Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-t6st2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-26T18:33:37.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why does God exist?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2020

C. A. MCINTOSH Open the ORCID record for C. A. MCINTOSH [Opens in a new window]
C. A. MCINTOSH*
Affiliation:
Sage School of Philosophy, Cornell University, 218 Goldwin Smith Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
*
e-mail: cam497@cornell.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many philosophers have appealed to the PSR in arguments for a being that exists a se, a being whose explanation is in itself. But what does it mean, exactly, for something to have its explanation ‘in itself’? Contemporary philosophers have said next to nothing about this, relying instead on phrases plucked from the accounts of various historical figures. In this article, I analyse five such accounts – those of Anselm, Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz – and argue that none are satisfactory. Should we abandon or restrict the PSR, then? I think that would be hasty, for many reasons. I therefore consider the prospects of explaining everything, including God, given the constraints of certain features of good explanations, and conclude with several observations about future approaches.

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 236 - 257
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, Robert (1994) Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist (New York NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Adams, Robert (1999) Finite and Infinite Goods: A Framework for Ethics (New York NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Anselm (M) Monologium, in St. Anselm: Basic Writings, Deane, S. N. (tr.) (La Salle IL: Open Court, 1988).Google Scholar
Aquinas (OBE) On Being and Essence (Toronto, Canada: The Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1968).Google Scholar
Aquinas (SCG) Summa Contra Gentiles: Book One: God, Pegis, A. C. (tr.) (Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Aquinas (ST) Summa Theologica, I, Fathers of the English Dominican Province (tr.) (New York NY: Benziger Bros., 1948).Google Scholar
Brenner, Andrew (2016) ‘What do we mean when we ask “Why is there something rather than nothing?”’, Erkenntnis, 81, 1305–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christofidou, Andrea (2013) Self, Reason, and Freedom: New Light on Descartes’ Metaphysics (New York NY: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Samuel (D) A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God and Other Writings, Vailati, Ezio (ed.) (New York NY: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Clarke, R. F. (1889) Logic (New York NY: Benzinger Brothers).Google Scholar
Clatterbaugh, Kenneth (1999) The Causation Debate in Modern Philosophy 1637–1739 (New York NY: Routledge).Google Scholar
Craig, William (2007) ‘Theistic critiques of atheism’, in Martin, Michael (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Atheism (New York NY: Cambridge University Press), 69–85.Google Scholar
Davis, Stephen (1999) ‘The cosmological argument and the epistemic status of belief in God’, Philosophia Christi, 1, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (2008) Spinoza (New York NY: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes (HR I) The Philosophical Works of Descartes, I, Haldane, Elizabeth & Ross, G. R. T. (trs) (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Descartes (HR II) The Philosophical Works of Descartes, II, Haldane, Elizabeth & Ross, G. R. T. (trs) (New York NY: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Descartes (CSMK) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, III: The Correspondence, Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald, & Kenny, Anthony (trs) (New York NY: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Fine, Kit (1995) ‘Ontological dependence’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 95, 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flage, Daniel & Bonnen, Clarence (1997) ‘Descartes on causation’, The Review of Metaphysics, 50, 841–872.Google Scholar
Gale, Richard & Pruss, Alexander (1999) ‘A new cosmological argument’, Religious Studies, 35, 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganssle, Gregory (2000) ‘Necessary moral truths and the need for explanation’, Philosophia Christi, 2, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Daniel (2015) ‘Superheroes in the history of philosophy: Spinoza, super-rationalist’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53, 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilson, Étienne (1937) The Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, Edward Bullough (tr.) (Freeport NY: Books for Libraries Press).Google Scholar
Glazier, Martin (2020) ‘Explanation’, in Raven, Michael J. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Metaphysical Grounding (New York NY: Routledge), 121–132).Google Scholar
Griffin, Michael (2013) Leibniz, God and Necessity (New York NY: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gurr, John Edwin (1959) The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Some Scholastic Systems: 1750–1900 (Milwaukee WI: The Marquette University Press).Google Scholar
Hale, Bob (2013) Necessary Beings (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocutt, Max (1974) ‘Aristotle's four becauses’, Philosophy, 49, 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Christopher (1989) A Complex Theory of a Simple God (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Hynes, Darren (2010) ‘Descartes’ ontological proof: cause and divine perfection’, Analecta Hermeneutica, 2, 1–24.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman (1999) The Metaphysics of Creation: Thomas Aquinas's Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles II (New York NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul (1971) ‘Identity and necessity’, in Munitz, Milton K. (ed.) Identity and Individuation (New York NY: New York University Press), 135–164.Google Scholar
Lee, Richard (2006) ‘The scholastic resources on Descartes’ concept of God as Causa Sui’, in Garber, Daniel & Nadler, Steven (eds) Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, III (New York NY: Oxford University Press), 91–118.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (AG) Philosophical Essays, Ariew, Roger & Garber, Daniel (trs & eds) (Indianapolis IN: Hackett, 1989).Google Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2003) ‘On a principle of sufficient reason’, Religious Studies, 39, 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2012) God and Necessity (New York NY: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levey, Samuel (2016) ‘The paradox of sufficient reason’, The Philosophical Review, 125, 397–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBrayer, Landon (2018) ‘Cartesian aseity in the Third Meditation’, Journal of Analytic Theology, 6, 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morreall, John (1984) ‘The aseity of God in St. Anselm’, Sophia, 23, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert (1981) Philosophical Explanations (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Penelhum, Terence (1960) ‘Divine necessity’, Mind, 69, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1964) ‘Necessary being’, in Plantinga, Alvin (ed.) Faith and Philosophy (Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans), 97–110.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1974) The Nature of Necessity (New York NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander (2006) The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment (New York NY: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruss, Alexander (2018) Infinity, Causation, and Paradox (New York NY: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruss, Alexander & Rasmussen, Joshua (2018) Necessary Existence (New York NY: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Joshua (2010) ‘From states of affairs to a necessary being’, Philosophical Studies, 148, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (F) On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, Payne, E. F. J. (tr.) (La Salle IL: Open Court, 1974).Google Scholar
Schnieder, Benjamin & Steinberg, Alex (2015) ‘Without reason?’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 97, 523–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruton, Roger (1986) Spinoza (New York NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. (2014) Anselm's Other Argument (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus de (E) Spinoza: Complete Works, Shirley, Samuel (tr.) (Indianapolis IN: Hackett).Google Scholar
Taylor, Richard (1992) Metaphysics (Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (1983) An Essay on Free Will (New York NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Vallicella, William (1997) ‘On an insufficient argument against sufficient reason’, Ratio, 10, 76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Cristopher (2016) ‘Yet another new cosmological argument’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 80, 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Harry (1934) The Philosophy of Spinoza, I (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Wuellner, Bernard (1956) Dictionary of Scholastic Philosophy (Milwaukee WI: Bruce Publishing Co.).Google Scholar