Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:15:37.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

(Re)visiting Délie: Maurice Scève and Marian Poetry*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Gérard Defaux
Gérard Defaux*
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Si iracunda, aut avaritia, aut carnis illecebra naviculam concusserit mentis, respice ad Mariam.

— Bernard, In laudibus Virginis Matris

Factat animam Vulcanus, vestes aptat Pallas, fucat Venus, & cesto cingit, ornant cteterte Den, docet pessimos mores Mercurius. Et quia omni genere rerum a Diis donata esset, Pandoram appellat.

— Jean Olivier, Pandora

Celle qui est la Vertu, et la Grace …

Monstre, qu'en soy elle a plus, que de femme.

— Délie, D354 and 284

This study proposes a new reading of Delie and tries to shed a new light on the poet himself. Sceve appears here not only as the humanist we all know, but as a Christian poet, a poet as much interested in biblical and other religious sources as in Classical and Italian ones. In his canzoniere, Scève follows very closely, and even sometimes imitates, a corpus of fixed-form poems — rondeaux parfaits, ballades, and chants royaux — written by poets of the two previous generations for poetic contests known as Puys. And he constantly expresses his love and describes his idol in terms, images, and symbols directly borrowed from Marian poetry. To the Christian cult of the Virgin Mary corresponds for the Lover the pagan cult of Délie.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , Autumn 2001 , pp. 685 - 740
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnould, Jean-Claude, and Mantovani, Thierry, eds. Forthcoming. Première poisie de la Renaissance. Autour despuys normands. Actes du Colloque international de Rouen (30 septembre-2 octobre 1999). Paris.Google Scholar
Bernard de Clairvaux, . 1993. Bernard de Clairvaux. A la louange de la Vierge mere. CEuvres completes XX. Ed. Marie-Imelda Huille, and Joel Regnard. Paris.Google Scholar
Biblia sacra vulgate editionis, Sixti V. et Clementis VIII. Pont. Max. jussu recognita atque edita. Edition nova versiculus distincta. 1751. Avignon.Google Scholar
La Bible. 1973. Ed. E. Osty and J. Trinquet. Paris.Google Scholar
Bibliothèque Imguinbertine, Carpentras. Ms. 385.Google Scholar
Bibliothèque Nationale de France. Mss. Fonds français 145, 379, 1537, 2205, 19184, 25534, Amiens. [Ms fr. 145 has been reproduced by Maurice Duvanel, Pierre Leroy and Matthieu Pinette as La Confrerie Notre-Dame du Puy dAmiens, Amiens, s.d.]Google Scholar
Blanc, Pierre, ed. 1988. Petrarque. Canzoniere. Le Chansonnier. Paris.Google Scholar
Cave, Terence. 1985. “Scève's Delie: Correcting Petrarch's Errors.” In Nash, ed., 1985, 111-24.Google Scholar
Chesney, Kathleen. 1977. Guillaume Cretin. CEuvres poetiques. 1932, Paris. Reprint, Geneva.Google Scholar
Coleman, Dorothy Gabe. 1964. “Sceve's Choice of the Name ‘Délie.” French Studies 18: 1–16.Google Scholar
Cornillliat, Francois. 1994. “Or ne mens. “ Couleurs de l'eloge et du blame cbez les Grands Rhetoriqueurs. Paris.Google Scholar
Defaux, Gerard. 1993. “L'idole, le poete et le voleur de feu: erreur et impiete’ dans Delie.” French Forum 18.3: 261–95.Google Scholar
Defaux, Gerard. 1994. “L'intertexte marotique de la Delie: Maurice Sceve et ‘ferme amour.” In Nash, ed., 1994, 23-41.Google Scholar
Defaux, Gerard. 1995. Clement Marot. Cinquante pseaumes de David mis en francoys selon la veriti hebraique. Paris.Google Scholar
Defaux, Gerard. 1997. “Preface.” In La Gintration Marot. Poetes francais et neolatins (1515-1550), 7–18. Paris.Google Scholar
Defaux, Gerard, ed. 1997. La Generation Marot. Poetes francais et niolatins (1515-1550). Paris.Google Scholar
Defaux, Gerard and Thierry Mantovani, eds. 1999. Jehan Marot. Les deux Recueils. Geneva.Google Scholar
DellaNeva, JoAnn. 1983. Song and Counter-Song: ‘Delie’ and Petrarch's Rime. Lexington.Google Scholar
DellaNeva, JoAnn. 1993. “The S(c)evered Intertext: Playfully Imitating Petrarch in the Delie.” Romance Quarterly 40.4: 195–202.Google Scholar
DellaNeva, JoAnn. 1994. “Image and (Un)likeness: Mirroring Other Texts in Sceve's Delie? In Nash, ed., 1994, 43-54.Google Scholar
Dolet, Estienne. 1538. Stephani I Doleti I Galli Aurelii I Carminum Libri I Quatuor. I Lugduni. / Anno M.D.XXXVIII. Lyons.Google Scholar
Donaldson-Evans, Lance. 1989. ‘“Love Divine, All Loves Excelling': Biblical Intertextualities in Sceve's Delie.” French Forum 14: 5–15.Google Scholar
Duval, Edwin M. 1979. “'Comme Hecate: Mythography and the Macrocosm in an Epigramme by Maurice Sceve.” Bibliotheque d'Humanisme et Renaissance 40.1: 7–22.Google Scholar
Engammare, Max. 1987. Le Cantique des Cantiques a la Renaissance. Geneva.Google Scholar
Fabri, Pierre. 1967. Ensuyt ungpetit traicte // dialogue fait en I'honneur de Dieu et de sa mere, nomme Le De II fensore de la Conception … . 1514, Rouen. (Reprinted as Pierre Fabri. Le Defensoire de la Conception de la Glorieuse Vierge Marie, in Monumenta italo-gallica ex tribus auctoribus materna lingua scribentibus pro Immaculata Virginis Maria Conceptione, ed. Petrus Alva y Astorga, vol. 2, Louvain, 1666.) Reprinr, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Fabri, Pierre. 1969. Le Grand et vray art de plaine rhetorique. 1521. Ed. Antoine Heron. 2 vols. 1889-1890, Rouen. Reprint, Geneva.Google Scholar
Fenoaltea, Doranne. 1985. “Sceve's Delie and Marot: A Study in Intertextualities.” In Nash, ed., 1985, 136-149.Google Scholar
Graf, Marc. 1980. “Nombres et emblems dans Delie.” Renaissance Humanisme, Reform 12: 5–12.Google Scholar
Gros, Gerard. 1992. Le Poete, la Vierge et le Prince du Puy. Etude sur les Puys marials de la France du Nord du XIVe siecle a la Renaissance. Paris.Google Scholar
Gros, Gerard. 1996. Le Poeme du Puy marial. Etude sur le serventois et le chant royal du XIV siecle a la Renaissance. Paris.Google Scholar
Guy, Henri. 1910. Histoire de la poesie francaise au XVIe siecle. Tome I: L'Ecole des rhetoriqueurs. Paris.Google Scholar
Hollstein, F.W.H. 1970. Dutch and Flemish Etchnings Engravings and Woodcuts ca. 1450-1700. Vol. XIII: Monogrammists of the XVIth andXVIIth Century. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hue, Denis. 1998. “Les Marot et le Puy de Rouen, Remarques a propos du Ms. BN, f. fr. 2205.” Nouvelle Revue du Seizieme Siecle, 16.2: 219–47.Google Scholar
Hue, Denis. 2001. La Poisie palinodique a Rouen, 1486-1550. Paris.Google Scholar
Joukovsky, Francoise, ed. 1996. Maurice Sceve. Delie. Paris.Google Scholar
Malaise, Isabelle. 1987. L'Iconographie du Cantique des Cantiques dans l'Occident mtdiival. Le Mans and Orleans.Google Scholar
Male, Emile. 1949. L'Art religieux de la fin du Moyen Age en France. Etude sur I'iconographie du Moyen Age et ses sources d'inspiration. Paris.Google Scholar
Marguerite de Navarre, . 197. Marguerites I de la Margverite I des Princesses, tresillvstre I royne I de I Navarre. — Svyte des I Marguerites I de la Margverite I des Princesses, tresillvstre I royne I de I Navarre. 1547, Lyon. 2 vols. Reprint, New York.Google Scholar
Marot, Clement. 1990-1993. Clement Marot. Œuvres poitiques completes. Ed. Gerard Defaux. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
McFarlane, Ian S., ed. 1966. The De'lie of Maurice Sceve. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Molinet, Jean. 1937. Les faictz et Dictz de Jean Molinet. Ed. Noel Dupire. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Nash, Jerry C. 1991. The Love Aesthetics of Maurice Sceve. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nash, Jerry C., ed. 1985. Pre-Pleiade Poetry. A Symposium. Lexington.Google Scholar
Nash, Jerry C., ed. 1994. A Sceve Celebration: Delie 1544-1994. Stanford.Google Scholar
Petrarque, Francois. 1514. Les triumphes messire I francoys petrarque. I Translatez de langaige thuscan en francois. I …. BNF Res. Yd. 80. Paris.Google Scholar
Regnault, Francois, ed. 152. Heures de la conception. Paris.Google Scholar
Rigolot, Francois. 1977. Pottique et onomastique: Texemple de la Renaissance. Geneva.Google Scholar
Rigolot, Francois. 1980. “L'intertexte du dizain scevien: Pe'trarque et Marot.” Cahiers de TAssociation Internationale des Etudes Francaises, 32: 93–106.Google Scholar
Robillard de Beaurepaire, Eugene de. 1907. Les Puys de Palinod de Rouen et de Caen. Caen.Google Scholar
Sceve, Maurice. 1544. Delie object de plus haulte vertu. BNF Re's. Ye. 1746. Lyon.Google Scholar
Skenazi, Cynthia. 1992. Maurice Scève et la penste chritienne. Geneva.Google Scholar
Vidoue, Pierre, ed. 1898. Palinodz I Chantz royaulx II Ballades I Rondeaulx I et Epigrammes II a Ihonneur de limmaculee Conception de II la toute belle mere de dieu Marir (Patron-II ne des Normans) presentez aupuy a Rouen …. 1541, Rouen. Reprint, Rouen.Google Scholar
Vloberg, Maurice. 1938. La Vierge notre midiatrice. Grenoble.Google Scholar
Zumthor, Paul. 1978. Anthologie des Grands Rhitoriqueurs. Paris.Google Scholar
Zumthor, Paul. 1978. Le masque et la lumière. Paris.Google Scholar