Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T05:07:11.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feasibility and sustainability of agroforestry in temperate industrialized agriculture: preliminary insights from California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2019

Sonja B. Brodt Open the ORCID record for Sonja B. Brodt [Opens in a new window] ,
Nina M. Fontana  and
Leigh F. Archer
Sonja B. Brodt*
Affiliation:
Academic Coordinator, Agriculture, Resources, and the Environment, University of California Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program, Agricultural Sustainability Institute at UC Davis, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA95616, USA
Nina M. Fontana
Affiliation:
Ecology Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, USA
Leigh F. Archer
Affiliation:
International Agricultural Development Graduate Group and Horticulture and Agronomy Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Sonja B. Brodt, E-mail: sbbrodt@ucdavis.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intensive use of external inputs in specialized industrial farming systems has created significant socio-ecological externalities, including water and air pollution from nutrients and pesticides, soil erosion and depletion of carbon stocks, biodiversity loss and rising production costs. Ecological intensification is a strategy for reducing reliance on inputs by intentionally designing agroecosystems to harness biological processes and ecological relationships for the sustainable functioning of the system. Incorporating perennials and diversifying systems are two avenues for achieving ecological intensification, and both are characteristics of agroforestry. This preliminary report uses examples of agroforestry in the US state of California as a proof of concept to explore the agronomic and economic feasibility and sustainability benefits of agroforestry in intensive irrigated and temperate farming systems. An exploratory study of farmers experimenting with agroforestry systems and other agricultural professionals identified eight different variants of agroforestry systems being practiced on prime agricultural land in California, ranging from simple use of winter cover crops in orchards to multi-storied cropping systems with integrated grazing. Respondents noted benefits of reduced inputs and production costs, and better nutrient cycling, soil health and pest control. Trade-offs and challenges included increases in labor requirements and management complexity. Knowledge gaps included lack of guidance in biophysical systems design, lack of clarity about economic tradeoffs, and lack of information about ecosystem services benefits. In light of interviewees’ responses, we discuss the constraints and factors needed to foster the successful expansion of agroforestry systems in California and other regions characterized by industrialized farming.

Keywords

Cover cropsdiversified farming systemshedgerowsintegrated crop-livestock systemsmulti-story systemsperennial farming systems
Type
Preliminary Report
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2020 , pp. 513 - 521
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altieri, MA and Rosset, P (1996) Agroecology and the conversion of large-scale conventional systems to sustainable management. International Journal of Environmental Studies 50, 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrianarisoa, KS, Dufour, L, Bienaimé, S, Zeller, B and Dupraz, C (2017) The introduction of hybrid walnut trees (Juglans nigra × regia cv. NG23) into cropland reduces soil mineral N content in autumn in southern France. Agroforestry Systems 90, 193–205.10.1007/s10457-015-9845-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asbjornsen, H, Hernandez-Santana, V, Liebman, MZ, Bayala, J, Chen, J, Helmers, MJ, Ong, CK and Schulte, LA (2014) Targeting perennial vegetation in agricultural landscapes for enhancing ecosystem services. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 29, 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, CM, Getz, C, Kraus, S, Montenegro, M and Holland, K (2012) The social dimensions of sustainability and change in diversified farming systems. Ecology and Society 17, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bainard, LD, Klironomos, JN and Gordon, AM (2011) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in tree-based intercropping systems: a review of their abundance and diversity. Pedobiologia 54, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentrup, G and Schoeneberger, M (2017) Appendix A. regional summaries: Great plains. In Schoeneberger, MM, Bentrup, G and Patel-Weynand, T (eds), Agroforestry: Enhancing Resiliency in U.S. Agricultural Landscapes Under Changing Conditions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, pp. 169–176.Google Scholar
Brodt, S, Klonsky, K, Jackson, L, Brush, SB and Smukler, S (2008) Factors affecting adoption of hedgerows and other biodiversity-enhancing features on farms in California, USA. Agroforestry Systems 76, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buehrer, KA and Grieshop, MJ (2014) Postharvest grazing of hogs in organic fruit orchards for weed, fruit, and insect pest management. Organic Agriculture 4, 223–232.Google Scholar
California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) (2015) California Agricultural Statistics Review 2014–2015. Sacramento, CA. Available at https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/statistics/PDFs/2015Report.pdf.Google Scholar
California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) (2016) California Agricultural Statistics Review 2015–2016. Sacramento, CA. Available at https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/statistics/PDFs/2016Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Cardinael, R, Tiphaine, C, Cambou, A, Béral, C, Barthès, BG, Dupraz, C, Durand, C, Kouakoua, E and Chenu, C (2017) Increased soil organic carbon stocks under agroforestry: a survey of six different sites in France. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 236, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champetier, A, Sumner, D and Tomich, TP (2016) Underlying drivers of nitrogen flows in California. Chapter 2: Underlying drivers of nitrogen flows in California. In Tomich, TP, Brodt, SB, Dahlgren, RA and Scow, KM (eds), The California Nitrogen Assessment: Challenges and Solutions for People, Agriculture, and the Environment. Oakland: University of California Press, pp. 19–43.Google Scholar
Clark, A (ed.) (2012) Managing Cover Crops Profitably, 3rd Edn. Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) Program Handbook Series Book 9. College Park, MD: USDA Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program.Google Scholar
Costa, JM, Ortuno, MF and Chaves, MM (2007) Deficit irrigation as a strategy to save water: physiology and potential application to horticulture. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 49, 1421–1434.10.1111/j.1672-9072.2007.00556.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeJong, TM, Day, KR and Johnson, RS (2008) Physiological and technological barriers to increasing production efficiency and economic sustainability of peach production systems in California. In Palmer, JW (ed.), Proc. XXVII IHC – Enhancing Economic and Environmental Sustainability of Fruit Production in A Global Economy, vol. 772, Acta Horticulturae, pp. 415–422.Google Scholar
Di Falco, S and Perrings, C (2005) Crop biodiversity, risk management and the implications of agricultural assistance. Ecological Economics 55, 459–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosskey, MG, Brandle, J, Bentrup, G (2017) Chapter 2: Reducing threats and enhancing resiliency. In Schoeneberger, MM, Bentrup, G and Patel-Weynand, T (eds), Agroforestry: Enhancing Resiliency in U.S. Agricultural Landscapes Under Changing Conditions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, pp. 7–42.Google Scholar
Eastham, J and Rose, CW (1988) Pasture evapotranspiration under varying tree planting density in an agroforestry experiment. Agricultural Water Management 15, 87–105.10.1016/0378-3774(88)90145-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fereres, E and Soriano, MA (2007) Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, RS and Lovell, ST (2017) Diversification and labor productivity on US permaculture farms. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 32, 1–12.Google Scholar
Garbach, K and Long, RF (2017) Determinants of field edge habitat restoration on farms in California's Sacramento Valley. Journal of Environmental Management 189, 134–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-Barrios, L and Ong, CK (2004) Ecological interactions, management lessons, and design tools in tropical agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 61, 221–236.Google Scholar
García de Jalón, S, Burgess, PJ, Graves, A, Moreno, G, McAdam, J, Pottier, E, Novak, S, Bondesan, V, Mosquera-Losada, R, Crous-Durán, J, Palma, JHN, Paulo, JA, Oliveira, TS, Cirou, E, Hannachi, Y, Pantera, A, Wartelle, R, Kay, S, Malignier, N, Van Lerberghe, P, Tsonkova, P, Mirck, J, Rois, M, Kongsted, AG, Thenail, C, Luske, B, Berg, S, Gosme, M and Vityi, A (2017) How is agroforestry perceived in Europe? An assessment of positive and negative aspects by stakeholders. Agroforestry Systems 92, 829–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, RD, Niles, M, Gil, JB, Gaudin, A, Chaplin-Kramer, R, Assmann, A, Assmann, TS, Brewer, K, de Faccio Carvalho, PC, Cortner, O, Dynes, R, Garbach, K, Kebreab, E, Mueller, N, Peterson, C, Reis, JC, Snow, V and Valentim, J (2017) Social and ecological analysis of commercial integrated crop livestock systems: current knowledge and remaining uncertainty. Agricultural Systems 155, 136–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, MR (n.d.) UC Rangelands Research and Education Archive: Mediterranean Climate. Available at http://rangelandarchive.ucdavis.edu/Annual_Rangeland_Handbook/Mediterranean_Climate/ (Accessed 22 February 2019).Google Scholar
Glover, JD, Reganold, JP, Bell, LW, Borevitz, J, Brummer, EC, Buckler, ES, Cox, CM, Cox, TS, Crews, TE, Culman, SW, DeHaan, LR, Eriksson, D, Gill, BS, Holland, J, Hu, F, Hulke, BS, Ibrahim, AMH, Jackson, W, Jones, SS, Murray, SC, Paterson, AH, Ploschuk, E, Sacks, EJ, Snapp, S, Tao, D, Van Tassel, DL, Wade, LJ, Wyse, DL and Xu, Y (2010) Increased food and ecosystem security via perennial grains. Science 328, 1638–1639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, MA and Garrett, HE (2009) Agroforestry nomenclature, concepts, and practices. In Garrett, HE (ed.), North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice, 2nd Edn.Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 45–56.Google Scholar
Gunier, RB, Bradman, A, Harley, KG, Kogut, K and Eskenazi, B (2016) Prenatal residential proximity to agricultural pesticide use and IQ in 7-year-old children. Environmental Health Perspectives 125. doi: 10.1289/EHP504.Google Scholar
Haden, VR, Liptzin, D, Rosenstock, TS, Vanderslice, J, Brodt, S, Yeo, BL, Dahlgren, R, Scow, K, Riddell, J, Feenstra, G, Oliver, A, Thomas, K, Kanter, D and Tomich, TP (2016) Chapter 5: Ecosystem services and human well-being. In Tomich, TP, Brodt, SB, Dahlgren, RA and Scow, KM (eds), The California Nitrogen Assessment: Challenges and Solutions for People, Agriculture, and the Environment. Oakland: University of California Press, pp. 113–193.Google Scholar
Harter, T, Lund, JR, Darby, J, Fogg, GE, Howitt, RE, Jessoe, K, Pettygrove, GS, Quinn, JF, Viers, JH, Boyle, DB, Canada, HE, DeLaMora, N, Dzurella, KN, Fryjoff-Hung, A, Hollander, AD, Honeycutt, KL, Jenkins, MW, Jensen, VB, King, AM, Kourakos, G, Liptzin, D, Lopez, EM, Mayzelle, MM, McNally, A, Medellin-Azuara, J and Rosenstock, TS (2012) Addressing nitrate in California's drinking water: with a focus on Tulare Lake Basin and Salinas Valley groundwater. Report for the State Water Resources Control Board Report to the Legislature. Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Hauggaard-Nielsen, H and Jensen, ES (2005) Facilitative root interactions in intercrops. Plant and Soil 274, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iles, A and Marsh, R (2012) Nurturing diversified farming systems in industrialized countries: how public policy can contribute. Ecology and Society 17, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingels, C (1998) Cover Cropping in Vineyards: A Grower's Handbook. Oakland, CA: University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Jacobson, M and Kar, S (2013) Extent of agroforestry extension programs in the United States. Journal of Extension 51, 4RIB4. Available at http://www.joe.org/joe/2013august/rb4.php.Google Scholar
Johnson, R and Cody, BA (2015) California Agricultural Production and Irrigated Water Use. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Available at https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44093.pdf.Google Scholar
Jose, S, Holzmueller, EJ and Gillespie, AR (2009) Tree-crop interactions in temperate agroforestry. In Garrett, HE (ed.), North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice, 2nd Edn.Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy. pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
Jose, S, Gold, MA and Garrett, HE (2012) The future of temperate agroforestry in the United States. 2011. In Nair, PK and Garrity, D (eds), Agroforestry: The Future of Global Land Use. Advances in Agroforestry, vol. 9. Dordecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 217–245.10.1007/978-94-007-4676-3_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantar, MB, Tyl, CE, Dorn, KM, Zhang, X, Jungers, JM, Kaser, JM, Schendel, RR, Eckberg, JO, Runck, BC, Bunzel, M, Jordan, NR, Stupar, RM, Marks, MD, Anderson, JA, Johnson, GA, Sheaffer, CC, Schoenfuss, TC, Ismail, B, Heimpel, GE and Wyse, DL (2016) Perennial grain and oilseed crops. Annual Review: Plant Biology 67, 703–729.Google ScholarPubMed
Koohafkan, P, Altieri, MA and Holt Gimenez, E (2012) Green agriculture: foundations for biodiverse, resilient and productive agricultural systems. Internal Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 10, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kottek, M, Grieser, J, Beck, C, Rudolf, B and Rubel, F (2006) World map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 15, 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, TT and Pallardy, SG (2002) Acclimation and adaptive responses of woody plants to environmental stresses. The Botanical Review 68, 270–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremen, C and Miles, A (2012) Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecology and Society 17, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, K, Elevitch, C, Friday, JB, Friday, K, Lake, FK and Zamora, D (2017) Chapter 5: Human dimensions of agroforestry systems. In Schoeneberger, MM, Bentrup, G and Patel-Weynand, T (eds), Agroforestry: Enhancing Resiliency in U.S. Agricultural Landscapes Under Changing Conditions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, pp. 169–176.Google Scholar
Millard, P and Grelet, G (2010) Nitrogen storage and remobilization by trees: ecophysiological relevance in a changing world. Tree Physiology 30, 1083–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagnini, F, Jordan, CF and Machado, M (1999) Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency in agroforestry systems. In Ashton, M and Montagnini, F (eds), The Silvicultural Basis for Agroforestry Systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 131–160.Google Scholar
Montgomery, DR (2007) Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. PNAS 104, 13268–13272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulville, K (2011) Increasing vineyard profits and sustainability. The Australian & New Zealand Grapegrower & Winemaker 568, 22–26.Google Scholar
Orefice, J, Carroll, J, Conroy, D and Ketner, L (2017) Silvopasture practices and perspectives in the Northeastern United States. Agroforestry Systems 91, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolotti, L, Boggia, A, Castellini, C, Rocchi, L and Rosati, A (2016) Combining livestock and tree crops to improve sustainability in agriculture: a case study using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 131, 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre, NF, Carlisle, L, Huntsinger, L, Fisher, G and Shattuck, A (2012) The role of rangelands in diversified farming systems: innovations, obstacles, and opportunities in the USA. Ecology and Society 17, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnitzer, SA, Klironomos, JN, HilleRisLambers, J, Kinkel, LL, Reich, PB, Xiao, K, Rillig, MC, Sikes, BA, Callaway, RM, Mangan, SA, van Nes, EH and Scheffer, M (2011) Soil microbes drive the classic plant diversity-productivity pattern. Ecology 92, 296–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoeneberger, MM, Bentrup, G and Patel-Weynand, T (eds) (2017) Agroforestry: Enhancing Resiliency in U.S. Agricultural Landscapes Under Changing Conditions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.Google Scholar
Schulte, LA, Asbjornsen, H, Liebma, M and Crow, TR (2006) Agroecosystem restoration through strategic integration of perennials. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 61, 164A–169A.Google Scholar
Schultz, RC, Isenhart, TM, Colletti, JP, Simpkins, WW, Udawatta, RP and Schultz, PL (2009) Riparian and upland buffer practices. In Garrett, HE (ed.), North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice, 2nd Edn.Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy. pp. 163–218.Google Scholar
Smith, R, Bugg, RL and Gaskell, M (2011 a) Cover Cropping for Vegetable Production. A Grower's Handbook. Oakland, CA: University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Smith, J, Pearce, BD and Wolfe, MS (2011 b) Reconciling productivity with protection of the environment: is temperate agroforestry the answer? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 28, 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smukler, SM, Sanchez-Moreno, S, Fonte, SJ, Ferris, H, Klonsky, K, O'Geen, AT, Scow, KM, Steenwerth, KL and Jackson, LE (2010) Biodiversity and multiple ecosystem functions in an organic farmscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 139, 80–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sousa, CD, Menezes, RSC, Sampaio, EVSB, Lima, FS, Oehl, F and Maia, LC (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi within agroforestry and traditional land use systems in semi-arid Northeast Brazil. Acta Scientiarum-Agronomy 35, 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamps, WT and Linit, MJ (1997) Plant diversity and arthropod communities: implications for temperate agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 39, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D, Cassman, KG, Matson, PA, Naylor, R and Polasky, S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418, 671–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomich, TP, Brodt, SB, Dahlgren, RA and Scow, KM (eds) (2016) The California Nitrogen Assessment: Challenges and Solutions for People, Agriculture, and the Environment. Oakland: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udawatta, RP, Kremer, RJ, Adamson, BW and Anderson, SH (2008) Variations in soil aggregate stability and enzyme activities in a temperate agroforestry practice. Applied Soil Ecology 39, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of California Agricultural Issues Center (UC AIC) (2009 a) Ch. 1: California farms and farmers. In UC AIC. The measure of California agriculture. Available at http://aic.ucdavis.edu.Google Scholar
University of California Agricultural Issues Center (UC AIC) (2009 b) Ch. 3: Inputs to farm production in UC AIC The Measure of California Agriculture. Available at http://aic.ucdavis.edu.Google Scholar
Valdivia, C, Gold, M, Zabek, L, Arbuckle, J and Flora, C (2009) Human and institutional dimensions of agroforestry. In Garrett, HE (ed.), North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice, 2nd Edn.Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy. pp. 339–367.Google Scholar
van Bruggen, AHC and Semenov, AM (2000) In search of biological indicators for soil health and disease suppression. Applied Soil Ecology 15, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandermeer, J (1989) The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Workman, SW, Bannister, ME and Nair, PKR (2003) Agroforestry potential in the southeastern United States: perceptions of landowners and extension professionals. Agroforestry Systems 59, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, QS and Xia, RX (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence growth, osmotic adjustment and photosynthesis of citrus under well-watered and water stress conditions. Journal of Plant Physiology 163, 417–425.10.1016/j.jplph.2005.04.024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiloyannis, C, Montanaro, G, Dichio, B (2016) Sustainable orchard management in semi-arid areas to improve water use efficiency and soil fertility. In Milatovic, D et al. (ed), Proc. III: Balkan Symposium on Fruit Growing, vol. 1139. Belgrade, Serbia: Acta Horticulturae, pp. 425–429.Google Scholar
Zhang, X, Liu, X, Zhang, M, Dahlgren, RA and Eitzel, M (2010) A review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution. Journal of Environmental Quality 39, 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Brodt et al. supplementary material

Brodt et al. supplementary material 1

Download Brodt et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 180.2 KB