Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T07:23:41.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diversity of embryos and seed dormancy in Rubiaceae: a taxonomic/phylogenetic and biogeographic perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2024

Carol C. Baskin*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225, USA Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0312, USA
Jerry M. Baskin
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225, USA
*
Corresponding author: Carol C. Baskin; Email: carol.baskin@uky.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have reviewed seed dormancy and germination in the Rubiaceae, the fourth-largest angiosperm family (in terms of species richness), in relation to ecology, life form, biogeography and phylogeny (subfamily/tribe). Life forms include trees, shrubs, vines and herbs, and tropical rainforest trees have the greatest number of tribes and species. The family has five kinds of embryos: investing, linear-full, linear-underdeveloped, spatulate and spatulate-underdeveloped, and seeds are non-dormant (ND) or have morphological (MD), morphophysiological (MPD) or physiological (PD) dormancy. Except for the occurrence of the investing embryo only in dry fruits of Dialypetalanthoideae, each kind of embryo is found in dry and fleshy fruits of Dialypetalanthodies and of Rubioideae. In tropical and temperate regions, there are species with ND seeds and others whose seeds have MD, MPD or PD. A complete seed dormancy profile (i.e. some species with ND seeds and others whose seeds have MD, MPD or PD) was found for tropical rainforest trees and shrubs and semi-evergreen rainforest shrubs. Dormancy-break occurs during cold or warm stratification or dry-afterripening, depending on the species. Some tropical species have long periods of dormancy-break/germination extending for 4–5 to 30–40 weeks. Soil seed banks are found in 5 and 15 tribes of Rubiaceae in tropical and temperate regions, respectively. With increased distance from the Equator, diversity of life forms and seed dormancy decreases, resulting in only herbs with PD at high latitudes. We conclude that the low species richness of Rubiaceae in temperate regions is not related to low diversity of seed dormancy/germination.

Type
Review Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The Rubiaceae consists of two subfamilies (Dialpetalanthoidea and Rubioideae) (Razafimandimbison and Rydin, Reference Razafimandimbison and Rydin2024), 620 genera (Plants of World Online) and 13,465 species (Stevens Reference Stevens2001). It is the fourth-largest angiosperm family after Asteraceae, Orchidaceae and Fabaceae (Mabberley, Reference Mabberley2017). Most species of Rubiaceae grow in tropical and subtropical regions, especially in non-disturbed lowland moist forests, and members of this family may be the most species-abundant woody plants present in the forest (Davis et al., Reference Davis, Govaerts, Bridson, Ruhsam, Moat and Brummitt2009). For example, in the rainforest flora of peninsular Malaysia, the families with 20 or more genera are Annonaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae and Rubiaceae with 25, 57, 27 and 24 genera, respectively, and with 130, 344, 127 and 237 species, respectively (Ng, Reference Ng1988). Some species in a few tribes grow in high latitude/elevation habitats, including subpolar regions of the Arctic and Antarctic but not on the Antarctic continent (Davis et al., Reference Davis, Govaerts, Bridson, Ruhsam, Moat and Brummitt2009). With an increase in latitude, the number of tribes and genera represented in the flora decreases. For example, Gleason and Cronquist (Reference Gleason and Cronquist1991) included nine genera in four tribes (Michelleae, Naucleae, Rubieae and Spermacoceae) in the flora of northeastern USA and adjacent Canada, but Hultén (Reference Hultén1968) has only the genus Galium (Rubieae) in the flora of Alaska and neighbouring Canadian territories.

Although studies have been conducted on seed dormancy and germination of many species of Rubiaceae (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014), no global assessment of the ecology and biogeography of seed dormancy or of the phylogenetic relationships of species with non-dormant (ND) seeds and those with different kinds (classes) of dormancy is available for the family. However, an analysis of the geographical distribution, diversity, endemism and on-going taxonomic work for the Rubiaceae has been published by Davis et al. (Reference Davis, Govaerts, Bridson, Ruhsam, Moat and Brummitt2009). The purpose of our review is to consider seed dormancy/germination of the Rubiaceae in relation to embryo morphology, ND and classes of dormancy, seed ecology, plant life form, biogeography/vegetation zone and phylogeny (tribe). We addressed five questions. (1) Do embryo morphology and seed dormancy vary in the two subfamilies of Rubiaceae? (2) What is the seed dormancy profile (i.e. proportion of ND and the different classes of dormancy) of Rubiaceae for the major vegetation zones on earth and for the various life forms in this family? (3) Does the morphology of Rubiaceae flowers (e.g. bisexual, dioecious, distyly and homostyly) have an influence of seed dormancy/germination? (4) How is seed dormancy broken in Rubiaceae? (5) What life forms and tribes of Rubiaceae are the most likely ones to form soil seed banks? Before addressing these questions, a family overview and background information on palaeohistory, seeds, embryo morphology and seed dormancy in the Rubiaceae will be provided.

Family overview

According to Davis et al. (Reference Davis, Govaerts, Bridson, Ruhsam, Moat and Brummitt2009), the five most species-rich countries/regions for Rubiaceae are Columbia, Venezuela, New Guinea, Brazil (north) and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. At least 30 genera of Rubiaceae have 100 or more species, and Psychotria has 1834 species, making it the world's third largest angiosperm genus after Astragalus (Fabaceae) with 3200 species and Bulbophyllum (Orchidaceae) with c. 2000 species (Frodin, Reference Frodin2004; Plants of World Online). However, the Rubiaceae has c. 200 monotypic genera, c. 330 genera with only 2–3 species and c. 450 genera with 4–10 species (Davis et al., Reference Davis, Govaerts, Bridson, Ruhsam, Moat and Brummitt2009). Based on 13,143 species of Rubiaceae, Davis et al. (Reference Davis, Govaerts, Bridson, Ruhsam, Moat and Brummitt2009) estimated that 64% of them are endemic to a particular island/country; the five places with the highest number of endemics are New Guinea, Madagascar, Philippines, Borneo and Cuba with 620, 520, 443, 428 and 344 endemic species, respectively.

Life forms of Rubiaceae are trees, shrubs, vines/lianas/climbers and herbs, including epiphytes. Tree height ranges from c. 10 to 30 m (Robbrecht, Reference Robbrecht1988; Gardner et al., Reference Gardner, Sidisunthorn and Anusarnsunthorn2000; Ricker et al., Reference Ricker, Hernández, Sousa and Ochoterena2013) with one of the tallest trees, Blepharidium guatemalense, reaching a height of 40 m (Ricker et al., Reference Ricker, Hernández, Sousa and Ochoterena2013). In contrast, small pachycaul (few branches) treelets such as Maschalodesme in New Guinea are only 1–2 m tall (Ridsdale et al., Reference Ridsdale, van den Brink and Koek-Noorman1972). There are 32 genera of climbers in the Rubiaceae in the Neotropics (Delprete, Reference Delprete2022a) and 88 in the Old World, including Eurasia, Africa and the West Malay Archipelago (Hu and Li, Reference Hu, Li and Parthasarathy2015). Plants of Rubiaceae climb via stipules, hook-like or straight thorns, involucral bracts, adventitious roots or twining stems (Robbrecht, Reference Robbrecht1988; Delprete, Reference Delprete2022a).

Benzing (Reference Benzing, Huxley and Cutler1991) reported 85 species of epiphytic Rubiaceae. Members of the genera Anthorrhiza, Hydnophytum, Myrmedodia, Myrmephytum and Squamellaria in subtribe Hydnophytinae of tribe Pychotrieae are not only epiphytic, but the hypocotyl of the seedling enlarges to form a tuber with chambers that become occupied by ants (Huxley, Reference Huxley1978; Jebb, Reference Jebb, Huxley and Cutler1991). These ant-plants are distributed throughout southeast Asia, being most diverse in New Guinea, (Huxley, Reference Huxley1978; Huxley and Jebb, Reference Huxley and Jebb1991; Chomicki and Renner, Reference Chomicki and Renner2016, Reference Chomicki and Renner2017), and species of Hydnophytum and Myrmecodia occur in northern Australia (Huxley, Reference Huxley and Buckley1982). Plants of Hydnophytum formicarum, H. moseleyanum, Myrmecodia armata and M. tuberosa are succulent (Succulent Plants Website).

Herbaceous Rubiaceae are annuals or perennials, and genera such as Borreria, Diodia, Galianthe, Galium, Hexasepalum, Mitracarpus, Paederia, Richardia and Spermacoce can be invasive and even serious weeds in crops (Salamero et al., Reference Salamero, Marnotte, Le Bourgeois and Carrara1997; Mersereau and DiTommaso, Reference Mersereau and DiTommaso2003; Gallon et al., Reference Gallon, Trezzi, Diesel, Junior and Baracelli2018; Kalsing et al., Reference Kalsing, Rossi, Lucio, Gonçalves and Valeriano2020). Some species of Richardia and Spermacoce have become resistant to the herbicide glyphosate used to control weeds in crops such as soybeans (Kalsing et al., Reference Kalsing, Rossi, Lucio, Gonçalves and Valeriano2020). The Rubiaceae also includes the mangrove shrubs Rustia occidentalis and Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea (Tomlinson, Reference Tomlinson1986). Further, species of a few genera such as Durringtonia (Henderson and Guymer, Reference Henderson and Guymer1985), Limnosipanea (Delprete and Cortés-B, Reference Delprete and Cortés-B2004) and Oldenlandia (Mukherjee and Ghosh, Reference Mukherjee and Ghosh2015) grow in wet habitats.

Taxonomic descriptions of species of Rubiaceae may include information about raphids (calcium oxalate crystals), leaves, inflorescences, flowers, fruits and seeds (Dwyer, Reference Dwyer1980; Robbrecht, Reference Robbrecht1988; Kirkbride et al., Reference Kirkbride, Gunn and Dallwitz2000; Simpson, Reference Simpson2006; Mabberley, Reference Mabberley2017). Raphides are present in Rubioideae, but they may, or may not, be present in Dialypetalanthoideae. Leaves are entire and simple, and they are opposite or decussate (rarely whorled) on the stem. Leaves of some species, for example Tricalysia, have domatia used by ants. Stipules are entire, bifid or fimbriate and may be deciduous or persistent. They are either intrapetiolar (stipule on both sides of a leaf fuse, placing margin of stipule between stem and petiole) or interpetiolar (stipules of opposite leaves fuse, placing margin of stipulate on stem between the petioles of opposite leaves). In some species, the stipules have colleters (glands) that produce mucilage.

Flowers are usually produced in a cyme, but sometimes they are solitary or in panicles or heads. The calyx has four or five sepals that fuse, forming a tube with distinct lobes, and the four or five (or more) petals fuse, forming a tubular actinomorphic flower with lobes. Flowers have four or five (rarely 8–10) stamens that dehisce pollen via longitudinal slits, but stamens of some species have pores. The ovary is inferior (or rarely half inferior) and has 1–10 locules, often 2, with 1 to many ovules per locule. The fruit is a berry, capsule, drupe or schizocarp with 1, 2–9, 10–24, 25–49 or ≥50 endospermous seeds, depending on the species and kind of fruit produced.

Family palaeohistory

In a critical analysis of 134 fossil specimens (macrofossils and pollen) attributed to the Rubiaceae, Graham (Reference Graham2009) accepted the genus name of 43 of them as being correct, but he questioned the identification of the other 91 specimens. The oldest accepted fossils for Rubiaceae were: Dialypetalanthoideae, Eocene to Pliocene from Australia and Middle Eocene from Oregon (USA) and Rubioideae, Late Eocene from Panama. The presence of fossils of the two subfamilies of Rubiaceae in the Eocene and their wide distribution in the world suggested to Graham that the family originated in the Late Cretaceous or Paleocene. Accepted fossils of Rubiaceae from the Eocene have been collected in Argentina, Australia, Caribbean region, Panama and the USA (Kentucky/Tennessee, Mississippi/Tennessee and Oregon/Washington). Based on fossils of 20 accepted genera from the Miocene collected in Africa, Central America, Europe, North America, South America and south-eastern Pacific-Asia, Graham concluded that the Miocene was a period of great diversification of the Rubiaceae.

The Rubiaceae is predominantly pantropical in distribution. According to Delprete and Jardin (Reference Delprete and Jardin2012), about one-third of the genera and one-half of the species in this family occur in the neotropics. In South America, the Rubiaceae is especially diverse in the Amazon Basin, but members of this family are also found in cloud forests and Páramo of the Andes, savannas (cerrado), dry forests (caatinga and restinga), Atlantic forest of Brazil and llanos (seasonally flooded areas) of Brazil and Venezuela (Delprete and Jardin, Reference Delprete and Jardin2012). Palaeobotanical research, for example palynology, in the neotropics has revealed that a significant increase in plant diversity occurred in northern South America in the early to middle Eocene (Jaramillo et al., Reference Jaramillo, Rueda and Mora2006, Reference Jaramillo, Ochoa, Contreras, Pagami, Carvajal-Ortiz, Pratt, Krishnan, Cardona, Romera, Quiroz, Rodriguez, Rueda, Parra, Morón, Green, Bayona, Montes, Quintero, Ramirez, Mora, Schouten, Bermudez, Navarrete, Parra, Alvarán, Osorno, Crowley, Valencia and Vervoort2010). Thus, by the Eocene, diverse rainforests were present in South America (Burnham and Johnson, Reference Burnham and Johnson2004). This increase in plant diversity, mostly angiosperms, occurred during a period of rapid global warming at the Paleocene–Eocene boundary, that is the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), which was correlated with thousands of petagrams (1015 g) of carbon being released into the atmosphere (McInerney and Wing, Reference McInerney and Wing2011). During the PETM, the 5–8°C increase in global temperature apparently promoted the rapid diversification of angiosperm species and thus greatly increased plant species richness of Neotropical forests (Dick and Pennington, Reference Dick and Pennington2019). However, tropical dry forests did not develop until the late Eocene, and other types of tropical vegetation, for example savanna, montane forest and Páramo, did not appear until the Miocene or Pliocene, after the PETM (Jaramillo, Reference Jaramillo2023). We note that the research cited here does not provide specific information about speciation of the Rubiaceae in the neotropics; however, it does provide clues as to when significant species diversification may have occurred in the Rubiaceae of South America.

Based on molecular data, various dates have been proposed for the beginning of divergence of Rubiaceae, for example 66.1 Ma (Antonelli et al., Reference Antonelli, Nylander, Persson and Sanmartin2009) to 84.9 Ma (Manns et al., Reference Manns, Wikström, Taylor and Bremer2012) and 90.4 Ma (Bremer and Eriksson, Reference Bremer and Eriksson2009). Bremer et al. (Reference Bremer, Friis and Bremer2004) obtained a stem age of 108 Ma for the Gentianales. However, when Wikström et al. (Reference Wikström, Kainulainen, Razafimandimbison, Smedmark and Bremer2015) reanalysed the dataset of Bremer et al. (Reference Bremer, Friis and Bremer2004) and added information from DNA analysis of 67 additional taxa of Rubiaceae, they obtained a stem and crown age for Gentianales of 99 and 75 Ma, respectively. Using the combined dataset, Wikström et al. (Reference Wikström, Kainulainen, Razafimandimbison, Smedmark and Bremer2015) obtained an estimated age for the Rubiaceae of 87 Ma with a credibility interval of 78–96 Ma.

Antonelli et al. (Reference Antonelli, Nylander, Persson and Sanmartin2009) concluded that the Rubiaceae originated in the palaeotropics in the Early Paleocene and that members of the family reached North America in the Late Paleocene/Early Eocene via land bridges such as the North Atlantic Thulean Land Bridge. From North America, Rubiaceae migrated to South America. In contrast, Manns et al. (Reference Manns, Wikström, Taylor and Bremer2012) concluded that the ancestor of the Dialypetalanthoideae was present in South America during the Late Cretaceous and that they were dispersed to Central America in the Early Paleocene and to islands in the Caribbean in the Oligocene–Miocene.

Much research using molecular techniques has been conducted to determine the general phylogenetic relationships in the Rubiaceae. Consequently, we have a good understanding of the phylogenetic relations of the Rubiaceae at the whole family level (Robbrecht and Manen, Reference Robbrecht and Manen2006; Davis et al., Reference Davis, Chester, Murin and Fay2007; Bremer and Eriksson, Reference Bremer and Eriksson2009; Rydin et al., Reference Rydin, Kainulainen, Razafimandimbison, Smedmark and Bremer2009, Reference Rydin, Wikström and Bremer2017; Wikström et al., Reference Wikström, Kainulainen, Razafimandimbison, Smedmark and Bremer2015, Reference Wikström, Bremer and Rydin2020; Razafimandimbison and Rydin, Reference Razafimandimbison and Rydin2024). Also, the phylogenetic relationships within the subfamilies (Andreasen and Bremer, Reference Andreasen and Bremer2000; Bremer and Manen, Reference Bremer and Manen2000; Sonké et al., Reference Sonké, Dessein, Taedoumg, Groeninckx and Robbrecht2008; Manns and Bremer, Reference Manns and Bremer2010; Wen and Wang, Reference Wen and Wang2012; Kainulainen et al., Reference Kainulainen, Razafimandimbison and Bremer2013; Thureborn et al., Reference Thureborn, Razafimandimbison, Wikström and Rydin2022 Razafimandimbison and Rydin, Reference Razafimandimbison and Rydin2024) and various tribes (e.g. Bremer and Thulin, Reference Bremer and Thulin1998; Rova et al., Reference Rova, Delprete, Andersson and Albert2002; Paudyal et al., Reference Paudyal, Delprete and Motley2014; Razafimandimbison et al., Reference Razafimandimbison, Taylor, Wikström, Pailler, Khodabandeh and Bremer2014, Reference Razafimandimbison, Wikström, Khodabandeh and Rydin2022; Delprete, Reference Delprete2015; Santos et al., Reference Santos, do Carmo, Harthman, Romagnolo and Souza2021) have been explored. However, questions remain about the phylogenetic relationships within the Rubiaceae. For example, the Acranthereae, Coptosapelteae and Lucelieae remain unplaced in the Rubiaceae (Bremer and Eriksson, Reference Bremer and Eriksson2009; Manns et al., Reference Manns, Wikström, Taylor and Bremer2012; Wikström et al., Reference Wikström, Bremer and Rydin2020; Razafimandimbison and Rydin, Reference Razafimandimbison and Rydin2024).

Molecular phylogenetic studies have revealed much information about the dispersal and diversification of the Rubiaceae. Tribe Rubieae is thought to have originated in the Old World, after which it was dispersed to the New World (Soza and Olmstead, Reference Soza and Olmstead2010; Ehrendorfer et al., Reference Ehrendorfer, Barfuss, Manen and Schneeweiss2018). Janssens et al. (Reference Janssens, Groeninckx, De Block, Verstraete, Smets and Dessein2016) concluded that Spermacoceae originated in the Late Eocene and diversified during the Oligocene and Miocene. These authors attributed the presence of two clades of Spermacoceae in Madagascar to long-distance dispersal events from eastern tropical Africa and from tropical America in the Oligocene and radiation in the Miocene. The ancestor of the genera Colletoecema and Seychellea likely reached the Seychelles islands from Africa via bird dispersal, and the two genera diverged in the late Oligocene–Early Pliocene (Razafimandimbison et al., Reference Razafimandimbison, Kainulainen, Senterre, Morel and Rydin2020). Diversification and dispersal of Plocama occurred in the Early Miocene during a time of climate warming. Today, there are sister species of Plocama growing in the Canary Islands and in eastern and southern Africa (Rincón-Barrado et al., Reference Rincón-Barrado, Olsson, Villaverde, Moncalvillo, Pokorny, Forrest, Riina and Sanmartín2021).

Deng et al. (Reference Deng, Zhang, Meng, Volis, Sun and Nie2017) reconstructed the evolution and migration of Theligonum and Kelloggia, which originated from ancestors growing in tropical/subtropical habitats along the coast of the Tethys Sea. When the Tibetan Plateau formed, it separated the eastern and western parts of the Tethys region, which helps to explain the current distribution of Theligonum in Asia and in the Mediterranean/Near East. The Plateau also separated the distribution of Kelloggia into an eastern and western part. The occurrence of Kelloggia in alpine meadows on the Tibetan Plateau represents the western part of this ancient distribution pattern; the eastern part per se became extinct. However, Kelloggia (from the western part of the distribution) migrated to North America via the North Atlantic Land Bridge and now grows in coniferous forests on the West Coast (Nie et al., Reference Nie, Wen, Sun and Bartholomew2005; Deng et al., Reference Deng, Zhang, Meng, Volis, Sun and Nie2017).

The ancestral lineage of the Psychotrieae alliance has been inferred to have originated in Africa in the Upper Cretaceous (Razafimandimbison et al., Reference Razafimandimbison, Kainulainen, Wikström and Bremer2017), and after its dispersal to the neotropics tribes Gaertnereae, Morindeae and Palicoureeae were formed. The alliance was dispersed from the neotropics to Asia and the Pacific islands, and in the Pacific, it gave rise to tribe Psychotrieae. During the last 10 million years, the alliance has reached the Western Indian Ocean Region at least 14 times via dispersal events from Africa, Asia and the Pacific. According to Barrabé et al. (Reference Barrabé, Maggia, Pillon, Rigault, Mouly, Davis and Buerki2014), New Caledonia has been colonized four times by Psychotria and allied genera, but only one clade of Psychotria s.l. underwent extensive and rapid diversification, resulting in 85 species that are all endemic to New Caledonia.

Molecular phylogenetic studies also have provided insight on long-distance dispersal and speciation within the Rubiaceae. For example, the Coffeeae alliance has undergone many dispersal events in the Western Indian Ocean Region, followed by diversification upon arrival in new habitats. Kainulainen et al. (Reference Kainulainen, Razafimandimbison, Wikström and Bremer2017) have inferred at least 15 immigrations of the Coffeeae alliance into Madagascar in the last 10 million years, with many of the dispersal events originating in Africa. Further, Madagascar has been the source of dispersal of members of the Coffeeae alliance to the Comoros, Mascarenes and Seychelles islands.

Various kinds of studies have been done with the aim of gaining insight into species diversification of Rubiaceae. Ploidy levels (2×, 4×, 6×, 7× and 10×) in the New Zealand species of Coprosma were evaluated to test the hypothesis that species with high ploidy levels occur in more biomes (i.e. types of habitat) than those with low ploidy levels (Liddell et al., Reference Liddell, Lee, Dale, Meudt and Matzke2021). Species with high ploidy were three to eight times more likely to occur in more than one biome than those with low ploidy. The authors suggested that whole-genome duplication has promoted expansion into additional biomes and thus speciation.

Niche modelling, in lieu of transplant studies, was used to investigate the role of ecogeographic (i.e. ecology and geography) isolation as a reproductive barrier in section Amphiotis of Houstonia (Glennon et al., Reference Glennon, Rissler and Church2012). Diploid and tetraploid forms of H. longifolia exhibited some ecogeographic isolation, but those of H. purpurea did not. The authors suggested that ecogeographic isolation has played a role in species divergence of Houstonia because niche models and principal components analyses showed that the species have niches with different climatic variables. Further, species diversification of the diploid-polyploid Galium pusillum complex has occurred in northern Europe in areas covered by glaciers during the Pleistocene (Kolář et al., Reference Kolář, Lučnová, Vít, Urfus, Chrtek, Fér, Ehrendorfer and Suda2013). Studies on niche differentiation of different species and ploidy levels of the G. pusillum complex in the deglaciated area revealed high levels of ecogeographic segregation/isolation.

Seeds of Rubiaceae

Seeds vary from <1 mm (dust-like or minute) to 10–20 mm long, and those of some species are distinguished by presence of wings or trichomes. The embryo is differentiated and has two cotyledons that are wider than, or the same width as, the hypocotyl-radicle, depending on the species. Also, embryo length relative to seed length varies with the species (e.g. Martin, Reference Martin1946). The endosperm in seeds of Rubiaceae may, or may not, contain starch, but it does contain hemicellulose and galactomannans (Jacobsen, Reference Jacobsen and Johri1984; Robbrecht, Reference Robbrecht1988). In tribes Guettardeae, Morindeae and Vanguerieae, the endosperm is soft and contains oil. However, Robbrecht (Reference Robbrecht1988) observed that the hard endosperm in seeds of Psychotria also contains some oil and suggested that presence of oil in the endosperm is not a dependable taxonomic character. Depending on the species, the endosperm is soft, fleshy, fleshy-firm, hard or cartilaginous (Robbrecht, Reference Robbrecht1988). The endosperm may have shallow or deep rumination, which provides useful taxonomic information for a few genera.

The seed coat of Rubiaceae is not multiplicative and generally consists of only the outer epidermis and a few layers of mesophyll cells. Depending on the genus, cells of the seed coat may be thin walled or variously thickened/lignified (Corner, Reference Corner1976). In some Rubiaceae, the integuments are well formed, but in other species, the integuments may be absorbed during seed development resulting in seeds without a seed coat (Boesewinkel and Bouman, Reference Boesewinkel, Bouman and Johri1984). The seed coat does not have a water-impermeable palisade layer of cells (macrosclereids). Thus, the Rubiaceae is not included on the list of plant families whose seeds have physical or combinaltional (physical + physiological) dormancy (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014).

Only a relatively few species of Rubiaceae have been reported to have recalcitrant (desiccation-sensitive) seed storage behaviour, and all these species are trees or shrubs (Table 1). Seeds of some Coffea species, Fosbergia shweliensis, Genipa americana, Gynochthodes jasminoides and Psychotria simmondsiana have been reported to have intermediate storage behaviour. Further, seeds of Coprosma, Gardenia, Kadua and Psydrax from Hawaii are sensitive to freezing (Chau et al., Reference Chau, Chambers, Weisenberger, Keir, Kroessig, Wolkis, Kam and Yoshinaga2019), suggesting that they may have intermediate storage behaviour. Various genera of Rubiaceae have been listed as having species with orthodox (desiccation tolerant) seeds, including Alseis, Anthocephalus, Asperula, Bertiera, Cephalanthus, Chomelia, Coutarea, Exostema, Galium, Guettarda, Hamelia, Houstonia, Kraussia, Lasianthus, Mitracarpus, Morinda, Nauclea, Neohymenopogon, Paederia, Palicourea, Phyllis, Psychotria, Randia, Rubia, Rudgea, Sherardia, Spermacoce, Stenostomum and Vangueria (Hong et al., Reference Hong, Linington and Ellis1998; Daws et al., Reference Daws, Garwood and Pritchard2005; Athugala et al., Reference Athugala, Jayasuriya, Gunaratne and Baskin2016; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Chen, Liao, Yu, Chung, Chen and Liu2019; Mattana et al., Reference Mattana, Peguero, De Sacco, Agramonte, Castillo, Jiménez, Clase, Prichard, Gómez-Barreiro, Castillo-Lorenzo, Encarnación, Way, Garcia and Ulian2020; Wanda et al., Reference Wanda, Oksari, Sahromi and Latifah2020; Ley-López et al., Reference Ley-López, Wawrzyniak, Chacón-Madrigal and Chmielarz2023). Seeds of Gardenia aubryi, G. brighamii, G oudiepe, G. remyi and G. taitensis were short lived when stored dry under conventional seed bank conditions, but the kind of seed storage behaviour was not determined (Opgenorth et al., Reference Opgenorth, Sailing, Rønsted and Wolkis2024).

Table 1. Species of Rubiaceae whose seeds have recalcitrant (R) or intermediate (I) seed storage behaviour

In attempting to test the hypothesis that animal dispersal of seeds promotes species diversification of plants, Eriksson and Bremer (Reference Eriksson and Bremer1991) used dispersal information for 427 genera of Rubiaceae. They concluded that no single dispersal trait was correlated with species diversification. However, they found large numbers of species for herbs with abiotically dispersed seeds, shrubs with animal-dispersed seeds and trees/shrubs with winged seeds, suggesting an association between species diversification and seed dispersibility. In relation to fruit dispersal by animals, Bremer and Eriksson (Reference Bremer and Eriksson1992) used a phylogenetic tree for Rubiaceae based on variation in chloroplast DNA to evaluate the origins of fleshy fruits in the family. They concluded that fleshy fruits have evolved independently from dry fruits at least 12 times in the Rubiaceae, with most of these events occurring in the Eocene to Oligocene.

Thus, we now find many tribes with dry fruits and many with fleshy fruits in both subfamilies of Rubiaceae (Table 2). The five alliances of Dialypetalanthoideae each have some tribes with dry fruits and others with fleshy fruits. However, the Hamelieae in the Cinchoneae alliance has both dry and fleshy fruits. In the Rubioideae, three alliances have some tribes with dry fruits and others with fleshy fruits. All nine tribes in the Psychotrieeae alliance have fleshy fruits. Anthrospermeae and Knoxieae in the Spermacoceae alliance have both dry and fleshy fruits.

Table 2. Embryo morphology and seed dormancy in tropical/subtropical and temperate/Arctic regions of subfamilies and tribes of Rubiaceae (following Razafimandimbison and Rydin (Reference Razafimandimbison and Rydin2024)) and information on general distribution of tribes

Amer., America; MD, morphological dormancy; MPD, morphophysiological dormancy; ND, non-dormant; PD, physiological dormancy; subtrop., subtropical; temp., temperate; trop., tropical; D, mature fruit is dry; F, mature fruit is fleshy; ud, underdeveloped; kind of embryo in parentheses (), have information on the embryo but not on germination; ?, no information is available.

b Can include the northern edge of the subtropical region.

Embryo morphology in seeds of Rubiaceae

Martin (Reference Martin1946) illustrated the embryo for 27 species of Rubiaceae, and 20 of them had a spatulate (spoon-shaped) embryo and 7 a linear (cotyledons and hypocotyl-radicle with the same width) embryo. Three of the 20 species with a spatulate embryo have a spatulate underdeveloped embryo, that is the small embryo has cotyledons and hypocotyl-radicle but its full length is much less than that of the endosperm/seed. The seven species with a linear embryo have an embryo that is about the full length of the seed, or nearly so, and thus they have a linear fully developed embryo (sensu Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2007). Part of our review involved an intensive literature research to expand our database on embryo morphology for the Rubiaceae to include all the kinds of embryos that occur in the family Rubiaceae (in addition to those illustrated by Martin (Reference Martin1946)) and to gain an understanding of embryo morphology in the two subfamilies and various tribes of Rubiaceae. Much attention was given to the drawings of embryos in early taxonomic works that included Rubiaceae (e.g. Gaertner, Reference Gaertner1788, Reference Gaertner1805–1807; Lamarck, Reference Lamarck1791–1823; Endlicher, Reference Endlicher1833–1835, Reference Endlicher1837–1838; Richard, Reference Richard1834; von Martius et al., Reference von Martius, Eichler and Urban1840–1906; Raoul, Reference Raoul1846; Wight, Reference Wight1846, Reference Wight1850; Wendell, Reference Wendell1855–1857; Baillon, Reference Baillon1866–1895; Hooker, Reference Hooker1867–1871, Reference Hooker1876; Kotschy and Peyritsch, Reference Kotschy and Peyritsch1867; Beddome, Reference Beddome1874; Beccari, Reference Beccari1877–1890; Grandidier, Reference Grandidier1890; Koorders and Valeton, Reference Koorders and Valeton1897–1914). The nomenclature of all species in the embryo and germination databases (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2) was checked/modified using Plants of World Online.

In addition to the three kinds of embryos seen in Martin's (Reference Martin1946) work, that is spatulate (S), spatulate-underdeveloped (SU) and linear-full (LF), some seeds of Rubiaceae have a linear-underdeveloped (LU) embryo (Supplementary Table S1). Further, seeds of Gleasonia, Henriquezia and Platycarpum in Tribe Henriquezieae collected in the Guiana Highlands in northern South America have large foliose cotyledons that cover more than half of the radicle (Rogers, Reference Rogers1984), which fit Martin's definition of an investing (I) embryo. Thus, based on morphology, five kinds of embryos have been identified in the Rubiaceae.

Information on embryo morphology was found for 260 genera in 62 tribes of Rubiaceae (Supplementary Table S1). All 62 tribes, except Mitchelleae, which is restricted to the temperate zone, occur in the tropics. Ten tribes occur in both the tropical and temperate zones (Table 2). S, SU, LF, LU and I were the only kind of embryo found in 23, 6, 5, 1 and 1 tribe(s), respectively (Table 2). However, some tribes have more than one kind of embryo, for example Guettardeae and Dialypetalantheaae have S, SU and LF, while Spermacoceae have S, SU, LF and LU embryos. Fifty-four of the 62 tribes (87.1%) have an S and/or SU embryo, either alone or in combination with LF and/or LU embryos. LF and LU embryos are the only kind of embryo occurring in 8.1 and 1.6%, respectively, of the 62 tribes and both LF and LU together in 3.2% of the tribes.

Embryo morphology in subfamilies and tribes of Rubiaceae

For the Dialpetalathoideae as delineated by Razafimandimbison and Rydin (Reference Razafimandimbison and Rydin2024), we found information on embryo morphology for 36 tribes, and 31 of them have some species with S embryos (Table 2). Twelve tribes have some species with S embryos and other species with SU embryos. Two tribes have S, SU and LF embryos, and two others have S, SU and LU embryos. We found two tribes with only LF embryos and one with LF and LU embryos. We note that absence of a kind of embryo in a tribe may be due to lack of research and not to phylogeny.

For the Rubioideae, as delineated by Razafimandimbison and Rydin (Reference Razafimandimbison and Rydin2024), we found information on embryo morphology for 23 tribes (Table 2). With the exception of Colletoecemateae and Schradereae with only LF embryos and Gaertnereae with only LU embryos, all tribes have S and/or SU embryos. Thus, both subfamilies have tribes with various combinations of S, SU, LF and LU embryos, but only the Henriquezieae in the Dialypetalanthoideae has an I embryo.

We obtained 94 tribe-level records for embryo morphology in the Rubiaceae: S, 45; SU, 27, LF, 13, LU, 8 and I, 1 (Table 2). Except for I, which was found only in dry fruits, all kinds of embryos were found in both dry and fleshy fruits: S, 18 dry and 27 fleshy; SU, 10 dry and 17 fleshy; FL, 7 dry and 6 fleshy and LU 4 dry and 4 fleshy.

Kinds of seed dormancy in Rubiaceae

Seed dormancy in Rubiaceae is related to embryo morphology and the time required for dormancy-break and germination. In seeds with a fully developed S or LF embryo, there is no growth of the embryo inside the mature seed prior to germination; thus freshly matured seeds are either ND or have physiological dormancy (PD). Seeds with a fully developed embryo are ND if they germinate to high percentages, often over a wide range of environmental conditions within about 4 weeks, and the range of environmental conditions does not increase after seeds are given a dormancy-breaking treatment (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014; Supplementary Table S2). Seeds with a fully developed embryo have PD if they fail to germinate at any set of environmental conditions in about 4 weeks, or they only germinate over a limited range of conditions that increases after seeds receive a dormancy-breaking treatment (conditional dormancy). Seeds with PD have a physiological inhibiting mechanism in the embryo that prevents the embryo from having enough growth potential to overcome the mechanical restriction of the seed coat or other structures covering the embryo. Dormancy-breaking treatments such as cold (0–10°C) or warm (≥15°C) moist stratification, or in some species dry-afterripening, lead to an increase in growth potential of the embryo and thus dormancy-break (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). It should be noted that we found no information in the literature on germination of Henriquezieae seeds, which have an investing embryo. Based on the large size of the fully developed investing embryo, however, it is assumed that Henriquezieae seeds are either ND or have PD.

In seeds of Rubiaceae with an SU or LU embryo, growth of the small, differentiated (has organs) embryo occurs inside the seed prior to germination. Seeds with an underdeveloped embryo in which embryo growth and germination occur in about 4 weeks or less after seeds are placed on a moist substrate have morphological dormancy (MD). That is, the delay in germination (under favourable conditions) is caused by a morphological ‘problem’, which is overcome after the embryo grows to full size. In some seeds with an underdeveloped embryo, germination does not occur within about 4 weeks when seeds are incubated under favourable conditions; they have morphophysiological dormancy (MPD). In seeds with MPD, the breaking of MD (i.e. embryo growth) is prevented because the embryo has PD. PD is broken by warm and/or cold stratification or dry-afterripening, and depending on the species, the embryo grows after and/or during the treatment that breaks PD (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014).

Seed dormancy in subfamilies of Rubiaceae

To supplement our database of information on seed dormancy/germination in the Rubiaceae that we have been accumulating since the late 1980s, extensive web searches were undertaken using various combinations of keywords, including names of the tribes of Rubiaceae, names of countries, grains, seeds, semillas, sementes, germinação and germinación. Information on seed dormancy/germination was found for 308 species of Rubiaceae, and 261 and 47 of them were from tropical/subtropical (hereafter tropical) and temperate/high latitude regions (hereafter temperate), respectively (Supplementary Table S2). If freshly matured seeds with a fully developed embryo germinated to a high percentage in about 4 weeks or less and dormancy-breaking treatments did not increase germination, the species was counted as having ND seeds. However, if seeds that germinated to a high percentage in about 4 weeks or less belonged to a genus/species with an underdeveloped embryo (and a dormancy-breaking treatment did not increase the range of conditions for germination), the species was counted as having MD. If seeds germinated to a low percentage, or not at all, and germination increased when seeds were given a dormancy-breaking treatment, they were listed as having dormant seeds. If the dormant seeds had a fully developed embryo, the species was listed as having PD. However, if the dormant seeds had an underdeveloped embryo, the species was listed as having MPD. In the case of PD, it was assumed that the seeds had non-deep PD, in which the excised embryo will grow and GA3 promotes germination (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). However, see ‘Concluding thoughts’ for the possibility of deep PD in some tropical Rubiaceae.

An examination of the information in Table 2 reveals strong evidence that much research remains to be done on seed dormancy/germination of the Rubiaceae. Of the 71 tribes listed in Table 2, we found no information on embryo morphology or seed dormancy for eight of them (Aitchisonieae, Cyanoneuroneae, Foonchewiee, Glionnetieae, Perameae, Schizocoleeae, Steenisieae and Temnoperygeae). For 23 tribes, we found information on embryo morphology but not on seed dormancy. For 12 tribes (Coffeeae, Coptosapelteae, Dialypetalantheae, Gardenieae, Knoxieae, Lasiantheae, Mussaendeae, Naucleeae, Octotropideae, Ophiorrhizeae, Psychotrieae and Rondeletieae), we found information on embryo morphology, but information on seed dormancy is incomplete. For example, in Coptosapelteae, S (Pitard, Reference Pitard1922–1933) and LU (Stoffelen et al., Reference Stoffelen, Robbrecht and Smets1996) embryos have been reported, but the only information for seed dormancy for a member of this tribe comes from a study by Mensbruge (Reference Mensbruge1966) on seeds of Corynanthe pachyceras. Based on presence of a LU embryo in seeds of Corynanthe sp. (Stoffelen et al., Reference Stoffelen, Robbrecht and Smets1996) and germination of C. pachyceras seeds to 80–90% (without treatment) in 8–20 days, we assume that seeds of this species have MD. It is likely that ND and/or PD occur in seeds of members of this tribe that have an S embryo.

In tropical regions, only MD and MPD have been reported in Coptosapelteae and Luculieae, while ND, MD, MPD and PD are found alone or in various combinations in 24 tribes of Dialypetalanthoideae and 14 tribes of Rubioideae (Table 2). In temperate regions, ND, MD, MPD and PD have been reported in 4 and 7 tribes of Dialypetalanthoideae and Rubioideae, respectively. In temperate Dialypetalanthoideae, seeds of Guettardeae have PD; Naucleeae, ND; Coffeeae, MPD and Gardenieae, ND. In temperate Ruboioideae, 3, 1, 1 and 2 tribes have ND/PD, MPD, MD/MPD and PD, respectively.

Some tribes have only ND (e.g. Greeneeae, Hamelieae and Scyphiphoreae), only PD (e.g. Bertiereae, Isertieae and Ixoreae) or both ND and PD (e.g. Naucleeae, Sherbournieae and Vanguerieae). It is expected that as more research is done on seeds of Rubiaceae the number of tribes with both MD and MPD as well as the number of tribes with both ND and PD will increase.

In tropical regions, each of the two subfamilies of Rubiaceae has ND seeds, or they have MD, MPD and PD, depending on the species (Table 2). However, in temperate regions, Dialypetalanthoideae is represented by species whose seeds are ND or have PD and MPD. In temperate regions, Rubioideae is represented by species whose seeds are ND, or they have MD, MPD and PD.

Seed dormancy profiles: biogeography and life forms

In the seed dormancy profile for Rubiaceae that includes all vegetation zones and life forms, 20.8% of the species had ND seeds, and 6.8, 22.1 and 50.3% had MD, MPD and PD, respectively (Table 3). Trees, shrubs, herbs and climbers account for 137. 98, 17 and 9 species, respectively, in tropical regions but for only 3, 19, 24 and 1 species, respectively, in temperate regions. Overall, 27.0% of the tropical tree species had ND seeds, and 8.0, 16.1 and 48.9% had MD, MPD and PD, respectively, with the most species in the rainforest. No trees with ND seeds were found for the tropical montane region, and MD was not found for tropical savanna and montane trees or MPD for tropical deciduous trees. MD and/or MPD occur in seeds of trees in the five vegetation regions, but overall MPD is more common than MD.

Table 3. Dormancy profile for Rubiaceae in relation to biogeography and life form

a Dormancy profile for 308 species of Rubiaceae, including all vegetation zones and life forms.

For tropical shrubs, 12.2% had ND seeds, and 8.3, 37.8 and 41.8% had MD, MPD and PD, respectively (Table 3). We found no shrubs in dry tropical deciduous forests with MD or PD or any savanna or montane shrubs with ND seeds. Among the tropical shrubs in general, MPD was more likely to occur than MD. In tropical herbs and climbers, some species had ND seeds, others had MPD or PD but none had MD.

Information for only a few temperate region species of Rubiaceae was found; thus, we constructed a life form dormancy profile for the whole region, with no consideration given to the vegetation zone. Some trees, shrubs and herbs in the temperate region have seeds with PD. ND seeds occur in some shrubs and herbs but have not been observed in any trees or climbers. Some trees, shrubs and herbs have seeds with MPD, but MD was found only for shrubs and climbers. It should be noted that the ‘vivipary’ reported for seeds of the herbs Ophiorrhiza mungos (Dintu et al., Reference Dintu, Dibi, Ravichandran and Satheeshkumar2015) and O. tomentosa (Tan and Rao, Reference Tan and Rao1981) are cases of ND orthodox seeds germinating in fruits during the rainy season and not true vivipary. That is, continuous rainfall promoted the germination of the ND seeds before they were dispersed (see Lu et al., Reference Lu, Liu, Han, Tan, Baskin and Baskin2022; Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2023).

Flower sexual morphology and seed dormancy/germination

Flowers of Rubiaceae mostly are bisexual, but some species are dioecious or rarely polygamo-dioecious or monoecious (Robbrecht, Reference Robbrecht1988). Many species of Rubiaceae have heterostylous flowers, and Darwin (Reference Darwin1877) observed that heterostyly is very common in this family. However, many Rubiaceae flowers are homostylous (e.g. Delprete, Reference Delprete2017). The heterostylous flowers of Rubiaceae are distylous, and Naiki (Reference Naiki2012) reported that 109 of 563 genera of Rubiaceae are distylous. In distyly, one flower morph (pin) has a long style and short stamens, and the other morph (thrum) has a short style and long stamens (Sobrevila, Reference Sobrevila1983; Naiki, Reference Naiki2012). Barrett and Richards (Reference Barrett and Richards1990) concluded that the basic characteristics of heterostyly are the same in temperate and tropical regions. They noted that woody heterostylous Rubiaceae are not represented by trees (and by only a few shrubs) in the temperate region, but many heterostylous trees and shrubs are found in tropical forests. In the tropics, the flowers may be pollinated by bees, butterflies, flies, hummingbirds and moths (e.g. Barrett and Richards, Reference Barrett and Richards1990; Machado and Loiola, Reference Machado and Loiola2000; Massinga et al., Reference Massinga, Johnson and Harder2005; Mendonça and Anjos, Reference Mendonça and Anjos2006).

Many pollination studies have been conducted on distylous species of Rubiaceae (e.g. Ferrero et al., Reference Ferrero, Rojas, Vale and Navarro2012; Watanabe et al., Reference Watanabe, Yang, Nishihara, Huang, Nakamura, Peng and Sugawara2015; Ornelas et al., Reference Ornelas, Márquez-Guzmán and Pacheco2020; Furtado et al., Reference Furtado, Matias, Pérez-Bárrales and Consolaro2021, Reference Furtado, Matias, Pérez-Bárrales and Consolaro2022), and the results of some of them have included information on fruit/seed set but not seed germination (e.g. Sobrevila, Reference Sobrevila1983; Murray, Reference Murray1990; Ree, Reference Ree1997; Massinga et al., Reference Massinga, Johnson and Harder2005; Silva et al., Reference Silva, Vieira and do Amaral2010, Reference Silva, Vieira, de Carvalho-Okano and de Oliveira2014; Hernández-Ramírez, Reference Hernández-Ramírez2012; Martén-Rodríguez et al., Reference Martén-Rodríguez, Muñoz-Gamboa, Delgado-Dávila and Quesada2013; Raju and Radhakrishna, Reference Raju and Radhakrishna2018; Xu et al., Reference Xu, Luo, Gao and Zhang2018). The general conclusion from these studies is that the distylous flowers promote cross-pollination in self-incompatible species. Pollen from long stamens results in fertilization of ovules of flowers with a long style, and pollen from short stamens results in fertilization of ovules of flowers with a short style.

In a study that did include seed germination, seeds of the distylous, self-incompatible Psychotria suterella were collected from both flower morphs from plants growing in a non-fragmented (continuous) forest, isolated forest fragments and forest fragments connected by corridors in the Atlantic Forest in Brazil (Lopes and Buzato, Reference Lopes and Buzato2007). Seeds were planted in a greenhouse, and germination was monitored. The authors did not analyse differences in seed germination between the flower morphs because germination did not differ significantly between the three kinds of habitats. Thus, from a plant reproduction perspective, P. suterella showed resilience to habitat fragmentation.

Among Rubiaceae species with hermaphroditic (perfect) homostylous flowers, self-pollination can be prevented by protandry. In Ferdinandusa speciosa, the male phase of flowering precedes the female phase by 1 day, but the species is self-compatible (de Castro and de Oliveira, Reference de Castro and de Oliveira2001). Seeds from cross-pollinated flowers had greater mass than those from self-pollinated flowers, and they germinated to 91.7 and 43.3%, respectively. Freshly matured seeds collected from plants of the annual weed Hedyotis corymbosa growing in open disturbed habitats in tropical, summer–dry regions of India were dormant (Raju and Krishna, Reference Raju and Krishna2018). Styles and stamens in flowers of this species are the same length, and the species is self-compatible and auto-selfing but weakly protandrous. Seed dormancy is broken during the dry season, and germination occurs with the onset of monsoon rains. Flowers of the shrubs Pavetta tomentosa (Raju and Rao, Reference Raju and Rao2016a) and Tarenna asiatica (Raju and Rao, Reference Raju and Rao2016b) growing in the Eastern Ghats Forest in India are hermaphroditic, protandrous and are both self- and cross-compatible. Freshly matured seeds of P. tomentosa are ND, but germination in the field does not occur until soil moisture becomes non-limiting. Seed germination of T. asiatica was not evaluated, but germination in the field occurred with onset of the monsoon rains.

The somewhat dioecious species Antirhea borbonica has polliniferous flowers and female flowers (Litrico et al., Reference Litrico, Paller and Thompson2005). Polliniferous flowers can produce a low number of seeds, but female flowers do not produce pollen. The polliniferous flower morph has a longer corolla tube, longer stamens, shorter style and produces more pollen but fewer seeds than the female flower morph. Seeds from female and polliniferous flowers germinated to 88 and 46%, respectively, and seedling survival was 95 and 50%, respectively. Thus, the sexual morphology of Rubiaceae flowers, in particular heterostylous flowers, has received much research attention from pollination biologists. Further, seed set from various kinds of crosses has been determined, but no detailed studies have been conducted on dormancy-break and germination of the resulting seeds. Thus, the effects (if any) of the diversity of pollination strategies in the Rubiaceae on seed dormancy/germination are not known.

Dormancy-break and germination requirements

One indication of the presence of non-deep PD in seeds is that treatments resulting in the disruption of the mechanical restriction of the seed coat allow the embryo, which has low growth potential, to germinate. Treatments of seeds of Rubiaceae that may increase germination include mechanical scarification (Msanga and Kalaghe, Reference Msanga, Kalaghe, Some and de Kam1993; Parreira et al., Reference Parreira, Cardozo, Giancotti and Alves2011; Valente et al., Reference Valente, Ferreira, Sousa, Leão-Araújo and Freitas2019) and acid scarification (Sadeghi et al., Reference Sadeghi, Ashrafi, Tabatabai and Alizade2009). Further, mechanical scarification of Oldenlandia corymbosa seeds removed the light requirement for germination; also, GA3 substituted for the light requirement in this species (Corbineau and Côme, Reference Corbineau and Côme1980/81). Soaking seeds of Rubia tinctorum in hot water (90°C) can promote germination (Sadeghi et al., Reference Sadeghi, Ashrafi, Tabatabai and Alizade2009); however, depending on the species, temperature and soaking time, hot water can kill the seeds (Garwood, Reference Garwood1986; Sadeghi et al., Reference Sadeghi, Ashrafi, Tabatabai and Alizade2009). Soaking seeds of Rubiaceae with PD in GA3 (Dhiman et al., Reference Dhiman, Kumar, Thakur and Sankhyan2022) or KNO3 solutions (Valente et al., Reference Valente, Ferreira, Sousa, Leão-Araújo and Freitas2019) or soaking seeds with MPD in these solutions (Campos-Ruíz et al., Reference Campos-Ruíz, Campos-Ruíz, de Chico and Chico-Ruíz2016) can promote germination, presumably by increasing the growth potential of the embryo and/or weakening the seed coat (Bewley et al., Reference Bewley, Bradford, Hilhorst and Nonogaki2013).

In temperate regions, PD in seeds of Rubiaceae is broken by cold stratification during winter followed by germination in spring (Farmer, Reference Farmer1979; Roberts, Reference Roberts1986; Masuda and Washitani, Reference Masuda and Washitani1992; Hölzel and Otte, Reference Hölzel and Otte2004), or it is broken in summer followed by germination in autumn (e.g. Brenchley and Warington, Reference Brenchley and Warington1930; Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1988). Also, in temperate regions, the PD part of MPD may be broken during cold stratification during winter, for example Mitchella repens (Barton and Crocker, Reference Barton and Crocker1945), allowing seeds to germinate in spring. In seasonally wet–dry tropical regions, PD in seeds of some species of Rubiaceae is broken during the dry season followed by germination at the onset of the wet season (Raju and Krishna, Reference Raju and Krishna2018). PD likely is broken during the dry season via afterripening, since it is known that dry-storage promotes dormancy-break and increases germination percentages of some Rubiaceae (Grijpma, Reference Grijpma1967; Kasera and Sen, Reference Kasera and Sen1987; Lugo and Figueroa, Reference Lugo and Figueroan.d.).

In tropical regions that receive rain throughout the year, germination of Rubiaceae seeds with MD can begin in 5–25 days after seed dispersal, and it may be extended for up to 50–60 days, depending on the species (Table 4). Embryo growth in seeds of Coffea arabica incubated on a water-moistened substrate at 30°C was detected after 1 day, and as the embryo grew the puncture force required to break the enclosing endosperm decreased (da Silva et al., Reference da Silva, Toorop, van Aelst and Hilhorst2004). ABA could inhibit an increase in pressure potential of the embryo, and the authors suggested that it also controlled the second step of endosperm cap weaking that occurs prior to germination (radicle emergence).

Table 4. Examples of the time required for dormancy-break and germination of Rubiaceae species in tropical/subtropical regions with no definite dry season for seeds sown under natural temperature regimes in nurseries or shade houses

a Time to 50% germination.

Germination of seeds of Rubiaceae with MPD can begin in 5–8 weeks, but depending on the species, it can continue for 14–75 weeks (Table 4). In general, the level of MPD in seeds of Rubiaceae has not been determined. However, seeds of Psychotria nigra and P. zeylandica from the tropical montane forests in Sri Lanka have non-deep simple epicotyl MPD (Athugala et al., Reference Athugala, Jayasuriya, Gunaratne and Baskin2016). Warm stratification promoted radicle emergence in 53 and 100 days for P. nigra and P. zeylandica, respectively, but 50 and 80 additional days of warm stratification, respectively, were required for the shoot to emerge. In contrast, seeds of Gaertnera walkeri, also from the tropical montane forests of Sri Lanka, have non-deep simple epicotyl MPD but required only c. 10 days for radicle emergence and another ≥ 28 days for the shoot to emerge (Athugala et al., Reference Athugala, Jayasuriya, Gunarathne and Baskin2018).

Germination of Rubiaceae seeds with PD in tropical regions that receive rain throughout the year generally begins in 2–6 weeks after dispersal but continues for 7–43 weeks, depending on the species (Table 4). Since the species grow in regions where soil moisture generally is not limiting for germination, we assume that dormancy-break is slow and seeds germinate as soon as they become ND. The slow breaking of PD in seeds with only PD and in those with MPD is an effective way to spread the germination of seeds in a cohort over time (see Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin, Yoshinaga and Thompson2005). Another possibility for the extended germination season of some species is that the freshly matured seed cohort is a mixture of ND seeds and those with PD. For example, a seed collection of Calycophyllum candidissimum from Cuba consisted of 41% ND seeds, 36% physiologically dormant seeds and 23% non-viable seeds (Gutiérrez et al., Reference Gutiérrez, Permús and Sánchez2020).

Frequently, seeds germination studies of Rubiaceae species have been conducted under ambient temperature conditions in nurseries/shade houses (Supplementary Table S2) or in the field (Lebrón, Reference Lebrón1979; Raich and Khoon, Reference Raich and Khoon1990). For tropical species that have been tested in incubators, the mean (±SE) temperature at which seeds germinated to a high percentage was 23.7 ± 0.7°C. In 21 of the studies on tropical species, seeds were tested in both light and dark: 6 species, seeds required light; 7, germinated equally in light and dark; 7, germinated to higher percentages in light than in dark and 1, germinated to a higher percentage in dark than in light (Supplementary Table S2). Seeds of the hot desert herb Plocama pendula germinated to a higher percentage in dark than in light (Pita, Reference Pita1996). For temperate species tested in incubators, the mean temperature at which seeds germinated to a high percentage was 17.7 ± 1.1°C. In 13 of the studies on temperate species, seeds were tested in both light and dark: 1 species, seeds required light; 1, germinated equally in light and dark and 11, germinated to higher percentages in light than in dark (Supplementary Table S2).

Soil seed banks

If soil samples are collected after the seed germination season has ended in the field but before dispersal of new seeds, they are likely to contain seeds that are a part of the persistent soil seed bank. We found 60 such studies in which seeds of Rubiaceae were present (Table 5). Soil seed banks have been reported for 74 species in 42 genera and 17 tribes of Rubiaceae. Shrubs/trees, herbs and climbers accounted for 61.9, 33.3 and 4.8%, respectively, of the genera and for 45.9, 50.0 and 4.1%, respectively, of the species. In the tropical region, the plant group with the most records for seed banks was shrubs > herbs > trees > climbers, and in the temperate region, the plant group with the most records for seed banks was herbs > shrubs with only one record each for trees and climbers. Seed banks of tribes Anthospermeae and Paederieae were found only in temperate regions; those of Naucleae, Rubieae and Spermacoceae in both temperate and tropical regions; and those of the other 12 tribes only in the tropical region.

Table 5. Seed banks for Rubiaceae

+, species present but no number given for seeds, m−2; H, herb; H/V, herb/vine; S, shrub; S/T, shrub/tree; S/V, shrub/vine; T, tree; V, vine/liana; temp., temperate region; trop., tropical/subtropical region.

The Spermacoceae had the highest representation in the seed bank studies with 14 genera and 25 species (8 in the genus Spermacoce), followed by Rubieae with 3 genera and 18 species (15 in the genus Galium). In both the Spermacoceae and Rubieae, there are woody and herbaceous species. The Naucleeae had five genera and five (four woody and one climbing) species, and Anthospermeae had three genera and three (two woody and one herbaceous) species with seed banks. Soil seed banks of tribes Argostemateae, Bertieae, Dialypetalantheae, Gardenieae, Guettardeae, Isertieae, Mussaendeae, Palicoureeae, Psychotrieae and Urophylleae were represented by one or two genera and species that were woody; Paederieae by one herbaceous genus and species and Sabiceae by one genus with two species of climbers and one shrub.

Although soil seed bank studies provide information on the presence of seeds of Rubiaceae in the soil, they do not tell us how old the seeds are or how long they can live in the soil. A few studies have been done for species of Rubiaceae in which seeds were buried in soil in the field and their viability monitored over a period of time. Seeds of the rare Gardenia actinocarpa and the common G. ovularis were placed in nylon-mesh bags and buried at a depth of 3–7 cm in a rainforest in northern Queensland (Australia) (Osunkoya and Swanborough, Reference Osunkoya and Swanborough2001). Seed viability was monitored at 3-month intervals for 12 months. The time for 50% of the seeds of G. actinocarpa and G. ovularis to become non-viable was about 2 and 3 months, respectively, and 0 and 20% of the seeds, respectively, were viable at 12 months.

Seeds of Palicourea sessilis (syn. Psychotria vellosiana) were placed in nylon-mesh bags and buried at depths of 5 and 15 cm in open and in shaded sites in cerrado vegetation in Brazil (Araújo and Cardoso, Reference Araújo and Cardoso2006). After 308 days of burial, seed viability ranged from 20 to 80%, with the highest viability for seeds in the shaded site at 5 cm. After about 100 days of burial, seeds began to germinate in the bags, probably in response to increased rainfall. In another study, seeds of Palicourea marcgravii and Palicourea hoffmannseggiana (syn. Psychotria hoffmannseggiana) were placed in nylon-mesh bags and buried at depths of 5 and 15 cm in open and in shaded sites in cerrado vegetation in Brazil (Araújo and Cardoso, Reference Araújo and Cardoso2007). After 308 days of burial, seed viability of P. marcgravii ranged from 15 to 60% with the highest viability of seeds in the open site at 15 cm, and seed viability for P. hoffmannseggiana ranged from 30 to 53% with the highest viability for seeds in the shaded site at 5 cm.

Fruits (natural dispersal unit) of the invasive vine Paederia foetida were placed in nylon-mesh bags on the soil surface and lightly covered with plant litter in forest interior, forest edge and open grassland in Hillsborough County, Florida (USA) (Liu and Pemberton, Reference Liu and Pemberton2008). In the forest interior, forest edge and grassland, seed viability after 1 year was 38, 1.2 and 1.1%, respectively; after 2 years 3.3, 0.3 and 0%, respectively; and after 3 years 0.2, 0.1 and 0%, respectively. Seeds of Asperula arvensis and Galium tricornutum were placed in nylon-mesh bags and buried at a depth of 10 cm in southeastern France, which has a Mediterranean climate (Saatkamp et al., Reference Saatkamp, Affre, Dutoit and Poschlod2009). After 2.5 years, 0 and 6% of the A. arvensis and G. tricornutum seeds, respectively, were viable. For A. arvensis, seed viability decreased from 100% in early autumn to 10% the following spring, possibly due in part to in situ germination.

Some information about persistence of seeds on/in soil can be obtained by monitoring the germination of seeds in long-term germination phenology studies. Seeds of Galium mollugo and Sherardia arvensis sown outdoors in Wellesbourn, England, germinated in years 1, 2 and 3, with only 0.1 and 0.2% (of the sown seeds), respectively, germinating in year 3 (Roberts, Reference Roberts1986). We collected seeds of eight species of Rubiaceae from Kentucky-Tennessee (USA) and immediately planted them on the soil surface in a non-heated glasshouse in Lexington, Kentucky. The seeds were exposed to natural seasonal temperature cycles (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Chester2019) and simulated summer–wet/dry and winter–wet soil moisture conditions. Germination was monitored at weekly intervals until at least 1 year after the appearance of the last seedling. Seedlings were removed during each monitoring, and there was no input of new seeds during the study. Seed germination of the five winter annuals occurred only in autumn, and depending on species and year of planting, seeds germinated over a 2- to 5-year period (Table 6). Seeds of the summer annual Hexasepalum teres germinated only in spring. Seeds of this species planted in 1978 germinated over a 3-year period, but those planted in 1979 germinated over a 5-year period. Seeds of the two polycarpic perennials germinated only in the first year (spring) after planting in autumn. Although we do not know why some seeds of annual species were delayed for 2–5 years, the delay in germination does show that seeds remained viable and thus formed at least a short-lived persistent soil seed bank (Thompson et al., Reference Thompson, Bakker and Bekker1997).

Table 6. Germination of seeds of Rubiaceae planted on soil in the non-heated greenhouse in Lexington, Kentucky (USA)

Concluding thoughts

In the two subfamilies of Rubiaceae and in both tropical and temperate regions, we find seeds that are ND, as well as those with MD, MPD and PD. However, the diversity of life forms in temperate regions with ND, MD, MPD and PD is lower than that in the tropics, with only temperate-region shrubs having seeds with MD, MPD or PD as well as ND seeds. Herbs are the second most diverse life form of Rubiaceae in the temperate region, and they have seeds with MPD and PD seeds as well as ND seeds. Thus, the overall diversity of seed dormancy (including ND) is the same in tropical and temperate regions, but in temperate regions, ND and MD, MPD and PD are not represented by all life forms. With an increase in distance from the Equator or increase in elevation on mountains, the number of life forms and kinds of dormancy decrease. At the high latitude/elevation limits of distribution of Rubiaceae, boreal and tundra species of this family are herbs, and their seeds have PD (Supplementary Table S2).

The Rubiaceae is diverse in terms of embryo morphology (I, S, SU, LF and LU), seed dormancy (ND and MD, MPD and PD) and life forms, and this diversity is centred in tropical regions of the world. In particular, large numbers of trees and shrubs whose seeds are ND or have MD, MPD or PD grow in tropical rainforest and in semi-evergreen rainforests. It is interesting to contrast the diversity of embryo morphology and seed dormancy of Rubiaceae and Asteraceae. Although Rubiaceae has five morphological kinds of embryos and ND seeds as well as those with MD, MPD and PD, the extent of its world distribution is much less than the extensive worldwide distribution of Asteraceae with one kind of embryo (S) and either ND or PD seeds (cypselae) (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2023).

Both Rubiaceae and Asteraceae have species that are trees, shrubs, herbs and climbers, with trees in both families restricted to the tropics. In the Rubiaceae, species diversity is mostly attributed to trees and shrubs in the tropics, while the Asteraceae has high diversity of shrubs and herbs in tropical and temperate regions, as well as trees in the tropics. Dormant cypselae of Asteraceae have non-deep PD, and all six known types of non-deep PD are found among species of Asteraceae. The great diversity of Asteraceae species, in part has been attributed to the diversity of types of non-deep PD, which provide great lability for adaptation to new environments and ultimately species diversification (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2023).

Little research has been done to determine the level of PD (non-deep, intermediate and deep) and types of non-deep PD (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) in Rubiaceae. For temperate-zone herbaceous species of Rubiaceae that undergo dormancy-break in summer (e.g. Galium aparine, Houstonia pusilla and Sherardia arvensis) or winter (Hexasepalum teres) and germinate in the subsequent autumn and spring, respectively, it seems reasonable that the seeds have non-deep PD. However, little work has been done to investigate changes in temperature requirements for germination during dormancy-break of species of Rubiaceae. Our preliminary studies on dormancy-break in seeds of H. teres during cold stratification indicated that the minimum temperature at which seeds can germinate decreases, that is type 2 of non-deep PD. Further, the germination of seeds of the winter annuals Galium parisiense and G. virgatum and the summer annual Hexasepalum teres over a 4- to 5-year period in a non-heated greenhouse (Table 6) where seeds were exposed to seasonal temperature changes in Kentucky (USA) hints that dormancy cycling may occur in seeds of these species. Dormancy cycling is known to occur only in seeds with non-deep PD or those with non-deep simple MPD (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014).

Unlike the Asteraceae with only non-deep PD, the prolonged period of incubation required for seed germination in some tropical species of Rubiaceae, for example Faramea occidentalis (13–43 weeks) and Guettarda foliacea (9–26 weeks) (Table 4), may indicate the presence of deep PD. One example of a tropical species with deep PD is Leptecophylla tameiameiae (Ericaceae) from Hawaii (USA). Seeds germinated over a period of 16–162 weeks, but when the study was terminated some viable seeds remained (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin, Yoshinaga and Thompson2005). If seeds have deep PD, the excised embryo does not grow or if it grows a dwarf plant results (nanism). Also, GA3 does not promote the germination of seeds with deep PD (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014, Reference Baskin and Baskin2022). Studies on seeds of tropical Rubiaceae that take a long time to germinate potentially would add much to our understanding of the variation in PD in tropical regions.

The diversity of embryo morphology and seed dormancy in Rubiaceae is associated with high species richness, especially trees and shrubs, in the tropics but not in temperate regions. However, various kinds of embryos and seed dormancy are found in Rubiaceae growing in temperate regions, suggesting that the low species richness of Rubiaceae in temperate regions is not due to lack of diversity of embryo morphology or seed dormancy per se. Since the Rubiaceae was widely distributed on earth by the Paleocene–Eocene (Graham, Reference Graham2009), much tribe/genus diversification of this family occurred when the climate was warm. According to Graham (Reference Graham2009), the Miocene was also a period of great diversification of Rubiaceae, but by this time temperate climates with cold winters had developed in some parts of the world due to global cooling at the Eocene–Oligocene boundary (Toumoulin et al., Reference Toumoulin, Tardif, Donnadieu, Licht, Ladant, Kunzmann and Dupont-Nivet2022). Any new species of Rubiceae that diverged in vegetation regions with cold winters would have been cold tolerant, which was mostly herbs. Further, since PD is the most labile class of dormancy (Willis et al., Reference Willis, Baskin, Baskin, Auld, Venable, Cavender-Bares, Donohue and Rubio de Casas2014), it seems reasonable that newly formed species of Rubiaceae in regions with cold winters would have seeds with PD. Thus, today herbs whose seeds have PD are the only Rubiaceae found at high latitudes in boreal/tundra plant communities.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258524000278.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

Amezaga, I and Onaindia, M (1997) The effect of evergreen and deciduous coniferous plantations on the field layer and seed bank of native woodlands. Ecography 20, 308318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade, LAZ and Miranda, HS (2014) The dynamics of the soil seed bank after a fire event in a woody savanna in central Brazil. Plant Ecology 215, 11991209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, K and Bremer, B (2000) Combined phylogenetic analysis in the Rubiaceae-Ixoroideae: morphology, nuclear and chloroplast DNA data. American Journal of Botany 87, 17311748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antonelli, A, Nylander, JAA, Persson, C and Sanmartin, I (2009) Tracing the impact of the Andean uplift on neotropical plant evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 97499754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Araújo, CG and Cardoso, VJM (2006) Storage in cerrado soil and germination of Psychotria vellosiana (Rubiaceae) seeds. Brazilian Journal of Biology 66, 709717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Araújo, CG and Cardoso, VJM (2007) Psychotria hoffmansegiana (Willd. Ex Roem. & Schult.) Mull. Arg. and Palicourea marcagravii St. Hil. (Rubiaceae): potential for forming soil seed banks in a Brazilian cerrado. Brazilian Journal of Biology 67, 421427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriaga, L and Mercado, C (2004) Seed bank dynamics and tree-fall gaps in a northwestern Mexican Quercus-Pinus forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 15, 661668.Google Scholar
Athugala, YS, Jayasuriya, KMGG, Gunaratne, AMTA and Baskin, CC (2016) Morphophysiological epicotyl dormancy in seeds of three Psychotria species from Sri Lanka: first record for Rubiaceae. Seed Science Research 26, 171181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athugala, YS, Jayasuriya, KMGG, Gunarathne, AMTA and Baskin, CC (2018) Diversity of epicotyl dormancy among tropical montane forest species in Sri Lanka. Plant Biology 20, 916925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Backlund, M, Bremer, B and Thulin, M (2007) Paraphyly of Paederieae, recognition of Putorieae and expansion of Plocama (Rubiaceae-Rubioideae). Taxon 56, 315328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillon, HE (1866–1895) Histoire des plantes. Paris: Librairie Hachette.Google Scholar
Barrabé, L, Maggia, L, Pillon, Y, Rigault, F, Mouly, A, Davis, AP and Buerki, S (2014) New Caledonian lineages of Psychotria (Rubiaceae) reveal different evolutionary histories and the largest documented plant radiation for the archipelago. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 71, 1535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, SCH and Richards, JH (1990) Heterostyly in tropical plants. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 55, 3561.Google Scholar
Barton, LV and Crocker, W (1945) Twenty Years of Seed Research at Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (1988) Studies on the germination ecophysiology of herbaceous plants in a temperate region. American Journal of Botany 75, 286305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2007) A revision of Martin's seed classification system, with particular reference to his dwarf-seed type. Seed Science Research 17, 1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2014) Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination, 2nd Edn. San Diego: Elsevier/Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2022) Mimicking the natural thermal environments experienced by seeds to break physiological dormancy to enhance seed testing and seedling production. Seed Science & Technology 50, 2129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2023) Seed dormancy in Asteraceae: a global vegetation zone and taxonomic/phylogenetic assessment. Seed Science Research 33, 135169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM, Yoshinaga, A and Thompson, K (2005) Germination of drupelets in multi-seeded drupes of the shrub Leptecophylla tameiameiae (Ericaceae) from Hawaii, a case for deep physiological dormancy broken by high temperatures. Seed Science Research 15, 349356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM and Chester, EW (2019) Long-term persistence of summer annuals in soil seed banks of seasonally dewatered mudflats. Plant Ecology 220, 731740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beccari, O (1877–1890) Malesia. Genova: Istituto de Sordo-Muti.Google Scholar
Beddome, RH (1874) Flora Sylvatica of Southern India. Madras: Gantz Brothers.Google Scholar
Benzing, DH (1991) Myrmecotrophy: origins, operation, and importance. In Huxley, CR and Cutler, DF (eds), Ant-Plant Interactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 353373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, JD, Bradford, KJ, Hilhorst, HWM and Nonogaki, H (2013) Seeds: Physiology of Development, Germination and Dormancy, 3rd Edn. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birhanu, L, Bekele, T, Tesfaw, B and Demissew, S (2022) Soil seed bank composition and aboveground vegetation in dry Afromontane forest patches of Northwestern Ethiopia. Trees, Forests and People 9, 100292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesewinkel, FD and Bouman, F (1984) The seed: structure. In Johri, BM (ed.), Embryology of Angiosperms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 567610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, LF, Sousa, MP, Braga, JF and Sa, ME (1999) Efeito da temperatura na germinacao de sementes de purui (Borojoa sorbilis (Duque) Cuatre. - Rubiaceae): morfologia das sementes e das plantulas. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 21, 4752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, B and Eriksson, T (1992) Evolution of fruit characters and dispersal modes in the tropical family Rubiaceae. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 47, 7995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, B and Eriksson, T (2009) Time tree of Rubiaceae: phylogeny and dating the family, subfamilies, and tribes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 170, 766793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, B and Manen, J-F (2000) Phylogeny and classification of the subfamily Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 225, 4372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, B and Thulin, M (1998) Collapse of Isertieae, re-establishment of Mussaendeae, and a new genus of Sabiceeae (Rubiaceae); phylogenetic relationships based on rbcL data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 211, 7192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, K, Friis, EM and Bremer, B (2004) Molecular phylogenetic dating of Asterid flowering plants shows Early Cretaceous diversification. Systematic Biology 53, 496505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenchley, WE and Warington, K (1930) The weed seed population of arable soil. I. Numerical estimation of viable seeds and observations on their natural dormancy. Journal of Ecology 18, 235272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, RJ and Johnson, KR (2004) South American palaeobotany and the origins of neotropical rainforests. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359, 15951610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calegari, L, Martins, SV, Campos, LC, Silva, E and Gleriani, JM (2013) Avaliacao do banco de sementes do solo para fins de restauracao florestal em Carandaí, MG. Revista Arvore 37, 871880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos-Ruíz, J, Campos-Ruíz, S, de Chico, LC-R and Chico-Ruíz, J (2016) Germinacion de semillas de quina, Cinchona pubescens Vahl com acido giberelico, nitrato de potasio y agua de coco. Revista Pakamures 4, 820.Google Scholar
Cao, M, Tang, Y, Sheng, C and Zhang, J (2000) Viable seeds buried in the tropical forest soils of Xishuangbanna, SW China. Seed Science Research 10, 255264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, JEU, Nascimento, WMO and Müller, CH (1998) Caracteristicas fisicas e de germinacao de sementes de especies frutiferas nativas da Amazonia. Boletim de Pesquisa 203, 518.Google Scholar
Chau, MM, Chambers, T, Weisenberger, L, Keir, M, Kroessig, TI, Wolkis, D, Kam, R and Yoshinaga, AY (2019) Seed freeze sensitivity and ex situ longevity of 295 species in the native Hawaiian flora. American Journal of Botany 106, 12481270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chippindale, HG and Milton, WEJ (1934) On the viable seeds present in the soil beneath pastures. Journal of Ecology 22, 508531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomicki, G and Renner, SS (2016) Evolutionary relationships and biogeography of the ant-epiphytic genus Squamellaria (Rubiaceae: Psychotrieae) and their taxonomic implications. PLoS One 11, e0151317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomicki, G and Renner, SS (2017) Partner abundance controls mutualism stability and the pace of morphological change over geologic time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 39513956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarkson, BR, Walker, LR, Clarkson, BD and Silvester, WB (2002) Effect of Coriaria arborea on seed banks during primary succession on Mt Tarawera, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 40, 629639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbineau, F and Côme, D (1980/81) Some particularities of the germination of Oldenlandia corymbosa L. seeds (tropical Rubiaceae). Israel Journal of Botany 29, 157167.Google Scholar
Corner, EJH (1976) The Seeds of Dicotyledons, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csontos, P, Horanszky, A, Kalapos, T and Lokos, L (1996) Seed bank of Pinus nigra plantations in dolomite rock grassland habitats, and its implications for restoring grassland vegetation. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 88, 6977.Google Scholar
Daínou, K, Bauduin, A, Bourland, N, Gillet, J-F, Fétéké, F and Doucet, J-L (2011) Soil seed bank characteristics in Cameroonian rainforests and implications for post-logging forest recovery. Ecological Engineering 37, 14991506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalling, JW and Denslow, JS (1998) Soil seed bank composition along a forest chronosequence in seasonally moist tropical forest, Panama. Journal of Vegetation Science 9, 669678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalling, JW, Swaine, MD and Garwood, NC (1997) Soil seed bank community dynamics in seasonally moist lowland tropical forest, Panama. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13, 659680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmayanti, AS, Lestari, DA and Firdiana, ER (2020) Seed exploration and conservation in Alas Purwo National Park, Banyuwangi, East Java, Indonesia. Bioscience Research 17, 28252835.Google Scholar
Darwin, C (1877) The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva, EAA, Toorop, PE, van Aelst, AC and Hilhorst, HWM (2004) Abscisic acid controls embryo growth potential and endosperm cap weakening during coffee (Coffee arabica cv. Rubi) seed germination. Planta 220, 251261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, AP, Chester, M, Murin, O and Fay, MF (2007) Searching for the relatives of Coffea (Rubiaceae), Ixoroideae): the circumscription and phylogeny of Coffeeae based on plastid sequence data and morphology. American Journal of Botany 94, 313329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, AP, Govaerts, R, Bridson, DM, Ruhsam, M, Moat, J and Brummitt, NA (2009) A global assessment of distribution, diversity, endemism, and taxonomic effort in the Rubiaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 96, 6878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daws, MI, Garwood, NC and Pritchard, HW (2005) Traits of recalcitrant seeds in a semi-deciduous tropical forest in Panamá: some ecological implications. Functional Ecology 19, 874885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Castro, CC and de Oliveira, PEAM (2001) Reproductive biology of the protrandrous Ferdinandusa speciosa Pohl (Rubiaceae) in southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Botanica 24, 167172.Google Scholar
Delprete, PG (2015) Revision of Neobertiera (Rubiaceae, Sipaneeae) with observations on distyly, and three new species from the Guianas. Phytotaxa 206, 118132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delprete, PG (2017) Sipaneopsis (Sipaneeae, Ixoroideae): a unique flowering process in the family Rubiaceae and its taxonomic significance. Phytotaxa 302, 4048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delprete, PG (2022a) Guide to the Genera of Lianas and Climbing Plants in the Neotropics: Rubiaceae. Washington: Smithsonian Institution. Available at https://naturalhistory.si.edu/sites/default/files/media/file/rubiaceae.pdfGoogle Scholar
Delprete, PG (2022b) Monograph of tribe Sipaneae (Rubiaceae, Ixoroideae). A neotropical group with its center of diversity on the Guiana Shield. Webbia 77, 1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delprete, PG and Cortés-B, R (2004) A phylogenetic study of the tribe Sipaneeae (Rubiaceae, Ixoroideae), using trnL-F and ITS sequence data. Taxon 53, 347356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delprete, PG and Jardin, JG (2012) Systematics, taxonomy and floristics of Brazilian Rubiaceae: an overview about the current status and future challenges. Rodriguésia 63, 101128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, T, Zhang, J-W, Meng, Y, Volis, S, Sun, H and Nie, Z-L (2017) Role of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau uplift in the Northern Hemisphere disjunction: evidence from two herbaceous genera of Rubiaceae. Scientific Reports 7, 13411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Rouw, A and van Oers, C (1988) Seeds in a rainforest soil and their relation to shifting cultivation in the Côte d'Ivoire. Weed Research 28, 373381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhiman, R, Kumar, D, Thakur, CL and Sankhyan, HP (2022) Effect of storage temperature, soaking period and chemical solutions on seed germination of Wendlandia exserta Roxb. DC. The Pharma Innovation Journal 11, 588592.Google Scholar
Dick, CW and Pennington, RT (2019) History and geography of neotropical tree diversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 50, 279301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dintu, KP, Dibi, CV, Ravichandran, P and Satheeshkumar, K (2015) Vivipary in Ophiorrhiza mungos L. – a rare phenomenon in angiosperms. Plant Biology 17, 294295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douh, C, Daínou, K, Loumeto, JJ, Moutsambote, J-M, Fayolle, A, Tosso, F, Forni, E, Gourlet-Fleury, S and Doucet, J-L (2018) Soil seed bank characteristics in two Central African forest types and implications for forest restoration. Forest Ecology and Management 409, 766776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussert, S, Chabrillange, N, Engelmann, F and Hamon, S (1999) Quantitative estimation of seed desiccation sensitivity using a quantal response model: application to nine species of the genus Coffee L. Seed Science Research 9, 135144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, JD (1980) Flora of Panama. Family 179. Rubiaceae – Part 1. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 67, 1256.Google Scholar
Ehrendorfer, F, Barfuss, MHJ, Manen, J-F and Schneeweiss, GM (2018) Phylogeny, character evolution and spatiotemporal diversification of the species-rich and world-wide distributed tribe Rubieae (Rubiaceae). PLoS One 13, e0207615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekasari, I, Sadono, R, Marsono, D and Witono, JR (2021) Species composition and richness of viable seed bank after fire events in Mount Ciremai National Park and Kuningan Botanic Gardens, West Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22, 34373447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, RH, Hong, TD and Roberts, EH (1990) An intermediate category of seed storage behaviour? I. Coffee. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 11671174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endlicher, SL (1833–1835) Atakta Botanica. Vienna: Friedrick Beck.Google Scholar
Endlicher, SL (1837–1838) Iconographia Generum Plantarum. Vindobonae: F. Beck, Universitatis Bibliopolam.Google Scholar
Enright, N (1985) Existence of a soil seed bank under rainforest in New Guinea. Australian Journal of Ecology 10, 6771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, O and Bremer, B (1991) Fruit characteristics, life forms, and species richness in the plant family Rubiaceae. The American Naturalist 138, 751761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, DFE and Torres, AM (2013) Morphology, ecophysiology and germination of seeds of the neotropical tree Alibertia patinoi (Rubiaceae). Revista Biologia Tropical 61, 547556.Google Scholar
Farmer, RE Jr (1979) Seed propagation of the Roan Mountain bluet. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Sciences 54, 126128.Google Scholar
Ferrero, V, Rojas, D, Vale, A and Navarro, L (2012) Delving into the loss of heterostyly in Rubiaceae: is there a similar trend in tropical and non-tropical climate zones? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 14, 161167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiore, EB and Putz, FE (1992) Buried dormant seeds in bottom sediments of Newnans Lake, Florida. Florida Scientist 55, 157159.Google Scholar
Francis, JK (1993) Genipa americana L. jagua, genipa. Rubiaceae. Madder family. New Orleans, LA: USDA. Forest Service, Southern Research Station General Technical Report SO-ITF-SM-58.Google Scholar
Frodin, DG (2004) History and concepts of big plant genera. Taxon 53, 753776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtado, MT, Matias, R, Pérez-Bárrales, T and Consolaro, H (2021) Do reciprocal herkogamy and pollinators affect legitimate pollen flow in distylous species of Rubiaceae? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 196, 524539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtado, MT, Matias, R, Pérez-Bárrales, T and Consolaro, H (2022) Complementary roles of hummingbirds and bees: pollen pickup, pollen deposition, and fruit production in the distylous Palicourea rigida. American Journal of Botany 110, e16194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, J (1788) Fructibus et seminibus plantarum. Stutgart: Sumtibus Auctoris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, KF (1805–1807) Supplementaum carpologicae; seu continuati operis Josephi Gaertner de Fructibus et seminibu plantarum. Leipzig: Enoch Richter Bibliopolae.Google Scholar
Gallon, M, Trezzi, MM, Diesel, E, Junior, AAB and Baracelli, MVJ (2018) Environmental factors’ action on the germination process and initial growth of weeds of Rubiaceae family. South African Journal of Botany 117, 2633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, S, Sidisunthorn, P and Anusarnsunthorn, V (2000) A Field Guide to Forest Trees of Northern Thailand. Bangkok: Kobfai Publishing Project.Google Scholar
Garwood, NC (1986) Effects of acid and hot water pretreatments and seed burial on the germination of tropical moist forest seeds. Turrialba 36, 479484.Google Scholar
Ginter, A, Razafimandimbison, SG and Bremer, B (2015) Phylogenetic affinities of Myrioneuron and Cyanoneuron, generic limits of the tribe Argostemmateae and description of a new Asian tribe, Cyanoneuroneae (Rubiaceae). Taxon 64, 286298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, HA and Cronquist, A (1991) Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, 2nd Edn. Bronx: The New York Botanical Garden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennon, KL, Rissler, LJ and Church, SA (2012) Ecogeographic isolation: a reproductive barrier between species and between cytotypes in Houstonia (Rubiaceae). Evolutionary Ecology 26, 909926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, AR, Martins, RCC, Martins, IS and Felfili, JM (2008) Bancos de sementes do sub-bosque de Pinus spp. e Eucalyptus spp. na Flona de Brasilia. Cerne 14, 2332.Google Scholar
Graham, A (2009) Fossil record of the Rubiaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 96, 90108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandidier, A (1890) Histoire physique, naturelle et politique de Madagascar. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Grant, CD and Koch, JM (1997) Ecological aspects of soil seed-banks in relation to bauxite mining. II. Twelve year old rehabilitated mines. Australian Journal of Ecology 22, 177184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grijpma, P (1967) Anthocephalus cadamba, a versatile, fast growing industrial tree species for the tropics. Turrialba 17, 321329.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, A, Permús, M and Sánchez, JA (2020) Rasgos funcionales de semillas de Calycophyllum candidissimum (Rubiaceae), arbol pionero del neotropico. Revista del Jardin Botáncio Nacional 41, 7177.Google Scholar
Hamilton, KN, Offord, CA, Cuneo, P and Deseo, MA (2013) A comparative study of seed morphology in relation to desiccation tolerance and other physiological responses in 71 eastern Australian rainforest species. Plant Species Biology 28, 5162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, RJF and Guymer, GP (1985) Durringtonia (Durringtonieae), a new genus and tribe of Rubiaceae from Australia. Kew Bulletin 40, 97107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Ramírez, AM (2012) Distyly, floral visitors, and fructification in 2 natural populations of Psychotria nervosa (Rubiaceae). Ecoscience 19, 133139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölzel, N and Otte, A (2004) Ecological significance of seed germination characteristics in flood-meadow species. Flora 199, 1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, TD and Ellis, RH (1995) Interspecific variation in seed storage behaviour within two genera – Coffee and Citrus. Seed Science & Technology 23, 165181.Google Scholar
Hong, TD, Linington, S and Ellis, RH (1998) Compendium of Information on Seed Storage Behaviour. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Hooker, JD (1867–1871) Icones Plantarum, Vol. 11. London: William and Norgate.Google Scholar
Hooker, JD (1876) Icones Plantarum, Vol. 12. London: William and Norgate.Google Scholar
Hooker, WJ and Hooker, JD (1895) Icones plantarum, Vol. 24. London: Dulau and Company.Google Scholar
Howard, TM (1973) Nothofagus cunninghamii ecotonal stages buried viable seed in north west Tasmania. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 86, 137142.Google Scholar
Hoyle, GL, Venn, SE, Steadman, KJ, Good, RB, McAuliffe, EJ, Williams, ER and Nicotra, AB (2013) Soil warming increases plant species richness but decreases germination from the alpine soil seed bank. Global Change Biology 19, 15491561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, L and Li, M (2015) Diversity and distribution of climbing plants in Eurasia and North Africa. In Parthasarathy, N (ed.), Biodiversity of Lianas, Sustainable Development and Biodiversity. Cham: Springer, pp. 5779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultén, E (1968) Flora of Alaska and Neighboring Territories. A Manual of the Vascular Plants. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, CR (1978) The ant-plants Myrmecodia and Hydnophytum (Rubiaceae), and the relationships between their morphology, ant occupants, physiology and ecology. New Phytologist 80, 231268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, CR (1982) Ant-epiphytes of Australia. In Buckley, RC (ed.), Ant-Plant Interactions in Australia. The Hague: Dr. W. Junk Publishers, pp. 6373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, CR and Jebb, MHP (1991) The tuberous epiphytes of the Rubiaceae 1: a new subtribe – the Hydnophytinae. Blumea 36, 120.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, JV (1984) The seed: germination. In Johri, BM (ed.), Embryology of Angiosperms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 611646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssens, SB, Groeninckx, I, De Block, PJ, Verstraete, B, Smets, EF and Dessein, S (2016) Dispersing towards Madagascar: biogeography and evolution of the Madagascan endemics of the Spermacoceae tribe (Rubiaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 95, 5866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaramillo, C (2023) The evolution of extant South American tropical biomes. New Phytologist 239, 477493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaramillo, C, Rueda, MJ and Mora, G (2006) Cenozoic plant diversity in the Neotropics. Science 311, 18931896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaramillo, C, Ochoa, D, Contreras, L, Pagami, M, Carvajal-Ortiz, H, Pratt, LM, Krishnan, S, Cardona, A, Romera, M, Quiroz, L, Rodriguez, G, Rueda, MJ, Parra, F, Morón, S, Green, W, Bayona, G, Montes, C, Quintero, O, Ramirez, R, Mora, G, Schouten, S, Bermudez, H, Navarrete, R, Parra, F, Alvarán, M, Osorno, J, Crowley, JL, Valencia, V and Vervoort, J (2010) Effects of rapid global warming at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary on neotropical vegetation. Science 330, 957961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jebb, M (1991) Cavity structure and function in the tuberous Rubiaceae. In Huxley, CR and Cutler, DF (eds), Ant-Pant Interactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 374389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
José, AC, da Silva, EA and Davide, AC (2007) Classificacao fisologica de sementes de cinco especies arboreas de mata ciliar quanto tolerancia a dessecacao e an armazenamento. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 29, 171178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jutila, HM (2003) Germination in Baltic coastal wetland meadows: similarities and differences between vegetation and seed bank. Plant Ecology 166, 275293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kainulainen, K, Mouly, A, Khodabandeh, A and Bremer, B (2009) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Alberteae (Rubiaceae), with description of a new genus, Razafimandimbisonia. Taxon 58, 757768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kainulainen, K, Razafimandimbison, SG and Bremer, B (2013) Phylogenetic relationships and new tribal delimitations in subfamily Ixoroideae (Rubiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 173, 387406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kainulainen, K, Razafimandimbison, SG, Wikström, N and Bremer, B (2017) Island hopping, long-distance dispersal and species radiation in the Western Indian Ocean: historical biogeography of the Coffeeae alliance (Rubiaceae). Journal of Biogeography 44, 19661979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalamees, R and Zobel, M (1997) The seed bank in an Estonian calcareous grassland: comparison of different successional stages. Folia Geobotanica and Phytotaxonomica 32, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalsing, A, Rossi, CVS, Lucio, FR, Gonçalves, EP and Valeriano, R (2020) Efficacy of control of glyphosate-tolerant species of the Rubiaceae family through double-kockdown applications. Planta Daninha 38, e020190700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasera, P and Sen, DN (1987) Effect of different environmental factors and growth regulators on seed germination of Borreria articularis (Linn.) F. N. Will. Biovigyanam 13, 112116.Google Scholar
Kellman, MC (1974a) Preliminary seed budgets for two plant communities in coastal British Columbia. Journal of Biogeography 1, 123133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellman, MC (1974b) The viable weed seed content of some tropical agricultural soils. Journal of Applied Ecology 11, 669678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkbride, Gunn, CR and Dallwitz, MJ (2000) Family guide for fruits and seeds: descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval. Version: 12th April 2021. delta-intkey.com. Available at https://www.delta-intkey.com/famfs/www/rubiac.htm (accessed 20 December 2022).Google Scholar
Kolář, F, Lučnová, M, Vít, P, Urfus, T, Chrtek, J, Fér, T, Ehrendorfer, F and Suda, J (2013) Diversity and endemism in deglaciated areas: ploidy, relative genome size and niche differentiation in the Galium pusillum complex (Rubiaceae) in northern and central Europe. Annals of Botany 111, 10951108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koorders, SH and Valeton, T (1897–1914) Icones Bogoriensis. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Kotschy, CGT and Peyritsch, J (1867) Plantae Tinneanae. Vienna: Caroli Gerold Filii.Google Scholar
Kramer, NB and Johnson, FD (1987) Mature forest seed banks of three habitat types in central Idaho. Canadian Journal of Botany 65, 19611966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacerda, F, Miranda, I, Lima, TTS, Mafra, NA, Leão, FM, Do Vale, I, Dispo, CJC and Kato, OR (2016) Origin of and resulting floristic composition from seedbanks in agroforestry systems of Tomé-Açu, eastern Amazon. Weed Research 56, 219228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarck, JBPAM (1791–1823) Recueil de planches de botanique de l'encyclopedie. Paris: Chez Mme. Veuve Agasse, Impremeur-libraire.Google Scholar
Lavorel, S, Debussche, M, Lebreton, J-D and Lepart, J (1993) Seasonal patterns in the seed bank of Mediterranean old-fields. Oikos 67, 114128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebrón, ML (1979) An autecological study of Palicourea riparia Bentham as related to rain forest disturbance in Puerto Rico. Oecologia 42, 3146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Page, C and Keddy, PA (1998) Reserves of buried seeds in beaver ponds. Wetlands 18, 242248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley-López, JM, Wawrzyniak, MK, Chacón-Madrigal, E and Chmielarz, P (2023) Seed traits and tropical arboreal species conservation: a case study of a highly diverse tropical humid forest region in southern Costa Rica. Biodiversity and Conservation 32, 15731590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, AH, Yang, J, He, HJ and Yang, XY (2013) Seed desiccation tolerance and germination of a potentially threatened Chinese species, Fosbergia shweliensis. Seed Science & Technology 41, 479482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, LG, Lee, WG, Dale, EE, Meudt, HM and Matzke, NJ (2021) Pioneering polyploids: the impact of whole-genome duplication on biome shifting in New Zealand Coprosma (Rubiaceae) and Veronica (Plantaginaceae). Biology Letters 17, 20210297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litrico, I, Paller, T and Thompson, JD (2005) Gender variation and primary succession in a tropical woody plant, Antirhea borbonica (Rubiaceae). Journal of Ecology 93, 705715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H and Pemberton, RW (2008) Differential soil seed bank longevity of Paederia foetida L., an invasive woody vine, across three habitats in Florida. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 135, 491496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, LE and Buzato, S (2007) Variation in pollinator assemblages in a fragmented landscape and its effects of reproductive stages of a self-incompatible treelet, Psychotria suterella (Rubiaceae). Oecologia 154, 305314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, J, Liu, W, Han, J, Tan, D, Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM (2022) Non-viviparous pre-dispersal seed germination in Amaranthaceae in the cold deserts of Central Asia. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10, 1047330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugo, AE and Figueroa, JC (n.d.) Anthrocephalus chinensis (Lam.) A. Rich. ex Walp. kadam. Rubiaceae. Madder family. New Orleans, LA: USDA Forest Service. Southern Research Station General Technical Report SO-ITF-SM-1.Google Scholar
Lyaruu, HVM and Backéus, I (1999) Soil seed bank and regeneration potential on eroded hill slopes in the Kondoa Irangi Hills, central Tanzania. Applied Vegetation Science 2, 209214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabberley, DJ (2017) Mabberley's Plant-Book. A Portable Dictionary of Plants, Their Classification and Uses, 4th Edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machado, IC and Loiola, MI (2000) Fly pollination and pollinator sharing in two synchronopatric species: Cordia multispicata (Boraginaceae) and Borreria alata (Rubiaceae). Revista Brasileira de Botanica 23, 305311.Google Scholar
Magistrali, PR, José, AC, Faria, JMR and Gasparin, E (2013) Physiological behavior of Genipa americana L. seeds regarding the capacity for desiccation and storage tolerance. Journal of Seed Science 35, 495500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manns, U and Bremer, B (2010) Towards a better understanding of intertribal relationships and stable tribal delimitations within Cinchonoideae s.s. (Rubiaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56, 2139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manns, U, Wikström, N, Taylor, CM and Bremer, B (2012) Historical biogeography of the predominantly neotropical subfamily Cinchonoideae (Rubiaceae): into or out of America? International Journal of Plant Sciences 173, 261289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martén-Rodríguez, S, Muñoz-Gamboa, P, Delgado-Dávila, R and Quesada, M (2013) Asymmetric pollen transfer and reproductive success of the hawkmoth-pollinated distylous tree Palicourea tetragona (Rubiaceae) at La Selva, Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology 29, 501510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, AC (1946) The comparative internal morphology of seeds. The American Midland Naturalist 36, 513660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massinga, PH, Johnson, SD and Harder, LD (2005) Heteromorphic incompatibility and efficiency of pollination in two distylous Pentanisia species (Rubiaceae). Annals of Botany 95, 389399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masuda, M and Washitani, I (1992) Differentiation of spring emerging and autumn emerging ecotypes in Galium spurium L. var. echinospermon. Oecologia 89, 4246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattana, E, Peguero, B, De Sacco, A, Agramonte, W, Castillo, WRE, Jiménez, F, Clase, T, Prichard, HW, Gómez-Barreiro, P, Castillo-Lorenzo, E, Encarnación, MT, Way, MJ, Garcia, R and Ulian, T (2020) Assessing seed desiccation responses of native trees in the Caribbean. New Forests 51, 705-721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McInerney, FA and Wing, SL (2011) The Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum: a perturbation of carbon cycle, climate, and biosphere with implications for the future. Annual Review of Earth Planetary Sciences 39, 489516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIvor, JG and Gardener, CJ (1991) Soil seed densities and emergence patterns in pastures in the seasonally dry tropics of northeastern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 16, 159169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendonça, LB and Anjos, LD (2006) Flower morphology, nectar features, and hummingbird visitation to Palicourea crocea (Rubiaceae) in the Upper Parana River floodplain, Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 78, 4557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mensbruge, GDL (1966) La germination et les plantules des essences arborees de la foret dense humide de la Cote D'Ivoire. Nogent-sur-Marne, France: Centre Technique Forestier Tropical No. 26.Google Scholar
Mersereau, D and DiTommaso, A (2003) The biology of Canadian weeds. 121. Galium mollugo L. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences 83, 453466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesquita, MLR, Andrade, LA and Pereira, WS (2014) Banco de sementes do solo em areas de cultivo de subsistencia na floresta ombrofila com barbacu (Orbygnia phalerata Mart.) no Maranhão. Revista Arvore 38, 677688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzner, K, Gachet, S, Rocarpin, P and Saatkamp, A (2017) Seed bank, seed size and dispersal in moisture gradients of temporary pools in southern France. Basic and Applied Ecology 21, 1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, GR and Cummins, RP (2003) Soil seed banks of woodland, heathland, grassland, mire and montane communities, Cairngorm Mountains, Scotland. Plant Ecology 168, 255266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, WEJ (1936) The buried viable seeds of enclosed and unenclosed hill land. Bulletin of the Welsh Plant Breeding Experiment Station. Series H 14, 5873.Google Scholar
Mndela, M, Madakadze, IC, Nherera-Chokuda, F and Dube, S (2019) Dynamics of the soil seed bank over the short-term after bush clearing in a semi-arid shrubland in Springbokvlakte thornveld of South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 125, 298309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moressi, M, Padovan, MP and Pereira, ZV (2014) Banco de sementes como indicador de restauracao em sistemas agroflorestais multiestratificados no sudoeste de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Revista Arvore 38, 10731083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motley, TJ, Wurdack, KJ and Delprete, PG (2005) Molecular systematics of the Catesbaeeae-Chiococceae complex (Rubiaceae): flower and fruit evolution and biogeographic implications. American Journal of Botany 92, 316329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Msanga, HP and Kalaghe, AG (1993) Germination of wild medlar (Vangueria infausta Burch.) following manual seed coat scarification and indole acetic acid treatments. In Some, LM and de Kam, M (eds), Tree Seed Problems, with Special Reference to Africa. Leiden: Backhuys, pp. 170179.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, P and Ghosh, TK (2015) Aquatic and semi-aquatic angiospermic flora of Lohardga (Jharkhand). Phytotaxonomy 15, 134145.Google Scholar
Murray, BG (1990) Heterostyly and pollen-tube interactions in Luculia gratissima (Rubiaceae). Annals of Botany 65, 691698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiki, A (2012) Heterostyly and the possibility of its breakdown by polyploidization. Plant Species Biology 27, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, JPB, Reis, MGF, Rei, GG, Silva, AF and Cacau, FV (2007) Banco de sementes do solo de uma floresta estacional semidecidual, em Vicosa, Minas Gerais. Ciência Florestal 17, 311320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, AM, Martins, SV, Silva, KA and Gleriani, JM (2014) Banco de sementes do solo e serapilheira acumulada em floresta restaurada. Revista Arbore 38, 609620.Google Scholar
Ng, FSP (1980) Germination ecology of Malaysian woody plants. Malaysian Forester 43, 406438.Google Scholar
Ng, FSP (1988) Forest tree biology. In Earl of Cranbrook (ed.), Key Environments, Malaysia. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 102125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, FSP (1992) Manual of Forest Fruits, Seeds and Seedlings, Vol. 2. Kuala Lumpur: Forest Research Institute Malaysia.Google Scholar
Nie, Z-L, Wen, J, Sun, H and Bartholomew, B (2005) Monophyly of Kelloggia Torrey ex Benth. (Rubiaceae) and evolution of its intercontinental disjunction between western North America and eastern Asia. American Journal of Botany 92, 642652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Numata, M, Hayashi, I, Komura, T and Oki, K (1964) Ecological studies on the buried-seed population in the soil as related to plant succession I. Japanese Journal of Ecology 14, 207217.Google Scholar
Opgenorth, M, Sailing, E, Rønsted, N and Wolkis, D (2024) Gardenia (Rubiaceae) seed conservation physiology with emphasis on rare Hawaiian species. Plant Ecology and Evolution 157, 220235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornelas, JF, Márquez-Guzmán, J and Pacheco, MP (2020) Pollen and anther development malfunction in distylous flowers of Palicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae). Botanical Sciences 98, 554569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oryem-Origa, H (1999) Fruit and seed ecology of wild robusta coffee (Coffea canephora Froehner) in Kibale National Park, Uganda. African Journal of Ecology 37, 439448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osunkoya, OO and Swanborough, PW (2001) Reproductive and ecophysiological attributes of the rare Gardenia actinocarpa (Rubiaceae) compared with its common co-occurring congener, G. ovularis. Australian Journal of Botany 49, 471478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parreira, MC, Cardozo, NP, Giancotti, PRF and Alves, PLCA (2011) Superacao de dormencia e influencia dos fatores ambientais na germinqacao de sementes de Spermacoce latifolia. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Agrarias 6, 427431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paudyal, SK, Delprete, PG and Motley, TJ (2014) Using molecular, morphological, and palynological evidence to transfer Strumpfia maritima to the monotypic tribe Strumpfieae (Cinchonoideae, Rubiaceae), and a re-delimitation of the tribe Chiococceae. Systematic Botany 39, 11971203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paz, H, Mazer, SJ and Martinez-Ramos, M (1999) Seed mass, seedling emergence, and environmental factors in seven rain forest Psychotria (Rubiaceae). Ecology 80, 15941606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pederson, RL (1981) Seed bank characteristics of the Delta Marsh, Montana. In Richardson, B (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the Midwest Conference on Wetland Values and Management, 17–19 June 1981, St. Paul, Minnesota. Navarre, Minnesota: Freshwater Society, pp. 6169.Google Scholar
Pérez, EM and Santiago, ET (2001) Dinamica estacional del banco de semillas en una sabana en los llanos central-orientalis de Venezuela. Biotropica 33, 435446.Google Scholar
Pita, JM (1996) Reqerimientos de luz para la germinacion de algunas especies Macaronesicas. Botanica Macaronesica 17, 3746.Google Scholar
Pitard, J (1922–1933) Flore generale de l'Indo-Chine. Paris: Masson et Cie, Éditeurs.Google Scholar
Plants of World Online. Available at https://powo.science.kew.org/ (accessed 22 April 2023).Google Scholar
Putz, FE and Appanah, S (1987) Buried seeds, newly dispersed seeds, and the dynamics of a lowland forest in Malaysia. Biotropica 19, 326333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raich, JW and Khoon, GW (1990) Effects of canopy openings on tree seed germination in a Malaysian dipterocarp forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6, 203217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raju, AJS and Krishna, JR (2018) Pollination ecology of the annual herb Hedyotis corymbosa (Rubiaceae). Phytologia Balcanica 24, 343349.Google Scholar
Raju, AJS and Radhakrishna, J (2018) Pollination ecology of the annual herb, Hedyotis brachiata (Rubiaceae). Annali di Botanica 8, 916.Google Scholar
Raju, AJS and Rao, MM (2016a) Flowering phenology, breeding system, pollinators and fruiting behaviour of Pavetta tomentosa (Rubiaceae) Roxb. ex SM., a keystone species in the southern Eastern Ghats Forests, Andhra Pradesh, India. Annali di Botanica 6, 8596.Google Scholar
Raju, AJS and Rao, MM (2016b) Pollination ecology of Tarenna asiatica (L.) Kuntz ex. K. Schum. (Rubiaceae), a keystone evergreen species in the Eastern Ghats Forest – Andhra Pradesh, India. Annali di Botanica 6, 97104.Google Scholar
Raoul, ME (1846) Choix de plantes de la Nouvelle-Zealande. Paris: Fortin, Masson ETCIE.Google Scholar
Razafimandimbison, SG and Rydin, C (2024) Phylogeny and classification of the coffee family (Rubiaceae, Gentianales): overview and outlook. Taxon 73, 673717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razafimandimbison, SG, Taylor, CM, Wikström, N, Pailler, T, Khodabandeh, A and Bremer, B (2014) Phylogeny and generic limits in the sister tribes Psychotrieae and Palicoureeae (Rubiaceae): evolution of schizocarps in Psychotria and origins of bacterial leaf nodules of the Malagasy species. American Journal of Botany 101, 11021126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Razafimandimbison, SG, Kainulainen, K, Wikström, N and Bremer, B (2017) Historical biogeography and phylogeny of the pantropical Psychotrieae alliance (Rubiaceae), with particular emphasis on the Western Indian Ocean Region. American Journal of Botany 104, 14071423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Razafimandimbison, SG, Kainulainen, K, Senterre, B, Morel, C and Rydin, C (2020) Phylogenetic affinity of an enigmatic Rubiaceae from the Seychelles revealing a recent biogeographic link with Central Africa: gen nov. Seychellea and trib. nov. Seychelleeae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 143, 106685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Razafimandimbison, SG, Wikström, N, Khodabandeh, A and Rydin, C (2022) Phylogeny of the Madagascar-centered tribe Danaideae (Rubiaceae) as a precursor to taxonomic revision: insights into its generic and species limits, affinities and distribution. Annals of Botany 130, 849867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ree, RH (1997) Pollen flow, fecundity, and the adaptive significance of heterostyly in Palicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae). Biotropica 29, 298308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RFK (The Rainforest Key), Zich, FA, Hyland, BPM, Whiffin, T and Kerrigan, RA (2020) Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants-Online Edition. Rubiaceae. Available at https://apps.lucidcentral.org/rainforest/text/entities/index.htm (accessed 3 February 2023). RFK code 2506, Gynochthodes retrophila; RFK code 3169, Eumachia frutescens; RFK code 3472, Amaracarpus nematopodus; and RFK code 3177, Psychotria loniceroides.Google Scholar
Richard, A (1834) Memorie sur la familie des Rubiacees. Memories de la societe d'historie de Paris 5, 80297.Google Scholar
Ricker, M, Hernández, HM, Sousa, M and Ochoterena, H (2013) Tree and tree-like species of Mexico: Asteraceae, Leguminosae, and Rubiaceae. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84, 439470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridsdale, CE, van den Brink, RCB and Koek-Noorman, J (1972) Notes on New Guinea Rubiaceae. Versteegia and Maschalodesme. Blumea 20, 339350.Google Scholar
Rincón-Barrado, M, Olsson, S, Villaverde, T, Moncalvillo, B, Pokorny, L, Forrest, A, Riina, R and Sanmartín, I (2021) Ecological and geological processes impacting speciation modes drive the formation of wide-range disjunctions within tribe Putorieae (Rubiaceae). Journal of Systematics and Evolution 59, 915934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbrecht, E (1988) Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Botanica Belgica 1, 1273.Google Scholar
Robbrecht, E and Manen, J-F (2006) The major evolutionary lineages of the coffee family (Rubiaceae, angiosperms). Combined analysis (nDNA and cpDNA) to infer the position of Coptosaelta and Luculia, and supertree construction based on rbcL, rps 16, trnL-trnF and atpB-rbcL data. A new classification in two subfamilies, Cinchonoideae and Rubioideae. Systematics and Geography of Plants 76, 85146.Google Scholar
Roberts, HA (1986) Seed persistence in soil and seasonal emergence in plant species from different habitats. Journal of Applied Ecology 23, 639656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, GK (1984) Gleasonia, Henriqueza, and Platycarpum (Rubiaceae). Flora Neotropica 39, 1134.Google Scholar
Rova, JHE, Delprete, PG, Andersson, L and Albert, VA (2002) A TRNL-F cpDNA sequence study of the Condamineeae-Rondeletieae-Sipaneeae complex with implications on the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae. American Journal of Botany 89, 145159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rydin, C, Kainulainen, K, Razafimandimbison, SG, Smedmark, JEE and Bremer, B (2009) Deep divergences in the coffee family and the systematic position of Acranthera. Plant Systematics and Evolution 278, 101123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydin, C, Wikström, N and Bremer, B (2017) Conflicting results from mitochondrial genomic data challenge current views of Rubiaceae phylogeny. American Journal of Botany 104, 15221532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saatkamp, A, Affre, L, Dutoit, T and Poschlod, P (2009) The seed bank longevity index revisited: limited reliability evident from a burial experiment and database analyses. Annals of Botany 104, 715724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadeghi, S, Ashrafi, Y, Tabatabai, MF and Alizade, HM (2009) Study methods of dormancy breaking and germination of common madder (Rubia tinctorum L.) seed in laboratory conditions. Botany Research International 2, 710.Google Scholar
Salamero, J, Marnotte, P, Le Bourgeois, T and Carrara, A (1997) Practical Identification Key for 14 Rubiaceae Weed Species of Western and Central Africa. Montpellier, France: CIRAD-CA. Agriculture et Développement. Special Issue May 1997. Available at https://agritrop.cirad.fr/388929/1/document_388929.pdfGoogle Scholar
Santos, AF, do Carmo, AAO, Harthman, VC, Romagnolo, MB and Souza, LA (2021) Can fruit ontogenetic features prove to be an important tool in the circumscription of Psychotrieae alliance? Australian Systematic Botany 34, 527540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saulei, SM and Swaine, MD (1988) Rain forest seed dynamics during succession at Gogal, Papua, New Guinea. Journal of Ecology 76, 11331152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sautu, A, Baskin, JM, Baskin, CC and Condit, R (2006) Studies on the seed biology of 100 native species of trees in a seasonal moist tropical forest, Panama, Central America. Forest Ecology and Management 234, 245263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, RL and Sharitz, RR (1986) Seed bank dynamics in a southeastern riverine swamp. American Journal of Botany 73, 10221030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, CA, Vieira, MF and do Amaral, CH (2010) Floral attributes, ornithophily and reproductive success of Palicourea longepedunculata (Rubiaceae), a distylous shrub in southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Botanica 33, 207213.Google Scholar
Silva, CA, Vieira, MF, de Carvalho-Okano, RM and de Oliveira, LO (2014) Reproductive success and genetic diversity of Psychotria hastisepala (Rubiaceae), in fragmented Atlantic forest, southeastern Brazil. Revista de Biologia Tropical 62, 309319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, IMS, Calvi, GP, Baskin, CC, dos Santos, GR, Leal-Filho, N and Ferraz, IDK (2021) Response of central Amazon rainforest soil seed banks to climate change – simulation of global warming. Forest Ecology and Management 493, 119224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, MG (2006) Plant Systematics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Singhakumara, BMP, Uduporuwa, RSJP and Ashton, PMS (2000) Soil seed banks in relation to light and topographic position of a hill dipterocarp forest in Sri Lanka. Biotropica 32, 190196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobrevila, C (1983) Reproductive biology of Palicourea fendleri and P. petiolaris (Rubiaceae), heterostylous shrubs of a tropical cloud forest in Venezuela. Biotropica 15, 161169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, KD, Errington, G, Newby, Z-J, Liyanage, GS and Offord, CA (2021) Assessing the storage potential of Australian rainforest seeds: a decision-making key to aid rapid conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 30, 31853218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonké, B, Dessein, S, Taedoumg, H, Groeninckx, I and Robbrecht, E (2008) A new species of Colletoecema (Rubiaceae) from southern Cameroon with a discussion of relationships among basal Rubioideae. Blumea 53, 533547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soza, VL and Olmstead, RG (2010) Molecular systematics of tribe Rubieae (Rubiaceae): evolution of major clades, development of leaf-like whorls, and biogeography. Taxon 59, 755771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, PD (2001) Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 14, July 2017 [and more or less continuously updated since]. Available at http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/.Google Scholar
Stoffelen, P, Robbrecht, E and Smets, E (1996) A revision of Corynanthe and Pausinystalia (African Rubiaceae – Coptosapelteae). Botanical Journal of the Linnea Society 120, 287326.Google Scholar
Stratton, L, Hudson, L, Suenaga, N and Morgan, B (1998) Overview of Hawaiian dry forest propagation techniques. Hawaiian Botanical Society 37, 1532.Google Scholar
Succulent Plants. Rubiaceae. Available at https://succulent-plant.com/families/rubiaceae.html (accessed 2 May 2023).Google Scholar
Takeuchi, W and Arifiani, D (2018) Floristic records in Rubiaceae from the Upper Sepik of Papua New Guinea: Airosperma grandifolia and Psychotria angustaflussiana sp. nov. Harvard Papers in Botany 23, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, H and Rao, AN (1981) Vivipary in Ophiorrhiza tomentosa Jack (Rubiaceae). Biotropica 13, 232233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Y, Cao, M and Fu, X (2006) Soil seedbank in a dipterocarp rain forest in Xishuangbanna, southwest China. Biotropica 38, 328333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teketay, D and Granström, A (1995) Soil seed banks in dry Afromontane forests of Ethiopia. Journal of Vegetation Science 6, 777786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, CG, Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM, Auld, JR, Venable, DL, Cavender-Bares, J, Donohue, K, Rubio de Casas, R and The NESCent Germination Working Group (2014) The evolution of seed dormancy: environmental cues, evolutionary hubs, and diversification of the seed plants. New Phytologist 203, 300309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, K, Bakker, JP and Bekker, RM (1997) The Soil Seed Banks of North West Europe: Methodology, Density and Longevity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thureborn, O, Razafimandimbison, SG, Wikström, N and Rydin, C (2022) Target capture data resolve recalcitrant relationships in the coffee family (Rubioideae, Rubiaceae). Frontiers in Plant Science 13, 967456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomlinson, PB (1986) The Botany of Mangroves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toumoulin, A, Tardif, D, Donnadieu, Y, Licht, A, Ladant, J-B, Kunzmann, L and Dupont-Nivet, G (2022) Evolution of continental temperature seasonality from the Eocene greenhouse to the Oligocene icehouse – a model-data comparison. Climate of the Past 18, 341362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valbuena, L and Trabaud, L (2001) Contribution of the soil seed bank to post-fire recovery of a heathland. Plant Ecology 152, 175183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valente, MS, Ferreira, LBS, Sousa, RPB, Leão-Araújo, EF and Freitas, MAM (2019) Methods for dormancy overcoming of Spermacoce latifolia seeds. Scientific Electronic Archives 12, 5963.Google Scholar
Venn, SE and Morgan, JW (2010) Soil seedbank composition and dynamics across alpine summits in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 58, 349362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Martius, CFP, Eichler, AG and Urban, I (1840–1906) Flora Brasiliensis, Vol. 6, Part 6. Leipzig: Monachii.Google Scholar
Wanda, IF, Oksari, AA, Sahromi, M and Latifah, D (2020) Seed exploration and conservation in Ciremai Mountain National Park and Kerinci Seblat National Park. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 457, 012026.Google Scholar
Wang, L (1997) The soil seed bank and understorey regeneration in Eucalyptus regnans forest, Victoria. Australian Journal of Ecology 22, 404411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warr, SJ, Kent, M and Thompson, K (1994) Seed bank composition and variability in five woodlands in south-west England. Journal of Biogeography 21, 151168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, K, Yang, TYA, Nishihara, C, Huang, T-L, Nakamura, K, Peng, C-I and Sugawara, T (2015) Distyly and floral morphology of Psychotria cephalophora (Rubiaceae) on the oceanic Lanyu (Orchid) Island, Taiwan. Botanical Studies 56, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, HZ and Wang, R-J (2012) Foonchewia guandongensis gen. et sp. nov. (Rubioideae: Rubiaceae) and its systematic position inferred from chloroplast sequences and morphology. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 50, 467476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendell, HA (1855–1857) Chloris Andina. Paris: P. Bertrand.Google Scholar
Wight, R (1846) Icones Plantarum Indiae Orientalis. Madras: Franck and Company.Google Scholar
Wight, R (1850) Illustrations of Indian Botany. Madras: American Mission Press.Google Scholar
Wikström, N, Kainulainen, K, Razafimandimbison, SG, Smedmark, JEE and Bremer, B (2015) A revised time tree of the Asterids: establishing a temporal framework for evolutionary studies of the coffee family (Rubiaceae). PLoS One 10, e0126690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wikström, N, Bremer, B and Rydin, C (2020) Conflicting phylogenetic signals in genomic data of the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Journal of Systematics and Evolution 58, 440460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, PR, Congdon, RA, Grice, AC and Clarke, PJ (2005) Germinable soil seed banks in a tropical savanna: seasonal dynamics and effects of fire. Austral Ecology 30, 7990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, JC, Chen, P-Y, Liao, YK, Yu, H-M, Chung, J-D, Chen, S-Y and Liu, C-P (2019) Seed storage, stem-cutting propagation and quantitative analysis of scopoletin for noni (Morinda citrifolia). Quarterly Journal of Chinese Forestry 52, 6375.Google Scholar
Xu, Y, Luo, Z, Gao, S and Zhang, D (2018) Pollination niche availability facilitates colonization of Guettarda speciosa with heteromorphic self-incompatibility on oceanic islands. Scientific Reports 8, 13765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, KR (1985) Deeply buried seeds in a tropical wet forest in Costa Rica. Biotropica 17, 336338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, KR, Ewel, JJ and Brown, BJ (1987) Seed dynamics during forest succession in Costa Rica. Vegetatio 71, 157173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, S, Bell, D, Sternberg, M and Kutiel, P (2008) The effect of microhabitats on vegetation and its relationships with seedlings and soil seed bank in a Mediterranean coastal sand dune community. Journal of Arid Environments 72, 20402053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, X-L, Li, Z-J, Xie, M-Y, Song, A-Q and Liu, Y (2006) Effect of simulating forest gap's illumination on germination of seed from seed bank in subtropical rainforest in Hexi, Nanjing, China. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Sciences) 45, 125130.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Species of Rubiaceae whose seeds have recalcitrant (R) or intermediate (I) seed storage behaviour

Figure 1

Table 2. Embryo morphology and seed dormancy in tropical/subtropical and temperate/Arctic regions of subfamilies and tribes of Rubiaceae (following Razafimandimbison and Rydin (2024)) and information on general distribution of tribes

Figure 2

Table 3. Dormancy profile for Rubiaceae in relation to biogeography and life form

Figure 3

Table 4. Examples of the time required for dormancy-break and germination of Rubiaceae species in tropical/subtropical regions with no definite dry season for seeds sown under natural temperature regimes in nurseries or shade houses

Figure 4

Table 5. Seed banks for Rubiaceae

Figure 5

Table 6. Germination of seeds of Rubiaceae planted on soil in the non-heated greenhouse in Lexington, Kentucky (USA)

Supplementary material: File

Baskin and Baskin supplementary material 1

Baskin and Baskin supplementary material
Download Baskin and Baskin supplementary material 1(File)
File 135.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Baskin and Baskin supplementary material 2

Baskin and Baskin supplementary material
Download Baskin and Baskin supplementary material 2(File)
File 145.3 KB