Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:19:45.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Immutability: Sexuality and Constitutive Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2014

Emily R. Gill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Advocates for the equality and dignity of LGBT persons often suggest that the immutability of sexual orientation is their strongest argument. I believe that it is a weak one. First, the individual freedom that liberalism accords to people, absent harm to others, as necessary for human flourishing applies to sexuality as well as to other areas of existence. Second, the distinction often made between status and conduct is a false one, and the argument from immutability effectively protects neither. Third, I examine the notion of constitutive choice, arguing that the line between immutability and choice is more complex than many realize. Finally, greater attention to the notion of constitutive choice may broaden liberalism's hospitality to conceptions of the good in ways that better respect human moral agency and autonomy.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , Winter 2014 , pp. 93 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Marcosson, Samuel A., “Constructive Immutability,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 3, no. 2 (2001): 673.Google Scholar

2 Adam Liptak, “Looking for Time Bombs and Tea Leaves on Gay Marriage,” New York Times, November 20, 2012.

3 Whisman, Vera, Queer by Choice: Lesbians, Gay Men, and the Politics of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1996)Google Scholar, 3. See also Smith, Charles Anthony, “Gay, Straight, or Questioning? Sexuality and Political Science,” PS: Political Science and Politics 44, no. 1 (2011): 35–38.Google Scholar

4 Stein, Edward, The Mismeasure of Desire: The Science, Theory, and Ethics of Sexual Orientation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar, 101.

5 Ibid., 112.

6 Mill, John Stuart, The Subjection of Women, in On Liberty and Other Writings, ed. Collini, Stefan (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1969), 122–23.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., 129; see also 119.

8 Ibid., 130; see also 127–31 and John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, in On Liberty and Other Writings, 9–10.

9 Mill, On Liberty, 9.

10 Ibid., 11.

11 Ibid., 59; see 56–61.

12 Ibid., 91; see also 10–11.

13 Ibid., 68.

14 Richards, David A. J., Identity and the Case for Gay Rights: Race, Gender, and Religion as Analogies (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999)Google Scholar, 18, 78.

15 Richards, David A. J., The Case for Gay Rights: From “Bowers” to “Lawrence” and Beyond (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2005)Google Scholar, 110; see also 103–4 and Hall, Lauren, “Rights and the Heart: Emotions and Rights Claims in the Political Theory of Edmund Burke,” Review of Politics 73, no. 4 (2011): 609–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Struening, Karen, “Privacy and Sexuality in a Society Divided over Moral Culture,” Political Research Quarterly 49, no. 3 (1996): 509CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see 507–13.

17 Ibid., 512. See also Nussbaum, Martha C., From Disgust to Humanity: Sexual Orientation and Constitutional Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), 57–60Google Scholar, 171–75.

18 Mill, On Liberty, 84; see 82–84, 89–90.

19 Babst, Gordon A., “Consuming Its Own? Heteronormativity contra Human Plurality,” in Moral Argument, Religion, and Same-Sex Marriage: Advancing the Public Good, ed. Babst, Gordon A., Gill, Emily R., and Pierceson, Jason (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2009), 187–90.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., 183–90.

21 Mill, On Liberty, 58, drawing on Wilhelm von Humboldt.

22 Gill, Emily R., Becoming Free: Autonomy and Diversity in the Liberal Polity (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2001)Google Scholar, 2; see also 17–20, 28–30.

23 Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186, 204–5 (1986); see also 205–6.

24 Bamforth, Nicholas and Richards, David A. J., Patriarchal Religion, Sexuality, and Gender: A Critique of the New Natural Law (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 191–200.Google Scholar

25 Boling, Patricia, Privacy and the Politics of Intimate Life (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996)Google Scholar, 146; see 146–48, 56–59.

26 Ibid., 103. See 85–90, 101–3.

27 Bamforth and Richards, Patriarchal Religion, Sexuality, and Gender, 211; see 200–211.

28 Carlos Ball, “Against Neutrality in the Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships,” in Moral Argument, Religion, and Same-Sex Marriage, 76; see also 84–86; Ball, Carlos, The Morality of Gay Rights: An Exploration in Political Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 2003), 91–99Google Scholar; and Chai R. Feldblum, “The Moral Values Project: Call to Moral Action in Politics,” in Moral Argument, Religion, and Same-Sex Marriage, 205–14.

29 Sandel, Michael J., Democracy's Discontents: America in Search of a Public Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996)Google Scholar, 93.

30 Ibid., 104.

31 Ibid., 107.

32 Feldblum, “Moral Values Project,” 205–11; see also Feldblum, Chai R., “Moral Conflict and Conflicting Liberties,” in Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty: Emerging Conflicts, ed. Laycock, Douglas, Picarello, Anthony R. Jr., and Wilson, Robin Fretwell (Lanham, MD: Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and Rowman & Littlefield, 2008)Google Scholar, 131.

33 Lund, William R., “Communitarian Politics and the Problem of Equality,” Political Research Quarterly 46, no. 3 (1993): 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Honig, Bonnie, Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics (New York: Cornell University Press, 1993), 186–95Google Scholar. See also Babst, Gordon A., “Community, Rights Talk, and the Communitarian Dissent in Bowers v. Hardwick,” in Playing with Fire: Queer Politics, Queer Theories, ed. Phelan, Shane (New York: Routledge, 1997), 147–57Google Scholar.

35 Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 571 (2003), quoting from Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 850 (1992).

36 Bamforth and Richards, Patriarchal Religion, Sexuality, and Gender, 212; see 211–27.

37 Ball, Morality of Gay Rights, 106; see 105–12.

38 Stein, Mismeasure of Desire, 273; see 265–74.

39 Ibid., 288–89; see also 295, 347.

40 Ibid., 290; see also 286–91.

41 Ibid., 291–93.

42 Ibid., 316; see 305–17.

43 Ibid., 326; see 322–27 and Whisman, Queer by Choice, 16–17.

44 Stein, Mismeasure of Desire, 347; see 328–48 and Whisman, Queer by Choice, 103.

45 Whisman, Queer by Choice, 42.

46 Ibid., 44.

47 Ibid., 41–48, 51–52, 65.

48 Ibid., 23.

49 Ibid., 122.

50 Ibid., 6; see also 23–25.

51 Ibid., 6.

52 Ibid., 28, 34–35, 25–30, 91, 110, 114–17.

53 Marcosson, “Constructive Immutability,” 650; see 650–51.

54 Ibid., 681; see also 655–57, 683–86.

55 Ibid., 689; see 689–91.

56 Ibid., 711; see 710–12.

57 Frank, Nathaniel, Unfriendly Fire: How the Gay Ban Undermines the Military and Weakens America (New York: Thomas Dunne Books of St. Martin's Press, 2008)Google Scholar, 83. See also 110 and Gerstmann, Evan, The Constitutional Underclass: Gays, Lesbians, and the Failure of Class-Based Equal Protection (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), 73–74.Google Scholar

58 Frank, Unfriendly Fire, 84.

59 Ibid., 110.

60 Ibid., 174–76.

61 Ibid., 177.

62 Ibid., 292.

63 Ibid., 178. See also xvii–xviii and Warnke, Georgia, After Identity: Rethinking Race, Sex, and Gender (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 214–16.Google Scholar

64 Frank, Unfriendly Fire, 36.

65 Ibid., 21.

66 Erik Eckholm, “Even on Religious Campuses Students Fight for Gay Identity,” New York Times, April 19, 2011.

67 David Bakke, “Lesbian Loses Job after Wedding Notice,” Peoria Journal-Star, November 12, 2010.

68 Yoshino, Kenji, Covering: The Hidden Assault on Our Civil Rights (New York: Random House, 2007)Google Scholar, 19. See also 17–19, 76–79, 22, 24–25, 131–32,176–82, and Jakobsen, Janet R. and Pellegrini, Ann, Love the Sin: Sexual Regulation and the Limits of Religious Tolerance (Boston: Beacon, 2004), 91–100Google Scholar, 128.

69 Yoshino, Covering, 70.

70 Ibid., 48. See also 46–49; Whisman, Queer by Choice, 30; and March, Andrew F., “Speech and the Sacred: Does the Defense of Free Speech Rest on a Mistake about Religion?,” Political Theory 40, no. 3 (2012): 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

71 Marcosson, “Constructive Immutability,” 711.

72 Jakobsen and Pellegrini, Love the Sin, 13; see also 21–22, 47, 97–100, 104, 109–10.

73 Ibid., 28. See also Marcosson, “Constructive Immutability,” 673–75.

74 Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993).

75 Brettschneider, Corey, “A Transformative Theory of Religious Freedom: Promoting the Reasons for Rights,” Political Theory 38, no. 2 (2010): 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

76 Murphy, Andrew R., Conscience and Community: Revisiting Toleration and Religious Dissent in Early Modern England (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001), 281–82.Google Scholar

77 Ibid., 242; see also 240, 287.

78 Ibid., 228; see also 112.

79 Ibid., 229; see also 254.

80 Ibid., 279.

81 Ibid., 281.

82 Ibid., 229.

83 Ibid., 279.

84 Gerstmann, Constitutional Underclass, 76–80.

85 Sandel, Michael, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 2nd ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 58; see 57–58.

86 Ibid., 172.

87 Ibid., 153.

88 Tamir, Yael, Liberal Nationalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), 39–40Google Scholar; see 35–42.

89 Ibid., 41.

90 Ibid., 37; see also 7–8, 41–42, and Gleason, Philip, “Americans All: World War II and the Shaping of American Identity,” Review of Politics 43, no. 4 (1981): 483–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

91 Richards, Identity and the Case for Gay Rights, 93; see 87, 91–97.

92 Goldman v. Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503 (1986).

93 Tamir, Liberal Nationalism, 39.

94 March, “Speech and the Sacred,” 335; see 333–36.

95 Bartlett, John, Familiar Quotations (Boston: Little, Brown, 1980), 155.Google Scholar

96 Galston, William A., Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 96–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

97 Ibid., 93.

98 Neal, Patrick, Liberalism and Its Discontents (New York: New York University Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 28; see also 34–47.

99 Koppelman, Andrew, “Sexual and Religious Pluralism,” in Sexual Orientation and Human Rights in American Religious Discourse, ed. Olyan, Saul M. and Nussbaum, Martha C. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 223–24.Google Scholar

100 Ibid., 225–26.

101 Ball, Morality of Gay Rights, 84; see also 89–94.

102 Ibid., 98; see 98–99.

103 Ibid., 101; see also 104, 106.