¹ Trainingir. Christianity (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967)Google Scholar. The major biography is the two volume Kierkegaard by Lowrie, Walter (London: Oxford, 1938, many reprints)Google Scholar.

² Collins, James, ‘Faith and Reflection in Kierkegaard’ in Hong, Howard and Thulstrup, Niels, ed., A Kierkegaard Critique (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1962), 142.Google Scholar

³ One of the truly helpful works is Sontag, FrederickA Kierkegaard Handbook (Atlanta: John Knox, 1979).Google Scholar

⁴ Kierkegaard, SorenThe Point of View for My Work as an Author (New York: Harper, 1962), 69.Google Scholar

⁵ Kierkegaard, SorenThe Point of View for My Work as an Author (New York: Harper, 1962), 70–71.Google Scholar

⁶ The problem of the relation of word and image has received a vigorous expositor in Ellul, JacquesThe Humiliation of the Word (Grand Rapids: Eerdrnans, 1985)Google Scholar. Ellul contends that Kierkegaard was the first to mount the attack on the philosophers who proceeded him. As we shall show, Kierkegaard was one among many!

⁷ Kierkegaard, 1: 163.

⁸ Kierkegaard, 1. 170.

⁹ Walter Lowrie Kierkegaard:1, 171.

¹⁰ Lossky, VladimirThe Myslical Theobgy of the Eastern Church (Crestwood: SVS Press, 1976): 32, 33–34, 38–39Google Scholar.

¹¹ Lowrie Kierkegaard: 1, 161.

¹² Hong, Howard, ed. The Journals of Soren Kierkegaard: entry 2795.Google Scholar

¹³ Kierkegaard, SorenEither/Or (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971)Google Scholar.

¹⁴ Jünel, EberhardThe Treedom of a Christian (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1988), 31ff.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Kierkegaard, SorenTraining in Christianity (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1941), 142.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Egan, HarveyChristian Mysticism (New York: Pueblo, 1984), 31.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Kierkegaard's complex relation to Hegel has been reassessed in Taylor, Mark, Journeys to Selfhood: Hegel and Kierkegaard (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980).Google Scholar

¹⁸ On Hegel see Welch, ClaudeProtestant Thought in the Nineteenth Century (New Haven: Yale, 1972), 86–107Google Scholar; Heiss, RobertHegel, Kierkegaard, Marx (New York: Delia, 1963)Google Scholar; Barth, KarlProtestant Thought in the Nineteenth Century (Valley Forge: Judson, 1973), 384–421.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Philosophical Fragments (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962), 55, 61, 66.Google Scholar

²⁰ As Pannenberg has done as a neo-Hegelian. See Walsh, Brian ‘Pannenberg's Eschaiological Ontology’ Christian Scholars Review No. 11, (1982), 229–249.Google Scholar

²¹ Bischoff, Guntram G. in LeClerq, Jean, ed., The Spirituality of Western Christendom (Kalamazoo: Cistercian Publications, 1976), 32–33.Google Scholar

²² Kierkegaard, SorenPhilosophical Fragments (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962), 49.Google Scholar

²³ Meyendorff, JohnByzantine Theology, (New York: Fordham University Press, 1974), 11–12.Google Scholar

²⁴ Lossky, VladimirThe Myslical Theology of the Eastern Church (Crestwood: SVS Press, 1976), 42.Google Scholar

²⁵ See the important discussion by Torrance, Thomas in Space, Time, and Incarnation (London: Oxford, 1969).Google Scholar

²⁶ Kierkegaard, SorenConcluding Unscientific Postscript (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968), 423.Google Scholar

²⁷ Dru, Alexander., ed., The Journals of Soren Kierkegaard (New York: Oxford University Press, 1938), #2760.Google Scholar

²⁸ Meyendorff, JohnByzantine Theology, 13–14.Google Scholar

²⁹ Allen, DiogenesThree Outsiders (Cambridge: Cowley Publications, 1983)Google Scholar.

³⁰ Rohde, Peter, ed., The Diary of Saren Kierkegaard (Seacaucus: Citadel, 1960), 202Google Scholar; see also Collins, JamesThe Mind of Kierkegaard (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983), 208–210.Google Scholar

³¹ See especially his comments on Kierkegaard, in Fragments Grave and Gay (London: Collins, 1971), 95–105.Google Scholar

³² Barth, KarlEvangelical Theology (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980), 10.Google Scholar

³³ Nils, & Thulstrup, Marie, ed., Theologica Conceptsin Kierkegaard (Copcnhagen: Boghandel, 1980), 185.Google Scholar

³⁴ Ibid., citing Hegel's Werke X, 378.

³⁵ This is not the same as Anselm's argument. See the remarks by Hartshorne, Charles in St Anselm: Basic Writings (LaSalle: Open Court, 1962), 1–9.Google Scholar

³⁶ ‘Quia inter crcaiorurn ct creaturam non potest. lama simililudo notari, quin inter eos maior sit dissimilitudonotanda.’ Dcnzinger, Echiridion Symbolorum (Rom: Herder, 1957), 202.Google Scholar

³⁷ Pieper, JosephScholasticism (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964), 52–54Google Scholar. Thomas has over 1,700 quotations from Dionysius in his Summa and wrote a commentary on On The Divine Names toward the end ofhis life. As an aside, the Lutheran Dietrich Bonhoeffer began his Chrislobgy lectures by invoking Kierkegaard, , and asserting, ‘Teaching about Christ begins in silence.’ Christology (New York: Harper and Row, 1966), 27.Google Scholar

³⁸ Zizioulas, JohnBeing in Communion (Cresiwood: SVS Press, 1985), 39.Google Scholar

³⁹ Lossky, VladimirThe Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, 197.Google Scholar