiocarbon 31(2): 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. W. 1970 Dendrochronology of bristlecone pine, Pinus aristata: Establishment of a 7484-year chronology in the White Mountains of eastern-central California. in Olsson, I. U., ed., Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology, Proceedings of the 12th Nobel Symposium. New York, John Wiley & Sons: 237–245.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Becker, B. 1993 High-precision decadal calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, AD 1950-6000 BC. Radiocarbon, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Pearson, G. W. 1993 High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, AD 1950-500 BC and 2500-6000 BC. Radiocarbon, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Quay, P. D. 1981 Atmospheric 14C changes resulting from fossil fuel CO2 release and cosmic ray flux variability. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 53: 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talma, A. S. and Vogel, J. C. 1993 A simplified approach to the calibration of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon, in press.Google Scholar
Tans, P. P., de Jong, A. F. M. and Mook, W. G. 1978 Chemical pretreatment and radial flow of 14C in tree rings. Nature 271: 234–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J. C., Fuls, A., Visser, E. and Becker, B. 1986 Radiocarbon fluctuations during the third millennium BC. in Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 935–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J. C. and van der Plicht, J. 1993 Calibration curve for short-lived samples, 1900-3900 BC. Radiocarbon, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar