Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T05:48:48.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pastoral Palimpsest: Writing the Laws of Love in L'Astré

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Twyla Meding
Twyla Meding*
Affiliation:
West Virginia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mediated by Neoplatonist thought of the Quattrocento, paradox governs both form and content of Honoré d'Urfé's L'Astreé. The prefatory epistles to the work's first three parts establish a Foucaldian notion of “author function“ while simultaneously positing the author's profound distrust of writing and his preference for an oral medium. Within the romance itself, the three episodes featuring the authoritative Laws of Love, their falsification, and finally their complete revision illustrate deconstruction of the “author function” through the force of the Platonic textual “drift” against which d'Urfé cautions his protagonists in his prefaces. At the same time, the revised Laws of Love announce means of collective composition prevalent in the later seventeenth century. The romance's sylvan cabinet thus reflects and resolves the dilemmas of authority and composition conceived in the prefaces' paternal Cabinet.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , Winter 1999 , pp. 1087 - 1117
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Michael J. B. The Platonism of Marsilio Ficino: A Study of His Phaedrus Commentary, Its Sources and Genesis. Berkeley, 1984.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B.. Icastes: Marsilio Ficino's Interpretation of Plato's. Sophist. Berkeley, 1989.Google Scholar
Antonioli, Roland. “Le néo-platonisme dans l'Astrée .”. In Melanges a la mimoire de Franco Simone: France et Italic dans la culture europienne. vol. 2, 69–80. Geneva, 1981.Google Scholar
Aragon, C. E. “Platonisme de L'Astrée?” Cahiers de Littirature du XVIIe Steel. 6 (1984): 11–21.Google Scholar
Bloch, Oscar and Walther, von Wartburg. Dictionnaire Etymologique de la languefrancaise. 5th ed. Paris, 1968.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. 2nd ed., Chicago, 1983.Google Scholar
Cave, Terence. The Cornucopian Text: Problems of Writing in the French Renaissance. Oxford, 1979.Google Scholar
Chabert, Nicole. “L'Amour du discours dans L'Astrée.” XVIIe Siècel. 133 (1981):393–407.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. “The Practical Impact of Writing.” In A History of Private Life. Vol 3: Passions of the Renaissance. ed. Roger, Chartier, trans. Arthur, Goldhammer, 111-59. Cambridge, MA, 1989.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. The Order of Books: Readers, Authors and Libraries in Europe between the Fourteenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Trans. Lydia G., Cochrane. Stanford, 1994.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie. Paradoxia Epidemica: The Renaissance Tradition of Paradox. Princeton, 1966.Google Scholar
The Compact Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar
Cotgrave, Randle. A Dictionarie of the French and English Tongues. London, 1611; reprinted Columbia, SC, 1950.Google Scholar
Debesse, Maurice. “Le pays de L'Astrée.”. In Bulletin de la Diana: Colloque commémoratif du quatrième centenaire de la naissance d'Honoré d'Urfé numéro. spécial (1970): 33–45.Google Scholar
Dejean, Joan. Tender Geographies: Women and the Origins of the Novel in France. New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Ehrmann, Jacques. Un paradis désespéré: L'Amour et l'illusion dans. L'Astrée. New Haven and Paris, 1963.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. The Court Society. Trans. Edmund, Jephcott. New York, 1983.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentum cum summis capitulorum. A Critical Edition and Translation. In Marsilio Ficino and the Phaedran Charioteer: Introduction, Texts, Translations. ed. Michael J. B., Allen. Berkeley, 1981.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Les Mots et les choses: Une archiologie des sciences humaines. Paris, 1966.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “What Is an Author?” In The Foucault Reader. ed. Paul, Rabinow, trans. Josué V., Harari, 101-20. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Furetière, Antoine. Dictionnaire universel. Paris, 1690.Google Scholar
Gaume, Maxime. Les Inspirations et les sources de l'oeuvre d'Honoré d'Urfé. Saint-Etienne, 1977.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. “Le Serpent dans la bergerie.” In Figures I. 109-22. Paris, 1966.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Palimpsestes: La littirature au seconddegri. Paris, 1982.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Mia. “Un personnage de L'Astrée. le Lignon.” In Bulletin de la Diana: Colloque commimoratif du quatrieme centenaire de la naissance d'Honore” d'Urfé. numéro special (1970): 31–56.Google Scholar
Giamatti, A., Bartlett. The Earthly Paradise and the Renaissance Epic. New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Gournay, Marie de. Egaliti des hommes et des femmes. Geneva, 1993.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Mitchell. Subjectivity and Subjugation in Seventeenth-Century Drama and Prose: The Family Romance of French Classicism. Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
Gregorio, Laurence. The Pastoral Masquerade: Disguise and Identity in L'Astrée. Stanford, CA, 1992.Google Scholar
Harth, Erica. Ideology and Culture in Seventeenth- Century France. Ithaca, NY, 1983.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, George. “The Montaigne Monopoly: Revising the Essai. under the French Privilege System.” PMLA 108.2 (1993): 308-19.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Louise K. Honori d'Urfé. Boston, 1984.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Louise K.. “Where Have All the ‘Old Knights’ Gone? L'Astrée ”. In Romance: Generic Transformation from Chritien de Troyes to Cervantes. eds. Kevin, Brownlee and Marina Scordilis, Brownlee, 253-64. Hanover, NH, 1985.Google Scholar
La Fontaine, Jean de. Les Amours de Psychi et de Cupidon. Ed. Michel, Jeanneret. Paris, 1991.Google Scholar
Lougee, Carolyn C. Le Paradis des Femmes: Women, Salons, and Social Stratification in Seventeenth-Century France. Princeton, 1976.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. Woman Triumphant: Feminism in French Literature: 1610- 1652. Oxford, 1977.Google Scholar
Magendie, Maurice. Du Nouveau sur. L'Astrée. Paris, 1927.Google Scholar
Plato, R.. Phaedrus. Trans. Hackforth, . In The Collected Dialogues. eds. Edith, Hamilton and Huntington, Cairns, 475–525. Princeton, 1961a.Google Scholar
Sophist, F. M.. Trans. Cornford, . In The Collected Dialogues. eds. Edith, Hamilton and Huntington, Cairns, 957–1017. Princeton, 1961b.Google Scholar
Ranum, Orest. “The Refuges of Intimacy.” In A History of Private Life. Vol. 3: Passions of the Renaissance. ed. Roger, Chartier, trans. Arthur, Goldhammer, 207-63. Cambridge, MA, 1989.Google Scholar
Robert, Paul. Dictionnaire alphabitique et analogique de la langue francaise. Paris, 1966.Google Scholar
Saly, Antoinette. “Amour et valeurs au XVIIe siecle: le legs du moyen age dans L'Astrée.” Travaux de linguistique et de literature. 20 (1982): 37–46.Google Scholar
Spencer, Catherine. “ L'Astrée. des intitules aux incipits: 40 titres en quete d'auteur.” In Colloque de la SATOR a Fordham: Actes du Troisieme Colloque International de la SATOR, University Fordham (25-28 juillet 1989). ed. Jean, Macary, 129-37. Paris, 1991.Google Scholar
Tripet, Arnaud. Montaigne et l'art du prologue au XVIe siècle. Paris, 1992.Google Scholar
Urfé Honoré d'. L'Astrée. Ed. Hugues, Vaganay. 5 vols. Lyons, 1925-28.Google Scholar
Tripet, Arnaud. Astrea. Trans. Steven, Rendall. Binghamton, NY, 1995.Google Scholar
Vaganay, Hugues. “Essai bibliographique.” In L'strée: Nouvelle édition. by Honoré d'Urfé, ed. Vaganay, . Vol. 5, 551–561. Lyons, 1928.Google Scholar
Wine, Kathleen. “ L'Astrée. Tomb or Fountain?” L'Esprit créateur. 25 (1985): 32–41.Google Scholar
Wine, Kathleen. “ L'Astrée's. Landscapes and the Poetics of Baroque Fiction.” Symposiu. 26 (1986): 141-53.Google Scholar