Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T06:42:38.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Collective Property Rights and Social Citizenship: Recent Trends in Urban Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2019

Diane E. Davis
Affiliation:
Harvard University, E-mail: ddavis@gsd.harvard.edu
José Carlos Fernández
Affiliation:
Harvard University, E-mail: jfernandez@gsd.harvard.edu

Abstract

This article argues that efforts to implement collective property ownership via community land trusts (CLTs) in Latin America can be seen as a viable means for reducing socio-spatial inequalities, strengthening the urban poor’s ‘right to the city,’ and enabling more substantive social citizenship. It begins by arguing that, in Latin America, market models intended to strengthen individual property rights can increase urban inequality and spatial exclusion. It then examines recent measures undertaken to reverse the negative impacts of these patterns, focusing explicitly on the adoption of CLTs and how they serve as a means for strengthening urban citizenship. After highlighting the fact that CLTs have proliferated in the US and Europe but not Latin America, we explain how and why a few Latin American countries have nonetheless embraced CLTs. Building on deeper analysis of two cases in the region, Puerto Rico and Brazil, we show that despite the legal and governance constraints of Latin American cities, CLTs can materialise when local authorities join with citizens to embrace these models.

Type
Themed Section: Property and Social Citizenship
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, A. (2018) ‘Community land trusts in Canada. Perpetual affordability and community control of the land’, http://chra-achru.ca/sites/default/files/congress2018/2018-09-18_summary_community-land-trusts.pdf [accessed 04.09.2019].Google Scholar
Bloemraad, I. (2018) ‘Theorising the power of citizenship as claims-making’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 1, 426.Google Scholar
Brogger, D. (2019) ‘Unequal urban rights: critical reflections on property and urban citizenship’, Urban Studies Journal Limited, 01/14/2019, 116.Google Scholar
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (2009) ‘Critical success factors for community land trusts in Canada’, https://ccednet-rcdec.ca/en/toolbox/critical-success-factors-community-land-trusts-canada [accessed 04.09.2019].Google Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency (2019) The World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/308.html [accessed 04.09.2019].Google Scholar
Davis, D. and White, M. (2013) ‘Community land trusts as a means for urban poverty alleviation: can collective property rights be the key to a socially sustainable and inclusive urban future?’, in Ziccardi, A. (ed.), Cities, the Knowledge Economy, and Social Inequality, vol. I, Mexico: National Autonomous University of Mexico/PUEC.Google Scholar
Davis, J. (ed.) (2010) The Community Land Trust Reader, Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
De Soto, H. (2001) ‘Dead capital and the poor’, SAIS Review, XXI, 1, 1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donzelot, J. (2011) ‘Le chantier de la citoyenneté urbaine’, Esprit, 373, 3/4, 118–36.Google Scholar
DuBroff, N. (2009) Community Mobilization and Ecological Outcomes in Peri-Urban Mexico City, 1989-1992, Cambridge: Department of Urban Studies and Planning of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Flores Dewey, O. and Davis, D. (2013) ‘Planning, politics, and urban mega-projects in developmental context: lessons from Mexico City’s airport controversy’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 35, 5, 531–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, M. (2006) ‘Citizenship practices and urban governance in European cities’, Urban Studies, 43, 4, 745–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giband, D. and Siino, C. (2013) ‘La Citoyenneté Urbaine Pour Penser Les Transformations De La Ville?’, (Own translation), Annales De Géographie, 694, 6, 644–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. (2008) ‘The right to the city’, New Left Review, 53, 2340.Google Scholar
Hernández Torrales, M., Algoed, L. and Rodriguez del Valle, L. (2018) ‘El Fideicomiso de la tierra del Cano Martín Pena Instrumento Notable de Regularización de Suelo en Asentamientos Informales’, https://www.lincolninst.edu/sites/default/files/pubfiles/algoed_wp18la1sp.pdf [accessed 04.01.2019].Google Scholar
Herzog, L. (2017) ‘Barra da Tijuca: the political economy of a global suburb in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil’, in Angotti, T., Urban Latin America: Inequalities and Neoliberal Reforms, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 166–85.Google Scholar
Herzog, T. (2018) A Short History of European Law: The Last Two and a Half Millennia. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holston, J. and Appadurai, A. (1996) ‘Cities and citizenship’, Public Culture, 8, 2, 187204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housing Europe (2018) ‘Community land trusts: a model for permanently affordable housing in European cities? First transnational meeting of the SHICC project held in Lille’, http://www.housingeurope.eu/resource-1122/community-land-trusts-a-model-for-permanently-affordable-housing-in-european-cities [accessed 04.09.2019].Google Scholar
Isin, E. (2009) ‘Citizenship in flux: the figure of the activist citizen’, Subjectivity, 29, 1, 367–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopper, M. (2016) ‘‘Minha Casa, Minha Vida’. experts, sentidos de classe e a invenção do ‘mercado’ da casa própria no Brasil contemporâneo’, Horizontes Antropológicos, 45, 185215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (1996) Writings on Cities, Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lund, C. (2011) ‘Property and citizenship: conceptually connecting land rights and belonging in Africa’, Africa Spectrum, 46, 3, 71–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, C. (2016) ‘Rule and rupture: state formation through the production of property and citizenship’, Development and Change, 47, 6, 1199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maricato, E. (2017) ‘The future of global peripheral cities’, in Angotti, T. (ed.), Urban Latin America: Inequalities and Neoliberal Reforms, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 4161.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. (1973) Class, Citizenship, and Social Development; Essays. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
McCann, E. (2002) ‘Space, citizenship, and the right to the city: a brief overview’, GeoJournal, 58, 77–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarlane, C. (2004) ‘Geographical Imaginations and spaces of political engagement: examples from the Indian Alliance’, Antipode, 36, 890916.Google Scholar
McGuirk, J. (2014) Radical Cities: Across Latin America in Search of a New Architecture, London; New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Midheme, E. and Moulaert, F. (2013) ‘Pushing back the frontiers of property: community land trusts and low-income housing in urban Kenya’, Land Use Policy, 35, 7384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monkkonen, P. (2018) ‘Empty houses across North America: housing finance and Mexico’s vacancy crisis’, Urban Studies, September, 24, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morett-Sánchez, J. and Cosío-Ruiz, C. (2017) ‘Panorama de los ejidos y comunidades agrarias en México’, Agricultura Sociedad y Desarrollo, 14, 1, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mount Alexander Community Land Ltd. (2019) ‘Welcome to the Mount Alexander Community Land website’, http://www.macll.org.au/ [accessed 04.09.2019].Google Scholar
National Community Land Trust Network (2019) ‘Find a CLT’, http://www.communitylandtrusts.org.uk/get-involved/find-a-clt [accessed 04.09.2019].Google Scholar
Ondetti, G. (2016) ‘The social function of property, land rights and social welfare in Brazil’, Land Use Policy, 50, 2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plyushteva, A. (2009) ‘The right to the city and struggles over urban citizenship: exploring the links’, Amsterdam Social Science, 1, 3, 8197.Google Scholar
Prak, M. (2018) Citizens Without Nations: Urban Citizenship in Europe and the World, c.1000-1789, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, M. (2003) ‘Citizenship and the right to the global city: reimagining the capitalist world order’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, 3, 564–90.Google Scholar
Rello, F. (1996) ‘La Privatización del Ejido ¿Una Contrarreforma Agraria?’, Investigacion Economica, 56, 215, 133–62.Google Scholar
Rigon, A. (2016) ‘Collective or individual titles? Conflict over tenure regularisation in a Kenyan informal settlement’, Urban Studies, 53, 13, 2758–78.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (1984) ‘Beyond housing classes: the sociological significance of private property rights in means of consumption’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 8, 2, 202–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher Center for a New Economics (2019) ‘Community Land Trust Directory’, https://centerforneweconomics.org/apply/community-land-trust-program/directory/ [accessed 04.09.2019].Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (1995) ‘Two conceptions of citizenship’, British Journal of Sociology, 46, 1, 6378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subadevan and Naqvi, I. (2017) ‘Contesting urban citizenship: the urban poor’s strategies of state engagement in Chennai, India’, IDPR, 39, 1, 7795.Google Scholar
Trubek, D. and Santos, A. (2006) The New Law and Economic Development: a Critical Appraisal, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, L. (2014) The Durable Slum: Dharavi and the Right to Stay Put in Globalizing Mumbai, Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2018) ‘Community land trusts in Rio’s Favelas’, Land Lines, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, July, 11–23.Google Scholar
World Habitat (2019) ‘Caño Martín Peña Community Land Trust’, http://www.world-habitat.org/world-habitat-awards/winners-and-finalists/cano-martin-pena-community-land-trust/ [accessed 03.18.2019].Google Scholar