Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:53:24.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relocating Civil Society: Theories and Practices of Civil Society between Late Medieval and Modern Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Extract

Civil society is widely considered as a crucial element in contemporary society. Academics and policy makers have traditionally associated it with voluntary associations and organizations, assuming that associational life is an ideal intermediary between citizens and government. While members of associations form large social networks, which they can mobilize at critical moments, the conviviality of group sociability fosters the development of a set of common values, such as a democratic political culture and other civic virtues. Its origins are generally situated in the eighteenth century, and are mostly attributed to secularization, Enlightenment thinking, the birth of the “public sphere,” and growing emancipation from oppressive structures such as the church and the state.

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, B. (2006) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Arsan, A., Lewis, S. L., and Richard, A.-I. (2012) “The roots of global civil society and the interwar moment.” Journal of Global History 7: 157–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, K. M. (2001a) “Enlightenment and the institution of society: Notes for a conceptual history,” in Kaviraj, S. and Khilnani, S. (eds.) Civil Society: History and Possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 84104.Google Scholar
Baker, K. M. (2001b) “Transformations of classical republicanism in eighteenth-century France.” The Journal of Modern History 73: 3253.Google Scholar
Banti, A. M. (2000) “Public opinion and associations in nineteenth-century Italy,” in Bermeo, N. G. and Nord, P. G. (eds.) Civil Society before Democracy: Lessons from Nineteenth-Century Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield: 4360.Google Scholar
Bhambra, G. K. (2007) Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bijsterveld, A.-J., and Trio, P. (2003) “Van gebedsverbroedering naar broederschap. De evolutie van het fraternitas-begrip in de Zuidelijke Nederlanden in de volle Middeleeuwen.” Pts. 1 and 2. Jaarboek voor Middeleeuwse Geschiedenis 6: 748; 9: 7–46.Google Scholar
Black, A. (1984) Guilds and Civil Society in European Political Thought from the Twelfth Century to the Present. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Black, A. (2003) Guild and State: European Political Thought from the Twelfth Century to the Present. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Bossy, J. (1985) Christianity in the West 1400–1700. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, C. (1999) “Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere,” in Calhoun, C. (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 148.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chartier, R. (1991) The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, N., and Terpstra, N. A. (2009a) “Sociability and its discontents,” in Eckstein, N. and Terpstra, N. A. (eds.) Sociability and Its Discontents: Civil Society, Social Capital, and Their Alternatives in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Turnhout: Brepols: 120.Google Scholar
Eckstein, N., and Terpstra, N. A. (2009b) Sociability and Its Discontents: Civil Society, Social Capital, and Their Alternatives in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Eckstein, N. A. (2004) “Words and Deeds, Stasis and Change: New Directions in Florentine Devotion around 1500.” Journal of Religious History 28: 118.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000) “Multiple modernities.” Daedalus 129: 129.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N., and Schluchter, W. (1998) “Paths to early modernities: A comparative view.” Daedalus 127: 118.Google Scholar
Finlay, C. J. (2006) “Rhetoric and citizenship in Adam Ferguson's Essay on the History of Civil Society.” History of Political Thought 27: 2749.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) “Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for civil society?The British Journal of Sociology 49: 210–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. (2007) “Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world.” Theory Culture and Society 24: 730.Google Scholar
Garrioch, D. (2001) “Sacred neighborhoods and secular neighborhoods: Milan and Paris in the eighteenth century.” Journal of Urban History 27: 405–19.Google Scholar
Geuna, M. (2002) “Republicanism and commercial society in the Scottish Enlightenment: The case of Adam Ferguson,” in Van Gelderen, M. and Skinner, Q. (eds.) Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage. Volume II: The Values of Republicanism in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 177–95.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (2001) “Civil society in an extra-European perspective,” in Kaviraj, S. and Khilnani, S. (eds.) Civil Society: History and Possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 149–64.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. Burger, T.. Cambridge, MA: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Hallberg, P., and Wittrock, B. (2006) “From Koinonìa politikè to societas civilis: Birth, disappearance and first renaissance of the concept,” in Wagner, P. (ed.) The Languages of Civil Wociety. Oxford: Berghahn: 2852.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S.-L. (2003) “Democracy and Associations in the Long Nineteenth Century: Towards a Transnational Perspective.” The Journal of Modern History 75: 269–99.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S.-L. (2006) Civil Society, 1750–1914. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hunt, L. (2007) Inventing Human Rights: A History. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Jacob, M. C. (1991) “The Enlightenment redefined: The formation of modern civil society.” Social Research 58: 475–95.Google Scholar
Joyce, P. (2003) The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Kaviraj, S. (2001) “In search of civil society,” in Kaviraj, S. and Khilnani, S. (eds.) Civil Society: History and Possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 287323.Google Scholar
Kaviraj, S., and Khilnani, S. (2001a) Civil Society: History and Possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaviraj, S., and Khilnani, S. (2001b) “Introduction: Ideas of civil society,” in Kaviraj, S. and Khilnani, S. (eds.) Civil Society: History and Possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 17.Google Scholar
Keane, J. (2007) Civil Society: Berlin Perspectives. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Khilnani, S. (2001) “The development of civil society,” in Kaviraj, S. and Khilnani, S. (eds.) Civil Society: History and Possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1132.Google Scholar
Kocka, J. (1995) “The middle classes in Europe.” Journal of Modern History 67: 783806.Google Scholar
Kocka, J. (2004) “Civil society from a historical perspective.” European Review 12: 6579.Google Scholar
Koller, A. (2010) “The public sphere and comparative historical research: An introduction.” Social Science History 34: 261–90.Google Scholar
Koo, J.-W. (2007) “The origins of the public sphere and civil society: Private academies and petitions in Korea, 1506–1800.” Social Science History 31: 381409.Google Scholar
Laurier, E., and Philo, C. (2007) “‘A parcel of muddling muckworms’: Revisiting Habermas and the English coffee-houses.” Social and Cultural Geography 8: 259–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, T. (2002) “Foucault, governmentality, and critique.” Rethinking Marxism 14: 4964.Google Scholar
Lynch, C. (2008) “Reflexivity in research on civil society: Constructivist perspectives.” International Studies Review 10: 708–21.Google Scholar
Lynch, K. A. (2010) “Social provisions and the life of civil society in Europe: Rethinking public and private.” Journal of Urban History 36: 285–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mah, H. (2000) “Phantasies of the public sphere: Rethinking the Habermas of historians.” Journal of Modern History 72: 153–82.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, P. (2003) “What's the civil in civil society? Robert Putnam, Italy and the Republican tradition.” Political Studies 51: 650–68.Google Scholar
Muir, E. (1999) “The sources of civil society in Italy.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 29: 379406.Google Scholar
Muir, E. (2006) “Why Venice? Venetian society and the success of early opera.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 36: 331–53.Google Scholar
Nautz, J., Ginsborg, P., and Nijhuis, T. (2009) The Golden Chain: Family, Civil Society and the State. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Otter, C. (2008) The Victorian Eye: A Political History of Light and Vision in Britain, 1800–1910. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outram, D. (2005) The Enlightenment: New Approaches to European History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oz-Salzberger, F. (2001) “Civil society in Scottisch Enlightenment,” in Kaviraj, S. and Khilnani, S. (eds.) Civil Society: History and Possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 5883.Google Scholar
Pérez Diaz, V. (2009) Markets and Civil Society: The European Experience in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, W. M. (2000) “Sentimentalism and its erasure: The role of emotions in the era of the French Revolution.” Journal of Modern History 72: 109–52.Google Scholar
Schwerhoff, G. (2002) “Criminalized violence and the process of civilisation: A reappraisal.” Crime, History and Societies 6: 103–26.Google Scholar
Schwerhoff, G. (2004) “Social control of violence, violence as social control: the case of early modern Germany,” in Roodenburg, H. W. and Spierenburg, P. C. (eds.) Social Control in Europe. Columbus: Ohio University Press: 220–46.Google Scholar
Sewell, W. H. (2005) Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swyngedouw, E. (2005) “Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state.” Urban Studies 42: 19912006.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2007) A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Terpstra, N. (2000) “The politics of ritual kinship,” in Terpstra, N. (ed.) The Politics of Ritual Kinship: Confraternities and Social Order in Eearly Modern Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 18.Google Scholar
Terpstra, N. (2011) “Charity, civil society, and social capital in Islamic and Christian societies,” in Ibrahim, B. et al. (eds.) Takaful 2011. The first annual conference on Arab Philantropy and Civic Engagement. Amman: John D. Gerhart Center for Philanthropy and Civic Engagement: 184–95.Google Scholar
Van Dijck, M.F. (2005) “Het verenigingsleven op het hagelandse Platteland: Sociale polarisatie en middenveldparticipatie in de 17e en 18e eeuw,” Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis 2: 95104.Google Scholar
van Horn Melton, J. (2001) The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe: New Approaches to European History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Kley, D. K. (1996) The Religious Origins of the French Revolution: From Calvin to the Civil Constitution, 1560–1791. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, P. (2006) The Languages of Civil Society: European Civil Society. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Warner, M. (2002) Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, B., and Yachnin, P. (2010) “Introduction,” in Wilson, B. and Yachnin, P. (eds.) Making Publics in Early Modern Europe: People, Things, Forms of Knowledge. New York: Routledge: 121.Google Scholar
Wittrock, B. (2000) “Modernity: One, none, or many? European origins and modernity as a global condition.” Daedalus 129: 3160.Google Scholar