Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:48:14.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimalizing Interlanguage Feedback to the Foreign Language Learner

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Mike Sharwood Smith
Affiliation:
Utrecht University

Extract

The term “interlanguage” is generally used in connection with the performance of second language learners in naturalistic learning situations, that is, outside the classroom and in situations where message CONTENT rather than message FORM is in focus. This is a reflection of the generally healthy separation that has taken place between investigations into learning and research into teaching or instruction. It remains true, however, that teaching methods and techniques can hardly be formulated without taking into account our current knowledge of what goes on or what seems to go on in learning. This, of course, has to be done with all due caution, that is, with a full appreciation of the limited nature of this current knowledge (Tarone et al. 1976). Seeing teaching from a learner's point of view is, in itself, a desirable attitude and one which is likely to be fostered if one searches through the literature on acquisition for possible insights, pointers, and even techniques of relevance to language instruction. Over the past four years, instructional techniques for teaching writing to advanced learners of English as a foreign language have been developed at the English Department, Utrecht University. These techniques are directly inspired by research into learning and have in turn proved to be of value for such research even though their primary aim is instructional. This paper will concentrate on the instructional aspects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allwright, R. 1975. Problems in the study of teachers' treatment of learner error. New directions in second language learning, teaching, and bilingual education, ed. by Dulay, H. and Burt, M., 96112. Washington: TESOL.Google Scholar
Angelis, P. G. 1975. Sentence combining and error analysis in the teaching of writing. New directions in second language learning, teaching, and bilingual education, ed. by Dulay, H. and Burt, M., 292300. Washington: TESOL.Google Scholar
Arena, A. 1975. Linguistics and composition. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ausubel, D. 1968. Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. and Robbins, M.. 1976. Towards assessing interlanguage performance: the relationship between selected errors, learner characteristics and learner explanations. Language Learning 26. 4566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H., and Burt, M.. 1975. New directions in second language learning, teaching and bilingual education. Washington: TESOL.Google Scholar
Pankhurst, J., and Smith, M. Sharwood. 1978. The developmental history of a written assignment: a study in language learning and communicative strategies. A paper presented at the Fifth AILA Congress in Montreal.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. 1976. Formal and informal linguistic environments in language acquisition and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 10. 157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. 1976. Error analysis and the clinic technique in a writing course: a progress report. Available from the Instituut voor Engelse Taal-en Letterkunde, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M.. 1977. Interlanguage and the clinic technique in a foreign language instruction. Paper given at the Nordic Summer Institute on Interlanguage, Helsingör.Google Scholar
Tarone, E.; Swain, M.; and Fathman, A.. 1976. Some limitations to the classroom application of current second language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly 10. 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigil, J., and Oiler, J.. 1976. Rule fossilization – a tentative model. Language Learning 26. 281–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamel, V. 1976. Teaching composition in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 10. 6776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar