Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:21:20.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DO LEARNERS LIGHTEN UP?

Phonetic and Allophonic Acquisition of Spanish /l/ by English-Speaking Learners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2016

Megan Solon
Megan Solon*
Affiliation:
University at Albany, SUNY
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Megan Solon, Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures, University at Albany, SUNY, 1440 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12222. E-mail: msolon@albany.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores the second language (L2) acquisition of a segment that exists in learners’ first language (L1) and in their L2 but that differs in its phonetic realization and allophonic patterning in the two languages. Specifically, this research tracks development in one aspect of the production of the alveolar lateral /l/ in the L2 Spanish of 85 native English speakers from various levels of study and compares L2 productions to those of native Spanish speakers as well as to learners’ L1 English. Additionally, laterals produced in specific contexts are compared to examine learners’ acquisition of L2 allophonic patterning, as Spanish contains a subset of the lateral allophones that exist in English. Results suggest development toward nativelike norms in the phonetic details of Spanish /l/ and in allophonic patterning. These findings have implications for existing theoretical accounts of L2 speech learning, which cannot adequately account for the learning situation examined.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 801 - 832
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Kimberly Geeslin, Erik Willis, Manuel Díaz-Campos, and Isabelle Darcy for their guidance on and support of the dissertation project (conducted at Indiana University) that serves as the basis for this manuscript. I would also like to thank the anonymous SSLA reviewers whose comments and suggestions greatly improved this article. Thanks also go to Lotfi Sayahi for his feedback on more recent versions of the article and Michael Frisby of the Indiana Statistical Consulting Center for his assistance with the statistical analyses. All errors that remain are my own.

References

REFERENCES

Barlow, J. A., Branson, P. E., & Nip, I. S. B. (2013). Phonetic equivalence in the acquisition of /l/ by Spanish-English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 68–85.Google Scholar
Best, C. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–206). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.- S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.85. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Bronstein, A. J. (1960). The pronunciation of American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Hillenbrand, J. (1984). Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 708–721.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1995). Japanese adults can learner to produce English /r and /l/ accurately. Language and Speech, 38, 25–56.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1996). Lexical familiarity and English language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /ɹ/ and /l/. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, C. A., Sramko, V., Ostry, D. J., Rowland, S., & Hallé, P. (2008). Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French-English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 649–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geeslin, K. L., & Gudmestad, A. (2008). Comparing interview and written elicitation tasks in native and non-native data: Do speakers do what we think they do? In Bruhn de Garavito, J. & Valenzuela, E. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 64–77). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “l” and “r.” Neuropsychologia, 9, 317–323.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, L., & Fix, S. (2012). Perceptual coding reliability of (L)-vocalization in casual speech data. Lingua, 122, 794–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harada, T. (2007). The production of voice onset time (VOT) by English-speaking children in a Japanese immersion program. IRAL, 45, 353–378.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. (2005). The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. (2010). Measuring second language proficiency. In Blom, E. & Unsworth, S. (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 185–200). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (2006). A course in phonetics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Thomson.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1964). Acoustical characteristics of selected English consonants. Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore and Linguistics, 34, 10–50.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maye, J., & Gerken, L. (2000). Learning phonemes without minimal pairs. In Howell, S. C., Fish, S. A., & Keith-Lucas, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 522–533). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Olive, J. P., Greenwood, A., & Coleman, J. (1993). Acoustics of American English speech: A dynamic approach. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2013). SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn. Language Learning, 63(Suppl. 1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quilis, A. (1993). Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas. Madrid, Spain: Gredos.Google Scholar
Recasens, D. (2012). A cross-language acoustic study of initial and final allophones of /l/. Speech Communication, 54, 368–383.Google Scholar
Ronquest, R. E. (2012). An acoustic analysis of heritage Spanish vowels (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (2013). SAS (Version 9.4) [Computer software]. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Schmidt, L. B., & Willis, E. W. W. (2011). Systematic investigation of voicing assimilation of Spanish /s/ in Mexico City. In Alvord, S. M. (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology (pp. 1–20). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Scobbie, J. M. (2007). Interface and overlap in phonetics and phonology. In Ramchand, G. & Reiss, C., (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistics interfaces (pp. 17–52). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shea, C. E., & Curtin, S. (2011). Experience, representations and the production of second language allophones. Second Language Research, 27, 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonet, M. (2010). Dark and clear laterals in Catalan and Spanish: Interaction of phonetic categories in early bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 663–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solon, M. (2013). Measuring proficiency in cross-sectional L2 phonetic production studies: An examination of three methods. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Provo, UT.Google Scholar
Solon, M. (2015). L2 Spanish /l/: The roles of F2 and segmental duration in foreign accent perception. In Willis, E. W., Butragueño, P. M., & Herrera, E. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology (pp. 83–94). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Solon, M. (2016). Novel sounds: Phonetic innovation in the acquisition of L2 allophones. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Solon, M. (in press). Acquisition of articulatory control or language-specific coarticulatory patterns? Evidence from the production of laterals in second-language Spanish. In MacDonald, J. (Ed.), Modern Analyses in Hispanic Linguistics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sproat, R., & Fujimura, O. (1993). Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 291–311.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. R. (2011). Sociophonetics: An introduction. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (1994). Assessment of L2 proficiency in second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 44, 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2011). Proficiency assessment standards in second language acquisition research: “Clozing” the gap. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 339–372.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2007). A dynamic look at L2 phonological learning: Seeking psycholinguistic explanations for implicational phenomena. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 407–448.Google Scholar
Watt, D., & Fabricius, A. (2002). Evaluation of a technique for improving the mapping of multiple speakers’ vowel spaces in the F1-F2 place. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 159–163.Google Scholar
White, L., & Mattys, S. L. (2007). Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 501–522.Google Scholar
Whitley, M. S. (2002). Spanish/English contrasts: A course in Spanish linguistics (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Zampini, M. L., & Green, K. P. (2001). The voicing contrast in English and Spanish: The relationship between perception and production. In Nicol, J. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 23–48). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar