Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:26:33.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Writing of Anglo and Hispanic Elementary School Students in Bilingual, Submersion, and Regular Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Robert S. Carlisle
Robert S. Carlisle
Affiliation:
California State University, Bakersfield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this descriptive cross-sectional study was to describe and rate the writing of Hispanic students in a bilingual program and to compare their writing with that of Hispanic students in a submersion program and with native English speakers in a regular program. Five dependent variables were investigated: rhetorical effectiveness, overall quality of writing, productivity, syntactic maturity, and error frequency. Analyses of variance for both grade and program revealed that the sixth graders had significantly higher scores than did the fourth graders on all of the dependent variables except for error frequency. The students in the regular program had significantly higher scores on rhetorical effectiveness and overall quality of writing than did the submersion program students and the bilingual program students; they also made significantly fewer errors than did the bilingual program students. The bilingual program students had significantly higher scores on syntactic maturity and productivity than did the submersion program students. Results suggest that students who learn to write in their L1 before learning to write in their L2 will write just as effectively in their L2 as those students who learn to write only in their L2.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 257 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, K. A., & de Kanter, A. A. (1981). The effectiveness of bilingual education: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Budget, and Evaluation.Google Scholar
Baral, D. P. (1977). Achievement levels among foreign-born and native-born Mexican American students. San Francisco: R & E Research Associates.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C. (1980). Development of writing. In Gregg, L. & Steinberg, E. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 73–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Braun, C., & Klassen, B. (1973). A transformational analysis of written structures of children representing varying ethno-linguistic communities. Research in the Teaching of English, 7, 312–323.Google Scholar
Crowhurst, M. (1980). Syntactic complexity in narration and argument at three grade levels. Canadian Journal of Education, 5, 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowhurst, M., & Piche, G. (1979). Audience and mode of discourse effects on syntactic complexity in writing at two grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 101–109.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles: National Dissemination and Assessment Center.Google Scholar
Donelson, K. (1967). Variables distinguishing between effective and ineffective writers in the tenth grade. Journal of Experimental Education, 35, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1978). Why bilingual education: A summary of research findings (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Bloomsbury West.Google Scholar
Edelsky, C. (1981). From “Jimosalsco” to “7 naranjas se calleron y el arbol-est-triste en lagrymas”: Writing development in a bilingual classroom. In Connell, B. (Ed.), The writing needs of linguistically different students (pp. 63–98). Los Alamitos, CA: SWRL Educational Research and Development.Google Scholar
Edelsky, C. (1982). Writing in a bilingual program: The relation of L1 and L2 texts. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelsky, C. (1983). Segmentation and punctuation: Developmental data from young writers in a bilingual programme. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 135–156.Google Scholar
Edelsky, C. (1986). Writing in a bilingual program. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ferris, M. R., & Politzer, R. L. (1981). Effects of early and delayed second language acquisition: English composition skills of Spanish-speaking junior high school students. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flahive, D. E., & Snow, B. G. (1980). Measures of syntactic complexity in evaluating ESL compositions. In Oller, J. & Perkins, K. (Eds.), Research in language testing (pp. 171–176). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gaies, S. (1980). T-unit analysis in second language research: Applications, problems and limitations. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, K., McClay, D., Christie, M., & Harris, S. (1981). Academic achievement in the Milingimbi bilingual program. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gipps, C., & Ewen, E. (1974). Scoring written work in English as a second language: The use of the T-unit. Educational Research, 16, 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition. Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research on English.Google Scholar
Homburg, T. J. (1984). Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: Can it be validated objectively? TESOL Quarterly, 18, 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudelson, S. (1984). Kan yu ret and rayt en ingles: Children become literate in English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kameen, P. T. (1983). Syntactic skill and ESL writing quality. In Freedman, A., Pringle, I., & Yalden, J. (Eds.), Learning to write: First language/second language (pp. 162–170). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1978). An ESL index of development. TESOL Quarterly, 12, 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Strom, V. (1977). The construction of a second language acquisition index of development. Language Learning, 27, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loban, W. D. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Modiano, N. (1973). Indian education in the Chiapas Highlands. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Mullis, I. V. S., & Mellon, J. C. (1980). Guidelines for describing three aspects of writing: Syntax, cohesion and mechanics (No. 10–W–50). Denver, CO: National Assessment of Educational Progress.Google Scholar
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1980a). Writing achievement, 1969–79: Results from the third national writing assessment: Vol. 1.17-year-olds (Report No. 10-W-01). Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1980b). Writing achievement, 1969–79: Results from the third national writing assessment: Vol. 2.13-year-olds (Report No. 10-W-02). Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1980c). Writing achievement, 1969–79: Results from the third national writing assessment: Vol. 3. 9-year-olds (Report No. 10-W-03). Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, R. C., Griffin, W. J., & Norris, R. C. (1967). Syntax of kindergarten and elementary school children: A transformational analysis. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
O'Hare, F. (1973). Sentence combining: Improving student writing without formal grammar instruction. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Peal, E., & Lambert, W. E. (1962). The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 76 (27, whole no. 546).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, K. (1980). Using objective methods of attained writing proficiency to discriminate among holistic evaluations. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prater, D., & Padia, W. (1983). Effects of modes of discourse on writing performance in grades four and six. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 127–134.Google Scholar
Richardson, K., Calnan, M., Essen, J., & Lambert, M. (1976). The linguistic maturity of 11-year-olds: Some analysis of the written compositions of children in the national child development study. Journal of Child Language, 3, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, R. J. (1974). A comparison of the written and oral English syntax of Mexican-American bilingual and Anglo-American monolingual fourth and ninth grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Rosier, P., & Farella, M. (1976). Bilingual education at Rock Point: Some early results. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosier, P., & Holm, W. (1980). The Rock Point experience: A longitudinal study of a Navajo school program (Bilingual Education Series, 8). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Samway, K. (1988). The writing processes of non-native English-speaking children in the elementary grades. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. F., & Grobe, C. H. (1979). Syntactic maturity, mechanics of writing, and teachers' quality ratings. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 207–215.Google Scholar
Troike, R. C. (1978). Research evidence for the effectiveness of bilingual education. NABE Journal, 3, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urzua, C. (1987). “You stopped too soon”: Second language children composing and revising. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, S. P., & Faigley, L. (1981). Coherence, cohesion and writing quality. College Composition and Communication, 32, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodfin, M. (1968). Correlations among certain factors and the written expression of third grade children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 1237–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar