Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T11:25:18.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concern for renewal in the root and branch debates of 1641

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Anthony Fletcher
Anthony Fletcher*
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The root and branch bill was debated in the house of commons between 27 May and 27 July 1641. The original bill introduced by Sir Edward Dering was short, simply abolishing bishops, deans and chapters with all their dependents. But after the house had wrestled for two months with the business of replacing episcopacy with a new form of church government the bill had grown to more than forty pages. No complete copy of it, as it stood when it was dropped in August, has survived, but its main provisions can be reconstructed from the commons journals and parliamentary diaries. A new system of government was to be set up in two stages: its final form would be determined by a synod of divines, which it was intended should meet in the autumn of 1641 and work fast enough for the new jurisdiction to be established by 1 March 1642; in the meanwhile parliament would take all ecclesiastical jurisdiction into its own hands and proceed with the redistribution of the church’s financial resources. This paper is concerned with the first of these two stages, the commons’s interim programme of action to fill the vacuum left by root and branch. The speeches of MPs on three topics that dominated the June and July debates—church courts, ordination and deans and chapters— strikingly reveal their concern to use a period of temporary control over the church for reform and renewal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 14: Renaissance and Renewal in Christian History , 1977 , pp. 279 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The fullest account of the progress of the bill is in Shaw, [W. A.], [A History of the] English Church [during the Civil Wars and under the Commonwealth], 2 vols (London 1900] 2, pp 78–102 Google Scholar. See also Zagorin, P., The Court and the Country (London 1969) pp 238-41Google Scholar; Dering, E., A Collection of Speeches (London 1642) p 119 Google Scholar.

2 [HMC], Cowper MSS, 2, p 288.

3 Hill, C., Economic Problems of the Church (Oxford 1956)Google Scholar; Marchant, R.A., The Church under the Law (Cambridge 1969)Google Scholar; Continuity and Change [: Personnel and Administration of the Church in England 1100-1642], ed O’Day, [R.] and Heal, [F.] (Leicester 1976) pp 18–29 Google Scholar, 239-57.

4 [BL], Harley MS 163, fol 798r.

5 Verney Notes on Proceedings in the Long Parliament, ed Bruce, J., CSer, 1 series, 31 (1845) p 104 Google Scholar.

6 Cowper MSS, 2, p 288.

7 Harley MS 163, fol 777v.

8 Ibid fol 789v. Shaw misread D’Ewes on this point, English Church, 1, p 96.

9 Collinson, P., The Elizabethan Puritan Movement (London 1967) particularly pp 280-2Google Scholar.

10 R. O’Day, ‘The Reformation of the Ministry 1558-1642’ in Continuity and Change, ed O’Day and Heal, pp 55-75.

11 For example see Proceedings in Kent, ed Larking, L.B., CSer, 1 series, 80 (1861) pp 101–240 Google Scholar.

12 The Journal of Sir Simonds D’Ewes, ed Notestein, W. (Yale 1923) pp 249-50Google Scholar.

13 C[ommons] J[ournals], 2, pp 54, 109, 183-4; The Suffolk Committees for Scandalous Ministers, ed Holmes, C., Suffolk Records Society 13 (Ipswich 1970) pp 9–11 Google Scholar; Shaw English Church, 2, pp 176-9.

14 Harley MS 163, fol 790r.

15 For this pattern see Fletcher, [A. J.], A County Community [in Peace and War] (London 1975) pp 72-3Google Scholar; Richardson, [R.C.], Puritanism in North-West England (Manchester 1972) pp 115-52Google Scholar.

16 Cross, C., ‘Dens of Loitering Lubbers: Protestant Protest against Cathedral Foundations, 1540-1640’, SCH 9 (1972) pp 231-7Google Scholar.

17 Marcombe, D., ‘The Durham Deanand Chapter: Old Abbey Writ Large?’, in Continuity and Change, ed O’Day, and Heal, , pp 125-44Google Scholar.

18 Keeler, M.F., The Long Parliament, (Philadelphia 1954) pp 316-17Google Scholar.

19 Harley MS 163, fol 696r.

20 Rushworth, [J.], Historical Collections (London 1692) part 3, vol 1, pp 288–300 Google Scholar.

21 Fletcher, A County Community, pp 235-7; Slack, P., ‘Poverty and Politics in Salisbury 1597-1666’ in Crisis and Order in English Towns, ed Clark, P. and Slack, P. (London 1972) pp 187-8Google Scholar; Dyer, A., The City of Worcester in the Sixteenth Century (Leicester 1973) pp 195 Google Scholar, 233-5.

22 Shaw, , English Church, 1, pp 90 Google Scholar, 94.

23 Rushworth, , Historical Collections, part 3, vol 1, pp 174-83Google Scholar; Clarendon’s History of the Rebellion, ed Macray, W. D. (Oxford 1888) 1, p 309 Google Scholar.

24 Nalson, J., Collection of the Affairs of State (London 1683) 2, pp 298–300 Google Scholar.

25 CJ, 2, p 255.

26 Harley MS 164, fols 913r/v.

27 Harley MS 163, fols 787v-8r.

28 For accountability see Hirst, D., The Representative of the People (Cambridge 1975) pp 178-88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Harley MS 164, fol 913v.

30 Harley MS 163, fol 80r; Richardson, Puritanism in North-West England, p 127.

31 Harley MS 479, fols 60r/v, cited but misunderstood by Gardiner, S. R. History of England from the Accession of James I to the Outbreak of the Civil War, 10 vols (London 1884) 9, p 408 Google Scholar; Shaw, , English Church, 1, p 82 Google Scholar.

32 Rushworth, , Historical Collections, part 3, vol 1, pp 170-3Google Scholar, 184-7.

33 Harley MS 164, fol 1015v.

34 I am grateful to my wife and to Lynn Beats for their comments on a draft of this paper.