Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T00:09:31.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How I Know I'm Not a Brain in a Vat*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2009

José L. Zalabardo
José L. Zalabardo
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 64 , July 2009 , pp. 65 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, Tim. (2002) “A Moorean Response to Brain-In-A-Vat Scepticism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80, 148–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brueckner, Anthony. (1994) “The Structure of the Skeptical Argument.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, 827–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, Keith. (1995) “Solving the Skeptical Problem.” Philosophical Review 104, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, Keith (1999) “Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense.” In The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, (eds.) Sosa, Ernest and Greco, John, 187–205. Malden, Massachusetts and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
DeRose, Keith (2004) “Sosa, Safety, Sensitivity, and Skeptical Hypotheses.” In Ernest Sosa and His Critics, (ed.) Greco, John, 22–41. Malden, Massachusetts and Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René. (1984) “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Volume II, (eds.) Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert and Murdoch, Dugald, 1–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred. (1970) “Epistemic Operators.” Journal of Philosophy 67, 1007–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. (1981) Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, Duncan. (2005) Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, James. (2000) “The Skeptic and the Dogmatist.” Noûs 34, 517–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. (1981) Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. (1999) “How to Defeat Opposition to Moore.” In Philosophical Perspectives, 13, Epistemology, (ed.) Tomberlin, James E., 141–53. Malden, Massachusetts and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williamson, Tim. (2000) Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zalabardo, José L. (2005) “Externalism, Skepticism and the Problem of Easy Knowledge.” Philosophical Review 114, 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalabardo, José L (forthcoming) “Wright on Moore.” In Wittgenstein, Epistemology and Mind. Themes from the Philosophy of Crispin Wright, (ed.) Coliva, Annalisa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar