Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T08:54:40.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expanding ‘religion’ or decentring the secular? Framing the frames in philosophy of religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2019

RICHARD AMESBURY Open the ORCID record for RICHARD AMESBURY [Opens in a new window]
RICHARD AMESBURY*
Affiliation:
School of Historical, Philosophical, and Religious Studies, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Ave., P.O. Box 874302, Tempe, AZ85287–4302, USA
*
e-mail: richard.amesbury@asu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New cross-cultural approaches to philosophy of religion seek to move it beyond the preoccupations of Christian theology and the abstractions of ‘classical theism’, towards an appreciation of a broader range of religious phenomena. But if the concept of religion is itself the product of extrapolation from modern, Western, Christian understandings, disseminated through colonial encounter, does the new philosophy of religion simply reproduce the deficiencies of the old, under the guise of a universalizing, albeit culturally and historically particular, category? This article argues that it is necessary to interrogate the secular episteme within which religion is thematized as a discrete topos.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 56 , Special Issue 1: Philosophy of Religions: Cross-Cultural, Multi-Religious Approaches , March 2020 , pp. 4 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amesbury, R. (2018) ‘Secularity, religion, and the spatialization of time’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 86, 591–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, T. (1993) Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Asad, T. (2003) Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. (1968) ‘Theses on the philosophy of history’, Illuminations, Arendt, H. (ed.), Zohn, H. (tr.) (New York: Schocken Books), 253–264.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (2006) ‘Subjects of Tolerance: why we are civilized and they are the barbarians’, in de Vries, H. & Sullivan, L. E. (eds) Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World (New York: Fordham University Press), 298–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cady, L. & Hurd, E. S. (eds) (2010) Comparative Secularisms in a Global Age (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantrell, M. A. (2015) ‘Must a scholar of religion be methodologically atheistic or agnostic?’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 84, 1–28.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, W. (2009) The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, Z. (2016) in ‘Religion snapshots: methodological atheism vs. methodological agnosticism’, Religion Bulletin, 13 January, <http://bulletin.equinoxpub.com/2016/01/religion-snapshots-methodological-atheism-vs-methodological-agnosticism/> [accessed 21 July 2019].+[accessed+21+July+2019].>Google Scholar
Dubuisson, D. (2003) The Western Construction of Religion: Myths, Knowledge, and Ideology, Sayers, W. (tr.) (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, T. (2000) The Ideology of Religious Studies (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, T. (2006) ‘Bruce Lincoln's “theses on method”: antitheses’, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 18, 392–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, T. (ed.) (2007) Religion and the Secular: Historical and Colonial Formations (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979, Senellart, M. (ed.), Burchell, G. (tr.) (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Handelman, D. (2012) ‘Postlude: framing hierarchically, framing moebiusly’, Journal of Ritual Studies, 26, 65–77.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, J. R. & Pellegrini, A. (eds) (2008) Secularisms (Durham NC: Duke University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. (1999) Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial Theory, India and the ‘Mystic East’ (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Knepper, T. (forthcoming) ‘Why philosophers of religion don't need “religion” ’, in Amesbury, R. & Rodgers, M. (eds) Philosophy of Religion after Religion.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. (2004) Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, Tribe, K. (tr.) (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Lincoln, B. (2005) ‘Theses on method’, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 17, 8–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, V. W. (2016) ‘Introduction: managing race, managing religion’, in Kahn, J. S. & Lloyd, V. W. (eds) Race and Secularism in America (New York: Columbia University Press), 1–20.Google Scholar
Mahmood, S. (2016) Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masuzawa, T. (2005) The Invention of World Religions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCutcheon, R. (1997) Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sherman, J. S. (2018) ‘Deprovincializing philosophy of religion: from “faith and reason” to the postcolonial revaluation of religious epistemologies’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 86, 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. (ed.) (2003) The Secular Revolution: Power, Interests, and Conflict in the Secularization of American Public Life (Berkeley: University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, L. (2013) ‘IMF Fourteenth Annual Research Conference in honor of Stanley Fischer’, 8 November, <http://larrysummers.com/imf-fourteenth-annual-research-conference-in-honor-of-stanley-fischer/> [accessed 12 July 2019].+[accessed+12+July+2019].>Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2007) A Secular Age (Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Wildman, J. (2010) Religious Philosophy as Multidisciplinary Comparative Inquiry: Envisioning a Future for the Philosophy of Religion (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar