Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:59:05.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sociological Concepts and the International Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Extract

The vague conceptualization of basic social phenomena seriously obstructs a clear understanding of many of the causes underlying national and international tensions. Significant contributions to the solution of these problems can hardly be expected as long as social scientists continue to operate with common-sense notions and the idols of the market place whose connotations are ever shifting with the changing intellectual fashions and political aspirations. Frequently these public concepts themselves are potent tools with which special interest and power groups may create and perpetuate conflict situations. Among the most fundamental, and at the same time potentially most dangerous, ideas are those of the nation, the people, and the ethnic group. In the following essay an attempt is made to formulate scientifically more adequate concepts within the frame of reference of sociological theory in the hope that social scientists in various fields might find them useful in their analysis of the highly complex social systems characteristic of modern times, and in the solution of certain practical problems affecting the national and international order.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. the bulletins of the Social Science Research Council by Williams, Robin M. Jr., The Reduction of Intergroup Tensions: A Survey of Research on Problems of Ethnic, Racial and Religious Group Relations (New York, 1947)Google Scholar, and Klineberg, Otto, Tensions Affecting International Understanding: A Survey of Research (New York, 1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 The Ides of Nationalism (New York, 1944).Google Scholar

3 See also Francis, E. K., “Minority Groups–A Revision of Concepts,” British Journal of Sociology II (1951): 219230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Cf. Davis, Kingsley, Human Society (New York, 1949), p. 489.Google Scholar

5 Cf. Kohn, Hans, op. cit.Google Scholar, and Carr, E. H., Nationalism and After, (London, 1945).Google Scholar

6 United Nations: Commission of Human Rights: Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, Definition and Classification of Minorities: Memorandum submitted by the Secretary-General (Lake Success, 1950), sections 75–79.Google Scholar