Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:54:21.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brown suggests that there are several fairly distinct gradations of the nationalist (culturalist) movement ranging from extreme chauvinism to a more benign liberal nationalism, with the “Russites” and “ruralists” occupying the center. But Brown himself acknowledges the difficulties of trying to classify various currents in the movement too rigidly. See Deming, Brown, “Nationalism and Ruralism in Recent Soviet Russian Literature,Review of National Literatures, 3, no. 1 (Spring 1972) : 183209.Google Scholar

2. “Vysokii dolg masterov kul'tury” (“The Lofty Duty of Experts of Culture“), Pravda, Nov. 30, 1972.

3. A. Iakovlev, “Protiv antiistorizma,” Literaturnaia gazeta, Nov. 15, 1972.