Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T12:50:50.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Japanese Learners' Acquisition of the Locality Requirement of English Reflexives

Evidence for Retreat from Overgeneralization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Masanori Matsumura
Masanori Matsumura
Affiliation:
Tobct High School, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on the process of Japanese learners' acquisition ofthe locality requirement of English reflexives. Previous studies seem to agree that the initial hypothesis of learners is an overgeneral one that allows nonlocal binding. Research findings diverge, however, as to whether or not learners can approximate the target grammar without the help of negativeevidence as their overall proficiency in English increases. This paper provides evidence of a successful retreat from the initial overgeneral hypothesis. In an attempt to explain the observed progress, it is suggested that a nonsyntactic aspect of language plays a role here, that is, viewpoint in sentence processing. This notion may help us to specify the type of evidence that can trigger learners' progress in the acquisition of the English reflexive.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 19 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, C. L. (1979). Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 533–581.Google Scholar
Berwick, R. (1985). The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. (1971). On two types of models of the internalization of grammars. In Slobin, D. (Ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar (pp. 153–188). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Broselow, E., & Finer, D. (1991). Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research, 7, 35–59.Google Scholar
Brown, R., & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and the order of acquisition in child speech. In Hayes, J. R. (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 155–207). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Chien, Y.-C., & Wexler, K. (1987). A comparison between Chinese-speaking and English-speaking children's acquisition of reflexives and pronouns. Paper presented at the Twelfth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cole, P., Hermon, G., & Sung, L.-M. (1990). Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 1–22.Google Scholar
Finer, D. (1991). Binding parameters in second language acquisition. In Eubank, L. (Ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 351–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, D., & Broselow, E. (1986). Second language acquisition of reflexive-binding. North Eastern Linguistic Society, 16, 154–168.Google Scholar
Hirakawa, M. (1990). A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives. Second Language Research, 6, 60–85.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J., & Tang, C.-C. J. (1988). On the nature of the long-distance reflexive in Chinese. Paper presented to the North Eastern Linguistic Society, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1973). The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1978). Danwa no bunpo. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1987). Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Manzini, R., & Wexier, K. (1987). Parameters, binding theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 413–444.Google Scholar
Matsumura, M. (1991). Parameter resetting to the subset value in second language acquisition: Japanese learners' acquisition of English reflexives. Unpublished master's thesis, Hyogo University of Education, Yashiro, Japan.Google Scholar
Nakamura, M. (1989). Reflexives in Japanese. Gengo Kenkyu, 95, 206–230.Google Scholar
O'Grady, W. (1987). Principles of grammar and learning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pica, P. (1987). On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. North Eastern Linguistic Society, 17, 483–499.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W. (1983). Language typology and language transfer. In Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 358–370). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Sawada, H. (1975). Nihongo-no daimeishi-ka, saikidaimeishi-ka-no joken-ni tsuite: Tokuni washa-no shiten-to sono ido-o chushin-toshite. Eigo Kyoiku, 23 (12), 61–65; (13), 57–61.Google Scholar
Sportiche, D. (1986). Zibun. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 369–374.Google Scholar
Takubo, Y. (1992). Gengo-kodo to shiten: Ninsho-shi-o chushin-ni. Nihongo-gaku, 11(9), 20–27.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (1989). The interpretation of English reflexive pronouns by non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. (1991a). Do second language learners have “rogue” grammars of anaphora? In Eubank, L. (Ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 375–388). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. (1991b). Universal Grammar and the interpretation of reflexives in a second language. Language, 67, 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomita, Y. (1992). A study of Japanese learners' acquisition process of English reflexives in the framework of UG-based SLA theory. JACET Bulletin, 23, 137–156.Google Scholar
Wexler, K., & Manzini, R. (1987). Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In Roeper, T. & Williams, E. (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 41–76). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1989). The adjacency condition on case assignment: Do L2 learners observe the Subset Principle? In Gass, S. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 134–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zobl, H. (1988). Configurationality and the Subset Principle: The acquisition of V′ by Japanese learners of English. In Pankhurst, J., Sharwood Smith, M., & Van Buren, P. (Eds.), Learnability and second languages: A book of readings (pp. 116–131). Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zobl, H. (1989). Modularity in adult L2 acquisition. Language Learning, 39, 49–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar