Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:15:29.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Useful charlatans: Giovanni Succi and Stefano Merlatti’s fasting contest in Paris, 1886

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2022

Agustí Nieto-Galan
Agustí Nieto-Galan*
Affiliation:
Institut d’Història de la Ciència. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
*
Email: agusti.nieto@uab.cat
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

This paper analyzes the public fasts of two Italian “hunger artists,” Giovanni Succi and Stefano Merlatti, in Paris in 1886, and their ability to forego eating for a long period (thirty and fifty days respectively). Some contemporary witnesses described them as clever frauds, but others considered them to be interesting physiological anomalies. Controversies about their fasts entered academic circles, but they also spread throughout the urban public at different levels. First, Succi and Merlatti steered medical debates among physicians on the “scientific” explanations of the limits of human resistance to inanition, and acted as ideal mediators for doctors’ professional interests. Second, they became useful tools for science popularizers in their attempt to gain authority in drawing the boundaries between “orthodox” and “heterodox” knowledge. Finally, in the 1880s, Succi and Merlatti’s contest, the controversy around the liquids they ingested, and their scientific supervision by medical doctors, all reinforced their own professional status as itinerant fasters in a golden decade for that kind of endeavor. For all those reasons, Succi and Merlatti can be viewed as useful, epistemologically-active charlatans.

Keywords

Hunger artistsfastingfoodGiovanni SucciStefano Merlatticharlatansphysiologypsychologyscience popularizationParisFranz Kafka
Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 33 , Issue 4: Charlatans , December 2020 , pp. 405 - 422
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkon, Paul K. 1994. Science Fiction before 1990. Imagination Discovers Technology. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
“Après cinquante jours. La fin du jeûne de Merlatti.” 1886. Courrier des Estats-Unis, 308:1–3.Google Scholar
Barrucand, Dominique. 1986. “Freud et Bernheim.” Histoire des sciences médicales 20:157–170.Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob. 2011. “Vivisecting Major: A Victorian Gentleman Scientist Defends Animal Experimentation, 1876—1885.” Isis 102:215–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Béguet, Bruno (ed.). 1990. La science pour tous: Sur la vulgarisation scientifique en France de 1850 a 1914. Paris: Bibliothèque du CNAM.Google Scholar
Bernheim, Hyppolite. 1886. “Physiologie pathologique. Le jeûne de Succi.” Gazete hebdomadaire de medicine et de chirurgie 42:681–683.Google Scholar
Bogdan, Robert. 1988. Freak Show: Presenting Human Oddities for Amusement and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brock, William. 1992. The Fontana History of Chemistry. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Brock, Pope. 2008. Charlatan: The Fraudulent Life of John Brinkley. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Bucchi, Massimiano. 1998. Science and the Media: Alternative Routes to Scientific Communication Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golan, Tal. 2000. “Blood Will Out: Distinguishing Humans from Animals and Scientists from Charlatans in the Nineteenth-Century American Courtroom.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 31 (1):93–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cenni Biografici. 1897. Giovanni Succi. Esploratore d’Africa. Roma: Tipografia Economica.Google Scholar
Cheung, Tobias. 2013. “Limits of Life and Death: Legallois’s Decapitation Experiments.” Journal of the History of Biology 46:283–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiverry, Giovanni. 1886. Del Signor Succi e del suo digiuno. Milano: Tipografia di Giacomo Pirola.Google Scholar
Chossat, Charles. 1843. Recherches expérimentales sur l’inanition: Mémoire auquel l’Académie des Sciences a decerné en 1841 le prix de physiologie expérimentale. Paris: Imprimérie royale.Google Scholar
Corfield, Penelope J. 2009. “From Poison Peddlers to Civic Worthies: The Reputation of the Apothecaries in Georgian England.” Social History of Medicine 22(1):1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fonvielle, Wilfrid. c.1900. Mort de faim: étude sur les nouveau jeûneurs. Paris: Librairie illustrée.Google Scholar
De Fonvielle, Wilfrid. 1911. Histoire de la navégation aérienne. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
De Fonvielle, Wilfrid, James, Glaisher, Camille, Flammarion, and Gaston, Tissandier. 1870. Voyages aériens ouvrage contenant 117 gravures. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Digby, Anne. 2002. Making a Medical Living: Doctors and Patients in the English Market for Medicine, 1720-1911. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dreifuss, Jean Jacques. 1988. “Charles Chossat (1796-1875), physiologiste, médecin et homme politique genevois.” Gesnerus 45:239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figuier, Louis. 1886. “Les nouveaux jeûneurs: Succi et Merlatti.” L’Année scientifique et industrielle 30:395–404.Google Scholar
Fox, Robert. 2012. The Savant and the State: Science and Cultural Politics in Nineteenth-Century France. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fyfe, Aileen and Bernard, Lightman (eds.). 2007. Science in the Marketplace: Nineteenth-Century Sites and Experiences. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallamand, E. 1929. “Le docteur Monin.” Le progrés médicale, 5 January, p.6.Google Scholar
Gallois, Pierre. 1926. “Phillippe Maréchal.” La presse médicale. 20:315-316.Google Scholar
Gano, Benedict, Francis. 1915. A Study of Prolonged Fasting. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
Glaser, Catherine. 1989. “Journalisme et critique scientifiques: l’exemple de Victor Meunier.” Romantisme 65:27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gley, Eugène. 1886. “Le jeûne et les jeûneurs.” Revue scientifique 38:723–727.Google Scholar
Gley, Eugène. 1902. Notice sur les travaux scientifiques du Dr. E. Gley. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Gooldin, Sigal. 2003. “Fasting Women, Living Skeletons and Hunger Artists: Spectacles of Body and Miracles at the Turn of the Century.” Body & Society 9:27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrini, Anita. 2003. Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Galen to Animal Rights. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gunn, Robert A. 1880. Forty Days without Food!: A Biography of H.S. Tanner. New York: M. D. A.Google Scholar
Hagner, Michael. 2003. “Scientific Medicine.” In From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nineteenth-Century Science. Edited by Cahan, David, 49–87. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hamlin, Christopher. 1990. A Science of Impurity: Water Analysis in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Bristol: Adam Hilger.Google Scholar
Kafka, Franz. [1922] 2012. A Hunger Artist and Other Stories. Translated by Crick, Joyce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kremer, Richard L. 2009. “Physiology.” In The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 6: The Modern Biological and Earth Sciences. Edited by Bowler, Peter and John, V. Pickstone, 342–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L’Abbé, Vallée. 1887. “Essai d’explication théorique et scientifique du jeûne extraordinaire des italiens Succi et Merlatti.” Annales de la Société d’agriculture, sciences, arts et belles lettres d’Indre-et-Loire 67:29–36.Google Scholar
Langlois, Pierre. 1894. “Inanition”, La grande Encyclopédie 20:653.Google Scholar
Larrey, Hippolyte Félix. 1871. Discours prononcé aux obsèques de M.F.A. Longet le 7 décembre 1871 au nom de l’Académie de médecine. Paris: JB. Baillière et fils.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1995. “Pasteur and Pouchet: The Heterogenesis of the History of Science.” In A History of Scientific Thought: Elements of a History of Science. Edited by Serres, Michel, 526–555. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
“Le secret de Succi.” Les Annales politiques et littéraires, 12 September 1886, p.165.Google Scholar
Loye, Paul. 1886. “La jeûne de Succi.” Le progrés médicale 4:861–62.Google Scholar
Loye, Paul. 1888. La mort par décapitation. Paris: Publications du progrès médicale.Google Scholar
Loye, Paul. 1889. “Death by Decapitation.” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 97 (4):387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luciani, Luigi. 1889. Fisiologia del digiuno: studi sull’uomo. Firenze: Tipografia dei Successori Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Luciani, Luigi. 1890. Das Hungern. Studien und Experimente am Menschen. Hamburg, Leipzig: Leopold Voss.Google Scholar
Martínez de Velasco, Eusebio. 1886. “El viajero italiano Juan Succi en el día vigesimoctavo de su ayuno.” La Ilustración Española y Americana 36:182.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Breon. 1987. “Kafka and the Hunger Artists.” In Kafka and the Contemporary Critical Performance: Centenary readings. Edited by Udoff, Alan, 236–55. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Monin, Ernest and Phillippe, Maréchal. 1887. Stefano Merlatti. Histoire d’un jeûne célèbre. Paris: C. Marpon et E. Flammarion.Google Scholar
Monroe, John Warne. 2008. Laboratories of Faith: Mesmerism, Spiritism and Occultism in Modern France. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
“Mort de Merlatti.” 1890. L’Avenir de Bel-Abbès. Journal agricole, commercial, industriel, politique et littéraire, 3 May, p. 1.Google Scholar
Nieto-Galan, Agustí. 2012. “Historicitat i heterodòxia. La divulgació científica de Louis Figuier (1819-1894).” Quaderns de Filologia. Estudis Lingüístics 17:81–94.Google Scholar
Nieto-Galan, Agustí. 2015. “Hunger Artists and Experimental Physiology in the Late Nineteenth Century: Mr Giovanni Succi Meets Dr Luigi Luciani in Florence.” Social History of Medicine 28(1):82–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieto-Galan, Agustí. 2016. Science in the Public Sphere: A History of Lay Knowledge and Expertise. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrussel, Henri. 1886. “La diète prologée volontaire.” Les Anales polítiques et littéraires 10 March, p. 220-21.Google Scholar
Podgorny, Irina, ed. 2012. Charlatanes. Crónicas de remedios incurables. Buenos Aires: Eterna Cadencia Editora.Google Scholar
Rabinach, Anson. 1992. The Human Motor: Energy, Fatigue and the Origins of Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Matthew. 1980. “Sous le régime de la législation de 1803: Trois enquêtes sur les charlatans au XIXe siècle.” Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine 27:485–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robida, Albert. 1886. “La jeûnomanie.” La Caricature, 363:406.Google Scholar
Rupke, Nicolaas A., ed. 1987. Vivisection in Historical Perspective. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Semelaigne, René. 1930-1932. Les pionniers de la psychiatrie française avant et après Pinel. 2 vols. Paris: J. B. Baillière et fils.Google Scholar
Spillane, Joseph. 1998. “The Making of an Underground Market: Drug Selling in Chicago, 1900-1940.”’ Journal of Social History 32:27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Lynn L. 1999. “Fighting for the Afterlife: Spiritists, Catholics, and Popular Religion in Nineteenth-Century France.” The Journal of Religious History 22(3):282–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinn, Terry and Richard, Whitley (eds.). 1985. Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularization. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secord, James. 2004. “Knowledge in Transit.” Isis 95:654–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Succi, Giovanni. 1881. Commercio in Africa. Il Madagascar, L’Isola di Johanna, L’Arcipelago di Comoro, Zanzíbar e Mozambese. Milan: Tipografia Nazionale.Google Scholar
“The Fasting Man.” 1890. The Illustrated London News, 26 April, p. 516.Google Scholar
“To Fast Fifty Days. Stefano Merlatti’s Attempt in Paris and a Talk with him.” 1886. Columbus Daily Enquire, 13 November, p. 5.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. 1982. “The Government of the Body: Medical Regimens and the Rationalization of Diet.” The British Journal of Sociology 33(2):254–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar