Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:20:50.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ontology of Determination: From Descartes to Spinoza

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2015

Andrea Sangiacomo
Andrea Sangiacomo*
Affiliation:
University of Goningen, The Netherlands E-mail: a.sangiacomo@rug.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

This paper argues that Spinoza's notions of “conatus” and “power of acting” are derived by means of generalization from the notions of “force of motion” and “force of determination” that Spinoza discussed in his Principles of Cartesian Philosophy to account for interactions among bodies (impacts) on the basis of their degrees of contrariety. I argue that in the Ethics, Spinoza's ontology entails that interactions must always be accounted for in terms of degrees of “agreement or disagreement in nature” among interacting things. The notion of “power of acting” is used to express the extent to which a thing's conatus is aided or restrained by external causes on the basis of its degree of agreement or disagreement in nature with them. “Power of acting” generalizes the same approach and method of resolution at the basis of the notion of “force of determination” in order to account for causal interactions not only among the simplest bodies but also among more complex individuals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 515 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Jacob. 1996. “Spinoza's Physical Philosophy.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 78 (3):253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damerow, Peter, Freudenthal, Gideon, McLaughlin, Peter, and Renn, Jürgen. [1991] 2004. Exploring the Limits of Preclassical Mechanics: A Study of Conceptual Development in Early Modern Science. Free Fall and Compounded Motion in the Work of Descartes, Galileo, and Beeckman. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René. 1964–1974. Oeuvres. Edited by Ernest Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul, new presentation by Joseph Beaude, Paul Costabel, Alain Gabbey and Bernard Rochot, 11 vols. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1. Translated by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald, Kenny, Anthony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1984. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 2. Translated by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald, Kenny, Anthony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1983. Principles of Philosophy. Translated with explanatory notes by Rodger Miller, Valentine and Miller, Reese P, Dordrecht: Reidel (ried. Kluwer).Google Scholar
Erlichson, Herman. 1997. “The Young Huygens Solves the Problem of Elastic Collisions.” American Journal of Physics 65 (149): http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. 1980a. “Force and Inertia in the Seventeenth Century: Descartes and Newton.” In Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, edited by Gaukroger, S., 230–320. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. 1980b. “Huygens and Mechanics.” In Studies on Christiaan Huygens (Invited Papers from the Symposium on the Life and Work of Christiaan Huygens, Amsterdam, 22–25 August 1979, vol. II), edited by Bos, H. J. M., 166–199. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. 1996. “Spinoza's Natural Science and Methodology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, edited by Garrett, Don, 142–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes' Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. 2002. “Spinoza's conatus Argument.” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, edited by Koinstinen, Olli and Biro, John I., 127–158. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephan. 2006. The Emergence of a Scientific Culture: Science and the Shaping of Modernity. 1210–1685, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillot, Pascale 2004. “Le conatus entre principe d'inertie et principe d'individuation: Sur l'origine mécanique d'un concept de l'ontologie spinoziste.” XVIIe siècle 56 (1):51–73.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial. 1974. Spinoza: L'âme (Ethique 2). Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Hassing, Richard F. 1980. “The Use and Non-Use of Physics in Spinoza's Ethics.” Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Paul. 2001. “Descartes' Theory of Distinctions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jullien, Vincent. 2011. “Relativité, determinatio et parallaxe dans la physique cartésienne.” Philosophiques 38 (2):493–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klever, William. 1988. “Moles in motu: Principles of Spinoza's Physics.” Studia Spinozana 4:165–195.Google Scholar
Klever, William. 1993. “The Motion of a Projectile: Elucidation of Spinoza's Physics.” Studia Spinozana 9:335–340.Google Scholar
Lachterman, David R. 1978. “The Physics of Spinoza's Ethics.” In Spinoza: New Perspectives, edited by Shahan, Robert W. and Biro, John I., 71–111. Norman OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Lécrivain, André. 1977–1978. “Spinoza et la physique cartésienne.” Cahiers Spinoza 1:235–265; 2:93–206.Google Scholar
Manning, Richard. 2012. “Spinoza's Physical Theory.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2012 edition, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/spinoza-physics/ (last accessed July 2015).Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. 2000. “Force, Determination and Impact.” In Descartes' Natural Philosophy, edited by Gaukroger, S., Schuster, J. and Sutton, J., 81–112. London-New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Messeri, Marco. 1990. L'espistemologia di Spinoza: Saggio sui corpi e le menti. Milano: Il Saggiatore.Google Scholar
Moreau, Pierre-François. 1994. Spinoza: L'expérience et l'éternité. Paris: Puf.Google Scholar
Parrochia, Daniel. 1984–1985. “Physique pendulaire et modèles dans l'Ethique de Spinoza.” Cahiers Spinoza 5:711–792.Google Scholar
Parrochia, Daniel. 1987. “La science de la nature corporelle.” Studia Spinozana 3:151–173.Google Scholar
Peterman, Alison. 2012. “Spinoza on the ‘Principles of Natural Things‐.” Leibniz Review 22:37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivaud, Albert. 1924. “La physique de Spinoza.” Chronicon Spinozanum 4:24–57.Google Scholar
Rohault, Jacques. 1671. Traité de Physique. Paris: Denys Thierry.Google Scholar
Roux, Sophie. 2006. “Découvrir le principe d'inertie.” Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage 24:449–511.Google Scholar
Sabra, Abdelhamid I. 1967. Theories of Light from Descartes to Newton. London: Oldbourne.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, Andrea. 2013a. “What Are Human Beings? Essences and Aptitudes in Spinoza's Anthropology.” Journal of Early Modern Studies 2 (2):78–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiacomo, Andrea. 2013b. L'essenza del corpo: Spinoza e la scienza delle composizioni. Hildesheim-Zürich-New York: G. Olms.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, Andrea. 2015. “Teleology and Agreement in Nature.” In Spinoza: Basic Concepts, edited by Santos Campos, A., forthcoming. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. 2014. “Spinoza and the Philosophy of Science: Mathematics, Motion, and Being.” In Oxford Handbook on Spinoza, edited by Della Rocca, M., 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sévérac, Pascal. 2005. Le devenir actif chez Spinoza. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch. 1994. A Spinoza Reader: The Ethics and Other Works. Edited and translated by Curley, E., Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch. 2002. Complete Works. Translated by Shirley, Samuel, edited by Morgan, Michael L.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Viljanen, Valtteri. 2011. Spinoza's Geometry of Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljanen, Valtteri. 2014. “Spinoza on Virtue and Eternity.” In Essays on Spinoza's Ethical Theory, edited by Kisner, Matthew J. and Youpa, Andrew, 258–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zac, Sylvain. 1963. L'idée de vie dans la philosophie de Spinoza. Paris: Puf.Google Scholar