Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T22:24:43.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

City Nomads

Changing Residence as a Coping Strategy, Amsterdam, 1890-1940

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Jan Kok ,
Kees Mandemakers  and
Henk Wals
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article analyzes residential mobility patterns of the Amsterdam poor from the perspective of their coping strategies. In periods when cheap houses were available, casual and unskilled laborers tended to move very often from house to house. Generally, they remained in the immediate vicinity, thus preserving their social networks. After the First World War, the typical proletarian mobility was less conspicuous, due to the housing shortage and improvements in the welfare system.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , spring 2005 , pp. 15 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M. (1982) “Indicators of population change and stability in nineteenth-century cities: Some sceptical comments,” in Johnson, J. H. and Pooley, C. G. (eds.) The Structure of Nineteenth Century Cities. London: Croom Helm:283–98.Google Scholar
Bonvalet, C., and Lelièvre, E. (1990)“Residential mobility in France and in Paris since 1945: The history of a cohort.” Population (English selection)2: 187–212.Google Scholar
Crew, D. (1979) Town in the Ruhr: A Social History of Bochum, 1860-1914. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
de Groot, G. (1988) “‘Door slapte gedaan gekregen’: Losse arbeiders en hun gezinnen in Amsterdam tussen 1880 en 1920” [“‘Fired because of slackness’: Casual workers and their families in Amsterdam between 1880 and 1920”]. Tijdschrift voor Sociale Geschiedenis 14:160–87.Google Scholar
Dennis, R., and Daniels, S. (1981) “‘Community’ and the social geography of Victorian cities.” Urban History Yearbook: 7–23.Google Scholar
Derosas, R. (1999) “;Residential mobility in Venice, 1850-1869.” Annales de Démographie Historique: 35–61.Google Scholar
de Vooijs, A. C. (1932) De trek van de plattelandsbevolking in Nederland: Bijdrage tot de kennis van de sociale mobiliteit en de horizontale migratie van de plattelandsbevolking [The migration of the rural population in the Netherlands: A contribution to the knowledge of social mobility and horizontal migration of the rural population]. Groningen: J. B. Wolters.Google Scholar
Fontaine, L., and Schlumbohm, J., eds. (2001)Household Strategies for Survival, 1600-2000: Fission, Faction, and Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaskell, S. M. (1990) “Introduction,” in Gaskell, S. M. (ed.) Slums. Leicester: Leicester University Press: 1–16.Google Scholar
Giele, J. J., and van Oenen, G. J. (1976)“Theorie en praktijk van onderzoek naar de sociale struktuur”[”Theory and practice of research into the social structure”].Tijdschrift voor Sociale Geschiedenis 2:167–85.Google Scholar
Gilliland, J. A. (1998) “Modeling residential mobility in Montreal, 1860-1900.” Historical Methods 31: 27–42.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. (1964) “The extent of repeated migration: An analysis based on Danish population registers.”Journal of the American Statistical Society 59: 1121–32.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. (1989) The Bevolkingsregisters and Their Use in Analyzing Co-residential Behaviour of the Elderly. The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.Google Scholar
Green, D. R. (1995) From Artisans to Paupers: Economic Change and Poverty in London, 1790-1870. Aldershot, U.K.: Scolar.Google Scholar
Green, D. R., and Parton, A. G. (1990) “Slums and slum life in Victorian England: London and Birmingham at mid-century,” in Gaskell, S. M. (ed.) Slums. Leicester: Leicester University Press: 17–91.Google Scholar
Harts, J. J., and Hingtsman, L. (1986)Verhuizingen op een rij: Een analyse van individuele verhuisgeschiedenissen [Moves in a row: An analysis of individual histories of changing residence]. Amsterdam: Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap.Google Scholar
Heerma van Voss, L. (2002) Why Is There No Socialism in the Netherlands? De Nederlandse arbeidersklasse in de twintigste eeuw [The Dutch working class in the twentieth century]. Amsterdam: Aksant.Google Scholar
Hochstadt, S. (1999) Mobility and Modernity: Migration in Germany, 1820-1989. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. Jr. (1982) “Migration in Duisburg, 1867-1890.” Journal of Urban History 8: 235–70.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. Jr. (1997) Migration and Urbanization in the Ruhr Valley, 1821-1914. Boston: Humanities.Google Scholar
Knotter, A. (1999) “Gezinsarmoedeen gezinsarbeid: De invloed van de gezinscyclus op de inkomsten van gezinnen van losse (haven)arbeiders in Amsterdam in de eerste helft van deze eeuw” [”Family poverty and family labor: The influence of the family cycle on the income of families of casual {harbor} workers in Amsterdam in the first half of this century”], in Kok, J., Knotter, A., Paping, R., and Vanhaute, E. (eds.) Levensloop en levenslot: Arbeidersstrategieën van gezinnen in de negentiende en twintigste eeuw [Life course and destiny: Labor strategies of families in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries]. Groningen: Nederlands Agronomisch Historisch Instituut:205–30.Google Scholar
Leliman, J. H. W. (1912) Volkshuisvesting te Amsterdam [Public housing in Amsterdam]. Amsterdam: F. van Rossen.Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, S. (1987) Wij hebben als mens geleefd: Het Joodse proletariaat van Amsterdam, 1900-1940 [We have lived as humans: The Jewish proletariat of Amsterdam, 1900-1940]. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.Google Scholar
Mandemakers, K. (2000) “The Netherlands: Historical sample of the Netherlands,” in Kelly, Hall P., McCaa, R., and Thorvaldsen, G. (eds.) Handbook of International Historical Microdata for Population Research. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center:149–77.Google Scholar
Menard, S. (1995) Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ottens, E. (1975) Ik moet naar een kleinere woning omzien want mijn gezin wordt te groot: 125 jaar sociale woningbouw in Amsterdam [I have to look for a smaller house because my family becomes too large: 125 years of public housing in Amsterdam]. Amsterdam: Gemeentelijke Dienst Volkshuisvesting.Google Scholar
Pooley, C. (2002) “Reflections on migration and mobility.” Annales de Démographie Historique 2: 125–28.Google Scholar
Pooley, C., and Turnbull, J. (1997) “Changing home and workplace in Victorian London: The life of Henry Jaques, shirtmaker.” Urban History 24:148–78.Google Scholar
Pooley, C., and Turnbull, J. (1998) Migration and Mobility in Britain since the Eighteenth Century. London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
Pooley, C., and Turnbull, J. (1999) “Moving through the city: The changing impact of the journey to work on intra-urban mobility in XXth century Britain.” Annales de Démographie Historique 1: 127–49.Google Scholar
Rikkert, A. J. A. (1919) De berekening van de woningbehoefte [The calculation of the demand for accommodations]. Amsterdam: Gemeentelijke Woningdienst.Google Scholar
Romer, H. (1997) Temidden van het straatgeraas: Rotterdamse herinneringen [In the midst of the street noise: Rotterdam memories]. Zaltbommel: Europese Bibliotheek.Google Scholar
Rood Rotterdam in de jaren '30 [Red Rotterdam in the 1930s] (1984) Amsterdam: Raket.Google Scholar
Speare, A. Jr., Goldstein, S., and Frey, W. H. (1975)Residential Mobility, Migration, and Metropolitan Change. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, A. (1982) “The growth of public intervention in the British urban environment during the nineteenth century: A structural approach,” in Johnson, J. H. and Pooley, C. G. (eds.)The Structure of Nineteenth Century Cities. London: Croom Helm:107–24.Google Scholar
Teijnant, I. (1993) “‘Huisjesmelkers’: Een portret van de particuliere huiseigenaar rond 1900” [“‘Rack-renters’: A portrait of the private homeowner around 1900”]. Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift 19: 110–49.Google Scholar
Ter Meulen, J. (1903) Huisvesting van armen te Amsterdam [Housing of the poor in Amsterdam]. Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink and Zoon.Google Scholar
van der Linden, M. (1994) “Households and labour movements.” Economic and Social History in the Netherlands 6:129–44.Google Scholar
van der Linden, M. (2002) “Introduction,” in Kok, J. (ed.) Rebellious Families: Household Strategies and Collective Action in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Oxford: Berghahn:1–23.Google Scholar
van Zee, J. W.,Ulendorp, J. T., Luitjes, H. H., and van Vlijmen, J., eds. (1984) 90 Jaar Statistiek in Amsterdam: Een aantal geïllustreerde overzichtsartikelen uit de periode 1894-1984 [Ninety years of statistics in Amsterdam: A number of illustrated overviews from the period 1894-1984]. Amsterdam: Afdeling Bestuursinformatie.Google Scholar
Wals, H. (2001) Makers en stakers: Amsterdamse bouwvakarbeiders en hun bestaansstrategieën in het eerste kwart van de twintigste eeuw [Workers and strikers: Amsterdam construction workers and their survival strategies in the first quarter of the twentieth century]. Amsterdam: Stichting Beheer IISG.Google Scholar
Wohl, A. S. (1977) The Eternal Slum: Housing and Social Policy in Victorian London. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Young, M., and Willmott, P. (1957) Family and Kinship in East London. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar