Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:08:13.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Working with Instruments: Ernst Mach as Material Epistemologist, a Short Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2017

Christoph Hoffmann
Affiliation:
University of Lucerne, Switzerland E-mail: Christoph.Hoffmann@unilu.ch
Alexandre Métraux
Affiliation:
Archives Henri Poincaré, Université de Lorraine (campus Nancy), France E-mail: ametraux@posteo.ch

Extract

With the death of Ernst Mach on February 19, 1916, one day after his seventy-eighth birthday, a question finally became explicit that had been looming for some time. It was as simple as it was fundamental: who, in the end, was this man, a scientist or a philosopher? The importance of this question for contemporaries can easily be gleaned from the obituaries that appeared in the weeks following Mach's death: one in the Physikalische Zeitschrift, written by Albert Einstein, and another in the Archiv für die Geschichte der Philosophie, written by Mach's former student Heinrich Gomperz. They both addressed this critical issue in plain words. Einstein stressed that Mach “was not a philosopher who chose the natural sciences as the object of his speculation, but a many-sided, interested, diligent scientist who also took visible pleasure in detailed questions outside the burning issues of general interest” (Einstein 1916, 104; translation cited in Blackmore 1992, 158). Gomperz in turn first emphasized the great loss science had experienced with Mach's death, asking subsequently whether “the suffering science is physics or philosophy?” (Gomperz 1916, 321). His answer broadly followed Einstein's conclusion; relying on Mach's own words, he reminded his readers that Mach never claimed to be a philosopher, but merely was looking for a viewpoint that transcended the disciplinary constraints of particular scientific activities.

Type
Documents in Translation
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackmore, John, ed. 1992. Ernst Mach – A Deeper Look: Documents and New Perspectives. Dordrecht, Boston & London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. 1916. “Ernst Mach.” Physikalische Zeitschrift 17:101104.Google Scholar
Gomperz, Heinrich. 1916. “Ernst Mach. (Nach einem am 26. Februar 1916 gesprochenen Nachrufe.)Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 29:321328.Google Scholar
Jeannel, Mauric. 1877. Arsenal du diagnostic médical: Mode d'emploi et appréciation des procédés et des instruments d'exploration employés en séméiologie et en thérapeutique avec applications au lit du malade. Paris: J.-B. Baillière et fils.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. 1923. “Eine Betrachtung über Zeit und Raum (1910).” In Populär-Wissenschaftliche Vorlesungen, by Mach, Ernst, 5th enlarged edition, 492508. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Rollett, Alexander. 1861. “Fachberichte [Physiologie: Puls].” Medizinische Jahrbücher. Zeitschrift der k. k. Gesellschaft der Ärzte in Wien 17 (Part 1):308311.Google Scholar
Stadler, Friedrich. 1997. Studien zum Wiener Kreis. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar