Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T04:22:28.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Manufacturing Uncertainty and Uncertainty in Manufacturing: Managerial Discourse and the Rhetoric of Organizational Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Yehouda Shenhav
Yehouda Shenhav
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and AnthropologyTel Aviv University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper I challenge the “uncertainty reduction” argument — the dominant explanation (and justification) for the rise of bureaucratic firms in the late nineteenth century. In contradiction to the agrument that “uncertainty” was a barrier to rational economic order and therefore needed to be reduced, I argue that “uncertainty” was manufactured, objectified, and reified in the course of developing industrial bureacracies. Using an alternative historical narrative I demonstrate that “uncertainty” was used to increase the “rationality” — i.e., control — of hierarchies and to enhance the legitimacy of “rational planning.” In other words, strategies to “reduce uncertainty” increased the “certainty” — i.e., control and centrality — of rational planners but increased the “uncertainty” of their subordinates. I point to the fact that the “uncertainty reduction” argument became a central element in the professional idelogy of management and a focal point in management education programs. Furthermore, the canonical organization theory in the social sciences adopted the rhetoric, logic, and epistemlogy produced by the agents under its study and disseminated their ideology. Through their interrelationship in organization theory, “uncertainty” and “rationality” were enacted as two binary opposites that reproduce each other and construct one “coherent” scheme.

Type
Modern Societies and Their Environments
Information
Science in Context , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Summer 1994 , pp. 275 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, Howard E. 1979. Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Aronowitz, Stanley. 1988. Science as Power. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, T. S. 1948. The Industrial Revolution 1790–1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1974. Work and Authority in Industry: Ideologies of Management in the Course of Industrialization. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Benson, Kenneth J. 1977. “Organizations: A Dialectical View.” Administrative Science Quarterly 22: 1–21.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. [1798] 1970. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Berle, Alfred A., and Means, G. C.. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bernal, J. D. 1965. Science in History. Vol. 4: The Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Braverman, Harry. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. 1979. Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buttrick, John. 1952. “The Inside Contract System.” Journal of Economic History 14: 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chirot, Daniel. 1985. “The Rise of the West.” American Sociological Review 50: 181–95.Google Scholar
Clawson, Dan. 1980. Bureaucracy and the Labor Process: The Transformation of the U.S. Industry, 1860–1920. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Clegg, Stewart, and Dunkerley, David. 1980. Organization, Class and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cohen, Patrica Cline. 1982. A Calculating People: The Spread of Numeracy in Early America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Michael D., March, James G., Olsen, Johan P.. 1972. “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 1–25.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robert, and Burrell, Gibson. 1988. “Modernism, Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis: An Introduction.“ Organization Studies 9: 91–112.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michael. 1964. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cyert, Richard M., and March, James G.. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1968. Essays in the Theory of Society. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine J. 1987. “The Domestication of Risk: Mathematical Probability and Insurance1650–1830.” In The Probabilistic Revolution, edited by Kruger, Lorenz et al. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1985. Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. New York: Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1992. How Institutions Think. New York.Google Scholar
Edwards, Richard. 1979. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. [1895] 1958. The Condition of the Working Class in England. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. (Originally written in 1845).Google Scholar
Fayol, Henry. [1918] 1949. General and Industrial Management. London: Pitman:Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. Edited by Gordon, Colin. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Galbraith, Jay. 1973. Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Swijtink, Zeno, Porter, Theodore, Daston, Lorraine, Beatty, John and Kruger, Lorenz. 1989. The Empire of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Paul, and Van Houten, Donald R.. 1977. “Managerial Strategies and the Worker: A Marxist Analysis of Bureaucracy.” Sociological Quarterly 18: 108–25Google Scholar
Gulick, Luther and Urwick, L.. 1937. Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1970. Toward a Rational Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hickson, David J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E., Pennings, J. M.. 1971. “A Strategic Contingencies' Theory of Intraorganizational Power.” Administrative Science Quarterly 16: 216–29.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. 1947. Eclipse of Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor. 1972. The Dialectics of Enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Mariann. 1980. “Toward Systematic Management: Alexander Hamilton Church.” Business History Review 54: 63–79.Google Scholar
Jenks, Leland H. 1961. “Early Phases of the Management Movement.” Administrative Science Quarterly 5: 421–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, P., and Tversky, A.. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1784[ 1950. “What Is Enlightenment?” In From Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, editied and translated by Beck, Lewis white Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977. Men and women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kunda, Gideon. 1991. Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Landes, David S. 1969. The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Eurpose from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Litterer, Joseph A. 1961. “Systematic Management: The Search for Order and Integration.” Business History Review 35: 461–76Google Scholar
Litterer, Joseph A. 1963. “Systematic Management: Design for Organizational Recoupling in American Manufacturing Firms.” Business History Review 37: 369–86.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J. F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Simon, Herbert A.. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbet. 1964 One Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Marglin, Stephen A. 1974. “What Do Bosses Do? The Origins and functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production.” Review of Radical Political Economics 6: 60–112.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1867] 1959. Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production, 1: Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W. 1986. “Social Environments and Organization Accounting.” Accounting Organizations and Society 11: 345–56.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., and Rowan, Brian. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Ian. 1989. “Discourse and Power.” In Texts of Identity”, edited by Shotter, John and Gergen, Kenneth J., 56–69. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. [1960] 1981. “Social Systems.” In his Structure and Process in Modern Societies. Reprinted in The Sociology of Organizations edited by Grusky, Oscar and Miller, George A., 98–109. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Salancik, Gerald R.. 1978. The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Pollard, Sidney. 1965. The Genesis of Modern Management: A Study of the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. 1982. Work and Politics: The Division of Labor in Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. Richard. 1987a “The Adolescence of Institutional Theorey.” Administrative Science Quarterly 32: 493–511.Google Scholar
Scott, W. Richard. 1987b. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1948. Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of Man, Social and Rational. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1922. The Wealth of Nations. London: J. M. Dent and Sons.Google Scholar
Smith, D. 1986. Behaviorism and Logical Positivism. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Katherine. 1974. “The Origins of Job Structures in the Stell Industry.” Review of Radical Political Economics 2: 113–73.Google Scholar
Thompson, James D. 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946. “Characteristics of Bureacracy.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, translated and edited by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weick, Karl. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar