Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:22:28.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ROLE OF LANGUAGE-ANALYTIC ABILITY IN CHILDREN’S INSTRUCTED SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2019

Karen Roehr-Brackin Open the ORCID record for Karen Roehr-Brackin [Opens in a new window]  and
Angela Tellier
Karen Roehr-Brackin*
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Angela Tellier
Affiliation:
University of Essex
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Karen Roehr-Brackin, Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom. E-mail: kroehr@essex.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Language-analytic ability, or the ability to treat language as an object of analysis and arrive at linguistic generalizations, is at the core of the constructs of language learning aptitude and metalinguistic awareness, which are implicated in our ability to learn explicitly. In the context of child second language (L2) learning, it has been argued that children learn primarily implicitly and that the most important component of aptitude may be memory ability. However, no empirical research to date has investigated the relationship and development of aptitude and metalinguistic awareness longitudinally as well as examined their predictive power for children’s L2 achievement in the classroom. In a study with English-speaking learners aged 8–9 (N = 111), we found that although aptitude and metalinguistic awareness were (still) dynamic, they significantly predicted children’s achievement in L2 French. Moreover, language-analytic ability proved to be the component with the strongest predictive power. This finding suggests that it may not be level of cognitive maturity alone that determines children’s approach to L2 learning; experiencing explicit, form-focused instruction may foster the role of language-analytic ability even in children as young as 8–9 years.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 41 , Issue 5 , December 2019 , pp. 1111 - 1131
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adair-Hauck, B., & Donato, R. (2009). Using a story-based approach to teach grammar. In Shrum, J. L. & Glisan, E. W. (Eds.), Teachers’ handbook: Contextualised foreign language instruction K–12 (4th ed., pp. 216–244). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.Google ScholarPubMed
Asset, . (2005). Breakthrough French primary teacher assessment materials. Cambridge, UK: Oxford, Cambridge and RSA Examinations Ltd.Google Scholar
Baker, C. (2006). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (4th ed.). Clevedon, UK: Mutilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Board, K., & Tinsley, T. (2017). Language trends 2016/17: Language teaching in primary and secondary schools in England . Manchester, UK: British Council.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching language to young learners. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In Glaser, R. (Ed.), Training research and education (pp. 87–136). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In Diller, K. C. (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83–118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1990). Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In Parry, T. S. & Stansfield, C. W. (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 11–29). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. (1959). The modern language aptitude test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (2002a). Modern language aptitude test—Elementary: MLAT-E. Rockville, MD: Second Language Testing Foundation.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (2002b). Modern language aptitude test: MLAT. N. Bethesda, MD: Second Language Testing Inc.Google Scholar
Council of Europe, . (2004). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. d. P. (2003). Age, length of exposure and grammaticality judgements in the acquisition of English as a foreign language. In García Mayo, M. d. P. & García Lecumberri, M. L. (Eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language (pp. 94–114). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester.Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2013). Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63, 665–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granena, G. (2014). Language aptitude and long-term achievement in early childhood L2 learners. Applied Linguistics, 35, 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, H. E., & Vonèche, J. J. (Eds.). (1977). The essential Piaget. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harley, B., & Hart, D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselgren, A., & Caudwell, G. (2016). Assessing the language of young learners. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.Google Scholar
Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaekel, N., Schurig, M., Florian, M., & Ritter, M. (2017). From early starters to late finishers? A longitudinal study of early foreign language learning in school. Language Learning, 67, 631–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiss, C. (2009). The role of aptitude in young learners’ foreign language learning. In Nikolov, M. (Ed.), The age factor and early language learning (pp. 253–276). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kiss, C., & Nikolov, M. (2005). Developing, piloting, and validating an instrument to measure young learners’ aptitude. Language Learning, 55, 99–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J. (2013). New conceptualizations of language aptitude in second language attainment. In Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 131–152). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30, 579–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research, 24, 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. (2016). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R . New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 801–842.Google Scholar
Lichtman, K. (2013). Developmental comparisons of implicit and explicit language learning. Language Acquisition, 20, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtman, K. (2016). Age and learning environment: Are children implicit second language learners? Journal of Child Language, 43, 707–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests. Swansea, UK: University of Wales Swansea.Google Scholar
Milton, J., & Alexiou, T. (2006). Language aptitude development in young learners. In Abello-Contesse, C., Chacón-Beltrán, R., López-Chiménez, M. D., & Torreblanca-López, M. M. (Eds.), Age in L2 acquisition and teaching (pp. 177–192). Oxford, UK: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2006). The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF project. In Muñoz, C. (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp. 1–40). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2008). Age-related differences in foreign language learning: Revisiting the empirical evidence. IRAL, 46, 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2009). Input and long-term effects of early learning in a formal setting. In Nikolov, M. (Ed.), The age factor and early language learning (pp. 141–159). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2014). The association between aptitude components and language skills in young learners. In Pawlak, M. & Aronin, L. (Eds.), Essential topics in applied linguistics and multilingualism: Studies in honour of David Singleton (pp. 51–68). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qureshi, M. A. (2016). A meta-analysis: Age and second language grammar acquisition. System, 60, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranta, L. (2002). The role of learners’ language analytic ability in the communicative classroom. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 159–180). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranta, L. (2005). Language analytic ability and oral production in a second language: Is there a connection? In Housen, A. & Pierrard, M. (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 99–130). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehr-Brackin, K. (2015). Long-term development in an instructed adult L2 learner: Usage-based and complexity theory applied. In Cadierno, T. & Eskildsen, S. W. (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 181–206). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roehr-Brackin, K. (2018). Metalinguistic awareness and second language acquisition. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sáfár, A., & Kormos, J. (2008). Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude. IRAL, 46, 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 319–353). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–94). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (2001). Aptitude for learning a foreign language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez, M. d. M., & Muñoz, C. (2011). Aptitude, age and cognitive development: The MLAT-E in Spanish and Catalan. In Roberts, L., Pallotti, G., & Bettoni, C. (Eds.), EuroSLA Yearbook (Vol. 11, pp. 5–29). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tellier, A. (2013). Developing a measure of metalinguistic awareness for children aged 8–11. In Roehr, K. & Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A. (Eds.), The metalinguistic dimension in instructed second language learning (pp. 15–43). London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2013). The development of language learning aptitude and metalinguistic awareness in primary-school children: A classroom study. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 62, 1–28Google Scholar
Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2017). Raising children’s metalinguistic awareness to enhance classroom second language learning. In García Mayo, M. d. P. (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 22–48). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language Teaching, 50, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar