Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T10:41:37.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learner feedback and its effects in communication tasks: a pilot study1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Stephen J. Gaies
Stephen J. Gaies
Affiliation:
University of Northein Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reports on a pilot investigation of learner feedback and its effects on teacher/ learner interactions in second language learning. In twelve ESL (English as a Second Language) dyads and triads, tapes were made of the performance by the participants of a pair of tasks in referential communication. In these tasks, the teacher described verbally a series of six graphic designs in such a way that the learner(s), who had the designs reproduced on a sheet of paper, could determine the order in which the designs were described. Data analysis involved classification of both learner feedback and teachers' post-feedback responses.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , fall 1981 , pp. 46 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellack, A. A. et al. , 1966. The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. 1973. Affective variables in second language acquisition. Language Learning 23, 231–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. 1977. A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors. Language Learning 27.29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, J. F. 1977. The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals 10.583–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaies, S. J. 1980. Learner feedback strategies: a typology of intake control. Paper read at the Fourteenth Annual TESOL Convention, San Francisco, March.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Krauss, R. M.. 1967. What do people say after they have learned how to talk? Studies of the development of referential communication. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development 13.309–16.Google Scholar
Guiora, A. Z. et al. , 1975. Language and person—studies in language behavior. Language Learning 25.43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, R. M., & Weinheimer, S.. 1966. Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4.343–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, M. H. 1977. Teacher feedback on learner error: mapping cognitions. On TESOL '77: teaching and learning English as a second language: trends in research and practice, ed. by Brown, H. D., Yorio, C. A., and Crymes, R. H., 278–94. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. 1979. Inside the ‘black box’: methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Paper read at the Thirteenth Annual TESOL Convention, Boston, February.Google Scholar
Seliger, H. W. 1977. Does practice make perfect?: a study of interaction patterns and L2 competence. Language Learning 27.263–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. E. 1977. Conscious communication strategies in interlanguage: a report. On TESOL '77: teaching and learning English as a second language: trends in research and practice, ed. by Brown, H. D., Yorio, C. A., and Crymes, R. H., 278–94. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar