Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:10:21.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Farmers and nature conservation: What is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2008

Johan Ahnström ,
Jenny Höckert ,
Hanna L. Bergeå ,
Charles A. Francis ,
Peter Skelton  and
Lars Hallgren
Johan Ahnström*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7023, S75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jenny Höckert
Affiliation:
Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7012, SE75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hanna L. Bergeå
Affiliation:
Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7012, SE75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Charles A. Francis
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, 102B KCR, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915, USA.
Peter Skelton
Affiliation:
New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 87701, USA.
Lars Hallgren
Affiliation:
Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7012, SE75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
*
*Corresponding author: johan.ahnstrom@ekol.slu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Farmers' attitudes towards viability of specific conservation practices or actions strongly impact their decisions on adoption and change. This review of ‘attitude’ information reveals a wide range of perceptions about what conservation means and what the impacts of adoption will mean in economic and environmental terms. Farmers operate in a tight financial situation, and in parts of the world they are highly dependent on government subsidies, and cannot afford to risk losing that support. Use of conservation practices is most effective when these are understood in the context of the individual farm, and decisions are rooted in land and resource stewardship and long-term concerns about health of the farm and the soil. The attitudes of farmers entering agri-environmental schemes decide the quality of the result. A model is developed to show how attitudes of the farmer, the farming context and agri-environmental schemes interact and thus influence how the farming community affects nature and biodiversity. As new agri-environmental schemes are planned, agricultural development specialists need to recognize the complexity of farmer attitudes, the importance of location and individual farmer circumstances, and the multiple factors that influence decisions. We provide these insights and the model to conservation biologists conducting research in farming areas, decision makers who develop future agri-environmental schemes, educators training tomorrow's extension officers and nature conservationists, and researchers dealing with nature conservation issues through a combination of scientific disciplines.

Keywords

attitudebiodiversitystewardshipagri-environmental scheme
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 38 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Benton, T.G., Bryant, D.M., Cole, L., and Crick, H.Q.P. 2002. Linking agricultural practices to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades. Journal of Applied Ecology 39:673–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Fuller, R.J., Gregory, R.D., Gibbons, D.W., Marchant, J.H., Wilson, J.D., Baillie, S.R., and Carter, N. 1995. Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain. Conservation Biology 9:1425–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Krebs, J.R., Wilson, J.D., Bradbury, R.B., and Siriwardena, G.M. 1999. The second silent spring. Nature 400:611–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Siebert, R., Toogood, M., and Knierim, A. 2006. Factors affecting European farmers' participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis 46:318–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Kleijn, D., Berense, F., and Gilissen, N. 2001. Agri-environmental schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 43:723–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Kleijn, D. and Sutherland, W.J. 2003. How effective are European agri-environmental schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? Journal of Applied Ecology 40:947–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Knop, K., Kleijn, D., Herzog, F., and Schmid, B. 2006. Effectiveness of the Swiss agri-environmental scheme in promoting biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology 43:120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Carey, P.D., Manchester, S.J., and Firbank, L.G. 2005. Performance of two agri-environmental schemes in England: a comparison of ecological and multi-disciplinary evaluations. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 108:178–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Bengtsson, J., Ahnström, J., and Weibull, A.-C. 2005. The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Mattison, H.A. and Norris, K. 2005. Bridging the gaps between agricultural policy, land-use and biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:610–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Benton, T.G., Vickery, J.A., and Wilson, J.D. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Firbank, L.G. 2005. Striking new balance between agricultural production and biodiversity. Annals of Applied Biology 146:163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Feehan, J., Gillmor, D.A., and Culleton, N. 2005. Effects of an agri-environmental scheme on farmland biodiversity in Ireland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 107:275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Smallshire, D., Robertson, P., and Thompson, P. 2004. Policy into practice: the development and delivery of agri-environmental schemes and supporting advice. IBIS 146:250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Toogood, M., Gilbert, K., and Rientjes, S. 2004. Farmers and the environment. Assessing the factors that affect farmers' willingness and ability to cooperate with biodiversity policies. Biofact, European Centre for Nature Conservation, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
16Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA.Google Scholar
17Burton, R.J.F. 2004. Reconceptualising the ‘behavioural approach’ in the agricultural studies: a socio-psychological perspective. Journal of Rural Studies 20:359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Sullivan, S., McCann, E., De Young, R., and Erickson, D.L. 1996. Farmers' attitudes about farming and the environment: a survey of conventional and organic farmers. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9:123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Trembley, K.R. and Dunlap, R.E. 1978. Rural-urban residence and concern with environmental quality: a replication and extension. Rural Sociology 43:474–491.Google Scholar
20Westmacott, R. 1983. The conservation of farmed landscapes: attitudes and problems in the United States and Britain. Landscape Design 144:11–14.Google Scholar
21Hanson, J.C., Kauffman, C.S., and Schauer, A. 1995. Attitudes and practices of sustainable farmers, with applications to designing a sustainable agricultural program. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 6:135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Liffman, R.H., Huntsinger, L., and Forero, L.C. 2000. To ranch or not to ranch: home on the urban range? Journal of Range Management 53:362–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Bieling, C. and Plieninger, T. 2003. ‘Stinking, disease-spreading brutes’ or ‘four-legged landscape managers’? Livestock, pastoralism, and society in Germany and the USA. Outlook on Agriculture 32:7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24McGregor, M.M., Willock, J., and Deary, I.J. 1995. Farmer stress. Farm Management 9:57–65.Google Scholar
25Schoon, B. and Te Grotenhuis, R. 2000. Values of farmers, sustainability and agricultural policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12:17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Duram, L.A. 1999. Factors in organic farmers' decision making: diversity, challenge, and obstacles. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 14:2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27van der Meulen, H.A.B., de Snoo, G.R., and Wossink, G.A.A. 1996. Farmers' perception of unsprayed crop edges in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Management 47:241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Oreszczyn, S. and Lane, A. 2000. The meaning of hedgerows in the English landscape: different stakeholder perspectives and the implications for future hedge management. Journal of Environmental Management 60:101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Brook, A., Zind, M., and DeYoung, R. 2003. Landowners' responses to an endangered species act listing and implications for encouraging conservation. Conservation Biology 17:1638–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Harrison, C.M., Burgess, J., and Clark, J. 1998. Discounted knowledges: farmers' and residents' understandings of nature conservation goals and policies. Journal of Environmental Management 54:305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Battershill, M.R.J. and Gilg, A.W. 1996. New approaches to creative conservation on farms in South-west England. Journal of Environmental Management 48:321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Clark, J. and Murdoch, J. 1997. Local knowledge and the precarious extension of scientific networks: a reflection on three case studies. Sociologia Ruralis 37:38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Skelton, P., Josiah, S.J., King, J., Brandle, J.R., Helmers, G., and Francis, C.A. 2005. Adoption of riparian forest buffers on private lands. Journal of Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management, and Policy 4:185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Davis, R.M. 1985. Conservation: a matter of motivation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 40:400–402.Google Scholar
35Morris, C. and Potter, C. 1995. Recruiting the new conservationists: farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies 11:51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Coleman, D., Crabtree, B., Fround, J., and O'Carrol, L. 1992. Comparative Effectiveness of Conservation Mechanisms. Manchester University, UK.Google Scholar
37Silvasti, T. 2003. The cultural model of ‘the good farmer’ and the environmental question in Finland. Agriculture and Human Values 20:143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Beedell, J.D.C. and Rehman, T. 1999. Explaining farmers' conservation behavior: why do farmers behave the way they do? Journal of Environmental Management 57:165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Fairweather, J.R. and Campbell, H.R. 2003. Environmental beliefs and farm practices of New Zealand farmers: contrasting pathways to sustainability. Agriculture and Human Values 20:287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Ryan, R.L., Erickson, D.L., and De Young, R. 2003. Farmers' motivations for adopting conservation practices along riparian zones in a Mid-western agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46:19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Carr, S. and Tait, J. 1991. Differences in the attitudes of farmers and conservationists and their implications. Journal of Environmental Management 32:281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42Wicker, A.W. 1969. Attitudes versus actions: the relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Rural Studies 11:51–63.Google Scholar
43Millar, J. and Curtis, A. 1999. Challenging the boundaries of local and scientific knowledge in Australia: opportunities for social learning in managing temperate upland pastures. Agriculture and Human Values 16:389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Vanclay, F. 1992. The social context of farmers' adoption of environmentally sound farming practices. In Lawrence, G., Vanclay, F., and Furze, B. (eds) Agriculture, Environment and Society. Macmillan, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45McCann, E., Shannon, S., Erickson, D., and Young, R.D. 1997. Environmental awareness, economic orientation, and farming practices: a comparison of organic and conventional farmers. Environmental Management 21:747–758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Storstad, O. and Bjørkhaug, H. 2003. Foundations of production and consumption of organic food in Norway: common attitudes among farmers and consumers? Agriculture and Human Values 20:151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Pyrovetsi, M. and Daoutopoulus, G. 1999. Farmers' need for nature conservation education in Greece. Journal of Environmental Management 56:147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Willock, J., Deary, I.J., McGregor, M., Sutherland, A., Edwards-Jones, G., Morgan, O., Dent, B., Grieve, R., Gibson, G., and Austin, E. 1999. Farmers' attitudes, objectives, behaviors, and personality traits: the Edinburgh study of decision making on farms. Journal of Vocational Behavior 54:5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Gasson, R. and Potter, C. 1988. Conservation through land diversion: a survey of farmers' attitudes. Journal of Agricultural Economics 39:340–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50Dick, R. 1992. Sustainability, can it be measured in agricultural systems? Fourth North American Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
51Westmacott, R. and Worthington, T. 1984. Agricultural Landscapes: A Second look. Countryside Commission, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
52Trout, S.K., Francis, C.A., and Barbuto, J. Jr 2005. Impacts of the North-Central Region SARE grants, 1988–2002. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 27:117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Buttel, F.H. and Gillespie, G.W. Jr 1988. Preferences for crop production practices among conventional and alternative farmers. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 3:11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54Filson, C.G. 1993. Cooperation differences in Ontario farmers' environmental attitudes. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6:165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55Albrecht, D.E. and Murdock, S.H. 1990. The Sociology of U.S. Agriculture: An Ecological Perspective. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.Google Scholar
56Traore, N. 1998. On-farm adoption of conservation practices: the role of farm and farmer characteristics, perceptions, and health hazards. Land Economics 74:114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57Featherstone, M.A. and Goodwin, B.K. 1993. Factors influencing a farmer's decision to invest in long-term conservation improvements. Land Economics 69:67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Bultena, G.L., Nowak, P., Hoiberg, E., and Albrecht, D. 1981. Farmers' attitudes toward land use planning. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 36:37–41.Google Scholar
59Bultena, G.L. and Hoiberg, E.O. 1983. Factors affecting farmers' adoption of conservation tillage. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 38:281–284.Google Scholar
60Jacobsen, R.M., Youngs, G.A. Jr, Goreham, G.A., Watt, D.L., Dahl, B.L., Sell, R.S., and Stearns, L.D. 1991. selected characteristics of North Dakota farm families engaged in sustainable agricultural practices. Agricultural Economics Report No. 271. Department of Agricultural Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.Google Scholar
61Carlson, J.E. and McLeod, M.E. 1977. Farmers' attitudes toward soil erosion and related farm problems in the Lewis and Idaho county wheat region. Progress Report No. 198. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.Google Scholar
62Gould, W., Saupe, W.E., and Klemme, R.M. 1989. Conservation tillage: the role of farm and operator characteristics and perception of soil erosion. Land Economics 65:167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63Wilson, G.A. 1996. Farmer environmental attitudes and ESA participation. Geoforum 27:115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64Segalen, M. 1987. Objets domestiques de la vie ouvrière. Transmissions et ruptures dans les familles de Nanterre (1920–1960). Ethnologie Française 17:29–38.Google Scholar
65Fehr, E. and Fischbacher, U. 2004. Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:185–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66Tajfel, H., Billig, M.G., Bundy, R.F., and Flament, C. 1971. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Psychology 1:149–177.Google Scholar
67Tajfel, H. (ed.)1982. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
68Burgess, J., Clark, J., and Harrison, C.M. 2000. Knowledge in action: an actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environmental scheme. Ecological Economics 35:119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69Jung, C.G. [1921] 1971. Psychological Types, Collected Works, Volume 6. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
70Eagly, A.H. and Chaiken, S. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt Brace, Orlando, FL, USA.Google Scholar
71Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press, NY, USA.Google Scholar
72Nordström Källström, H. and Ljung, M. 2005. Social sustainability and collaborative learning. Ambio 34:376–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
73Harrison, C. and Burgess, J. 2000. Valuing nature in context: the contribution of common-good approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 9:1115–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar