Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:47:18.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The prevalence and practice of soil balancing among organic corn farmers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2020

Caroline Brock Open the ORCID record for Caroline Brock [Opens in a new window] ,
Douglas Jackson-Smith Open the ORCID record for Douglas Jackson-Smith [Opens in a new window] ,
Subbu Kumarappan Open the ORCID record for Subbu Kumarappan [Opens in a new window] ,
Steve Culman Open the ORCID record for Steve Culman [Opens in a new window] ,
Douglas Doohan  and
Cathy Herms
Caroline Brock*
Affiliation:
Sociology, University of Missouri, 322 Middlebush Hall, Columbia, MO, USA
Douglas Jackson-Smith
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, 120A Williams Hall, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, OH, USA
Subbu Kumarappan
Affiliation:
Agricultural Technology Institute, The Ohio State University, 1328 Dover Road, Halterman 089A, Wooster, OH, USA
Steve Culman
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, 120A Williams Hall, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, OH, USA
Douglas Doohan
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Sciences, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, OH, USA
Cathy Herms
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Sciences, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, OH, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Caroline Brock, E-mail: brockcc@missouri.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The scientific community and most mainstream agriculturalists typically design fertilizer recommendations to provide a ‘sufficient level of available nutrients’ to meet the annual N, P and K requirements of common field crops. Soil balancing is another approach to managing soil fertility that focuses on the levels of Ca, Mg and K to achieve a desired base cation saturation ratio (BCSR). Soil balancing is believed to be practiced frequently by organic and other alternative farmers but is viewed skeptically by conventional agricultural scientists due to a lack of support for the idea in the published scientific literature. This study represents a pioneering effort to collect systematic data on the extent of soil balancing, how it is practiced and the types of outcomes reported by organic farmers. Our survey of over 850 farmers who grow certified organic corn in Indiana, Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania found that over half report using a soil-balancing approach based on BCSR. Their practice of soil balancing frequently includes more than management of base cations, but also uses a wide range of soil amendment products (such as purchased organic NPK fertilizers, micronutrients, microbial stimulants and soil inoculants) other than those applied specifically for cation balance. Farms that rely on vegetable and dairy production for most of their income, and Amish farmers who rely on horses for fieldwork, were more likely to report using a soil-balancing program. Self-described soil balancers perceived positive agronomic outcomes from the use of a BCSR program, including improvements in soil physical and biological properties and improved crop health and quality. Although farmers in our study report extensive use and positive perceived outcomes from soil-balancing methods, the scientific research literature has been unable to reproduce evidence that manipulating soil base cation levels has any systematic effect on crop yield. Future research could consider the interacting effects of BCSR with other field management practices to more closely approximate the actual practices of farmers.

Keywords

Base cation saturation ratiocalciumcorn farmingfarmer experiencegypsumorganic farmingsoil amendmentssoil balancingsoil science
Type
Research Paper
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , August 2021 , pp. 365 - 374
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, W (1975) The Albrecht Papers, Vol. 1: Foundation Concepts. Kansas City, MO: Acres USA.Google Scholar
Albrecht, WA and Walters, C (2011) Albrecht on Soil Balancing: The Albrecht Papers, Volume VII. Austin, TX: Acres USA.Google Scholar
Astera, M (2014) The Ideal Soil v2.0: A Handbook for New Agriculture Soil Minerals.com.Google Scholar
Bhardwaj, AK, Jasrotia, P, Hamilton, SK and Robertson, GP (2011) Ecological management of intensively cropped agro-ecosystems improves soil quality with sustained productivity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 140, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, CA (1993) Soil Fertility Evaluation and Control. Boca Raton, FL: CRS Press.Google Scholar
Brock, C (2020) Soil balancing within organic farming: negotiating meanings and boundaries in an alternative agricultural community of practice. Agriculture and Human Values, 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10165-yGoogle Scholar
Brunetti, J (2014) The Farm as Ecosystem: Tapping Nature's Reservoir-Biology. Greeley, CO: Geology, Diversity Acres USA.Google Scholar
Bullock, C and Hitzhusen, G (2015) Participatory development of key sustainability concepts for dialogue and curricula at The Ohio State University. Sustainability 7, 14063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaganti, V and Culman, S (2017) Historical perspective of soil balancing theory and identifying knowledge gaps: a review. Crops & Soils 51, 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compagnone, C and Simon, B (2018) Cooperation and competition among agricultural advisory service providers. The case of pesticides use. Journal of Rural Studies 59, 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, JA (2015) Change and sustainability issues in America's Dairyland. Focus on Geography 58, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhaliwal, S, Naresh, R, Mandal, A, Walia, M, Gupta, RK, Singh, R and Dhaliwal, M (2019) Effect of manures and fertilizers on soil physical properties, build-up of macro and micronutrients and uptake in soil under different cropping systems: a review. Journal of Plant Nutrition 42, 2873–2900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, DA, Smyth, JD and Christian, LM (2014) Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 4th Edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Donnermeyer, J and Luthy, D (2013) Amish settlements across America: 2013. Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies 1, 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, DJ and McLean, EO (1981) Basic cation saturation ratios as a basis for fertilizing and liming agronomic crops: I. growth chamber studies. Agronomy Journal 73, 795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favaretto, N, Norton, LD, Joern, BC and Brouder, SM (2006) Gypsum amendment and exchangeable calcium and magnesium affecting phosphorus and nitrogen in runoff. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70, 1788–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopinath, KA, Saha, S, Mina, B, Pande, H, Kundu, S and Gupta, H (2008) Influence of organic amendments on growth, yield and quality of wheat and on soil properties during transition to organic production. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 82, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, C (2013) Growth patterns in the U.S. organic industry. Amber Waves. United States Department of Agriculture Washington, DC. Available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2013/october/growth-patterns-in-the-us-organic-industry/.Google Scholar
Greene, C, Dimitri, C, Lin, B, McBride, W, Oberholtzer, L and Smith, TA (2009) Emerging issues in the U.S. organic industry. USDA ERS Economic Information Bulletin EIB-55. Available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=44416.Google Scholar
Haynes, RJ and Naidu, R (1998) Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 51, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, M (2007) Biology and beyond: The science of "back to nature" farming in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97, 298–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, J, Fry, P and Mathieu, A (2010) Revealing different understandings of soil held by scientists and farmers in the context of soil protection and management. Land Use Policy 27, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabbour, R, Gallandt, ER, Zwickle, S, Wilson, RS and Doohan, D (2014) Organic farmer knowledge and perceptions are associated with on-farm weed seedbank densities in Northern New England. Weed Science 62, 338–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, N and Walters, C (2006) Neal Kinsey's Hands-on Agronomy: Feeding & Balancing your Soil. Austin, TX: Acres USA.Google Scholar
Kopittke, PM and Menzies, NW (2007) A review of the use of the basic cation saturation ratio and the ‘ideal’ soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71, 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraybill, D and Hostetter, CN (2001) The Amish. Anabaptist World USA. Scottsdale, AZ: Harold Press, pp. 66–78.Google Scholar
Krzywoszynska, A (2019) Making knowledge and meaning in communities of practice: what role may science play? The case of sustainable soil management in England. Soil Use and Management 35, 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, R (2015) Soil health paradigms and implications for disease management. Annual Review of Phytopathology 53, 199–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehman, R, Cambardella, C, Stott, D, Acosta-Martinez, V, Manter, D, Buyer, J, Maul, J, Smith, J, Collins, H and Halvorson, J (2015) Understanding and enhancing soil biological health: the solution for reversing soil degradation. Sustainability 7, 988–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, SE (2003) The complexity of labor exchange among Amish farm households in Holmes county, Ohio. The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
McBride, WD, Greene, C, Foreman, L and Ali, M (2015) The profit potential of certified organic field crop production. ERR-188. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC. Available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/45380/53409_err188.pdf?v=0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKibben, W (2012) The Art of Soil Balancing: A Practical Guide to Interpreting Soil Tests. Acres USA., Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Melero Sánchez, S, Madejón, E, Herencia, JF and Ruiz Porras., J (2008) Effect of implementing organic farming on chemical and biochemical properties of an irrigated loam soil. Agronomy Journal 100, 136–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niggli, U, Slabe, N, Halberg, O, Schmid, O and Schlüter, M (2008) Vision for an organic food and farming research agenda to 2025. IFOAM Regional Group European Union (IFOAM EU Group); International Society of Organic Agriculture Research (ISOFAR), Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Reading, LP, Baumgartl, T, Bristow, KL and Lockington, DA (2012) Hydraulic conductivity increases in a sodic clay soil in response to gypsum applications: impacts of bulk density and cation exchange. Soil Science Society of America Journal 177, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romig, DE, Garlynd, MJ, Harris, RF and McSweeney, K (1995) How farmers assess soil health and quality. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50, 229.Google Scholar
Schneider, F, Ledermann, T, Fry, P and Rist, S (2010) Soil conservation in Swiss agriculture—approaching abstract and symbolic meanings in farmers’ life-worlds. Forest Transitions 27, 332–339.Google Scholar
Tirado-Corbala, R, Slater, BK, Dick, WA, Bigham, J and Munoz-Muno, M (2019) Gypsum amendment effects on micromorphology and aggregation in no-till Mollisols and Alfisols from western Ohio, USA. Geoderma Regional E00217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, C and Fenzau, CJ (2003) Eco-Farm. Austin, TX: Acres USA.Google Scholar
Wang, JM and Yang, PL (2018) Potential flue gas desulfurization gypsum utilization in agriculture: a comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82, 1969–1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsten, JR, Parsons, RL and Hanson, GD (2000) Differentiated dairy grazing intensity in the Northeast. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 836–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmer, G and Zimmer-Durand, L (2017) The Biological Farmer: A Complete Guide to the Sustainable and Profitable Biological System of Farming. Austin, TX: Acres USA.Google Scholar
Zwickle, S, Wilson, R and Doohan, D (2014) Identifying the challenges of promoting ecological weed management (EWM) in organic agroecosystems through the lens of behavioral decision making. Agriculture and Human Values 31, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar