Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T09:06:13.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fertility-promoting laparoscopically-directed procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2009

Malcolm G Munro  and
Victor Gomel
Malcolm G Munro
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, USA
Victor Gomel*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
*
Professor Victor Gomel, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Room 2H30-4490 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V5, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Fertility-promoting procedures are among the most frequently performed laparoscopic procedures. Some of the procedures have a relatively long history, with good documentation of technique, efficacy and effectiveness. On the other hand, many are experimental, in development or relatively new and lacking supportive clinical data.

Type
Articles
Information
Reproductive Medicine Review , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 29 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Jacobaeus, HC. Uber due moglichkeit die zystoskopie bei unterschlung seroser Hohlungen anzerwerden. Münchener Medizinische Wochenschrift 1910; 57: 2090–92.Google Scholar
2Berheim, BM. Organoscopy: cystoscopy of the abdominal cavity. Ann Surg 1911; 53: 764–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Nadeau, OE, Kampmeier, OF. Endoscopy of the abdomen, abdominoscopy: a preliminary study, including a summary of the literature and a description of the technique. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1925; 41: 259–71.Google Scholar
4Short, AR. The uses of celioscopy. Br Med J 1925; 2: 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Fervers, C. Die laparoskopie mit dem Cystoskope. Ein beitrag zur Vereinfachung der Technik und zur endoskopischen. Strangdurchtrennung in der bauchole. Medizinische Klinil 1933; 29: 1042–45.Google Scholar
6Bosch, PF. Laparoskopische sterilization. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Krankenhaus und Anstaltswesen, 1936.Google Scholar
7Anderson, ET. Peritoneoscopy. Am J Surg 1937; 35: 136–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Power, FH, Barnes, AC. Sterilization by means of peritoneoscopic fulguration: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1941; 41: 1038–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Hope, RB. Differential diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy by peritoneoscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1937; 64: 229.Google Scholar
10Ruddock, JC. Peritoneoscopy. Southern Surgeon 1939; 8: 113.Google Scholar
11Donaldson, JK, Sanderlin, JH, Harrell, WB Jr. A method of suspending the uterus without open abdominal incision. Am J Surg 1942; 55: 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Fourestiere, M, Gladu, A, Vulmiere, J. Perfectionnements à l'endoscopie medicale. Realization bronchoscopique. Press Med 1952; 60: 292.Google Scholar
13Hopkins, HH. On the diffraction theory of optical images. Proc R Soc Lond 1953; A217: 408.Google Scholar
14Palmer, R, de Brux, J. Essais de sterilization tubaire celioscopique par electrocoagulation isthmique. Bull Fed Soc Gynecol Obstet Lang Fr 1962; 14: 298.Google Scholar
15Gordji, M, Palmer, R. Libération par coelioscopique des adhérences pelviennes. Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb 1967; 104: 93–95.Google Scholar
16Palmer, R. Laparoscopies opératoires dans traitment de la stérilité fémmine. Acta Endose 1971; 1: 19.Google Scholar
17Palmer, R, de Brux, J. Résultats histologiques, biochemiques et therapeutics obtenus chez les femmes dont les ovaries avaient été diagnostiqués Stein-Leventhal à la coelioscopie. Bull Féd Soc Gynecol et Obstet 1967; 19: 405–12.Google Scholar
18Allen, JR, Shemwell, RE, Macleod, DP, Weed, JC. Removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices after uterine perforation. Obstet Gynecol 1972; 40: 225–30.Google ScholarPubMed
19Gomel, V. Experience with operative laparoscopy. Presented at the 20th annual meeting of the Canadian Fertility Society, Vancouver, June 1973. Vancouver: Canadian Fertility Society, 1973: (Program) 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Gomel, V. Laparoscopic tubal surgery in infertility. Obstet Gynecol 1975; 46: 47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Shapiro, HI, Adler, DH. Excision of an ectopic pregnancy through the laparoscope. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973; 117: 290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Gomel, V. Laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic gestation. Cine Dips 1975; 2: 85.Google Scholar
23Frangenheim, H, Kleindienst, W. Chronic pelvic disease of unknown origin. In: Phillips, JM, Keith, L eds. Gynecological laparoscopy. New York: Stratton, 1974: 43.Google Scholar
24Gomel, V. Salpingostomy by laparoscopy. J Repro Med 1977; 18: 265–67.Google ScholarPubMed
25Mettler, L, Giesel, H, Semm, K. Treatment of female infertility due to tubal obstruction by operative laparoscopy. Fertil Steril 1979; 32: 384–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Steptoe, PC, Edwards, RG. Reimplantation of a human embryo with subsequent tubal pregnancy. Lancet 1976; i: 880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Steptoe, PC, Edwards, RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 1978; ii: 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Daniell, J. Operative laparoscopy for endometriosis. Semin Reprod Endocrinol 1985; 3: 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Feste, JR. Laser laparoscopy, a new modality. J Reprod Med 1985; 40: 413.Google Scholar
30Nezhat, C, Crowgey, SR, Garrison, CP. Surgical treatment of endometriosis via laser laparoscopy. Fertil Steril 1986; 45: 778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Martin, DC. CO2 laser laparoscopy for endometriosis associated with infertility. J Reprod Med 1986; 31: 1089.Google ScholarPubMed
32Davis, GD. Management of endometriosis and its associated adhesions with the CO2 laser laparoscope. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Filmar, S, Gomel, V, McComb, PF. Operative laparoscopy versus open abdominal surgery: a comparative study on postoperative adhesion formation in the rat model. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 486–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Luciano, AL, Whitman, G, Maier, D et al. Comparison of thermal injury, healing patterns and postoperative adhesion formation following CO2 laser and electromicrosurgery. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 1025–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Filmar, S, Jetha, N, McComb, P, Gomel, V. A comparative histologic study on the healing process after tissue transection. I. Carbon dioxide laser and electromicrosurgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1062–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Tulandi, T, Vilos, GA. A comparison between laser surgery and electrosurgery for bilateral hydrosalpinx: a 2 year follow-up. Fertil Steril 1985; 44: 846–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Tulandi, T. Salpingo-ovariolysis: a comparison between laser surgery and electrosurgery. Fertil Steril 1986; 45: 489–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Prevention of postsurgical adhesions by Interceed (TC7), an absorbable adhesion barrier: a prospective, randomized multicenter clinical study. Interceed (TC7) Adhesion barrier study group. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 933–38.Google Scholar
39Best, CL, Rittenhouse, D, Sueldo, CE. A comparison of TC7 and dextran 70 for prevention of postoperative adhesions in hamsters. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 858–60.Google ScholarPubMed
40Urman, B, Gomel, V, McComb, P, Lee, N. Mid-tubal occlusion: etiology, management and outcome. Fertil Steril 1992; 57: 747–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Gomel, V. Laparoscopic tubal surgery in infertility. Obstet Gynecol 1975; 46: 47–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Gomel, V. Salpingo-ovariolysis by laparoscopy in infertility. Fertil Steril 1983; 340: 607–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Fayez, JA. An assessment of the role of operative laparoscopy in tuboplasty. Fertil Steril 1983; 39: 476–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Bruhat, MA, Mage, G, Manhes, H et al. Laparoscopy procedures to promote fertility: ovariolysis and salpingolysis results of 93 selected cases. Acta Europa Fertilitatis 1983; 14: 476–79.Google ScholarPubMed
45Tulandi, T, Collins, JA, Burrows, E et al. Treatment-dependent and treatment-independent pregnancy among women with periadnexal adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 354–57 (erratum: Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 271).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Gomel, V. Microsurgery in female infertility. Boston: Little Brown and Co, 1983:143–44.Google Scholar
47Dubuisson, JB, Borquet de Jolinierè, J et al. Terminal tuboplasties by laparoscopy: 65 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 410–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Daniell, JF, Herbert, CM. Laparoscopic salpingostomy using the CO2 laser. Fertil Steril 1984; 41: 558–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49McComb, P, Paleologou, A. The intussesception salpingostomy technique for the therapy of distal oviductal occlusion at laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 443–47.Google Scholar
50Gomel, V. Distal tubai occlusion. Fertil Steril 1987; 49: 946.Google Scholar
51Gomel, V, Erenus, M. Prognostic value of the American Fertility Society's (AFS) classification for distal tubal occlusion (DTO). The American Fertility Society, 46th Annual meeting. Program Supplement (p-097). Washington, DC: AFS, 1990: S-106.Google Scholar
52Wheeler, JM, Malinak, LR. Does mild endometriosis cause infertility? Semin Reprod Endocrinol 1988; 6: 239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Thomas, EJ, Cooke, I. Successful treatment of asymptomatic endometriosis: does it benefit infertile women? Br Med J 1987; 294: 1117–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Hughes, EG, Fedorkow, DM, Collins, JC. A quantitative overview of controlled trials in endometriosis-associated infertility. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 963–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Tulandi, T. Salpingo-ovariolysis: a comparison between laser surgery and electrosurgery. Fertil Steril 1986; 45: 489–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Luciano, AL, Whitman, G, Maier, D et al. Comparison of thermal injury, healing patterns and postoperative adhesion formation following CO2 laser and electromicrosurgery Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 1025–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57Filmar, S, Jetha, N, McComb, P, Gomel, V. A comparative histologic study on the healing process after tissue transection. II: carbon dioxide laser and surgical microscissors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1068–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Filmar, S, Jetha, N, McComb, P, Gomel, V. A comparative histologic study on the healing process after tissue transection. I. Carbon dioxide laser and electromicrosurgery. Am J of Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1062–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59Maiman, M, Seltzer, V, Boyce, J. Laparoscopic excision of ovarian neoplasms subsequently found to be malignant. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 563–65.Google ScholarPubMed
60Brumstead, JR, Deaton, J, Lavigne, E, Riddick, DH. Postoperative adhesion formation after ovarian wedge resection with and without ovarian reconstruction in the rabbit. Fertil Steril 1990; 53: 723–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61Meyer, WR, Gainger, DA, DeCherney, AH, Lachs, MS, Diamond, MP. Ovarian surgery on the rabbit: effect of cortex closure on adhesion formation and ovarian function. J Repro Med 1991; 36: 639–43.Google ScholarPubMed
62Diamond, MP, Daniell, JF, Johns, DA et al. Postoperative adhesion development after operative laparoscopy: evaluation at early second-look laparoscopy. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 700–704.Google Scholar
63American Fertility Society. Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1985; 43: 351–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64Bayer, SR, Seibel, M, Saffan, DS, Berger, MJ, Taymour, M. Efficacy of danazol treatment for minimal endometriosis in infertile women. J Reprod Med 1988; 33: 179–83.Google ScholarPubMed
65Telimas, S. Danazol and medrozyprogesterone acetate inefficacious in the treatment of infertility in endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1988; 50: 872–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66Paulson, JD, Asmar, P, Saffan, DS. Mild and moderate endometriosis. Comparison of treatment modalities for infertile couples. J Reprod Med 1991; 36: 151–55.Google ScholarPubMed
67Nowroozi, K, Chase, JS, Check, J, Wu, C. The importance of laparoscopic coagulation of mild endometriosis in infertile women. Int J Fertil 1987; 32: 442–44.Google ScholarPubMed
68Fayez, JA, Collozo, LM, Vernon, C. Comparison of different modalities of treatment for minimal and mild endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 927–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69Chong, AP, Keene, ME, Thornton, NL. Comparison of three modes of treatment for infertility patients with minimal pelvic endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1990; 53: 407–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70Seller, JC, Gidwani, G, Ballard, L. Laparoscopic cauterization of endometriosis for fertility: a controlled study. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 1098–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71Hasson, HM, Rotman, C, Rana, N, Sistos, F, Dmowski, WP. Laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 884–89.Google ScholarPubMed
72Stein, FI, Leventhal, JL. Amenorrhoea associated with bilateral polycystic ovaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1935; 29: 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73Adashi, EY, Rock, JA, Guzic, D et al. Fertility following bilateral wedge ovarian resection: a critical analysis of 90 consecutive cases of the polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 1981; 36: 320–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74Toaff, R, Toaff, ME, Peyser, MR. Infertility following wedge resection of the ovaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 124: 92–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75Gindoff, PR, Jewelewicz, R. Polycystic ovarian disease. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1987; 14: 931–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76Palmer, R, de Brux, J. Histological, biochemical and therapeutic results obtained in women with Stein-Leventhal ovaries diagnosed by celioscopy. Bulletin de la federation des societies de gynecologie et d'obstétrique de langue Francaise 1967; 19: 405–12.Google ScholarPubMed
77Gjönnaess, H. Polycystic ovarian syndrome treated by ovarian electrocautery through the laparoscope. Fertil Steril 1984; 41: 20–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
78Greenblatt, E, Casper, RF. Endocrine changes after laparoscopic ovarian cautery in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 279–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
79van der Weiden, RM, Alberda, AT. Laparoscopic ovarian electrocautery in patients with polycystic ovarian disease resistant to clomiphene citrate. Surg Endosc 1987; 1: 217–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
80Kovacs, G, Buckler, H, Bangah, M et al. Treatment of anovulation due to polycystic ovarian syndrome by laparoscopic ovarian cautery. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 98: 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
81Huber, J, Hosmann, J, Spona, J. Polycystic ovarian syndrome treated by laser through the laparoscope. Lancet 1988; ii: 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
82Daniell, JF, Miller, W. Polycystic ovaries treated by laparoscopic laser vaporization. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 232–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
83Aakvaag, A, Gjonnaess, H. Hormonal response to electrocautery of the ovary in patients with polycystic ovarian disease. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 92: 1258–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
84In vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in the United States: 1990 results from the National IVF-ET registry. Fertil Steril 1992; 57: 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar