Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T18:15:57.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III. Basic Emotions, Complex Emotions, Machiavellian Emotions1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Paul E. Griffiths
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

According to the distinguished philosopher Richard Wollheim, an emotion is an extended mental episode that originates when events in the world frustrate or satisfy a pre-existing desire (Wollheim, 1999). This leads the subject to form an attitude to the world which colours their future experience, leading them to attend to one aspect of things rather than another, and to view the things they attend to in one light rather than another. The idea that emotions arise from the satisfaction or frustration of desires—the ‘match-mismatch’ view of emotion aetiology—has had several earlier incarnations in the psychology of emotion. Early versions of this proposal were associated with the attempt to replace the typology of emotion found in ordinary language with a simpler theory of drives and to define new emotion types in terms of general properties such as the frustration of a drive. The match-mismatch view survived the demise of that revisionist project and is found today in theories that accept a folk-psychological-style taxonomy of emotion types based on the meaning ascribed by the subject to the stimulus situation. For example, the match-mismatch view forms part of the subtle and complex model of emotion episodes developed over many years by Nico Frijda (Frijda, 1986). According to Frijda, information about the ‘situational antecedents’ of an emotion—the stimulus in its context, including the ongoing goals of the organism—is evaluated for its relevance to the multiple concerns of the organism. Evaluation of match-mismatch—the degree of compatibility between the situation and the subject's goals—forms part of this process.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 52 , March 2003 , pp. 39 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N. and Mullett, J. 1990. ‘Truth, lies and equivocations: The effects of conflicting goals on discourse’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 135–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. 2000. The Dangerous Passion: Why Jealousy is as Essential as Love and Sex (New York: Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W. and Whiten, A. E. 1988. Machiavellian Intelligence (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Charland, L. C. 1995. ‘Emotion as a natural kind: towards a computational foundation for emotion theory’, Philosophical Psychology, 8(1), 59–84.Google Scholar
Charland, L. C. 1997. ‘Reconciling Cognitive and Perceptual Theories of Emotion: A Representational Proposal’, Philosophy of Science, 64(4), 555–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. 1973. ‘Facial expression of emotion in nonhuman primates’, In Ekman, P. (ed.), Darwin and Facial Expression: A Century of Research in Review (pp. 11–89). (New York and London: Academic Press).Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. 2000. ‘Evolutionary Psychology and the Emotions’, In Lewis, M. and Haviland-Jones, J. M. (eds), Handbook of the Emotions (2 edn, pp. 91–115). (New York and London: Guildford Press).Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. 1994. Descartes Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain (New York: Grosset/Putnam).Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness (New York: Harcourt Brace).Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1872. The Expressions of Emotions in Man & Animals (1 st edn). (New York: Philosophical Library).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deigh, J. 1994. ‘Cognitivism in the theory of emotions’, Ethics, 104, 824–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information (Oxford: Blackwells).Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1988. Explaining Behaviour (Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT).Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1973. ‘Expressive behaviour of the deaf & blind born’, In von Cranach, M. and Vine, I. (eds), Social Communication & Movement (pp. 163–194). (London & New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
Ekman, P. 1971. ‘Universals and Cultural Differences in Facial Expressions of Emotion’, In Cole, J. K. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 4. (pp. 207–283). (Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press).Google Scholar
Ekman, P. 1972. Emotions in the Human Face (New York: Pergamon Press).Google Scholar
Ekman, P. 1980. ‘Biological & cultural contributions to body & facial movement in the expression of emotions’, In Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Explaining Emotions (pp. 73–102). (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Ekman, P. 1999. ‘Basic Emotions’, In Dalgleish, T. and Power, M. (eds), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (pp. 45–60). (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Co.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, N. J. and Amaral, D. G. 2000. ‘The role of the amygdala in primate social cognition’, In Lane, R. and Nadel, L. (eds), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion (pp. 156–91). (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Esteves, F. and Öhman, A. 1993. ‘Masking the face: recognition of emotional facial expression as a function of the parameters of backward masking’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 34(1–18).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández-Dols, J. M. and Ruiz-Belda, M.-A. 1997. ‘Spontaneous facial behaviour during intense emotional episodes: Artistic truth and optical truth’, In Russell, J. A. and Fernández-Dols, J. M. (eds), The Psychology of Facial Expression (pp. 255–294). (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R. H. 1988. Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
Fridlund, A. 1994. Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View (San Diego: Academic Press).Google Scholar
Fridlund, A. J. 1989. Evolution and facial action in reflex, social motive, and paralanguage (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Fridlund, A. J., Schaut, J. A., Sabini, J. P., Shenker, J. I., Hedlund, L. E. and Knauer, M. J. 1990. ‘Audience effects on solitary faces during imagery: displaying to the people in your head’, Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 14(2), 113–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frijda, N. H. 1986. The Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gaulin, S. J. C. and McBurney, D. H. 2001. Psychology: An Evolutionary Approach (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
Greenspan, P. 1988. Emotions and Reasons: An Inquiry into Emotional Justification (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Greenspan, P. S. 1995. Practical Guilt: Moral Dilemmas, Emotions, and Social Norms (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 1989. ‘The Degeneration of the Cognitive Theory of Emotion’, Philosophical Psychology, 2 (3), 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 1990. ‘Modularity & the Psychoevolutionary Theory of Emotion’, Biology & Philosophy, 5, 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 1997. What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 2001. ‘Emotion and Expression’, International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (Pergamon/Elsevier Science).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, C. M. (ed.), 1986. From Learning to Love: The Selected Papers of H. F. Harlow (New York: Praeger).Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. 1956. ‘Ethological Models and the Concept of “Drive”’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 6, 321–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. 1985a. ‘Expression and Negotiation’, In zivin, G. (ed.), The Development of Expressive Behaviour (pp. 103–16). (New York: Academic Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. 1985b. ‘Was “The Expression of Emotions” a misleading phrase?’, Animal Behaviour, 33, 985–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izard, C. E. 1992. ‘Basic emotions, relations amongst emotions and emotion-cognition relations’, Psychological Review, 99 (3), 561–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, V. S. 1999. Why We Feel: The New Science of Human Emotions.Google Scholar
Konner, M. 1982. The Tangled Wing: Biological Constraints on the Human Spirit (London: William Heinemann Ltd).Google Scholar
Lazaru, R. S. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. 1999. The cognition-emotion debate: a bit of history. In Dalgleish, T. and Power, M. J. (eds), Handbook of Emotion and Cognition (pp. 3–19). Chichester, New York: John Wiley and sons.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S., Coyne, J. C. & Folkman, S. 1984. Cognition, emotion & motivation: doctoring Humpty Dumpty. In Scherer, K. and Ekman, P. (eds), Approaches to Emotions (pp. 221–237). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum,Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. 1996. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life (New York: Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E. 1993. ‘Emotional networks in the brain’, In Lewis, M. and Haviland, J. M. (eds), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 109–118). (New York: Guildford Press).Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. (1996). The Natural Science of the Human Species: An Introduction to Comparative Behavioural Research. The Russian Manuscript (1944–1948) (Martin, R. D., trans.). (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Mandler, G. 1984. Mind and Body: The Psychology of Emotion and Stress (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
Mason, W. A. 1985. ‘Experiential influences on the development of expressive behaviours in Rhesus monkeys’, In Zivin, G. (ed.), The Development of Expressive Behaviour (pp. 117–152). (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
Mele, A. R. 2001. Self-Deception Unmasked (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, Thought & Other Biological Categories (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öhman, A. 1986. ‘Face the beast and fear the face: animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analyses of emotion’, Psychophysiology, 23, 123–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Öhman, A. 1999. ‘Distinguishing Unconscious from Conscious Emotional Processes: Methodological Considerations and Theoretical Implications’, In Dalgleish, T. and Power, M. J. (eds), Handbook of Emotion and Cognition (pp. 321–52). (Chichester: John Wiley and sons).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öhman, A. 2002. ‘Automaticity and the amygdala: Nonconscious responses to emotional faces’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(2), 62–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öhman, A. and Soares, J. J. F. 1994 Unconscious anxiety: phobicresponses to masked stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 121–32.Google Scholar
Parkinson, B. 1995.Ideas and Realities of Emotion (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Prinz, J. (Forthcoming).Emotional Perception (Oxford:Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Rozin, P. 1976. ‘The evolution of intelligence & access to the cognitive unconscious’, In Sprague, J. M. and Epstein, A. N.(eds), Progress in Psychobiology & Physiological Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 245–81. (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
Salovey, P., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B. and Mayer, J. D. 2000. ‘Current Directions in Emotional Intelligence Research’, In Lewis, M. and Haviland-Jones, J. M. (eds), Handbook of Emotions (2 ed., pp. 514–520). (New York: Guildford Press).Google Scholar
Sartre, J. P. 1962. Sketch for a Theory of the Emotions (Mairet, P., Trans.). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. 1999. ‘Appraisal Theory’, In Dalgleish, T. and Power, M. J. (eds), Handbook of Emotion and Cognition (pp. 637–63). (Chichester: New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, R. C. 1993. ‘The philosophy of emotions’, In Lewis, M. and Haviland, J. M. (eds), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 3–15). (New York: Guildford).Google Scholar
Stein, N. L., Trabasso, T. and Liwag, M. (1993). ‘The representation and organization of emotional experience: unfolding the emotion episode’, In Lewis, M. and Haviland, J. M. (eds), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 279–300). (New York: Guildford Press).Google Scholar
Stich, S. 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science (Cambridge, U.K.: M.I.T. Press).Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. D. 1999. ‘Multi-level Theories of Cognition-Emotion Relations’, In Dalgleish, T. and Power, M. J. (eds), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (pp. 665–81). (Chichester: John Wiley and sons).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, N. 195). ‘Derived activities: their causation, biological significance, origin and emancipation during evolution’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 27 (1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A. and Byrne, R. W. (eds), 1997. Machiavellian Intelligence II: Extensions and Evaluations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, R. 1999. On the Emotions (Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. 1980. ‘Feeling & thinking: preferences need no inference’, American Psychologist, 35, 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. 1984a. ‘On the primacy of affect’, In Scherer, K. & Ekman, P. (eds), Approaches to Emotion (pp. 259–70). (Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc).Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. 1984b. ‘The interaction of affect and cognition’, In Scherer, K. & Ekman, P. (eds), Approaches to Emotions (pp. 239–46). (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).Google Scholar