Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:12:46.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The monocentric model and after

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Catherine Baumont  and
Jean-Marie Huriot
Catherine Baumont
Affiliation:
LATEC (CNRS), University of Burgundy
Jean-Marie Huriot
Affiliation:
LATEC (CNRS), University of Burgundy
Get access

Summary

Von Thünen's monocentric model is considered as one of the foundations of spatial economics. Most of its assumptions have been transfered from agricultural to urban space by New Urban Economics. This transposition gave new impetus both to the monocentric model and to urban economics. Yet the urban monocentric model, because of its strong economic and spatial assumptions, fails to explain the formation of cities. The economics of agglomeration, and more generally New Economic Geography, propose to solve this problem by considering endogenous formation of spatial concentrations, i.e. by changing radically the approach of space. We attempt to identify the lines of continuity and the main changes from von Thünen to contemporary urban microeconomics, and to understand in what way continuity is an obstacle to innovation, and how change has made it possible to renew urban economics.

Le modèle agricole monocentrique de von Thünen est un des modèles fondateurs de l'économie spatiale. On retrouve la plupart de ses hypothèses aujourd'hui dans l'approche de la Nouvelle Economie Urbaine. Cette transposition a donné un nouveau souffle au modèle monocentrique. Mais ces hypothèses rendent l'économie urbaine incapable d'expliquer la formation des villes. L'économie de l'agglomération et plus généralement la Nouvelle Géographie Economique proposent une solution par un changement radical des hypothèses qui consiste à endogénéiser la formation des concentrations spatiales. Dans ce papier, nous cherchons à interpréter les périodes de continuité et les phases de ruptures de von Thünen a l'économie urbaine contemporaine, en montrant en quoi la continuité est un obstacle à la nouveauté et comment une rupture peut renouveler l'économie urbaine.

Keywords

B00R00B00R00
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 64 , Issue 1: Space and economics in retrospect , 1998 , pp. 23 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso, W. [1964], Location and Land Use, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, W.B. [1990], Silicon Valley locational clusters: When do increasing returns imply monopoly?, Mathematical Social Science, 19, pp. 235–251.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. [1938], La formation de l'esprit scientifique, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. [1953], Le matérialisme rationnel, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
Baumont, C. [1993], Analyse des espaces urbains multicentriques: la localisation résidentielle, Bibliothèque d'analyse économique, Dijon, LATEC.Google Scholar
Baumont, C. & Huriot, J.-M. [1998], Urban economy in retrospect: Continuity or change? To be published in Huriot, J.-M. and Thisse, J.-F. J.-F, eds, Economics of Cities.Google Scholar
Beckmann, M.J. [1957], On the distribution of rent and residential density in cities. Paper presented at the Inter-Departmental Seminar on Mathematical Applications in the Social Sciences, Yale University.Google Scholar
Beckmann, M.J. [1976], Spatial equilibrium in a dispersed city, in Papageorgiou, Y.Y. (Ed.), Mathematical Land Use Theory, Toronto, Lexington Books, pp. 117–125.Google Scholar
Borukhov, E. & Hochman, O. [1977], Optimum and market equilibrium in a model of a city without a predetermined centre, Environment and Planning, A, 9, pp. 849–856.Google Scholar
Brueckner, J. [1998], Urban growth models with durable housing: An overview. To be published in Huriot, J.-M. and Thisse, J.-F (Eds.), Economics of Cities.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. & Wilson, A.G. [1985], The analysis of bifurcation phenomena associated with the evolution of urban spatial structures, in Hazewinkel, M., Jurkovich, R. and Paelinck, J.H.P., eds, Bifurcation Analysis: Principles, Applications and Synthesis, Dortrecht, Reidei Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Derycke, P.-H. [1992], The “New urban economics” in retrospect, Sistemi Urbani, 14(1/2/3), pp. 109–126.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. & Stiglitz, J. [1977], Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, American Economic Review, 67(3), pp. 297–308.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. [1986], Urban land use theory, in Gabszewicz, J.J., Thisse, J.-F., Fujita, M. & Schweizer, U., Location Theory, Chur, Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 73–149.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. [1994], L'équilibre spatial - L'interaction entreprises ménages, in Auray, J.-P. et al., Encyclopédie d'économie spatiale, Bibliothèque de Science Régionale, Paris, Economica, pp. 213–223.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. & Krugman, P. [1995], When is the economy monocentric? von Thünen and Chamberlin unified, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25(4), pp. 505–528.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. and Krugman, P. [1998], A monopolistic competition model of urban systems and trade. To be published in Huriot, J.-M. and Thisse, J.-F. (Eds.), Economics of Cities.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. & Ogawa, H. [1982], Multiple equilibria and structural transition of nonmonocentric urban configurations, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 12, pp. 161–196.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. & Thisse, J.F. [1986], Spatial competition with a land market: Hotelling and von Thünen unified, Review of Economic Studies, 53, 819–841.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. & Thisse, J.-F. [1998], Economics of agglomeration. To be published in Huriot, J.-M. and Thisse, J.-F. (Eds.), Economics of Cities.Google Scholar
Goffette-Nagot, F. [1996], Un modèle radioconcentrique pour l'analyse des espaces ruraux périurbains, Revue d'Economie Régionale et Urbaine, 2, pp. 229–246.Google Scholar
Granger, G.G. [1995], La science et les sciences, 2nd edition, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
Huriot, J.-M. [1994], Von Thünen: économie et espace, Paris, Economica.Google Scholar
Jayet, H., Puig, J.-P. & Thisse, J.-F. [1996], Enjeux économiques de l'organisation du territoire, Revue d'Economie Politique, 106(1), pp. 127–158.Google Scholar
Kellerman, A. [1977], The pertinence of the macro-thünian analysis, Economic Geography, 58(3), pp. 255–264.Google Scholar
Kellerman, A., [1981], The pertinence of the macro-thünian analysis: The case of Israel, Geographical Research Forum, n ° 4, pp. 46–54.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T.C. [1957], Three Essays on the State of Economic Science, New York, Mc Graw-Hill.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. [1991a], Geography and Trade, Cambridge (Mass.), The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. [1991b], Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), pp. 483–499.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. [1993], First nature, second nature and metropolitan location, Journal of Regional Science, 33(2), pp. 129–144.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. [1995], Development, Geography, and Economic Theory, Cambridge (Mass.), The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. [1996], The Self-Organizing Economy, Cambridge, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. [1970], The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. enlarged, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lösch, A. [1940], Die Raümliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft, Jena, Fischer, G.. English translation by W.H. Woglom and W.F. Stolper [1954R], The Economics of Location, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mohring, H. [1961], Land values and the measurement of highway benefits, Journal of Political Economy, June, pp. 236–249.Google Scholar
Muth, R.F. [1969], Cities and Housing, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ogawa, H. & Fujita, M. [1989], Nonmonocentric urban configuration in a two-dimensional space, Environment and Planning, A, 21, pp. 363–374.Google Scholar
Papageorgiou, Y.Y. [1990], The Isolated City State. An Economic Geography of Urban Spatial Structure, London and New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Papageorgiou, Y.Y. & Thisse, J.-F. [1985], Agglomeration as spatial interdependance between firms and households, Journal of Economic Theory, 37(1), pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. [1978], Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York, Norton.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. [1954], History of Economic Analysis, London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Starrett, D. [1978], Market allocation of location choice in a model with free mobility, Journal of Economic Theory, 17, 21–37.Google Scholar
Thisse, J.-F. [1992], Espace et concurrence, in Derycke, P.-H. (Ed.), Espace et dynamiques territoriales, Bibliothèque de Science Régionale, Paris, Economica, pp. 113–135.Google Scholar
Von Thünen, J.H. [1826-1863], Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie. Vol. 1 [1826], Hamburg, Perthes; Vol. 2, Section 1 [1850], Rostock, Leopold; Vol. 2, Section 2 and Vol. 3, posthumous edition by H. Schumacher [1863], Rostock, Hinstorff. Complete edition by H. Schumacher & Zarchlin [1875R], Wiegandt, Hempel und Parey. Partial English translation [1966R] in P. Hall (Ed.) [1966], Von Thünen's Isolated State, Oxford, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Walliser, B.,[1994], L'intelligence de l'économie, Paris, Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Wingo, L. [1961], Transportation and Urban Land, Washington DC, Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Zenou, Y. [1996], Marché du travail et économie urbaine, Revue Economique, 47(2), pp. 263–288.Google Scholar
Zoller, H.G. [1988], L'espace résidentiel et le prix du logement, in Ponsard, C. (Ed.), Analyse économique spatiale, Paris, PUF, pp. 59–92.Google Scholar