Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T21:41:05.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Actual Threat, Perceived Threat, and Authoritarianism: An Experimental Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2020

Silvia Russo Open the ORCID record for Silvia Russo [Opens in a new window] ,
Michele Roccato Open the ORCID record for Michele Roccato [Opens in a new window]  and
Ugo Merlone Open the ORCID record for Ugo Merlone [Opens in a new window]
Silvia Russo
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Torino (Italy)
Michele Roccato*
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Torino (Italy)
Ugo Merlone
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Torino (Italy)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Michele Roccato. Università degli Studi di Torino. Dipartimento di Psicologia. Via Verdi, 10. 10124 Torino (Italy). E-mail: michele.roccato@unito.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archival, correlational, and experimental studies converge showing strong links between societal threat and authoritarianism. However, inconsistent with the social cognitive studies showing that our perception of the reality is systematically biased, the literature on the threat-authoritarianism relations has largely ignored the connection between the actual societal threat and its perception. In this study, we analyzed the relation between objective societal threat and authoritarians’ perception of it, hypothesizing that authoritarians would tend to overestimate societal threat and that such overestimation would increase the endorsement of authoritarian attitudes and the preference for authoritarian political systems. Using an experimental approach, we studied the relations between right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), actual societal threat (manipulated as low vs. moderate), and perceived societal threat working with an Italian community sample (N = 209, Mage = 29.70, SD = 9.53, 64.1% women). Actual threat and RWA equally predicted participants’ threat perception, while their interaction did not. In turn, threat perception further increased RWA and support to authoritarian political system. We discussed the results in terms of a vicious circle whereby authoritarians overestimate societal threat and such overestimation reinforces authoritarian attitudes.

Keywords

authoritarianismauthoritarian political systemsperceived threatthreat
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 23 , 2020 , e3
Copyright
© Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 3, 113–133. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohrs, J. C., & Ibler, S. (2009). Authoritarianism, threat, and prejudice: An analysis of mediation and moderation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 81–94. http://doi.org/10.1080/01973530802659638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallago, F., & Roccato, M. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism, Big Five, and perceived threat to safety. European Journal of Personality, 24, 106–122. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.745Google Scholar
Doty, R. M., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G. (1991). Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978–1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 629–640. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.629CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duckitt, J., & Bizumic, B. (2013). Multidimensionality of right-wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism. Political Psychology, 34, 841–862. http://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685–715. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J., & Fisher, K. (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199–222. http://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 98–109. http://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunwoody, P. T., & McFarland, S. G. (2018). Support for anti‐Muslim policies: The role of political traits and threat perception. Political Psychology, 39, 89–106. http://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. Avon Books.Google Scholar
Funke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 195-218. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00415.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, C. (1996). Fear of crime: A review of the literature. International Review of Victimology, 4, 79–150. http://doi.org/10.1177/026975809600400201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, L., & Feldman, S. (2011). Americans respond politically to 9/11: Understanding the impact of the terrorist attacks and their aftermath. American Psychologist, 66, 455–467. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024894CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kakkar, H., & Sivanathan, N. (2017). When the appeal of dominant leader is greater than a prestige leader. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 6734–6739. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617711114Google ScholarPubMed
Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18–35. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 264–268. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavine, H., Lodge, M., & Freitas, K. (2005). Threat, authoritarianism, and selective exposure to information. Political Psychology, 26, 219–244. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00416.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavine, H., Lodge, M., Polichak, J., & Taber, C. (2002). Explicating the black box through experimentations: Studies of authoritarianism and threat. Political Analysis, 10, 343–361. http://doi.org/10.1093/pan/10.4.343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirisola, A., Roccato, M., Russo, S., Spagna, G., & Vieno, A. (2014). Societal threat to safety, compensatory control, and right-wing authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 35, 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, A., & Méndez, P. (2002). Attitudes toward democracy: Mexico in comparative perspective. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43, 350–367. http://doi.org/10.1177/002071520204300307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh Edition. Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Onraet, E., van Hiel, A., Dhont, K., & Pattyn, S. (2013). Internal and external threat in relationship with right-wing attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81, 233–248. http://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redlawsk, D. P., & Lau, R. R. (2009, September). Understanding individual decision making using process tracing [Paper presentation]. General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research. Potsdam, Germany.Google Scholar
Roccato, M., & Russo, S. (2015). Two short, balanced, unidimensional, invariant across genders parallel forms of Altemeyer's (1996) Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale. Psicologia Sociale, 10, 257–271. http://doi.org/10.1482/81371Google Scholar
Roccato, M., & Russo, S. (2017). Right-wing authoritarianism, societal threat to safety, and psychological distress. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 600–610. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roccato, M., Vieno, A., & Russo, S. (2014). The country’s crime rate moderates the relation between authoritarian predispositions and the manifestations of authoritarianism: A multilevel, multinational study. European Journal of Personality, 28, 14–24. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.1922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sales, S. M. (1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 44–57. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0035588CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sales, S. M., & Friend, K. E. (1973). Success and failure as determinants of level of authoritarianism. Behavioral Science, 18, 163–172. http://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830180304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The personality bases of ideology: A one-year longitudinal study. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 540–559. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365364CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, J. G. (1988). Building politics into psychology: The misperception of threat. Political Psychology, 9, 245–271. http://doi.org/10.2307/3790955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. http://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Russo et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Russo et al. supplementary material(File)
File 23.9 KB