Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:13:14.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synthesis of a minimum-time manipulator trajectories with geometric path constraints using time scaling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

H. Ozaki  and
A. Mohri
H. Ozaki
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering Production Division, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, 6–10–1 Hakozaki Higashiku, Fukuoka (Japan)
A. Mohri
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering Production Division, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, 6–10–1 Hakozaki Higashiku, Fukuoka (Japan)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The minimum-time and subminimum-time joint trajectories of manipulators with geometric path constraints are planned in consideration of physical constraints based on kinematics and dynamics. The idea of time scaling is introduced, i.e. a time scale factor k(t) and a set of joint trajectories, called reference trajectories, are used to describe all the sets of trajectories tracing the specified geometric path. The desirable factor k(t) which makes the travelling time as short as possible is obtained by two proposed methods: the first one is an iteratively improving method using B spline, and the second one is a directly minimizing method. These two methods are preferably applied to a geometric collision-free path of a manipulator.

Keywords

Time scalingMinimum timeTrajectoriesGeometric pathConstraintsManipulator
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 41 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Liégeois, A., “Automatic supervisory control of the configuration and behavior of multibody mechanisms” IEEE Trans. SMC 7, No. 12, 868–871 (1977).Google Scholar
2.Luh, J.Y.S. and Lin, C.S., “Approximate joint trajectories for control of industrial robots along cartesian paths” IEEE Trans. SMC 14, No. 3, 444–450 (1984).Google Scholar
3.Dubowsky, S. and Shiller, Z., “Optimum dynamic trajectories for robotic manipulators” Procs. of RoManSy, 5th CISM-IFToMM Symp. 133–143 (1984).Google Scholar
4.Shin, K.G. and McKay, N.D., “Minimum-time control of robotic manipulators with geometric path constraints” IEEE Trans. AC 30, No. 6, 531–541 (1985).Google Scholar
5.Rogers, D.F. and Adams, J.A., Mathematical Elements for Computer Graphics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
6.Ozaki, H., Mohri, A. and Takata, M., “Planning of collision free movement of a manipulator considering its body space” Trans. Soc. Instrum. Control Engrs. 18, No. 9, 942–949 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ozaki, H., Mohri, A. and Takata, M., “On the collision free movement of manipulator” Advanced Software in Robotics, North-Holland, 189–200 (1984).Google Scholar
8.Lin, C.S., Chang, P.R. and Luh, J.Y.S., “Formulation and optimization of cubic polynomial joint trajectories for industrial robots” IEEE Trans. AC 28, No. 12, 1066–1074 (1983).Google Scholar