Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:36:30.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Players on Crowded Playing Fields: The Institutional Embeddedness of Social Innovation in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2014

Claudia Ruddat  and
Anna-Lena Schönauer
Claudia Ruddat
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany E-mail: claudia.ruddat@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Anna-Lena Schönauer
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany E-mail: anna-lena.schoenauer@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article1 analyses whether and how social innovations can be implemented in a Conservative/Bismarckian welfare regime and society such as Germany. It examines the transferability and the relevance of this discourse and practice, and argues that, due to existing institutional structures and cultures, innovation by public sector intrapreneurship is more significant in Germany than through social entrepreneurship. The article challenges the assumption that social innovation emerges from entrepreneurship, and questions the level of attention and importance attached to this development

Keywords

Social innovationintrapreneurshipsocial entrepreneurshipsocial servicesGerman welfare state
Type
Themed Section on Social Innovation and Social Policy
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 445 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anheier, H. and Seibel, W. (2001) The Nonprofit Sector in Germany: Between State, Economy and Society, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Anton, S. and Diemert, D. (2010) ‘Kommunale Finanzen: Kein Licht am Ende des Tunnels! Gemeindefinanzbericht 2010 im Detail’, Der Städtetag, 5, 11–85.Google Scholar
BEPA (2010) Empowering People, Driving Change: Social Innovation in the European Union, Luxembourg: European Union/Bureau of European Policy Advisers.Google Scholar
BMAS (2010) Sozialbudget 2009, Berlin: o.V., http://www.bmas.de/portal/46628/property=pdf/a230-09_sozialbudget_2009.pdf.Google Scholar
Bode, I. and Evers, A. (2004) ‘From institutional fixation to entrepreneurial mobility? The German third sector and its contemporary challenges’, in Evers, A., Laville, J.-L. (eds.), The Third Sector in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 101–21.Google Scholar
Borzaga, C. and Bodini, R. (2012) What to Make of Social Innovation? Towards a Framework For Policy Development, Euricse Working Paper, N.036/12, Trento: European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprise.Google Scholar
BAGFW (2009) Gesamtstatistik 2008, Berlin: BAGFW.Google Scholar
European Commission (2010) Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union, SEC(2010) 1161, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Evers, A. and Heinze, R. G. (eds.) (2008) Sozialpolitik: Ökonomisierung und Entgrenzung, Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, A. and Ewert, B. (2010) ‘Hybride Organisationen im Bereich sozialer Dienste – Ein Konzept, sein Hintergrund und seine Implikationen’, in Klatetzki, T. (ed.), Soziale personenbezogene Dienstleistungsorganisationen: Soziologische Perspektiven, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 103–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gogolin, I., Neumann, U. and Roth, H.-J. (2003) Förderung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Migrationshintergrund, Gutachten Bonn: BLK (Materialien zur Bildungsplanung und zur Forschungsförderung, 107).Google Scholar
Grohs, S. (2010) Modernisierung kommunaler Sozialpolitik, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. G., Schönauer, A.-L., Schneiders, K., Grohs, S. and Ruddat, C. (2013) ‘Social Entrepreneurship im etablierten Wohlfahrtsstaat: Aktuelle empirische Befunde zu neuen und alten Akteuren auf dem Wohlfahrtsmarkt’, in Jansen, S. A., Heinze, R. G. and Beckmann, M. (eds.), Sozialunternehmertum in Deutschland – Analysen, Trends und Handlungsempfehlungen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 315–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmann, S., Bogumil, J. and Grohs, S. (2008) ‘Evaluating administrative modernization in German local governments: success or failure of the “new steering model”?’, Public Administration Review, 68, 5, 851–63.Google Scholar
Mair, J. and Martí, I. (2006) ‘Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight’, Journal of World Business, 41, 1, 36–44.Google Scholar
Nicholls, A. (ed.) (2006) Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. A., Deiglmeier, K. and Miller, T. D. (2008) ‘Rediscovering social innovation’, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6, Fall, 34–43, http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovation (accessed 3 December 2013).Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. and Anheier, H. K. (eds.) (1996) The Emerging Nonprofit Sector: An Overview, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, S. and Baglioni, S. (forthcoming) ‘Review article: social innovation and social policy – promises and risks’, Social Policy and Society.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1997) Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schmitz, B. and Scheuerle, T. (2012) ‘Founding or transforming? Social intrapreneurship in three German Christian-based NPOs’, ACRN Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives, 1, 1, 13–36.Google Scholar
Schneiders, K. (2010) Vom Altenheim zum Seniorenservice: Institutioneller Wandel und Akteurkonstellationen im sozialen Dienstleistungssektor, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.Google Scholar