Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:19:30.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Burke on Political Economy: The Nature and Extent of State Authority

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

James Conniff
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The interpretation of Edmund Burke as a laissez-faire economist has a long pedigree but is inaccurate. Rather, Burke is best seen as a moderate Whig who believed that governmental social and economic policy should be based on pragmatic and prudential considerations. However, utilitarian rule-making makes most sense when the rules can be formulated in terms of realizing some more abstract goal. This goal Burke obtained from his reading of the Scotch moral sense writers, who convinced him that man has an innate moral nature which can be improved through association with other men in society. Consideration of Burke's writings on a variety of specific economic and social issues, ranging from poor relief and economic reform to the slave trade, confirms this instrumental interpretation of Burke's economic thought.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , Fall 1987 , pp. 490 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Cobban, Alfred, Edmund Burke and the Revolt Against the Eighteenth Century (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1960)Google Scholar, for example, was able to interpret Burke as a precursor of the Romantics without noting their extensive disagreement on practical political issues and social policy.

2 Namier, Lewis, The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III (New York: Macmillian and Company, 1928).Google Scholar

3 A good example is Pares, Richard, King George III and the Politicians (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970)Google Scholar, who believes that foreign policy offered some exception to Namier's general rules.

4 On Burke as a laissez-faire economist, see Barrington, Donald Patrick Michael, “Edmund Burke as an Economist,” Economica, New Series, 21 (1954): 252–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Petrella, Frank Jr., “Edmund Burke: A Liberal Practioner of Political Economy,” Modern Age 8 (1963–1964): 52–60Google Scholar. The Burke-Smith relationship is reviewed in Dunnes, W. L., “Adam Smith and Burke: Complementary Contemporaries,” Southern Economic Journal 7 (1941): 330–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Fay, C. R., The World of Adam Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950), chap. 1Google Scholar. The case for Adam Smith as a laissez-faire thinker is presented in Viner, Jacob, “Adam Smith and Laissez-Faire,” The Long View and the Short: Studies in Economic Theory and Policy (Glencoe, Illinois, 1958)Google Scholar; Skinner, Andrew, Adam Smith and the Role of the State (Glasgow, 1974)Google Scholar; Hayek, Fredrich, Individualism and Economic Order (London, 1948)Google Scholar; and Cropsey, Joseph, Political Economy: An Interpretation of the Principles of Adam Smith (The Hague, 1957).Google Scholar

5 Stanlis, Peter J., Edmund Burke and the Natural Law (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1958).Google Scholar

6 Gandy, Clara I. and Stanlis, Peter J., Edmund Burke A Bibliography of Secondary Studies to 1982 (New York: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1983), p. 213.Google Scholar

7 Himmelfarb, Gertrude, The Idea of Poverty (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984), pp. 66–73.Google Scholar

8 Ibid., p. 43.

9 Ibid., p. 66 ff.

10 Macpherson, C. B., Burke (New York: Hill and Wang, 1980).Google Scholar

11 Ibid., p. 50.

12 See especially Kramnick, Isaac, “The Left and Edmund Burke,” Political Theory 11 (05 1983): 189–214Google Scholar. Oddly, Kramnick stresses Woodrow Wilson's praise of Burke: “for Wilson, Burke was the embodiment of racial wisdom, the instinctive common sense and practical soul of the Anglo-Saxon” (p. 197). Burke was, of course, not Anglo-Saxon. See also Kramnick, 's The Rage of Edmund Burke (New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1977), passim.Google Scholar

13 Pocock, J. G. A., “Burke's Analysis of the French Revolution,” in Virtue, Commerce, and History (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Burke, Edmund, The Correspondence of Edmund Burke (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958–1978), vol. 2Google Scholar, to Smith, Adam, 10/09/1759, pp. 129–130.Google Scholar

15 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Smith, Adam, 7/12/1786, 5:296.Google Scholar

16 Burke, Edmund, “Letter to a Noble Lord,” The Works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke (Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1889 – ), 5:174 ff.Google Scholar

17 Ibid., p. 189.

18 Winch, Donald, Adam Smith's Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978), pp. 46 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also see Campbell, T. D., Adam Smith's Science of Morals (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1971), p. 205 ff.Google Scholar

19 See, for example, Bryson, Gladys, Man and Society: the Scottish Inquiry of the 18th Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1945).Google Scholar

20 Hutcheson, Francis, “A Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy,” Collected Works of Francis Hutcheson (Hildesheim: George Olms, 1969), vol. 4.Google Scholar

21 Ibid., p. 4.

22 Ibid., pp. 16–17.

23 Ibid., p. 36 ff. See especially, p. 56

24 Campbell, , Adam Smith's Science of Morals, p. 232.Google Scholar

25 Quoted in Burke, , Correspondence, 1:129.26.Google Scholar

26 Burke, Edmund, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1958), p. 13.Google Scholar

27 Ibid., p. 23.

28 Burke, Edmund, “Appeal From the New to the Old Whigs,” Works, 6:57–215Google Scholar; 166. See pp. 164–69.

29 Campbell, , Adam Smith's Science of Morals, p. 205.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., p. 213.

31 Burke, Edmund, “An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs,” p. 81.Google Scholar

32 Burke, , Reflections On the Revolution in France (Bobbs-Merrill), pp. 194–95.Google Scholar

33 Campbell, , Adam Smith's Science of Morals, p. 214.Google Scholar

34 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to O'Hara, Charles, 26/07/1775, 3:182.Google Scholar

35 Winch, , Adam Smith's Politics, p. 172.Google Scholar

36 Smith, Adam, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (New York: Random House, Inc., 1937), p. 653 ff.Google Scholar

37 Ibid., p. 716 ff.

38 Ibid., p. 769 ff.

39 Ibid., p. 859 ff.

40 Ibid., p. 308.

41 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Charles-Jean-Francois Depont, Nov./1789, 6: 46.

42 Burke, Edmund, “Thoughts and Details on Scarcity,” Works, 5:131–69.Google Scholar

43 Macpherson, , Burke, p. 52 ff.Google Scholar

44 Ibid., p. 53.

45 Burke, , “Thoughts and Details on Scarcity,” especially pp. 134–37 and 141–42.Google Scholar

46 Ibid., p. 165.

47 Ibid., p. 135–36.

48 Ibid., p. 134.

49 Ibid., p. 137.

50 Ibid., p. 157.

51 Ibid., p. 142.

52 Ibid., p. 135.

53 Ibid., p. 146.

54 Ibid.

55 Ibid., p. 154.1

56 Ibid., p. 166.

57 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Windham, William, 9/06/1795, 8:265.Google Scholar

58 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Windham, William, 17/11/1795, 8:341 ff.Google Scholar; and to Dundas, Henry, 6/12/1795, 8:353ff.Google Scholar

59 Burke, , “Thoughts and Details on Scarcity,” p. 164.Google Scholar

60 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Woodford, Captain Emperor John Alexander, 9/12/1796, 9:155.Google Scholar

61 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Ridge, John, 23/04/1763, 3:169.Google Scholar

62 Burke, Edmund, “Speech to the Electors at Bristol,” Works, 2:385.Google Scholar

63 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to O'Hara, Charles, 26/07/1775, 3:181–82.Google Scholar

64 Townsend, Joseph, A Dissertation on the Poor Laws (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1971), p. 19 ff.Google Scholar

65 Smith, , Wealth of Nations, p. 413.Google Scholar

66 Townsend, , Dissertation on Poor Laws, p. 24.Google Scholar

67 Ibid., p. 27.

68 Ibid., p. 40.

69 Smith, , Wealth of Nations, p. 79.Google Scholar

70 Ibid., p. 66 and p. 87 ff.

71 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Pitt, William, 7/11/1795, 8:337.Google Scholar

72 Ibid., p. 337.

73 Kramnick, , Rage of Edmund Burke, p. 161.Google Scholar

74 Ibid., p. 161.

75 Macpherson, , Burke, p. 29.Google Scholar

76 Burke, Edmund, “Speech on Presenting to the House of Commons a Plan for the Better Security of the Independence of Parliament, and the Economic Reformation of the Civil and Other Establishments,” Works, 2:265–364.Google Scholar

77 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Harford, Joseph, 4/04/1780, 4:219–20.Google Scholar

78 Burke, , “Letter to a Noble Lord,” p. 195.Google Scholar

79 Ibid., p. 195.

80 Burke, , “Economic Reformation,” pp. 286–87.Google Scholar If one examines Burke's seven rules of procedure, one finds extensive discussion of the importance of order and system and very little of cost-cutting.

81 Ibid., p. 334.

82 Ibid., p. 335.

83 Ibid., p. 291.

84 Ibid., p. 298.

85 Ibid., p. 310.

86 Ibid., p. 311.

87 Ibid., p. 351.

88 Ibid., p. 310–11. Macpherson's comment is at Burke, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar

89 Burke, , “Economic Reformation,” p. 311.Google Scholar

90 For the significance of the American Indians in eighteenth-century sociology, see Meek, Ronald L., Social Science and the Ignoble Savage (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1976), pp. 37 ff.Google Scholar

91 Burke, Edmund, An Account of the English Settlements in America, 2 Vol. (New York: Research Reprints, Inc., 1970), 1:167–68.Google Scholar

92 Ibid., p. 31. See also, p. 257.

93 Burke, , Account, 2:128.Google Scholar

94 Ibid., pp. 128–29.

95 Ibid., pp. 130–31.

96 Ibid., p. 131.

97 Burke, Edmund, “Sketch of a Negro Code,” Works, 6:262–89.Google Scholar

98 Ibid., p. 262.

99 Ibid., p. 263 ff.

100 Ibid., p. 265 ff.

101 Ibid., p. 273 ff.

102 Ibid., p. 275 ff.

103 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Dundas, Henry, 9/04/1792, 7:122.Google Scholar

104 Ibid., p. 123.

105 Ibid., p. 124.

106 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Windham, William, 28/03/1796, 8:451.Google Scholar

107 See the editorial note following the letter to Dundas, , Correspondence, 7:125.Google Scholar

108 Ibid.

109 Burke's evaluation of the Navigation Acts may be found at “Speech on American Taxation,” Works, 6:31 ff.Google Scholar A more critical view is in “Observations on a Late Publication Entitled “The Present State of the Nation,” Works, 1:269–432; 394 ff.Google Scholar

110 For an application of the natural law thesis to Burke's view of Civil liberties, see Wilkins, Burleigh T., The Problem of Burke's Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967), esp. pp. 42 ff.Google Scholar

111 Burke, Edmund, “Fragments of a Tract Relative to the Laws Against Popery in Ireland,” Works, 6:299–360.Google Scholar

112 For Anglophone conservative, see Preece, Rod, “The Political Economy of Edmund Burke,” Modern Age 24 (1980): 266–73.Google Scholar

113 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Robertson, William, 9 or 10/06/1777, 3:350–52.Google Scholar The work in question was Robertson, 's History of AmericaGoogle Scholar.

114 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Dupont, Adrien-Jean-Francois, Post 29/03/1790, 6:108.Google Scholar

115 Burke, , CorrespondenceGoogle Scholar, to Markham, William, 9/11/1771, 2:282.Google Scholar