Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:54:05.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Justice and authority in the global order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Abstract

The global justice debate has largely ignored law. But that debate presupposes a legal order within which principles of justice could be implemented. Paying attention to law alters our understanding of global justice by requiring us to distinguish principles that are properly prescribed and enforced within a legal order from those that are not. Given that theories of global governance depreciate law and that cosmopolitan and confederal theories are utopian, the most promising context for a realistic global justice discourse is one that is focused on strengthening, not transcending, the international legal order.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘International Law as Inter-Public Law’, in Richardson, Henry S. and Williams, Melissa S. (eds), Moral Universalism and Pluralism, NOMOS 49 (New York: New York University Press, 2009), pp. 167204Google Scholar .

2 Oakeshott, Michael, ‘The Rule of Law’, in On History and Other Essays (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983), pp. 140141Google Scholar . What Oakeshott calls ‘civil association’ is a non-voluntary mode of association, in the sense that non-instrumental laws prescribe obligations and are not merely recommendations or advice, but it is not inherently coercive. Coercion enters the picture only because a state cannot work if its laws are not observed, and enforcement may be required to secure that observance. Coercion is one of the contingent conditions for the existence of civil association, but it is not itself part of the civil mode.

3 Puddington, Arch, ‘The 2008 Freedom House Survey: A Third Year of Decline’, Journal of Democracy, 20 (2009), pp. 93107Google Scholar . On Rwanda, see Gourevitch, Philip, ‘The Life After’, The New Yorker (4 May 2009), pp. 3649Google Scholar .

4 Williams, Bernard, In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005), pp. 117Google Scholar .

5 By ‘circumstances of justice’ I mean, following Rawls, the existence of different and possibly incompatible beliefs and values in a situation in which collective decisions need to be made. Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 110Google Scholar .

6 Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Arthur Ripstein develops a Kantian argument along these lines in Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009)Google Scholar .

7 Kant, Immanuel, Political Writings, ed. Reiss, Hans, trans. Nisbet, H. B. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), pp. 132135Google Scholar .

8 For further consideration of these themes in the context of international relations, see Nardin, Terry, ‘Justice and Coercion’, in Bellamy, Alex J. (ed.), International Society and its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 247263Google Scholar , and ‘International Political Theory and the Question of Justice’, International Affairs, 82 (2006), pp. 449465CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

9 An exception is Thomas Nagel, who defends what he calls a ‘political conception’ of justice as arising from the fact that because the state imposes obligations on its citizens, those obligations must respond to basic considerations of fairness and equality. Nagel, Thomas, ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33 (2005), p. 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

10 Kant, , Political Writings, p. 100Google Scholar .

11 I defend this understanding of the rule of law in Nardin, Terry, ‘Emergency Logic: Prudence, Morality, and the Rule of Law’, in Ramraj, Victor V. (ed.), Emergencies and the Limits of Legality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 97117CrossRefGoogle Scholar , and ‘Theorizing the International Rule of Law’, Review of International Studies, 34 (2008), pp. 385401Google Scholar .

12 Many theorists who identify themselves as cosmopolitans, such as Charles Beitz and Thomas Pogge, distinguish moral from institutional cosmopolitanism. The former is simply one version or another of moral universalism and entails no commitment to the idea of a world state or any other system of political authority. For a full discussion, see Barry, Brian, ‘International Society from a Cosmopolitan Perspective’, in Mapel, David R. and Nardin, Terry (eds), International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998), pp. 144163Google Scholar .

13 Jackson, Robert, The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar ; Held, David, Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004)Google Scholar ; Archibugi, Daniele, The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

14 Brunkhorst, Hauke, Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community, trans. Flynn, Jeffrey (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005), p. 122Google Scholar .

15 Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar . Though he confines his argument to a potential European federation, Friedrich Hayek makes the interesting argument that confederal government is more suited than a unitary state to protecting individual liberty. See Hayek, F. A. ‘The Economic Conditions of Interstate Federalism’, in Individualism and Economic Order (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1949), pp. 255272Google Scholar .

16 See Jahn, Beate, ‘Kant, Mill, and Illiberal Legacies in International Affairs’, International Organization, 59 (2005), pp. 177207CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Mahbubani, Kishore, ‘The Dangers of Democratic Delusions’, Ethics & International Affairs, 23 (2009), pp, 1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

17 Kukathas, Chandran, ‘The Mirage of Global Justice’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 23 (2006), pp. 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Kukathas is criticising the reform interventionist arguments of Thomas Pogge and Allen Buchanan, among others: Pogge, Thomas, World Poverty and Human Rights (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002)Google Scholar ; and Buchanan, Allen, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar .

18 Habermas, Jürgen, ‘A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society’, in Cronin, Ciaran, trans., Between Naturalism and Religion (Cambridge: Polity, 2008), pp. 312352Google Scholar , and ‘The Constitutionalization of International Law and the Legitimation Problems of a Constitution for World Society’, Constellations, 15 (2008), pp, 444455CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

19 On lex mercatoria as a model for global legal order, see the essays in Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Global Law without a State (Brookfield: Dartmouth Publishing Company, 1997)Google Scholar .

20 Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar .

21 Nardin, Terry, ‘Globalization and the Public Realm’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 12 (2009), pp. 297312CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

22 Teubner, Gunther, ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centred Constitutional Theory?’, in Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inger-Johanne and Teubner, Gunther (eds), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), pp. 328Google Scholar . Teubner repeats an argument made David Mitrany in 1932 and by others after 1945 with respect to European integration. ‘The transfer of functions from the domestic to the international field has been apt to run further and faster than the corresponding change in legal doctrine’. Mitrany, David, ‘The Progress of International Government’, in The Functional Theory of Politics (London: Martin Robertson, 1975), p. 96Google Scholar . The implication is that law can and must catch up.

23 Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’, Modern Law Review, 70 (2007), pp. 130CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

24 Loughlin, Martin, The Idea of Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar .

25 For example, Bellamy, Richard, Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

26 Sunstein, Cass R., A Constitution of Many Minds (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009), pp. 187209Google Scholar .

27 Examples of an emerging literature on global law include Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne, and Ulfstein, Geir, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Trachtman, Joel P. (eds), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; and Cohen, Jean L., Rethinking Legitimacy and Legality in the Epoch of Globalization (Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar .

28 The long-running dispute between ‘pluralists’ and ‘solidarists’ within the English School illustrates this disagreement. For a discussion, see William Bain, ‘The Pluralist-Solidarist Debate in the English School’, in Denemark, Robert A. (ed.), The International Studies Encyclopedia, vol. 9 (Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 56465666Google Scholar .