Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:55:49.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Popular Sources of American Capitalism*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Joyce Appleby
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles

Extract

Long ago, Louis Hacker noted the anticapitalist bias in American historiography. The tendency of capitalism, particularly marked after the advent of industrialization, to concentrate wealth and to turn that wealth into political power suggests the problem. The Declaration of Independence with its twinned affirmation of equality and liberty provided the ideological underpinnings for national unity. Both seemed threatened during the long transition from an agricultural to an industrial economy as the rich got richer and more and more of America's free citizens were exposed to the unfreedom of the workplace. Progressive historians who systematically analyzed the impact of industrial capitalism in the United States wrote out of sympathy with labor in its struggle for recognition, and no doubt Hacker was thinking of this tendency when he made his remark. This anticapitalist bias in the writing of American history has continued, only now historians decry the steady incursion of commerce and industry out of deference to a traditional way of life.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. von Hayek, Frederick A., ed., Capitalism and the Historians (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954), 74–6Google Scholar.

2. See Orren, Karen, Belated Feudalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar, for an exploration of this development.

3. Appleby, Joyce, “A Different Kind of Independence: The Postwar Restructuring of the Historical Study of Early America,” William and Mary Quarterly 50 (04 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Henretta, James A., “Families and Farms: Mentalite in Pre-Industrial America,” William and Mary Quarterly 35 (1978): 332CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Subsequent works inspired in part by Henretta's questions are Clark's, ChristopherThe Roots of Rural Capitalism: Western Massachusetts, 1780–1860 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990)Google Scholar; and Brooke's, John L.The Heart of the Commonwealth: Society and Political Culture in Worcester County, Massachusetts, 1713–1861 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

5. Horwitz, Morton, The Transformation of American Law (Cambridge, 1977).Google Scholar

6. Ibid., 253.

7. Freyer, Tony, Producers Versus Capitalists: Constitutional Conflict in Antebellum America (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1994)Google Scholar.

8. Ibid., 13–6, 24–5, 35, 43–4, 55.

9. Merrill, Michael, “The Anticapitalist Origins of the United States,” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 13 (Fall 1990): 469Google Scholar. The size at which a manufacturer passed into the “monied interest” is not specified.

10. Freyer, Producers Versus Capitalists, 3–5. “The followers of Adam Smith in America recognised the distinctiveness of the capitalists and producers,” Freyer notes (p. 5), adding “Smith himself distinguished between ‘productive and unproductive’ classes.” Smith did indeed, but the unproductive classes for him were composed of noblemen and rentiers, not merchants and those incorporating their enterprises. His principle of the division of labor only makes sense in an economic environment where an ever-enlarging market can absorb the fruits of more efficient production.

11. Sellers, Charles, The Market Revolution: Jacksonian America, 1815–1846 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 208Google Scholar, 236.

12. Ibid., 208.

13. See for instance Schwartz, Gary T., “The Character of Early American Tort Law,” UCLA Law Review 36 (1989)Google Scholar; and Gienapp, William, “The Myth of Class in Jacksonian America,” Journal of Policy History 6 (1994): 232–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14. These mini-biographies are personal records that I have collected from a wide variety of primary and secondary sources about individuals in this cohort.

15. I have relied upon Kaplan, Louis, ed., A Bibliography of American Autobiographies (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1961)Google Scholar, to locate extant autobiographies. Of the 488 written by men and women born between 1775 and 1800, 85 percent were composed by white men born in New England, Pennsylvania, and New York. Of these, I have read 217, including all that were written by women and African-Americans.

16. Nelson, John R. Jr, Liberty and Property: Political Economy and Policymaking in the New Nation, 1789–1812 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

17. Sloan, Herbert, Principle and Interest: Thomas Jefferson and the Problem of Debt (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

18. Only a new political arrangement that took key powers from the state level could clip their wings – which of course is what the proposed new Constitution did.

19. A particularly fascinating account of conflict between an emerging elite and those championing an egalitarian entrepreneurial order can be found in Cayton, Andrew R.L., The Frontier Republic: Ideology and Politics in the Ohio Country, 17801825 (Kent, OH: Kent State University Press), 110–28Google Scholar.

20. Washburn, Ichabod, Autobiography and Memorials (Boston: Lothrop, 1878), 43.Google Scholar

21. Ibid., x.

22. Ball, John, Autobiography of John Ball, 1794–1884 (Grand Rapids, MI: Dean Hicks, 1925)Google Scholar.

23. Ibid., 55.

24. Ibid., 133–43.

25. [Delano A. Goddard], Biographical Sketch of A. Bronson Alcott (no pub., n.d.), 7–9.

26. Autobiography of Thomas Douglas (New York: Calkins and Stiles, 1956), 32.

27. Bragg, Arial, The Memoirs of Col. Arial Bragg (Milford: G.W. Stacy, 1846), 25Google Scholar.

28. Ibid., 49.

29. Sheldon, Asa, Yankee Drover: Being the Unpretending Life of Asa Sheldon, Farmer, Trader, and Working Man, 1788–1870 (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1988), 6083Google Scholar.

30. Jerome, Chauncey, History of the American Clock Business for the Past Sixty Years, and Life of Chauncey Jerome (New Haven, CT: F.C. Dayton, Jr., 1860), 5ffGoogle Scholar.

31. Ibid., 7. In 1860 Jerome alone made 200,000 metal clocks.

32. Ibid., 16–8, 25ff.

33. Trimble, Allen, Autobiography and Correspondence (no pub., 1909), 4956Google Scholar.

34. Carter, James G., Letters on the Free Schools of New England, cited in [Caldwell, Joseph], Letters on Popular Education (Hillsborough, North Carolina, 1832), 12Google Scholar.

35. The Autobiography of Commodore Charles Morris, U.S. Navy (Annapolis, MD: The Institute, 1880), 17.

36. Bragg, Memoirs, 39.

37. Washburn, Autobiography, 31–2.

38. Neal, John, Wandering Recollections of a Somewhat Busy Life (Boston: Roberts Bros., 1869), 124–25Google Scholar. See also Johnson, David, Illegal Tender (Washington, 1995)Google Scholar.

39. Stuart, William, Sketches of the life of William Stuart (published by the author in Bridgeport, CT, 1854), 40–2.Google Scholar

40. Trimble, Autobiography, 108.

41. Stanley Engerman and Kenneth Sokoleff, “Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economies: A View from Economic Historians of the United States,” in Stephen Haber, ed., How Latin America Fell Behind, forthcoming.

42. See notes 5–13.

43. Bushman, Richard, The Refinement of America: Persons, Houses, Cities (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1992), 229Google Scholar.

44. Farmer, John and Moore, Jacob B., Gazetteer of the State of New-Hampshire (Concord, 1823)Google Scholar.

45. Majewski, John, “Commerce and Community: Economic Culture and Internal Improvements in Pennsylvania and Virginia, 1790–1860,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California–Los Angeles, 1994Google Scholar.

46. Pocock, Emil, “Popular Roots of Jacksonian Democracy: The Case of Dayton, Ohio, 1815–1830,” Journal of the Early Republic, 9 (Winter, 1989): 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47. Lindstrom, Diane, Economic Development in the Philadelphia Region 1810–1850 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1978), 1112Google Scholar, notes the rapidity with which farmers gave up making things when they could buy them, a process expressed statistically as a 2.5 percent in volume of purchasing for every I percent decrease in price.

48. de La Rochefoucauld-Liancourt, Due, Travels through the United States of North America (London, 1799)Google Scholar, as cited in Brandenburg, David J., “A French Aristocrat Looks at American Farming,” Agricultural History 32 (1958): 162–63Google Scholar.

49. Ward, John W., ed., Society, Manners, and Politics in the United States (Garden City, 1961, originally published in 1839)Google Scholar, as cited in Gunn, L. Ray, The Decline of Authority (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988), 1011Google Scholar.

50. Recollections of John Jay Smith (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1892), 32.

51. Pred, Allan R., Urban Growth and the Circulation of Information (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973), 107–9Google Scholar.

52. Gilmore, William, “Literacy, The Rise of an Age of Reading, and the Cultural Grammar of Print Communications in America, 1735–1850,” Communication, 1988Google Scholar, special issue.

53. Pred, Allan, “Manufacturing in the American Mercantile City: 1800–1840,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 56 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54. Bushman, Richard, The Refinement of America: Persons, Houses, Cities (New York: 1992), 265Google Scholar.

55. The literature on this subject is vast, encompassing most that has been written about the Jacksonian period. See for instance Watson, Harry L., Liberty and Power: The Politics of Jacksonian America, New York, 1990Google Scholar; Cayton, Andrew R., The Frontier Republic: Ideology and Politics in the Ohio Country, 1780–1825, Kent, 1986Google Scholar; Gunn, L. Ray, The Decline of Authority: Public Economic Policy and Political Development in New York State, 1800–1860, Ithaca, 1988Google Scholar; and Pocock, “Popular Roots of Jacksonian Democracy.”