Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T20:22:47.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irregular Migration, Historical Injustice and the Right to Exclude

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2022

Lea Ypi
Lea Ypi*
Affiliation:
LSE
*
l.l.ypi@lse.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper makes the case for amnesty of irregular migrants by reflecting on the conditions under which a wrong that is done in the past can be considered superseded. It explores the relation between historical injustice and irregular migration and suggests that we should hold states to the same stringent standards of compliance with just norms that they apply to the assessment of the moral conduct of individual migrants. It concludes that those standards ought to orient migrants and citizens’ moral assessment of how their states handle questions of irregular migration and to inform political initiatives compatible with these moral assessments.

Type
Paper
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 91: A Philosophers' Manifesto: Ideas and Arguments to Change the World , May 2022 , pp. 169 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anaya, S. James, Indigenous Peoples in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan (ed.) Empire, Race and Global Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).10.1017/9781108576307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosniak, Linda, ‘Wrongs, Rights and Regularization’, Moral Philosophy and Politics, 3, (2016) 187–222.10.1515/mopp-2016-0036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, Joseph, ‘The case for amnesty’, Boston Review, (2009).Google Scholar
Keal, Paul, European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Moral Backwardness of International Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).10.1017/CBO9780511491467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezzadra, Sandro and Neilson, Brett, Border as Method or the Multiplication of Labor (Duke University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Miller, David, Strangers in Our Midst (Cambridge Harvard University Press, 2016).10.4159/9780674969827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagden, Anthony, Peoples and Empires, A Short History of European Migration, Exploration and Conquest from Greece to the Present (Random House Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar
Parfitt, Rose, The Process of International Legal Reproduction: Inequality, Historiography, Resistance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).10.1017/9781108655118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Schutter, Helder and Ypi, Lea, ‘Mandatory Citizenship for Immigrants, The British Journal of Political Science, 45 (2015), 235–51.10.1017/S0007123414000568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet, The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Torpey, John, The Invention of the Passport (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Simmons, A.J., Justification and Legitimacy. Essays on Rights and Obligations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Superseding historic injustice’, Ethics, 103 (1992), 4–28.10.1086/293468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ypi, Lea, ‘A Permissive Theory of Territorial Rights’, The European Journal of Philosophy, 22 (2014), 288–312.10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00506.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ypi, Lea, ‘What's Wrong with Colonialism’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 41 (2013) 158–91.10.1111/papa.12014CrossRefGoogle Scholar