Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T03:18:05.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE INTERPRETATION OF SPANISH SUBJUNCTIVE AND INDICATIVE FORMS IN ADVERBIAL CLAUSES

A Cross-Sectional Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2014

Matthew Kanwit  and
Kimberly L. Geeslin
Matthew Kanwit*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Kimberly L. Geeslin
Affiliation:
Indiana University
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Matthew Kanwit, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Linguistics, 2816 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. E-mail: mkanwit@pitt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study fills a need for investigations of learner and native speaker (NS) interpretation of the Spanish subjunctive in contexts that allow variation. The analysis compares responses by NSs and three levels of learners on a written interpretation task in which each item contained a temporal indicator (cuando “when”, después de que “after”, or hasta que “until”) and in which verbal mood, verbal morphological regularity, the order of clauses, and the temporal indicator were manipulated. Participants indicated their interpretation of each item by selecting that the event happened habitually or had not yet occurred, or that both were possible. Results show that NSs’ and highly advanced learners’ interpretations corresponded with verbal mood, whereas intermediate learners patterned separately. Using models generated with binomial regressions, the current study proposes stages of development for the interpretation of adverbial clauses that are essential for the growing number of theoretical approaches to language variation.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 487 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adamson, H. D. (2009). Interlanguage variation in theoretical and pedagogical perspective. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, H. D., & Regan, V. (1991). The acquisition of community speech norms by Asian immigrants learning English as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 1–22.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). The interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49, 677–713.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–193). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–73). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bayerová, M. (1994). Alternancia indicativo x subjuntivo en oraciones independientes [The indicative/subjunctive alternation in independent clauses]. Etudes Romanes de Brno, 24, 61–71.Google Scholar
Bayley, R., & Langman, J. (2004). Variation in the group and the individual: Evidence from second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42, 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, R., & Preston, D. (Eds.). (1996). Second language acquisition and linguistic variation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Blake, R. J. (1981). Some empirically based observations on adult usage of the subjunctive mood in Mexico City. In Lantolf, J. & Stone, G. B. (Eds.), Current research in Romance languages (pp. 13–22). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Blake, R. J. (1985). From research to the classroom: Notes on the subjunctive. Hispania, 68, 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blas Arroyo, J. L., & Porcar Miralles, M. (1997). Aproximación sociolingüística al fenómeno de la neutralización modal in las comunidades de habla castellonenses (análisis de algunos contornos sintácticos) [Sociolinguistic approaches to mood neutralization in Castellon speech communities (an analysis of some syntactic contours)]. Sintagma, 9, 27–45.Google Scholar
Borgonovo, C., Bruhn de Garavito, J., & Prévost, P. (2005). Acquisition of mood distinctions in L2 Spanish. In Burgos, A., Clark-Cotton, M. R., & Ha, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 97–108). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Borgonovo, C., & Prévost, P. (2003). Knowledge of polarity subjunctive in L2 Spanish. In Beachley, B., Brown, A., & Conlin, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 1, pp. 150–161). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Borgonovo, C., & Prévost, P. (2005, May). Polarity subjunctive in L2 Spanish: Is the semantics syntax interface vulnerable in L2 acquisition? Paper presented at the XLI Congreso Asociación Canadiense de Hispanistas, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (1993). L2 acquisition of verb complementation and binding principle B. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 101–120.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (1997). Verb complementation, coreference and tense in the acquisition of Spanish as a second language. In Pérez-Leroux, A. T. & Glass, W (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in the acquisition of Spanish (pp. 167–180). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 529–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.Google Scholar
Collentine, J. (1995). The development of complex syntax and mood-selection abilities by intermediate-level learners of Spanish. Hispania, 78, 122–135.Google Scholar
Collentine, J. (1997). The effects of irregular stems on the detection of verbs in the subjunctive. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 3–23.Google Scholar
Collentine, J. (2003). The development of subjunctive and complex-syntactic abilities among FL Spanish learners. In Lafford, B. & Salaberry, R. (Eds.), Studies in Spanish second language acquisition: State of the science (pp. 74–97). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (2008). Multi-competence: Black hole or wormhole for second language acquisition research? In Han, Z. (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 16–26). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
De la Puente-Schubeck, E. B. (1992). La pérdida del modo subjuntivo en el español chicano de Nuevo Mexico [The loss of subjunctive mood in the Chicano Spanish of New Mexico] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 63–103). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59, 90–125.Google Scholar
García, M. E., & Terrell, T. (1977). Is the use of mood in Spanish subject to variable constraints? In Hagiwara, M. P. (Ed.), Studies in Romance linguistics: Proceedings of the Fifth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Linguistics (pp. 214–226). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L. (2003). A comparison of copula choice in advanced and native Spanish. Language Learning, 53, 703–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L. (2005). Crossing disciplinary boundaries to improve the analysis of second language data: A study of copula choice with adjectives in Spanish. Munich, Germany: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L. (2006). Task design, discourse context and variation in second language data elicitation. In Klee, C. A. & Face, T. L. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 74–85). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Gudmestad, A. (2008). Comparing interview and written elicitation tasks in native and non-native data: Do speakers do what we think they do? In Bruhn de Garavito, J. & Valenzuela, E. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 64–77). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2006). Second language acquisition of variable structures in Spanish by Portuguese speakers. Language Learning, 51, 53–107.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
González Salinas, A. (2003). The use of present subjunctive and modal variation in three socio-educational groups from Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico: A descriptive and comparative linguistic analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of New York, Albany.Google Scholar
Gudmestad, A. (2006). L2 variation and the Spanish subjunctive: Linguistic features predicting mood selection. In Klee, C. L. & Face, T. L. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 170–184). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gudmestad, A. (2008). Acquiring a variable structure: An interlanguage analysis of second-language mood use in Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Gudmestad, A. (2012). Toward an understanding of the relationship between mood use and form regularity: Evidence of variation across tasks, lexical items, and participant groups. In Geeslin, K. & Díaz-Campos, M. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 214–227). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gudmestad, A., & Geeslin, K. (2013). Second-language development of variable future-time expression in Spanish. In Carvalho, A. M. & Beaudrie, S. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 63–75). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Isabelli, C. A. (2006). Mood selection: A look at northern Nevada Latinos. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10, 18–22.Google Scholar
Iverson, M., Kempchinsky, P., & Rothman, J. (2008). Interface vulnerability and knowledge of the subjunctive/indicative distinction with negated epistemic predicates in L2 Spanish. EUROSLA Yearbook, 8, 135–163.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). A complexity approach to second language development/acquisition. In Atkinson, D. (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48–72). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, J. (1987). Comprehending the Spanish subjunctive: An information processing perspective. Modern Language Journal, 71, 50–57.Google Scholar
Lee, J. (2000). Comprehending subject-object relations while processing object pronouns in written input. In Leow, R. P. & Sanz, C. (Eds.), Spanish applied linguistics at the turn of the millennium: Papers from the 1999 Conference on the L1 & L2 Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese (pp. 119–140). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lee, J. F., & Rodríguez, R. (1997). The effects of lexemic and morphosyntactic modifications on L2 reading comprehension and input processing. In Glass, W. R. & Pérez-Leroux, A. T. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish (Vol. 2, pp. 135–157). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Young, D., Bransdorfer, D., & Wolf, D. (2005). ¿Qué te parece? Intermediate Spanish. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lubbers Quesada, M. (1998). L2 acquisition of the Spanish subjunctive mood and prototype schema development. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 1–23.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2008). A unified model. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 341–371). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malovrh, P. (2006). L2 sentence processing of Spanish OVS word order and direct object pronouns: An analysis of contextual constraints. In Sagarra, N. & Toribio, A. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 169–179). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Perpiñán, S. (2011). Assessing differences and similarities between instructed L2 learners and heritage language learners in their knowledge of Spanish Tense-Aspect and Mood (TAM) morphology. Heritage Language Journal, 8, 90–133.Google Scholar
Mougeon, R., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2004). Preface. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42, 295–301.Google Scholar
Murillo Medrano, J. (1999). Subjuntivo e indicativo en las oraciones circunstanciales [Subjunctive and indicative in circumstantial sentences]. Kanina, 23, 143–156.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2010, March). The bilingual turn in SLA. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Preston, D. (2000). Three kinds of sociolinguistics and SLA: A psycholinguistic perspective. In Swicrzbin, B., Morris, F., Anderson, M., Klee, C., & Tarone, E. (Eds.), Social and cognitive factors in SLA: Selected proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 3–30). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Quer, J. (2001). Interpreting mood. Probus, 13, 81–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, V. (2004). The relationship between the group and the individual and the acquisition of native speaker variation patterns: A preliminary study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42, 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, V., Howard, M., & Lemée, I. (2009). The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad setting. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rehner, K. (2002). The development of aspects of linguistic and discourse competence by advanced second language learners of French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Rehner, K., Mougeon, R., & Nadasdi, T. (2003). The learning of sociolinguistic variation by advanced FSL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 127–156.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994). The gradual loss of mood distinctions in Los Angeles Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 6, 255–272.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (2007). Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition—1997–2007. Modern Language Journal, 91, 837–848.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (1989). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Terrell, T., Baycroft, B., & Perrone, C. (1987). The subjunctive in Spanish interlanguage: Accuracy and comprehensibility. In VanPatten, B., Dvorak, T. R., & Lee, J. F. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective (pp. 19–32). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1984). Learners’ comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence for a word order strategy. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 57–67.Google Scholar