Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:24:06.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tricks of Transference: Oka Asajirō (1868–1944) on Laissez-faire Capitalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2010

Gregory Sullivan
Gregory Sullivan*
Affiliation:
United States Merchant Marine Academy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

Contrary to common portrayals of social Darwinism as a transference of laissez-faire values, the widely read evolutionism of Japan's foremost Darwinist of the early twentieth-century, Oka Asajirō (1868–1944), reflects a statist outlook that regards capitalism as the beginning of the nation's degeneration. The evolutionary theory of orthogenesis that Oka employed in his 1910 essay, “The Future of Humankind,” links him to a pre-Darwinian idealist tradition that depicted the state as an organism that develops through life-cycle stages. For Oka, laissez-faire capitalism marked the moment when the state began to decline toward extinction due to the orthogenetic overdevelopment of hitherto subordinate individual egos. Because conservative bureaucrat-intellectuals had been drawing upon this same organicist-developmental tradition since the 1880s in an attempt to forestall the social ills of industrialism, Oka's call for statist measures, including eugenics, to lessen and delay the atomizing, enervating, and corrupting influence of capitalism articulated the political vision of officialdom. Statist evolutionism, not social Darwinism, might be the term that best describes Oka's approach.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 367 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abosch, David. 1965. “Kato Hiroyuki and the Introduction of German political Thought in Modern Japan.” Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bix, Herbert. 2001. Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter. 1983. The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Theories in the Decades around 1900. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Peter. 1988. The Non-Darwinian Revolution: Reinterpreting a Historical Myth. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Peter. 2003. Evolution: The History of an Idea, 3rd edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, Francis William. [1910] 2002. Organismic Theories of the State: Nineteenth Century Interpretations of the State as Organism or Person. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific.Google Scholar
Cumings, Bruce. 1999. “Webs with No Spiders: The Genealogy of the Developmental State.” In The Developmental State, edited by Woo-Cumings, Meredith, 61–92. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, William. 1996. The Moral and Political Naturalism of Baron Katō Hiroyuki. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Fridell, Wilbur. 1970. “Government Ethics Textbooks in Late Meiji Japan.” Journal of Asian Studies 29.4:823–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluck, Carol. 1985. Japan's Modern Myths: Ideology in the Late Meiji Period. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst. 1905. The Wonders of Life: A Popular Study of Biological Philosophy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Hardacre, Helen. 1989. Shintō and the State 1868–1988. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Marvin. 1968. The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 1998. “Cell Theory in its Development and Inheritance in Meiji Japan.” Historia Scientiarum 8 (2):115–32.Google Scholar
Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich. 1967. Philosophy of Right. Translated by Knox, T. M.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1944. Social Darwinism in American Thought. New York: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Ishida, Takeshi. 1983. Japanese Political Culture: Change and Continuity. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 2001. “The Institutional Embedding of Market Economies: The German ‘Model’ and Its Impact on Japan.” In The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison, edited by Yamamura, Kozo, 39–93. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy. 1982. The Strategy of Life: Teleology and Mechanics in Nineteenth-Century German Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Bernd. 1995. Japan and Germany in the Modern World. Providence: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Migita, Hiroki. 2003. “Meijiki Chishikijin ni okeru seibutsu shinkaron no hayari saikou – jinjuu dosousetsu no inpakuto wo megutte.” Kagakusi Kenkyu 42.225;1–10.Google Scholar
Migita, Hiroki. 2009. Tennosei to Shinkaron. Tokyo: Seikyusha.Google Scholar
Nagai, Michio. 1954. “Herbert Spencer in Early Meiji Japan.” Far Eastern Quarterly 14 (1):55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gakkai, Nihon Kagakushi. 1972. Nihon kagaku gijutsushi taikei hen 15. Tokyo: Daiichi Hoki Shuppan.Google Scholar
Nyhart, Lynn. 1995. Biology Takes Form: Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800–1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oda, Hidemi. 1994. “Oka Asajirō Sensei no Ōmokage.” Seibutsu Kagaku 46.3:113–128.Google Scholar
Oka, Asajirō. 1909. “Jiruni no Shorai.” Chūōkōron 42.11;4–33.Google Scholar
Oka, Asajirō. 1968. Shinka to Jinsei [Evolution and Human Life]. Tokyo: Yuseido Shuppan.Google Scholar
Oka, Asajirō. 1974. Oka Asajirō Shu. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
Oka, Yoshitake. 1982. “Generational Conflict after the Russo-Japanese War.” In Conflict in Modern Japanese History: The Neglected Tradition, edited by Najita, Tetsuo, 197–225. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ozawa, Kazunori. 1997. “Oka Asajirō no shinkaron.” Kōchi Daigaku Gakujutsu Kenkyu Hokoku, Jinbun Kagaku 46:167–76.Google Scholar
Pittau, Joseph. 1967. Political Thought in Early Meiji Japan 1868–1889. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1971. The Open Society and Its Enemies, Volumes I and II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 2002. The Poverty of Historicism. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pyle, Kenneth. 1974. “Advantages of Followership: German Economics and Japanese Bureaucrats, 1890–1925.” Journal of Japanese Studies 1.1:127–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyle, Kenneth. 1998. “Meiji Conservatism.” In Modern Japanese Thought, edited by Wakabayashi, Bob, 98–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyle, Kenneth. 2007. Japan Rising: The Resurgence of Japanese Power and Purpose. New York: Public Affairs Books.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert. 1992. The Meaning of Evolution: Morphological Construction and Ideological Reconstruction of Darwin's Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Robert. 2002. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Robert. 2008. The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanuki, Masakazu. 2009. “Kindai nihon ni okeru kyowashugi – 1920 nendai no Oka Asajirō wo tsuujite.” Sokendai Bunaka Kagaku Kenkyu 5, March, 29–68.Google Scholar
Schirokauer, Conrad. 2004. Modern East Asia: A Brief History. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Shimao, Eiko. 1981. “Darwinism in Japan, 1877–1927.” Annals of Science 33:93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1975. Hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Julia. 2001. Reconfiguring Modernity: Concepts of Nature in Japanese Political Ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Unaura, Hiroshi. 1991. “Kindai nihon ni okeru shakai daawuinizumu no juyou to tenkai.” In Shinka-shiso to Shakai, Kouza Shinka 2, edited by Atsuhiro, Shibatani. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Masao.1976. The Japanese and Western Science. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weikart, Richard. 2004. From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethnics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, George. 1969. Radical Nationalist in Japan: Kita Ikki 1883–1937. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, Harold. 1973. “A Study in Contrasts: Japanese School Textbooks, 1903 and 1941–1945.” Monumenta Nipponica 27.1:69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Robert. 1971. “Evolutionary Biology and Ideology: Then and Now.” Science Studies 1:177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Robert. 1985. Darwin's Metaphor: Nature's Place in Victorian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar