Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:19:44.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continual Fascination: The Oscillating Universe in Modern Cosmology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2009

Helge Kragh
Helge Kragh*
Affiliation:
University of Aarhus, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

Until the mid-nineteenth century the age-old idea of a cyclic or oscillating universe belonged to philosophical and religious discourse, with little connection to the physical and astronomical sciences. It was only with the emergence of thermodynamics, and even more so with the general theory of relativity, that it became possible to discuss the hypothesis within a scientific context. This paper follows the development of oscillating cosmological models in the twentieth century, when they were often discussed if rarely taken very seriously. How is it that this conception of the universe was seen as both fascinating and controversial? Can the persistence of such models be explained on a scientific basis alone? The idea of an oscillating universe has been in crisis several times, but recently it has experienced a spectacular revival in the form of models inspired by string theory and other theories of quantum gravity. This paper argues that the current revival of interest in cyclic models is not primarily rooted in their “aesthetic” qualities, as used to be the case. With the maturation of cosmology following the discovery of the cosmic microwave background in 1965, the hypothesis has become part of the discourse of modern theoretical cosmology, and as such it is discussed within a normal scientific context. On the other hand, extrascientific considerations continue to play a role, and they probably always will. The heritage from the past is still visible.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 587 - 612
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baum, Lauris and Frampton, Paul H.. 2007. “Turnaround in Cyclic Cosmology.” Physical Review Letters 98:071301.Google Scholar
Bojowald, Martin. 2008. “Follow the Bouncing Universe.” Scientific American 299 (October):444–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonnor, William. 1954. “The Stability of Cosmological Models.” Zeitschrift für Astrophysik 35:10–20.Google Scholar
Bonnor, William. 1957. “La formation des nébuleuses en cosmologie relativiste.” Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré 15:158–172.Google Scholar
Bonnor, William. 1964. The Mystery of the Expanding Universe. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brown, Matthew G., Freese, Katherine, and Kinney, William H.. 2008. “The Phantom Bounce: A New Oscillating Cosmology.” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Issue 3:002.Google Scholar
Clausius, Rudolf. 1867. The Mechanical Theory of Heat. Translated by Hirst, T. A.. London: T. Van Voorst.Google Scholar
Clausius, Rudolf. 1868. “On the Second Fundamental Theorem of the Mechanical Theory of Heat.” Philosophical Magazine 35:405–419.Google Scholar
Clifton, T. and Barrow, John D.. 2007. “Ups and Downs of Cyclic Universes.” Physical Review D 75:043515.Google Scholar
Copp, C. M. 1982. “Relativistic Cosmology, I: Paradigm Commitment and Rationality.” Astronomy Quarterly 4:103–116.Google Scholar
Copp, C. M. 1983. “Relativistic Cosmology, II: Social Structure, Skepticism, and Cynicism.” Astronomy Quarterly 4:179–188.Google Scholar
Couderc, Paul. 1952. The Expansion of the Universe. Translated by Sidgwick, J. B.. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Craig, William L. and Smith, Quentin. 1995. Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dabrowski, Mariusz P. 1995. “Oscillating Friedman Cosmology.” arXiv:gr-qc/9503017v1.Google Scholar
Delevsky, J. 1946. “L'idée du cycle éternel dans l'histoire de monde.” In Studies and Essays in the History of Science and Learning Offered in Homage to George Sarton, edited by Ashley Montagu, M. F., 377–401. New York: Henry Schuman.Google Scholar
De Sitter, Willem. 1933. “On the Expanding Universe and the Time-Scale.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 93:628–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, Robert H. and Peebles, P. James E.. 1979. “The Big Bang Cosmology – Enigmas and Nostrums.” In General Relativity: An Einstein Centennial Survey, edited by Hawking, Stephen and Israel, Werner, 504–517. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dicke, Robert H., Peebles, P. James E., Roll, Peter G., and Wilkinson, David T.. 1965. “Cosmic Black-Body Radiation.” Astrophysical Journal 142:414–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drell, Sidney and Okun, Lev. 1990. “Andrei Dmitrievich Sakharov.” Physics Today 43 (August):26–36.Google Scholar
Durrer, Ruth and Laukenmann, Joachim. 1996. “The Oscillating Universe: An Alternative to Inflation.” Classical and Quantum Gravity 13:1069–1087.Google Scholar
Earman, John and Mosterin, Jesus. 1999. “A Critical Look at Inflationary Cosmology.” Philosophy of Science 66:1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, Arthur S. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, Arthur S. 1935. New Pathways in Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. 1931. “Zum kosmologischen Problem der Allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie.” Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: 235–237.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert, Podolsky, Boris, and Rosen, Nathan. 1935. “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?”Physical Review 47:777–780.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert and de Sitter, Willem. 1932. “On the Relation Between the Expansion and the Mean Density of the Universe.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 18:213–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eliade, Mircea. 1954. The Myth of Eternal Return. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Falb, Rudolf. 1875. “Die Welten, Bildung und Untergang.” Sirius: Zeitschrift für populäre Astronomie 8:193–202.Google Scholar
Frampton, Paul H. 2007. “Did Time Begin? Will Time End?” arXiv:0704.1132v2.Google Scholar
Franklin, Allan. 1986. The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Alexander [Aleksandr Fridman]. 1922. “Über die Krümmung des Raumes.” Zeitschrift für Physik 10:377–386.Google Scholar
Friedmann, Alexander. 1999. “On the Curvature of Space.” General Relativity and Gravitation 31:1991–2000.Google Scholar
Friedmann, Alexander. 2000. Die Welt als Raum und Zeit. Translated by Singer, Georg. Frankfurt am Main: Harri Deutsch.Google Scholar
Gale, George. 1990. “Cosmological Fecundity: Theories of Multiple Universes.” In Physical Cosmology and Philosophy, edited by Leslie, John, 189–206. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gott, J. Richard III, Gunn, James E., Schramm, David N. and Tinsley, Beatrice M.. 1974. “An Unbound Universe?” Astrophysical Journal 194:543–553.Google Scholar
Gott, J. Richard III, Gunn, James E., Schramm, David N., and Tinsley, Beatrice M.. 1976. “Will the Universe Expand Forever?” Scientific American 234 (March):62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guth, Alan H. and Kaiser, David I.. 2005. “Inflationary Cosmology: Exploring the Universe from the Smallest to the Largest Scales.” Science 307:884–890.Google Scholar
Harrison, Edward R. 1967. “Classification of Uniform Cosmological Models.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 137:69–79.Google Scholar
Holton, Gerald. 1988. Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holton, Gerald. 2003. “Einstein's Third Paradise.” Dædalus 132 (Fall):26–34.Google Scholar
Hubble, Edwin. 1936. The Realm of the Nebulae. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Inge, William R. 1934. God and the Astronomers. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Israelit, Mark. 1996. “Nathan Rosen: 1909–1995.” Foundations of Physics Letters 9:105–108.Google Scholar
Israelit, Mark and Rosen, Nathan. 1989. “A Singularity-Free Cosmological Model in General Relativity.” Astrophysical Journal 342:627–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israelit, Mark and Rosen, Nathan. 1991. “Perturbations in a Singularity-Free Cosmological Model.” Astrophysical Journal 375:463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaki, Stanley L. 1974. Science and Creation: From Eternal Cycles to an Oscillating Universe. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jammer, Max. 1999. Einstein and Religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kardashev, Nikolai. S. [Nikolay S.] 1990. “Optimistic Cosmological Model.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 243:252–256.Google Scholar
Kennefick, Daniel. 2007. Traveling at the Speed of Thought: Einstein and the Quest for Gravitational Waves. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kragh, Helge. 1996. Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kragh, Helge. 2008. Entropic Creation: Religious Contexts of Thermodynamics and Cosmology. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lemaître, Georges. 1933. “L'univers en expansion.” Annales de Sociétés Scientifiques de Bruxelles 53:51–85.Google Scholar
Lemaître, Georges. 1997. “The Expanding Universe.” General Relativity and Gravitation 29:641–680.Google Scholar
Luminet, Jean-Pierre, ed. 1997. Alexandre Friedmann, Georges Lemaître. Essais de cosmologie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
MacRobert, Alan. 1983. “Beyond the Big Bang.” Sky and Telescope 65 (March):211–213.Google Scholar
McCrea, William H. 1951. “Relativity Theory and the Creation of Matter.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A 206:562–575.Google Scholar
Narlikar, Jayant V., Burbidge, Geoffrey and Vishwakarma, R. G.. 2007. “Cosmology and Cosmogony in a Cyclic Universe.” Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 28:67–99.Google Scholar
Neswald, Elizabeth R. 2006. Thermodynamik als kultureller Kampfplatz: Zur Fazinationsgeschichte der Entropie 1850–1915. Freiburg im Breisgau: Rombach-Verlag.Google Scholar
Novikov, Igor D. and Zel'dovich, Yakov B.. 1973. “Physical Processes Near Cosmological Singularities.” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 11:387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öpik, Ernst J. 1954a. “The Age of the Universe.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5:203–214.Google Scholar
Öpik, Ernst J. 1954b. “The Time-Scale of Our Universe.” Irish Astronomical Journal 3:89–108.Google Scholar
Öpik, Ernst J. 1960. The Oscillating Universe. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Overbye, Dennis. 1991. Lonely Hearts of the Cosmos. The Story of the Scientific Quest for the Secret of the Universe. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Pachner, Jaroslav. 1965. “An Oscillating Isotropic Universe Without Singularity.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 131:173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, Martin. 1969. “The Collapse of the Universe: An Eschatological Study.” Observatory 89:193–198.Google Scholar
Russell, Henry N. 1940. “The Time-Scale of the Universe.” Science 92:19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakharov, Andrei D. [Andrey D.] 1982. Collected Scientific Works. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Sakharov, Andrei D. 1990. Memoirs. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Sandage, Allan R. 1957. “The Red Shift.” In The Universe, edited by Piel, Gerard et al., 89–98. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Saslaw, William C. 1991. “Black Holes and Structure in an Oscillating Universe.” Nature 350:43–45.Google Scholar
Seife, Charles. 2002. “Eternal-Universe Idea Comes Full Circle.” Science 296:639.Google Scholar
Shklovskii, Iosef and Sagan, Carl. 1966. Intelligent Life in the Universe. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
Sovacool, Benjamin. 2005. “Falsification and Demarcation in Astronomy and Cosmology.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 25:53–62.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, Paul J. 2004. “The Endless Universe: A Brief Introduction.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 148 (4):464–470.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, Paul J. and Turok, Neil. 2002a. “A Cyclic Model of the Universe.” Science 296:1436–1439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinhardt, Paul J. and Turok, Neil. 2002b. “Cosmic Evolution in a Cyclic Universe.” Physical Review D 65:126003.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, Paul J. and Turok, Neil. 2002c. “The Cyclic Universe: An Informal Introduction.” arXiv:astro-ph/0204479v1.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, Paul J. and Turok, Neil. 2004. “The Cyclic Model Simplified.” arXiv:astro-ph/0404480v1.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, Paul J. and Turok, Neil. 2006. “Why the Cosmological Constant is Small and Positive.” Science 312:1180–1183.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, Paul J. and Turok, Neil. 2007. Endless Universe: Beyond the Big Bang. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Tolman, Richard C. 1931. “On the Theoretical Requirements for a Periodic Behaviour of the Universe.” Physical Review 38:1758–1771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, Richard C. 1932a. “Possibilities in Relativistic Thermodynamics for Irreversible Processes without Exhaustion of Free Energy.” Physical Review 39:320–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, Richard C. 1932b. “Models of the Physical Universe.” Science 75:367–373.Google Scholar
Tolman, Richard C. 1934. Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tolman, Richard C. and Ward, Morgan. 1932. “On the Behavior of Non-Static Models of the Universe when the Cosmological Term is Omitted.” Physical Review 39:835–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Steven. 1977. The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe. London: Trinity Press.Google Scholar
Worthing, Mark W. 1996. God, Creation, and Contemporary Physics. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Zanstra, Herman. 1957. “On the Pulsating or Expanding Universe and its Thermodynamical Aspect.” Proceedings, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series B, 60:285–307.Google Scholar
Zanstra, Herman. 1964. “Thermodynamics, Statistical Mechanics and the Universe.” Vistas in Astronomy 10:23–43.Google Scholar
Zehnder, Ludwig. 1897. Die Mechanik des Weltalls in ihren Grundzügen dargestellt. Freiburg: Mohr.Google Scholar
Zel'dovich, Yakov B. and Novikov, Igor D.. 1983. Relativistic Astrophysics, II: The Structure and Evolution of the Universe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zöllner, Johann K. F. 1872. Über die Natur der Cometen. Beiträge zur Geschichte und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar