¹ Hobbes, T., Leviathan (London: Dent, 1914).Google Scholar

² Locke, J., An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Nidditch, P. H. (ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).Google Scholar

³ Locke, , op. cit. III, ii, i.Google Scholar

⁴ Pohlenz, M., Die Stoa (Gottinghen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1959)Google Scholar; Long, A. A., Problems in Stoicism (London: Athlone, 1971).Google Scholar

⁵ Descartes, R., The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, tr. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D. (Cambridge University Press, 1985), 343.Google Scholar

⁶ Descartes, , op. cit. 205.Google Scholar

⁷ Plato, , The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H. (eds) (New York: Pantheon, 1961).Google Scholar

⁸ Ibid.

⁹ Chisholm, R. M., ‘Human Freedom and the Self’, in Watson, G. (ed.) Free Will (Oxford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar; Davidson, D., ‘Agency’, in D. Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980)Google Scholar; Kolnai, A., ‘Agency and Freedom’, in Vesey, G. (ed.), The Human Agent, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures, Vol. 1, 1966/7 (London: Macmillan), 20–46 Google Scholar; Taylor, R., Action and Purpose (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966)Google Scholar; Thalberg, I., ‘Do We Cause Our Own Actions?, Analysis 27 (1967), 196–201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Yolton, J., ‘Agent Causality’, American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1966), 14–26.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Aristotle, , The Basic Works of Aristotle Google Scholar, edited and with an introduction by R. McKeon (New York: Random House, 1941).

¹¹ Danto, A., ‘What We Can Do’, Journal of Philosophy 60 (1963), 435–445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Basic Actions’, American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1965), 141–148 Google Scholar; Brand, M., ‘Danto on Basic Actions’, Nous (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stoutland, F., ‘Basic Actions and Causality’, Journal of Philosophy 65 (1968), 467–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹² James, W., The Principles of Psychology (London: Macmillan, 1891).Google Scholar

¹³ Descartes, , op. cit. II, 113–114.Google Scholar

¹⁴ James, , op. cit. II, 560.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Descartes, , op. cit. I, 315, 341, 343–345.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Descartes, , op. cit. I, 206.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Ibid.

¹⁸ Kenny, A. (tr. and ed.), Descartes: Philosophical Letters (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970), 94.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Descartes, , op. cit. II, 39.Google Scholar

²⁰ Hume, D., ‘An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding’, in Hume's Enquiries, Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.), with revisions by P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), 82.Google Scholar

²¹ Hartley, D., Observations on Man, His Frame, His Duty and His Expectations (Hildesheim: Ohms, 1967).Google Scholar

²² Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd edn, Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.), revised by P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), I, i, 4.Google Scholar

²³ Hartley, D., op. cit.Google Scholar

²⁴ Mill, J. S., A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive, Robson, (ed.), in Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974), VI, ii, 1.Google Scholar

²⁵ Ibid. VI, ii, 2.

²⁶ Ibid. VI, ii, 3.

²⁷ Tucker, A., The Light of Nature Pursued (London: Thomas Tegg, 1837), I, 39–40.Google Scholar

²⁸ Huxley, T. H., ‘On the Hypothesis that Animals are Automata, and its History’, in Huxley, T. H., Collected Essays, Vol. I, Methods and Results (London: Macmillan, 1912), 240, 243–244.Google Scholar